Im not going to get into the debate going on... (me head hurts too much to do any justice to this thread)...a lot of how I feel has already been said quite well by others. Great thread topic by the way!!! Very emotive subject....
Slight change to the subject but I saw this today and wondered if it woud ever catch on?
Took me a while to work out exactly what it was and how it worked....
xanaisx
So many people talking at cross purposes.
So many people assuming what appears to be polarised views on the same subject but which are in fact perfectly reasonable views on different subjects.
I think it's about time we let this fraught little area close over and heal don't you think?
I'm not criticising the reason for starting it - it was perfectly valid but as soon as it went into starburst mode it was doomed - I tell ye - doomed!
You watch 50 people will want to start debating it again now!!
its clear that its about control, giving and taking, or not as the case maybe, but as its a control thing, is the word used just to pigeonhole it using a vague description?
I've never experienced a 'forced orgasm' but I'm willing to give it a go! However the same ground rules would apply - it wouldn't work with just anyone - it would have to be someone I trusted implicately - it would be with my consent. You may then say that it's not 'forced', I really don't want to bicker over semantics, suffice to say agreeing to it in principle and having no control over the time and the place or the situation would class as forced to me.
Tania I find your comments quite worrying and agree with Dark that you are talking about something quite different, and as Dark says (wise woman, that DF) the swinging environment is no place to be 'making love' (unless you discover a connection with a partner with whom you're swinging - but then surely it stops being swinging and becomes a relationship?)
H.x
Lots of good points raised in this very interesting thread - thanks to all who have contributed for a damn good read.
I guess there is a big issue around the meaning of ' fantasy'. I have no problem with people wanting to play victim, or those willing to help them live out their fantasy, and absolutley no tolerance whatsoever for people who fantasise about committing an illegal, non-consensual act.
Personally, having flirted with the BDSM scene, it seems I have a lot more tolerance for fantasy play than most, so I think that some of the negative reaction to fantasies seen on this thread is more a fear of the unknown than a fear of the practices themselves.
I've taken part in this sort of thing from both sides, to a mild extent, and it can be immensely pleasureable, as long as everyone knows it's the 'play victim's' fantasy that is being acted out and not the 'play attacker's' fantasy.
Further down the road, are consensual acts that involve strangers. I'm not offended or repulsed by the idea of wanting to involve strangers, getting rid of all the emotional baggage involved and concentrating on the pure physicality of the act is something that attracts me.
I find it odd that people here accept the idea of sex with strangers at swinging clubs, and the idea of fantasy play with trusted partners, but don't accept the idea of fantasy play with strangers. Isn't this exactly the sort of intolerance to sexual freedom we all object to from the vanilla world?
I'm still trying to write my contribution to this thread. Have been for a few days :doh:
(although I'll probably not post it in the end)
But in the meantime . . . . .
wtf is a forced orgasm ??????