Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Old Steam Room Stuff

last reply
430 replies
8.9k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by Wishmaster
I am against anything or anyone who seeks to gain extra rights ABOVE THOSE WHICH THEY ALREADY HAVE ......

Hang on a mo
It wasn't that long ago that women was having to fight for extra right ABOVE THOSE WHICH THEY ALREADY HAD, and them ritghts was to vote, for equal pay, equal jobs etc, if you was around then would u also have been against that too? because but your very own wording YES you would have :shock:
Ali.. women didn't have the SAME rights as anyone else.... they had LESS ..... so no, I would not have been against Mrs Parkhurst and her equal rights movement. Many women did actually sacrifice themselves upon the altar of equality and I respect that enormously. If it wasn't for them then we would have a very male-biased society today.
But i think thats what gays are after, they to had less rights and are fighting for the same, how long was it b4 the age of consent was dropped for gay sex? how many TS's was sent to male prisons? how long has it taken for same sex marrages to be seriously considered as ok? gay couples to adopt or foster? the list is endless, i do not believe they are fighting for more right, just the same righs as everyone else and its taken a long time for them to get them and in some case's still fighting, i really do undersnad where you are coming from, if they want to be equal just live without a special day like the rest of us! lol i do get that, but maybe its these special days they have that made people listen so we are where we are at today, maybe if gays did just sit on their bums and not talk about there sexuality they would not have the rights they have now, because noone would know they wanted them confused
just my opinion tho
Quote by Wishmaster
There is no equality between people, there never has been and never will be.. it starts in the playground and extends it's reach right through our lifetimes. It is extremely niave to believe that democracy can bring about equality. Even the most 'equalitarian' political bias - Communism - cannot work because it means someone has to be in charge to ensure that everyone is equal - and that's not equal is it - one guy (or a committee of people) in charge of everyone else.
There are leaders and there are followers, there are winners and there are losers. Equality is a myth, and to combat inequality society seeks to peg back the 'haves' to the level of the 'have nots' - the lowest common denominator.
There are many rules and cons used against us in every aspect of our lives and it is all centred around the transference of power from one person to another - namely from YOU to them. I know what these rules are and I know when they are being used against me, ergo my power cannot be taken from me, only I can give it away.
So what's the answer?
'I don't give a shit' is the only answer you can have - live your life as best you can, ensure that those around you are happy with you as a person and to hell with all the rest. I'm sure not going to give a flying fook about someone in another part of the world who doesn't even know my name. But I'm not letting ANY government con me into thinking that I should care coz governments change and when they do so do their policies. It's all bullshit.

Wishmaster you are spot on with what you say, about the reality of leaders and followers, BUT what happens when the followers stop following?
Would any leader (read politician) be prepared for example, to take away votes for women? of course not, not only would it be a political disaster, but it would almost certainly go against what that politician believes the society they live in should be like. Yet barely 100 years ago there were leaders (politicians) that felt women should not get the vote. What changed them, and what changed society?
A few women who fought sufferage, and brought it to the publics attention (the followers). It took a long time, but eventually the leaders had to listen to the followers, and the rules changed.....
It still happens, today. We only have the laws regarding homosexuality becuase the leaders have had to listen to the people. It takes a long time to change things, but it can and does happen.
Your last paragraph?............. well that is your personal choice, and yes it is a choice I would defend.
Quote by naughtynymphos1
I am against anything or anyone who seeks to gain extra rights ABOVE THOSE WHICH THEY ALREADY HAVE ......

Hang on a mo
It wasn't that long ago that women was having to fight for extra right ABOVE THOSE WHICH THEY ALREADY HAD, and them ritghts was to vote, for equal pay, equal jobs etc, if you was around then would u also have been against that too? because but your very own wording YES you would have :shock:
Ali.. women didn't have the SAME rights as anyone else.... they had LESS ..... so no, I would not have been against Mrs Parkhurst and her equal rights movement. Many women did actually sacrifice themselves upon the altar of equality and I respect that enormously. If it wasn't for them then we would have a very male-biased society today.
But i think thats what gays are after, they to had less rights and are fighting for the same, how long was it b4 the age of consent was dropped for gay sex? how many TS's was sent to male prisons? how long has it taken for same sex marrages to be seriously considered as ok? gay couples to adopt or foster? the list is endless, i do not believe they are fighting for more right, just the same righs as everyone else and its taken a long time for them to get them and in some case's still fighting, i really do undersnad where you are coming from, if they want to be equal just live without a special day like the rest of us! lol i do get that, but maybe its these special days they have that made people listen so we are where we are at today, maybe if gays did just sit on their bums and not talk about there sexuality they would not have the rights they have now, because noone would know they wanted them confused
just my opinion tho
And a good opinion as well Spot on :thumbup:
Quote by Calista
Whilst in no way do I condone what Wishie is saying (or how he's saying it) I can see one point he's trying to make. We allow minorities to have their parades and yes people do knock it, but if the hetero's had a similar parade then they would be accused of all sorts of bigotry and homophobia. Hetero's can be as proud of who they are but aren't allowed the same freedom to expression. Granted they don't suffer the same prejudices as the LGBT communities but if you want to be accepted then both parties need the same right of expression without being labeled as bigoted.
C ... Bi and damn well proud of it... not necessarily out ... but only because I don't think it's anyone elses damn business!

The point I would make here is that every day is "Hetero" day, if you go out into any town or city ordinary people are performing "Hetero" actions all the time without fear of abuse, condemnation or ridicule. Male/Female couples take their children out, Men and Women kiss and cuddle on park benches, young lads go flirt with girls who walk past etc. etc. etc.
Gay men and women who perform these same actions in public do not get the same response, they dont even get the same response on here on what is a liberated site. This was highlighted to me by the fact that it was considered potentially unwise or unacceptable for 2 men to have a snog at a munch in a discussion some time ago. If it is okay for a man and a woman to hold hands, have a kiss and flirt in public then it should be okay for a same sex couple to do the same thing.
So long as that is not the case then Pride events are in my opinion important.
So, Wishy, I take it you won't be taking up my offer of a "straight but not narrow" t-shirt and a rainbow flag for you to wave? Oh well, you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink dunno
Apologies for my posting which appears to have led to Judy and others being offended.
The intention was to complain about QUOTING long postings. I just happened to use Judy as an example as someone who gets repeatedly quoted.
There was no intention to comment on Judy's postings, which I generally find are informative and reasonably well balanced.
However I can see that the way I said it could be taken as an unwelcome comment on his work.
Quote by Wishmaster
I am against anything or anyone who seeks to gain extra rights ABOVE THOSE WHICH THEY ALREADY HAVE

wishy, your posts seem to be coming from the point of view that all sections of society are equal and now everyone has equal rights......on paper in the corridors of power maybe however......
1. women are still on average paid less for the same jobs as men
2. gay men and women are still less likely to gain employment in various occupations
3. black and ethnic minorities are less likely to be interviewd for work than their white counterparts.
4. members of the LGBT community are still more likely than other groups to be the victims of random attacks, violence, verbal abuse and than 'straight white' groups.
so perhaps you will promote the next pride festival/ carnival etc as these groups strive to not only have equal rights on paper, but also in the real world.
Quote by Wishmaster
I'm getting a bit sick of ppl telling me i'm homophobic, racist, sexist, ageist, ... and any other 'ist' or 'ism' that they want to label me.

Quote by Wishmaster
Examples of sexist and ageist remarks.
If you want to feel bigger - find a tighter fitting woman.
you're doing her a favour by checking her boobs bounce ok ... that's working and definately NOT lazy.
the thing with shagging grannies though is finding the right wrinkle.

Quote by Wishmaster
I hurt someone's delicate senses by using the term 'shitter' .....ffs.. ok then, anal, bum, asshole. choose one. it's all the same ... you're simply picking flaws in my vocabulary..
IMHO you are Crude and Vulgar.

Quote by Wishmaster
ffs...... . nothing special about sticking ur dick up another guy's shitter is there?
Wishmaster quote.
Places to shag?..... Up the Arse!!

Quote by Wishmaster
what u do in your own bedroom is your business. keep it to yourself. Sex is a personal, private and intimate thing and I believe that it should not be made an open issue.
But you have confused
I'm going for a club record lol........ got 5 female names (no guys please, not in the mood lol) down already .... add urs to the bottom of this list if you want to help me beat the record! (whatever that is.... 7 now wink anymore I'm such a tart.
Wishy & David48 ..... the SH Spit Roast Tag Team

Quote by Wishmaster
my own sexuality is known by a few in here .
What ? you know your sexuality ? :shock: :shock:

Contradiction and hypocrisy throughout your posts.
I have got to say, as much as i have always got on with wishy, HR is correct, after reading fabio's post i sat here and though about all the stuff you have done and posted on the forum, like the women you met just after you and leedslass split up that you felt the need to tell us about her screaming about a fly while you was 'on the job' the lets go for a record women in the jacuzzi thing a few have pointed out, there are countless posts by you telling people what you have got upto in private, yet you are the one says what you do in the bed room is private and we don't all need to know confused
Now i'm not saying your posts are wrong, they do not bother me and i find some quite funny but you do seem to be having a case of its ok for me but not them, ok so your not having a special day to tell us all but you are doing the same as them on a much smaller scale, your openly advertising your life style for other to know, and seeing as you have a post saying you are going to chams on a bi night i for one doubt your homophobic as i assum you must be bi yourself.
HORNY RED on your msn now you tart Debs wants words!
ooo sorry peeps just letting off steam!
RED!!!
Quote by Wishmaster
It's not that I object to them Angel.... I just think that sex and sexuality is a private matter .... it shouldn't be paraded down the street with the kids in tow...... we're told to protect our kids from knowledge of sex too early on and then some people haul them off to a gay march ffs.. what's their first question : er ..... daddy..... or you daddy..... either of you will do..... what does 'Gay' mean?

But why is it about sex? dunno I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong, but Pride events don't have floats exhibiting sexual acts between gay/bi/tg folks do they? :dunno:
I have a really good relationship with my children whereby they can ask me questions about anything. OK, I don't always give them an answer, my 9 year old asked me a couple of weeks ago what and STI is and I told her that she didn't need to know at her age but that I'd explain it to her when I felt she needed the information. She was perfectly happy with that answer.
When the same child asked me (probably 3 or 4 years ago) what "gay" means, I explained to her that sometimes people fall in love with people of the same gender and that a gay man loves and/or fancies other men, and a gay woman loves and/or fancies other women. She was surprised and asked a few innocent child-like questions, such as "So boys can have boyfriends?" and I answered yes. In my opinion this is the way to bring your children up as more tolerant of people who are different from themselves. I hope that my honesty with them means that they don't really think too deeply about the differences between "them and us" and just accept that different people like different things.
My eldest daughter (almost 16) is also aware that I sometimes go on nights out in the Village, and although I don't think she's fully aware of what "The Village" is, she does know that I have friends who are gay and that one of my friends is a TV.
At no point have I ever gone anywhere near a discussion as to how gay or bi men have sex with each other, and whilst I agree with you that it would be wrong of me to do so, I fail to see how your argument means that children should be kept away from Pride marches.
Quote by MikeNorth
Wonderful post Sassy!
worship
Mike.

Mike north says it all smile
Well done and well said mistress sassy
Mr goodtimez
I really do not want this to descend into a slanging match, however I again feel the need to respond to what has been said. I believe we all the right to our opinions, however I also reserve the right to try and change oyur mind If I think you are wrong. Without this none of us would have any rights at al, as we simply would have accepted 'our lot' so to speak.
Lets start with Gay Christians. No, (well if you even believe in him - I don't), Jesus did not hava special pink loin cloth, and what is the point of that comment, may I ask? The reason there is a specific gay christian movement is because of the teachings of and indeed the history of the church, (pick a church, almost any church), has been and remains homophobic. Why chooce your religion and then go to practice somewhere where you cannot be yourself, have to hide who you are and listen to sermons and rants about the ungodliness of gays. If you sincerely believe, as many christians do, that god loves us all, and you want to practice your faith, well then of course you set up your own, that not only gay people but also more tolerant and accepting christians also go to.
I think that some people here do not fundamentally understand the concept of oppression and how this differ from discrimination, and what the significance is. Oppression is something which is inherent in everyday society, has been there throughout history, is still here now, and is not simply to do with actual rights and legislation but also to do with attitudes and peoples place in society. Women have faces oppression as women - called sexism, LGB people have faced oppression as a result of their sexuality and Black and ethnic minority people have faced oppression as a result of their race/colour of their skin - called racism.
If you accpet this view point, and I do, then men canot face sexism, white people cannot face racism and straight people cannot face oppression with regards to sexuality. Now I don't mean that these people cannot be discriminated against and for those reasons, they of course can, but this is not oprression, this is discrimination - why - because it is not something which is absolutely inherent in society, for the most part these groups are the norm, the majority, hold the power balance within society, do not face day in day challenges only as a result of their sexuality/ethnicity/gender. They are not subject to stereotyping, do not face lesser treatment under law and haven't done either, do not face institutionalised, (ie it goes through every level of society from the police, to the media, to education, the workplace etc ) racism, sexism or homophobia - I hope this makes some sense, but if not I would be happy to meet and discuss this in person, as it rather a complex theory.
You talk about black people and self segregation - don't be absurd! Black poeple have not sought to segregate themselves from society, however it has taken many many years for them to gain any semblance of equal right under the law in this country, and even with those laws in place they are not equal. Still worse off in education, more likely to be stopped by the police, still targeted by groups such as BNP, still subject to attack, a young man was killed not so long ago in Liverpool you may remember - his crime - the colour of his skin! Talking about legal right is all well and good, but if there is not the mechanisms in place to enfoce these legal rights then they are no good to anyone. If the institutions that enforce these laws are themselves racist etc, then are they realy doing an effective job, and did it ever occur to you that legal equality does not give you eqal standing within society, not until every barrier has been smashed away, when we look at each other and see each other and not a skin colour / a sexuality etc then, legal equality isn't quite franky worth the paper it's written on!
There have been equal rights laws around gender and race since the 1970's - but are seriously trying to tell me that women and ethnic monorities are equal! Thats bull! Women still earn 2/3's of what men earn, still earn less for doing the same job, still face violence, a woman is sexually assualted something like avery two minutes in this country, women who press charges for /assualt are still subject to ideas of did she ask for it - what was she wearing etc, women are still under-represented in all institutions of society - law, workplace, parliament, judiciary, police etc. Black people and those from other ethnic minorities still face attack, prejudice, have to move from areas for fear of their lives, face horrific experiences in the workplace, are under-represented in all institutions etc - and they have had legal equality for years! Legal equality doesn't give you anything unless there are ways to enforce, and even then, I don't want something that is given and can be taken awat again, I want to see a societal change, where the legal is nothing but a back-up just in case!
If caucasian people demanded a special day there would be outrage - quite rightly so! I am caucasian and gave never been oppressed as a reslut of the colour of my skin! Yes I've had comments etc, but day in day out the majority of people I see are the same colour as me, on tv, in magazines, etc as it was very eloquently put by rodger - everyday is caucasian day, and so for the same reasons we don't need a special day for caucasian people, niether do we for heterosexuals or for men.
As a veteran equal rights campaigner, I would like to point out I have never asked for more than was my due! We don't want extra rights, we wanted the same rights, and once we have those, then we'll work on setling into society and taking our place alongside the rest of you, without fear, without intolerance and without discrimination. I am not settling for second best, I want the same rights, I don't want to not be attacked for my sexuality becasue a law says you can't, but because everyone recognises quite simply that its wrong! That is no more and no less than a heterosexual male or famale has, not just about the law but about society and attitudes.
By the way, incase your interested, the laws regarding a whole host of sexuality issues are extremely new, as I said about race and gender legislation - it came in in the 70's and we're still not there yet with regards to that, what makes you think legislation which has been in a for a few years will make huge difference straight away.
You say that "sexual orientation is not something that should confer special status upon a specific group of people as it then becomes detrimental to other people who don't belong to that dempgraphic section of society"
I never wanted, nor asked for special status. In all my campigning years, when I've marched and rallied, and met with ministers, and sent post cards and visited MP's, when I've been attacked when I've led and when I've followed, I have never once asked for more than was my due, and if you see that as being detrimental to other sections of society then so be it! But I would say one thing, as a campaigner, I was never going to settle for merely equality, I wanted and still want more for everybody! I don't want to be equal with men to earnm a shit wage in the same job, so I join with them and work to get an equal but higher wage for all, for example.
You say you 'don't give a shit' - well I do, and have dedicated my time, my life to chnaging this world, and ideas such as these in this thread do not help, but must be challenged, It won't be first time I hear then and it won't be the last! You did say that many women did sacrifice themselves and you respect that - did it never occur to you that so many of us still do, in one way or another - granted I've never thrown myself under a horse to propagate the equal rights agenda, but for me, my place in Pride is a liitle like that, as is it for the hundreds of thousands of lgb people who have a day where they can be out and simply be themselves!
Well another huge rant, and I'm sorry for it, but I will keep on posting as long as the views I don't agree keep appearing! That is afterall, my right!
I would just like to add from my own personal experience that gay and lesbian people do not have equal right.
About 3 years ago when we was still living in mansfield, a women who lived a few doors down from me saw me kissing a female i used to meet on my door step as she was leaving, a harmless act you may think, but a few days later i had social services knocking on my door because she had called them as she was concerned a 'lesbian' had 3 young girls living with her, my daughters BTW, and i had 2 sit and lsitern to them asking my children all kinds of personal question, now had that been a man i had kissed on the door step do you think my nosey neighbour would have called social services? and more to the point do you think social services would have bothered coming out?
thats not a story i have just made up to add to the thread it really happened and a few close friends of mine on here know about it as i was very upset at the time. so it just goes to show even now days people still do not accept it.
As far as i know.......no one is excempt from any parades that go on ......Notting Hill Carnival or Gay Pride....if i'm not mistaken everyone is welcome to join in the fun.
That is EVERYONE!!!!!!
So no one is segregated if Everyone is in it together!
Quote by da69ve
As far as i know.......no one is excempt from any parades that go on ......Notting Hill Carnival or Gay Pride....if i'm not mistaken everyone is welcome to join in the fun.
That is EVERYONE!!!!!!

yes i believe you are right, well you see loads of while people at notting hill carnival don't you?
and i know none gay people that go and give support at gay pride, you don't have to be gay to give support to other people.
I seemed to have provoked quite some reaction here, both on this thread and in PM. And that's good, any dialogue is better than none.
Ok, so I may have been playing devil's advocate here, in fact I was being deliberately non-pc here for the simple reason that political correctness changes with the tide so why the fook should I be pc about one thing one day and then change my view on it another day as it's no longer pc? Bollox to that philosophy!!!
HornyRed has trawled through my previous posts and quoted some of the things I've said from months back - and on this thread it's been quoted out of context. I'm not about to backtrack on anything I've said in the past, most of it has been tongue-in-cheek anyway as that's the kind of person I am - I don't take life seriously and there's a reason for that.
The Chams thread from start to finish has been one big giggle - it is clearly stated on the opening post that it began as an off-the-cuff remark made in the chat room so to misquote me on this thread is doing me a grave injustice. Go read the thread in it's entirety. I'm here to swing, I don't give a toss who gets victimised in Botswana or fookin Brighton for that matter, let the politician's deal with that, that's what they are elected for. But don't expect too much action unless there's a fook load of oil to be gained by intervening.
I have been politically active when I was young - and very niave - believing that I could change the world by getting involved - and what a total waste of time that was. Why?
I'll tell you - local politics are ruled by local people and if you want to change things you cannot go against your local party leader - I did and the bastard kicked me out - you have to bide your time, procrastinate yourself on an unholy alter of bureaucracy and sucking up to the big cheese until maybe in ten, twenty years time the miserable git dies or gets caught pilfering public funds or awarding contracts to his fookin masonic brothers and THEN you can finally step into his job and implement your own policies - THAT'S LOCAL POLITICS - I KNOW, I'VE BEEN THERE!
The one thing that has permeated this thread is the issue of equaility.
In a perfect world, yes I agree, we should all be equal under the sun, but we're not living in Utopia, Shangri-La or any other mythical place where everyone lives a free and happy life with no fear of persecution, victimisation, bullying, whatever. Wake up and smell the shit-stained roses. We live here, in this hellhole and it isn't fair, life isn't fair. People aren't fair. Look at all those poor buggers from China that died in a stinking container - why? Coz their own government wasn't fair, the people that smuggled them in weren't fair, the British public aren't fair - coz we don't want them here and all they wanted was a better life for themselves - why haven't the Brits and the Americans gone into China and sorted them out? Answer: Coz China would kick the fookin crap out of us if we tried! China has 1000's of those 50 foot missiles they can send over here and render our homeland into a nuclear desert for the next 200 years. We (read: the Western Superpowers) prefer to go and scrap someone we KNOW we can beat. We don't let mad fanantical muslim states have nuclear weapons but our leaders will tell us that the muslim faith is a good faith - it may well be a good faith but we still feel a wee bit queezy letting some mullah have his finger on a Big Red Button somewhere don't we ...... tsk tsk tsk... like we know better don't we - who was it that enslaved the negroes a 100 years ago? - oh yeah, it was us wasn't it, the supreme whites and look how we fooked that up!
In answer to Sassy's post (and you know I like you as a person Sassy, we've had many a giggle in the chat room so this isn't personal ok).
A few points I'd like to answer here:
You talk about black people and self segregation - don't be absurd! Black poeple have not sought to segregate themselves from society, however it has taken many many years for them to gain any semblance of equal right under the law in this country, and even with those laws in place they are not equal.

Are you denying the existence of ghettoes where white people cannot go after dark? Even the police have no go areas for the fear of violence if they enter into black areas. That is a fact!
I'd agree that there is racism in every fibre of our society but it's not a one-way racism, white's have been victims of racist attacks as well as black people (I use the word 'black' generically, no offence intended) - and it is abhorrent whoever is on the receiving end of it.
Still worse off in education

Black children do not have a lesser chance at a decent education than white children, the opportunity to knuckle down at school and get some serious work done is there for all children in Britain today. I do not know why the statistics show that white children fare better in schools than black children, but the stats are there for all to see. I don't have the answer as to why, but your statement is incorrect in so much as it's not an institutional problem.
more likely to be stopped by the police, still targeted by groups such as BNP, still subject to attack, a young man was killed not so long ago in Liverpool you may remember - his crime - the colour of his skin!

Yes, institutional racism within the Police Force is rife and should be stamped out - I'm with you 100% on that one, the BNP have had many of their teeth pulled in some very carefully planned manoevres on their leaders who been shown to be nothing more than gangster-style thugs. The sooner the BNP is banned the better in my opinion. The young man killed in Liverpool was an absolute tradegy and it should never have happened but it was an isolated incident - it is not a common place occurance in Britain today, but I do have to ask the question: Why did the media continually refer to him as 'the black teenager etc ...' yet when white children are murdered they are not referred to as 'the white teenager etc...'? The reason for that is due to media sensationalism, these types of stories sell papers, grab headlines and we, the consuming public, prop up this media frenzy by feeding off it.
and did it ever occur to you that legal equality does not give you equal standing within society, not until every barrier has been smashed away, when we look at each other and see each other and not a skin colour / a sexuality etc then, legal equality isn't quite franky worth the paper it's written on!

I'm sorry Sassy, you have my cast iron guarantee that this will NEVER happen. The people in power don't want it to happen. We could combat racism very easily and very effectively by simply shooting anyone who is guilty of a racist crime. Would that work? Damn right it would, but it's too draconian, and we're too delicate, we don't have the stomach for it. The fight against racism starts in the playground - that's where the battle is fought and won. I will not allow my daughter to refer to anyone by their skin colour, she has in the past but that's down to her maternal grandfather who is a racist I'm ashamed to say. So long as there are differences between people then some form of racism will exist - it's human nature. Maybe everyone should fuck everyone until we're all the same colour, it will only take 500 years! (quote from a film with Warren Beatty)
a woman is sexually assualted something like avery two minutes in this country, women who press charges for /assualt are still subject to ideas of did she ask for it - what was she wearing etc, women are still under-represented in all institutions of society - law, workplace, parliament, judiciary, police etc.

I have been with women from THIS website who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse in the past and I asked them why they didn't leave the bastard after the very first incident (it's normally the husband or someone the victim knows well) and I was shocked at some of the answers I got: I loved him, my family wanted me to go back, my kids were there, I loved the social lifestyle I had ..... er...... Hello!!!!..... the guy beat the fook out of you/ you etc,...... pack ya bags and go!!! . End of!
Sorry Sassy hon, I'm not having a go at you at all, your posts have been eloquent and well thought out and you have made some very valid points but I've seen them before in the past and nothing really changes. The day I realised that was like having the wind physically knocked out of me and I gave up on politics altogether.
Change of subject:
It's been assumed in this thread that I am bi myself - ok - now the subject has been raised I'll answer it, yes I am. Not many people know my sexuality because I choose not to advertise it - it's my business, yet on occasion in the chat room where it has been mentioned one or two people have been shocked and casually remarked "Wishy, is there something you're not telling us" - all tongue-in-cheek and I treated it as such, but still it remains no-one's business but mine. But they felt they had a right to know - do they fook!
I do not give a flying fart who gets offended by what I say, I have always spoken my mind and will continue to do so until the day I draw my last breath. Castigate me if you will but you should know this: I have received pm's from people who agree with me wholeheartedly but are too afraid to voice their opinions on here for fear of BEING PERSECUTED FOR DOING SO! ... so take your best shot, it bothers me not one iota.
I'll leave the bold off this post as it's a long one ........ hehehe
Quote by Wishmaster
I seemed to have provoked quite some reaction here, both on this thread and in PM. And that's good, any dialogue is better than none.
I have been with women from THIS website who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse in the past and I asked them why they didn't leave the bastard after the very first incident (it's normally the husband or someone the victim knows well) and I was shocked at some of the answers I got: I loved him, my family wanted me to go back, my kids were there, I loved the social lifestyle I had ..... er...... Hello!!!!..... the guy beat the fook out of you/ you etc,...... pack ya bags and go!!! . End of!

No, sorry a dialogue that is so misguided as yours is not good, however much of a response it gets. I am insulted that you have said that.
I am even more insulted about your paragraph I have enboldened. It shows just how misguided and naive you really are. Again, I am insulted by your lack of tact and lack of understanding.
Please do not continue to insult me Wishy or we will seriously fall out.
Quote by bluexxx
I seemed to have provoked quite some reaction here, both on this thread and in PM. And that's good, any dialogue is better than none.
I have been with women from THIS website who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse in the past and I asked them why they didn't leave the bastard after the very first incident (it's normally the husband or someone the victim knows well) and I was shocked at some of the answers I got: I loved him, my family wanted me to go back, my kids were there, I loved the social lifestyle I had ..... er...... Hello!!!!..... the guy beat the fook out of you/ you etc,...... pack ya bags and go!!! . End of!

No, sorry a dialogue that is so misguided as yours is not good, however much of a response it gets. I am insulted that you have said that.
I am even more insulted about your paragraph I have enboldened. It shows just how misguided and naive you really are. Again, I am insulted by your lack of tact and lack of understanding.
Please do not continue to insult me Wishy or we will seriously fall out.
Woah!.... hold on a sec ...... these were actual conversations that took place....... I'm condemning violence against women here not condoning it! . why do they stay with abusive men?...... Surely anyone would leave at the first sign of trouble... wouldn't they?
Having been in a relationship in the past, i must stress not Paul, where i was hit by my partner to the point i ended up in hospital on more than one ocasion i feel i must say in defence of all these women......
walking out is not easy, you are looking at it from a mans point of view not a womans who is scared of this person, if they can beat you into hospital while you are together what will they do to you if you leave and they find you? thats the thought that go thro your head and please do not insult these women and say go to the police cause believe me its a joke they DO NOT want to know.
Quote by Wishmaster
I seemed to have provoked quite some reaction here, both on this thread and in PM. And that's good, any dialogue is better than none.
Ok, so I may have been playing devil's advocate here, in fact I was being deliberately non-pc here for the simple reason that political correctness changes with the tide so why the fook should I be pc about one thing one day and then change my view on it another day as it's no longer pc? Bollox to that philosophy!!!
HornyRed has trawled through my previous posts and quoted some of the things I've said from months back - and on this thread it's been quoted out of context. I'm not about to backtrack on anything I've said in the past, most of it has been tongue-in-cheek anyway as that's the kind of person I am - I don't take life seriously and there's a reason for that.
The Chams thread from start to finish has been one big giggle - it is clearly stated on the opening post that it began as an off-the-cuff remark made in the chat room so to misquote me on this thread is doing me a grave injustice. Go read the thread in it's entirety. I'm here to swing, I don't give a toss who gets victimised in Botswana or fookin Brighton for that matter, let the politician's deal with that, that's what they are elected for. But don't expect too much action unless there's a fook load of oil to be gained by intervening.
I have been politically active when I was young - and very niave - believing that I could change the world by getting involved - and what a total waste of time that was. Why?
I'll tell you - local politics are ruled by local people and if you want to change things you cannot go against your local party leader - I did and the bastard kicked me out - you have to bide your time, procrastinate yourself on an unholy alter of bureaucracy and sucking up to the big cheese until maybe in ten, twenty years time the miserable git dies or gets caught pilfering public funds or awarding contracts to his fookin masonic brothers and THEN you can finally step into his job and implement your own policies - THAT'S LOCAL POLITICS - I KNOW, I'VE BEEN THERE!
The one thing that has permeated this thread is the issue of equaility.
In a perfect world, yes I agree, we should all be equal under the sun, but we're not living in Utopia, Shangri-La or any other mythical place where everyone lives a free and happy life with no fear of persecution, victimisation, bullying, whatever. Wake up and smell the shit-stained roses. We live here, in this hellhole and it isn't fair, life isn't fair. People aren't fair. Look at all those poor buggers from China that died in a stinking container - why? Coz their own government wasn't fair, the people that smuggled them in weren't fair, the British public aren't fair - coz we don't want them here and all they wanted was a better life for themselves - why haven't the Brits and the Americans gone into China and sorted them out? Answer: Coz China would kick the fookin crap out of us if we tried! China has 1000's of those 50 foot missiles they can send over here and render our homeland into a nuclear desert for the next 200 years. We (read: the Western Superpowers) prefer to go and scrap someone we KNOW we can beat. We don't let mad fanantical muslim states have nuclear weapons but our leaders will tell us that the muslim faith is a good faith - it may well be a good faith but we still feel a wee bit queezy letting some mullah have his finger on a Big Red Button somewhere don't we ...... tsk tsk tsk... like we know better don't we - who was it that enslaved the negroes a 100 years ago? - oh yeah, it was us wasn't it, the supreme whites and look how we fooked that up!
In answer to Sassy's post (and you know I like you as a person Sassy, we've had many a giggle in the chat room so this isn't personal ok).
A few points I'd like to answer here:
You talk about black people and self segregation - don't be absurd! Black poeple have not sought to segregate themselves from society, however it has taken many many years for them to gain any semblance of equal right under the law in this country, and even with those laws in place they are not equal.

Are you denying the existence of ghettoes where white people cannot go after dark? Even the police have no go areas for the fear of violence if they enter into black areas. That is a fact!
I'd agree that there is racism in every fibre of our society but it's not a one-way racism, white's have been victims of racist attacks as well as black people (I use the word 'black' generically, no offence intended) - and it is abhorrent whoever is on the receiving end of it.
Still worse off in education

Black children do not have a lesser chance at a decent education than white children, the opportunity to knuckle down at school and get some serious work done is there for all children in Britain today. I do not know why the statistics show that white children fare better in schools than black children, but the stats are there for all to see. I don't have the answer as to why, but your statement is incorrect in so much as it's not an institutional problem.
more likely to be stopped by the police, still targeted by groups such as BNP, still subject to attack, a young man was killed not so long ago in Liverpool you may remember - his crime - the colour of his skin!

Yes, institutional racism within the Police Force is rife and should be stamped out - I'm with you 100% on that one, the BNP have had many of their teeth pulled in some very carefully planned manoevres on their leaders who been shown to be nothing more than gangster-style thugs. The sooner the BNP is banned the better in my opinion. The young man killed in Liverpool was an absolute tradegy and it should never have happened but it was an isolated incident - it is not a common place occurance in Britain today, but I do have to ask the question: Why did the media continually refer to him as 'the black teenager etc ...' yet when white children are murdered they are not referred to as 'the white teenager etc...'? The reason for that is due to media sensationalism, these types of stories sell papers, grab headlines and we, the consuming public, prop up this media frenzy by feeding off it.
and did it ever occur to you that legal equality does not give you equal standing within society, not until every barrier has been smashed away, when we look at each other and see each other and not a skin colour / a sexuality etc then, legal equality isn't quite franky worth the paper it's written on!

I'm sorry Sassy, you have my cast iron guarantee that this will NEVER happen. The people in power don't want it to happen. We could combat racism very easily and very effectively by simply shooting anyone who is guilty of a racist crime. Would that work? Damn right it would, but it's too draconian, and we're too delicate, we don't have the stomach for it. The fight against racism starts in the playground - that's where the battle is fought and won. I will not allow my daughter to refer to anyone by their skin colour, she has in the past but that's down to her maternal grandfather who is a racist I'm ashamed to say. So long as there are differences between people then some form of racism will exist - it's human nature. Maybe everyone should fuck everyone until we're all the same colour, it will only take 500 years! (quote from a film with Warren Beatty)
a woman is sexually assualted something like avery two minutes in this country, women who press charges for /assualt are still subject to ideas of did she ask for it - what was she wearing etc, women are still under-represented in all institutions of society - law, workplace, parliament, judiciary, police etc.

I have been with women from THIS website who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse in the past and I asked them why they didn't leave the bastard after the very first incident (it's normally the husband or someone the victim knows well) and I was shocked at some of the answers I got: I loved him, my family wanted me to go back, my kids were there, I loved the social lifestyle I had ..... er...... Hello!!!!..... the guy beat the fook out of you/ you etc,...... pack ya bags and go!!! . End of!
Sorry Sassy hon, I'm not having a go at you at all, your posts have been eloquent and well thought out and you have made some very valid points but I've seen them before in the past and nothing really changes. The day I realised that was like having the wind physically knocked out of me and I gave up on politics altogether.
Change of subject:
It's been assumed in this thread that I am bi myself - ok - now the subject has been raised I'll answer it, yes I am. Not many people know my sexuality because I choose not to advertise it - it's my business, yet on occasion in the chat room where it has been mentioned one or two people have been shocked and casually remarked "Wishy, is there something you're not telling us" - all tongue-in-cheek and I treated it as such, but still it remains no-one's business but mine. But they felt they had a right to know - do they fook!
I do not give a flying fart who gets offended by what I say, I have always spoken my mind and will continue to do so until the day I draw my last breath. Castigate me if you will but you should know this: I have received pm's from people who agree with me wholeheartedly but are too afraid to voice their opinions on here for fear of BEING PERSECUTED FOR DOING SO! ... so take your best shot, it bothers me not one iota.
I'll leave the bold off this post as it's a long one ........ hehehe
Good on ya. The truth is one of the bitterest things to swallow and so most people avoid it, preferring to live in their own bubble or under the illusion that things don't happen for the reasons they do. Domestic abuse is a horrible thing, most women are too scared to leave their partner as mentioned above. But some do stay with these men in the vain hope they can change them, or that they won't do it again. Deep down they know it will, and are afraid, but how can you help someone who refuses to acknowledge they need it. Although some of the things you have voiced have been without much tact, I agree with you in principal on them. And I, like you, don't care what others think of my opinions.
Wishmaster, why do you come back to this subject and keep getting people wound up by your misguided views; then go in the chatroom and complain about posting in The Steam Room?
Quote by Wishmaster
I seemed to have provoked quite some reaction here, both on this thread and in PM. And that's good, any dialogue is better than none.
I have been with women from THIS website who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse in the past and I asked them why they didn't leave the bastard after the very first incident (it's normally the husband or someone the victim knows well) and I was shocked at some of the answers I got: I loved him, my family wanted me to go back, my kids were there, I loved the social lifestyle I had ..... er...... Hello!!!!..... the guy beat the fook out of you/ you etc,...... pack ya bags and go!!! . End of!

No, sorry a dialogue that is so misguided as yours is not good, however much of a response it gets. I am insulted that you have said that.
I am even more insulted about your paragraph I have enboldened. It shows just how misguided and naive you really are. Again, I am insulted by your lack of tact and lack of understanding.
Please do not continue to insult me Wishy or we will seriously fall out.
Woah!.... hold on a sec ...... these were actual conversations that took place....... I'm condemning violence against women here not condoning it! . why do they stay with abusive men?...... Surely anyone would leave at the first sign of trouble... wouldn't they?
You don't seem to grasp the idea that physical violence is nothing at all next to the mental abuse that occurs.
In relationships, people can be ground down to believe they are worth next to nothing, and the only point of their existence is to be respectful to the abusive partner.
It's easy to say "if someone smacked me i'd leave" - of course anyone looking at it from the outside would say that - but you have to look at the whole circumstance and the series of events leading up to the physical abuse.
It's never a case of a girl with a guy for 2 weeks and then he cracks her one - its built up mental abuse over months and years until she's in a position were its not even a case of putting up with the occasional beating - it is acceptance of it. It becomes a habit, much in the same vein as smoking if you want to look at it like that.
As with smoking, to break the "habit" of being physically and mentally abused takes amazing strength and will-power to stand back up on your own two feet and say to yourself "I count and I am a person".
That doesn't happen overnight and it is naive to suggest that any sane person would walk out on someone who smacks them - because circumstances, for all, are very very different.
Saying that, i don't believe you are sexist, homophobic or anything negative - i simply believe it is a case of a naive and misguided opinion and that you aren't intending to offend anybody. smile
Quote by naughtynymphos1
Having been in a relationship in the past, i must stress not Paul, where i was hit by my partner to the point i ended up in hospital on more than one ocasion i feel i must say in defence of all these women......
walking out is not easy, you are looking at it from a mans point of view not a womans who is scared of this person, if they can beat you into hospital while you are together what will they do to you if you leave and they find you? thats the thought that go thro your head and please do not insult these women and say go to the police cause believe me its a joke they DO NOT want to know.

Ok Ali, fair comment, I can only look at it from a man's perspective as that's what I am, but what's the answer: stay until he kills you?? Surely there must be somewhere or someone that these women can turn to?
Only today I read about a young mother of two who married into a family from hell and eight members of that family systematically beat her to death over a period of months. They eventually killed her and dumped her body. She was just 20 years old.
Quote by Wishmaster
I seemed to have provoked quite some reaction here, both on this thread and in PM. And that's good, any dialogue is better than none.
I have been with women from THIS website who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse in the past and I asked them why they didn't leave the bastard after the very first incident (it's normally the husband or someone the victim knows well) and I was shocked at some of the answers I got: I loved him, my family wanted me to go back, my kids were there, I loved the social lifestyle I had ..... er...... Hello!!!!..... the guy beat the fook out of you/ you etc,...... pack ya bags and go!!! . End of!

No, sorry a dialogue that is so misguided as yours is not good, however much of a response it gets. I am insulted that you have said that.
I am even more insulted about your paragraph I have enboldened. It shows just how misguided and naive you really are. Again, I am insulted by your lack of tact and lack of understanding.
Please do not continue to insult me Wishy or we will seriously fall out.
Woah!.... hold on a sec ...... these were actual conversations that took place....... I'm condemning violence against women here not condoning it! . why do they stay with abusive men?...... Surely anyone would leave at the first sign of trouble... wouldn't they?
Yes it's so easy to judge .... lets answer this one practically shall we Wishmaster!
You've been in a relationship where you are a victim, your abuser has over a period or years isolated you from all your friends and family ..... so you know no-one, the people you do know the abuser has poisoned that you are hysterical and prone to over exaggeration. You (the victim) have been slowly ground down to the point you are robbed of all your confidence, your self esteem and you might believe to yourself that you deserve everything you get. You (the victim) have no where to go and wouldn't know who to turn to .... you have ne means of support and possibly small children ... where would you go? You (the victim) cannot go to the police in case they don't believe you or visit the house when your abuser is home .... you daren't phone a help agency in case the number shows on phone records, you have no mobile phone and no money to use a payphone.
Now, how easy is it to leave an abuser?
Quote by Wishmaster
Having been in a relationship in the past, i must stress not Paul, where i was hit by my partner to the point i ended up in hospital on more than one ocasion i feel i must say in defence of all these women......
walking out is not easy, you are looking at it from a mans point of view not a womans who is scared of this person, if they can beat you into hospital while you are together what will they do to you if you leave and they find you? thats the thought that go thro your head and please do not insult these women and say go to the police cause believe me its a joke they DO NOT want to know.

Ok Ali, fair comment, I can only look at it from a man's perspective as that's what I am, but what's the answer: stay until he kills you?? Surely there must be somewhere or someone that these women can turn to?
Only today I read about a young mother of two who married into a family from hell and eight members of that family systematically beat her to death over a period of months. They eventually killed her and dumped her body. She was just 20 years old.

They have organisations they can turn to for support. Apart from the obvious police and NHS they have other groups who's names I've forgotten. The major part is actually gathering the strength and determination to go talk to these groups and get the wheel rolling. The first step is always the hardest.
Quote by nesxycple
Wishmaster, why do you come back to this subject and keep getting people wound up by your misguided views; then go in the chatroom and complain about posting in The Steam Room?

I didn't complain.. I'm having a giggle..... I find it hilarious that my views are dismissed as niave or stupid or whatever.... simply because they don't coincide with other people's views. I have not called anyone anything on this thread. I have stated my argument and responded to other arguments put back to me..... I have not resorted to name calling at all.
I love adult reasoned debate, I find it stimulating and I do learn from it. But I will never back down from anyone by being intimidated.
Quote by Wishmaster
Wishmaster, why do you come back to this subject and keep getting people wound up by your misguided views; then go in the chatroom and complain about posting in The Steam Room?

I didn't complain.. I'm having a giggle..... I find it hilariousthat my views are dismissed as niave or stupid or whatever.... simply because they don't coincide with other people's views. I have not called anyone anything on this thread. I have stated my argument and responded to other arguments put back to me..... I have not resorted to name calling at all.
I love adult reasoned debate, I find it stimulating and I do learn from it. But I will never back down from anyone by being intimidated.
I'm glad you find domestic violence so funny ..... you can see all the women here laughing too!!!!
In reality I pity you I really do ...
Quote by Calista
I seemed to have provoked quite some reaction here, both on this thread and in PM. And that's good, any dialogue is better than none.
I have been with women from THIS website who have been victims of sexual or physical abuse in the past and I asked them why they didn't leave the bastard after the very first incident (it's normally the husband or someone the victim knows well) and I was shocked at some of the answers I got: I loved him, my family wanted me to go back, my kids were there, I loved the social lifestyle I had ..... er...... Hello!!!!..... the guy beat the fook out of you/ you etc,...... pack ya bags and go!!! . End of!

No, sorry a dialogue that is so misguided as yours is not good, however much of a response it gets. I am insulted that you have said that.
I am even more insulted about your paragraph I have enboldened. It shows just how misguided and naive you really are. Again, I am insulted by your lack of tact and lack of understanding.
Please do not continue to insult me Wishy or we will seriously fall out.
Woah!.... hold on a sec ...... these were actual conversations that took place....... I'm condemning violence against women here not condoning it! . why do they stay with abusive men?...... Surely anyone would leave at the first sign of trouble... wouldn't they?
Yes it's so easy to judge .... lets answer this one practically shall we Wishmaster!
You've been in a relationship where you are a victim, your abuser has over a period or years isolated you from all your friends and family ..... so you know no-one, the people you do know the abuser has poisoned that you are hysterical and prone to over exaggeration. You (the victim) have been slowly ground down to the point you are robbed of all your confidence, your self esteem and you might believe to yourself that you deserve everything you get. You (the victim) have no where to go and wouldn't know who to turn to .... you have ne means of support and possibly small children ... where would you go? You (the victim) cannot go to the police in case they don't believe you or visit the house when your abuser is home .... you daren't phone a help agency in case the number shows on phone records, you have no mobile phone and no money to use a payphone.
Now, how easy is it to leave an abuser?
An answer to a question I did not know the answer to before, thank you Calista.
I will NEVER understand a man who professes love for someone then beats her/him up. That is not love in my book. Love is putting that one special person before all others for the rest of your life. It's just a shame I haven't found her yet.
Quote by Calista
Wishmaster, why do you come back to this subject and keep getting people wound up by your misguided views; then go in the chatroom and complain about posting in The Steam Room?

I didn't complain.. I'm having a giggle..... I find it hilariousthat my views are dismissed as niave or stupid or whatever.... simply because they don't coincide with other people's views. I have not called anyone anything on this thread. I have stated my argument and responded to other arguments put back to me..... I have not resorted to name calling at all.
I love adult reasoned debate, I find it stimulating and I do learn from it. But I will never back down from anyone by being intimidated.
I'm glad you find domestic violence so funny ..... you can see all the women here laughing too!!!!
In reality I pity you I really do ...
Oh FGS!!! I give up!!!