Quote by fabio grooverider
and haven't had many pull outs....
Oh my overactive mind
bloody perves!!!!!!!
just get yourself an innuendo theosaurus, if you can't afford it ask a friend to give you one
Quote by cockslut
also there was a forum running last week seeking mentors for newbies, surely if these mentors have differing views, people will get differing views on what socials are etc. they may even scare them to death with supposedly unsafe gatherings they may never progress further along this path
Quote by Sharif
I think the emphasis of explaining as to what type of event and what to expect at that event should lay with the organiser, when they first post advertising the event in LMU. I assume this is what a good events organiser would do anyways. People can then decide if they want to attend based on the facts given. If the event posted goes against the ethos of the site, if the type of event or what to expect at the event is not explained then the powers that be can have a word with them on how to put it right.
Quote by Sharif
Also from what I can understand the only reason the term social’s started to appear is because people wanted to invite ex SH members who were not banned but who moved onto the splinter sites for what ever reason.
Quote by Sharif
I don’t understand maybe it’s just me.
Not at all. The best thing about opinions (imho) is that they differ.
So there’s always been munch’s, there’s always been social’s, there’s always been the Forums, there’s always been the add section, there’s always been a chat room (although the nature of it has changed slightly). Ok there’s never been a unified login but that’s never stopped people like using all 3.
I've always believed that (by and large) many people in the ads either weren't aware, or weren't interested in the forums. And, to a degree, vice versa. The unified log in - again, in my opinion, changed that. It sort of "presented" the one to the other.
So why are people getting confused now? What’s different now?
Possibly, and I mean possibly, because there is no yardstick. No guidelines. etc. Clearly, I discount the sticky in LMU.
Ok yes there are a lot more people here now but I’m sure they know what social means. When ever I’ve described a munch to someone I’ve said it’s a purely social event. What’s so hard about grasping the concept of a social event ? the description is in the name.
Obviously we're not discussing the dictionary definition of "social" - more a question of what people can, or should be able to expect the evening (whatever) to be. The whole evening.
Quote by dambuster
Please cut me a little slack Sharif. I'm not having a dig at your post, just trying to answer you with my opinions as to why there could be a potential problem, if not with us now, then on the horizon.
I feel the need at the moment to choose my words and statements carefully.
Quote by cockslut
regarding name and shame, it was mentioned earlier re a hyperthetical social run by a newbie who may not fully understand the etiquette may allow people to disappear during the social for sex and someone may of drove 100's of miles to get there and only half the people left were there wouldn't be very happy, (understandably). surely if the list was full of continual known non showers we got the same scenario.
I view them as entirely different things.
if people choose to leave a social for sex then there is nothing an organiser can do to stop it for a start.
The point being made was about the nature of the event.
If that is how the event had been set up then the organiser needs to make sure that everyone is aware of that, if it isn't how it was advertised then people may have travelled a long way for a meet that wasn't suitable for them.
It's about clarifying that bit in the terminology and the invite post that is important, not controlling others actions at the event.
i think people who are against something are the people who may participate in that thing, as an example, fast drivers are against speed cameras, so don't drive fast, it is the law, (rule)
we all can have a problem that stops us from attending a meet / munch etc but like someone said earlier a cat may have 9 lifes but he can only die once.
Well my understanding is that the mods and organisers hold lists of serial non attenders that other organisers can check against.
I have attended numerous munches and socials from this site. I've had to pull out of some as well.
That doesn't make me one of these regular non attendees but I still don't agree with naming and shaming on the forums. So I'll disagree with you here.
Equally if I've cancelled that is my business and that of the organiser.
Why does the forum need to be told that I was unable to make it unless I choose to tell them myself?.
Quote by da69ve
I'm having a blonde moment here.......but how did this all start..(The Munch Terminology explains it all.)....i've been using this site for nearly two years and have been to a few munches and socials in that time ,in fact there really is no difference in them at all....with no problem to rules so what seems to have changed to drag this all up again......because in my opinion if it can't be sorted....munches and socials could become a thing of the past.
A Munch is purely a social event!.....,thats the first line used in the Munch Terminolgy ,which must mean a Social is also the same!......how difficult is that!
Quote by da69ve
I'm having a blonde moment here.......but how did this all start..(The Munch Terminology explains it all.)....i've been using this site for nearly two years and have been to a few munches and socials in that time ,in fact there really is no difference in them at all....with no problem to rules so what seems to have changed to drag this all up again......because in my opinion if it can't be sorted....munches and socials could become a thing of the past.
A Munch is purely a social event!.....,thats the first line used in the Munch Terminolgy ,which must mean a Social is also the same!......how difficult is that!
Quote by Sharif
I don’t believe in spoon feeding people, I believe in common sense…
If an organiser states that they are having a BBQ Social I expect there to be a BBQ.
If an organiser states that they are having a Bowling Social I expect there to Bowling.
If an organiser states that they are having a Pub Social I expect there to be a Pub.
If an organiser states that they are having a Birthday Social I expect someone to be having a Birthday.
If an organiser states that they are having a fuckfest I expect there to be a fuckfest, and so on and so forth.
Quote by cockslut
. . . . . . re a hyperthetical social run by a newbie who may not fully understand the etiquette may allow people to disappear during the social for sex and someone may of drove 100's of miles to get there and only half the people left were there wouldn't be very happy, (understandably).
Quote by cockslut
coudn't agree more dave, it's just a few peeps worrying about newbies arranging socials, because theres little or no rules written about a social on here, but surely common sense prevails when attending any because theres an increasing number of socials being arranged in the chatroom there not sure they will be handled correctly, they want to see clear written rules not guidelines from the owners.
Quote by goose35
Hope i got the jist of things . . . . . .
Quote by goose35
A social is a non official event which can or can not involve play depending on who,s involved.
Quote by goose35
So the best thing to do would be to make certain on the criteria for the social before committing to attending.
Quote by dambuster
I think it would be better/easier if there was an easy point of permanent reference, rather than needing to ask the same or similar questions, and people having to give the same or similar answers over and over again in their own words.
As an example - (and these are open questions, not specifically directed at goose)
When someone first lists a Munch, how necessary is it for potential guests to ask about the format of the evening ?
AND
How straight forward and clear is it to answer, by referring the questions back to the Munch Terminology ?
Quote by HornyLittleBlonde
I'm having a blonde moment here.......but how did this all start..(The Munch Terminology explains it all.)....i've been using this site for nearly two years and have been to a few munches and socials in that time ,in fact there really is no difference in them at all....with no problem to rules so what seems to have changed to drag this all up again......because in my opinion if it can't be sorted....munches and socials could become a thing of the past.
A Munch is purely a social event!.....,thats the first line used in the Munch Terminolgy ,which must mean a Social is also the same!......how difficult is that!
hiya peeps, we're having our 4th social meet 29th april at 8pm, please mail for venue or catch us online for an invite, please though only apply if your local to the area. singles / couples made very if you can't make it that night please don't fill our mailbox with questions etc, and we have a strict policy if you say your going to cum and don't you won't get another oppurtunity.
As a single guy,I have been to the previous 3 socials,and can vouch that *** and *** are the top gals in have a few beers,a great laugh, and maybe some naughtiness to end the night,should we get an inside are often in the chatroom,and from that you can all see how friendly we are,and horny to would like to say more couples though,pref with a bi-fem cus our gals do get a bit this is your first time at swinging,drop the gals a line,we will all put on the 29th
Quote by HornyLittleBlonde
Da69ve
I think you're thinking of the large socials that are run similar to munches, which is more obvious all though there was this:
Here's the first 2 posts from another "Social" organised in Let's Meet Up:
hiya peeps, we're having our 4th social meet 29th april at 8pm, please mail for venue or catch us online for an invite, please though only apply if your local to the area. singles / couples made very if you can't make it that night please don't fill our mailbox with questions etc, and we have a strict policy if you say your going to cum and don't you won't get another oppurtunity.
As a single guy,I have been to the previous 3 socials,and can vouch that *** and *** are the top gals in have a few beers,a great laugh, and maybe some naughtiness to end the night,should we get an inside are often in the chatroom,and from that you can all see how friendly we are,and horny to would like to say more couples though,pref with a bi-fem cus our gals do get a bit this is your first time at swinging,drop the gals a line,we will all put on the 29th
Quote by HornyLittleBlonde
Perhaps a whole new word should be used for such events.....as i believe "Social".....is the wrong wording.
Quote by cockslut
your still reading that advert wrongly guys,