I cannot believe that Devon1 has had to post here to defend himself FFS. There's a lot of 'concern' being expressed by people who were not there. Call it what you will - it was a great night. The rest is just semantics really.
It is for those who attend to make their feelings known to Devon1 about preferences - that was done and Devon1 has said he's intending to make it a private venue next time (glad he's prepared to do it quite frankly).
I was speaking to Devondelight at length and I mentioned that the place was heaving and that there were a lot of non-site members there (I repeated this to Devon1). That did make it different to other 'munches' but we're all capable of dealing with it and it was not a problem. Next time I'm sure it will be better and I'm looking forward to it - I for one will be there.
As Kat says - storm in a teacup. We're not dealing with just anybody here - we're dealing with munch organisers, who are some of the most selfless, constructive people we have hereabouts and I reckon Devon1 has done the most difficult task in starting a regular munch from scratch - credit to him fer that. So the issue can be developed privately under the watchful eye of the Mods. This really isn't a problem.
Love you all - let's allow it to rest there now FFS!
This wasn't the first Munch held at a non-exclusive venue, and personally I don't have a problem with it. The people who approached us were charming and OK, we were lucky... people could have been given more information than they were prepared for and may have taken offence... in the event, that didn't happen, but it's a possibility, and I think it should always be made absolutely clear if a venue is not exclusive to the group. I for one was not aware, but I arranged to be at this one very late on so I may have missed some details in the run up.
Ice
Organising any Munch is bloody hard work,we all know that.
Everyone makes errors in judgement,cockups etc.I can hold my hands up to that.
It sounds to me like this should perhaps have been termed a mini munch,purely for the public nature of the reading what some have said,it seems the PM's for the event established it was not an exclusive venue.
I wouldn't dream to say I/we were experts on munches,but,my one alarm bell is this.......
Most Munches are held on "someones" doorstep,chatting to vanillas,having a laugh,is all well and good,but what if the organiser or one of the munch attendees bumped into said vanilla in the supermarkket or at the local nightclub or even at their kids school!.Said vanilla decides to get stroppy/take the piss,people can be all for the fun of meeting a bunch of swingers :giggle: ..........But in sober light of day,may find it more amusing to do said swingers harm..........
Maybe this is a bit too much of a rant,no munch is 100% secure,but shouldnt we all try to do our best that they are at least 90%?