Most pedestrians killed in accidents are not killed by drivers exceeding the speed limit.
In 2003, 33% of pedestrians killed (sample size 256 deaths) had blood alcohol levels exceeding 100mg/100mL.
People don't need speeding drivers to kill them, they do quite well in guaranteeing their deaths by being drunk, drugged or just plain stupid.
As reported by THE DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT 5% of road deaths were caused by driving in excess of speed limits.
I promise not to mention the handheld radar gun that clocks brick walls moving at 28mph.
I also promise not to mention the fixed laser equipment that clocks stationary m/cycles moving at 78 mph.
some say that speed cameras save lives but theres no evidence of this, you don't hear of anyone being saved by a speed camera, but you do hear of people being killed at speed camera locations, they are there for revenue only in my opinion the 3 points is punishment enough so why the fine? that just backs up my opinion, but this isn't about the rights and wrongs of cameras its more about people who choose to ignore them and when they do they should take it on the chin and take the punishment.
"I know a guaranteed way to avoid getting caught by a speed camera..... Don't speed!!"
"By the same token I know a guaranteed way of not being convicted for dangerous driving, drunk driving, driving without insurance, license, m.o.t, road tax or even driving under the influence of drugs...... Don't Speed!
Pretty much sums speed cameras up.... Money Money Money!