Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

the death penalty.

last reply
185 replies
7.2k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Innocent people have been hanged before.
People have been put away for life before. Imagine if for example Colin Stagg had his case goto trial, he would, in all probability have been found guilty, not based on the evidence at the time, of which there was little but due to the pressure the jury would have felt from the media frenzy that had been whipped up by very poor journalism at the time.
He could quite easily then have been hanged only to have found that he was in fact totally innocent later on.
This all said - I think these young bastards that take a life should have theirs taken away from them and they should automatically get a life sentance, and that should mean 'life' ie, never coming out. Afterall, death, is really too good for them, I would rather see them suffer and have plenty of time to think about what they have done.
Quote by Lost
I think that the death penalty is so wrong. I can not ever see the justice in legalised murder. As to the horrific crimes and criminals that warrant these thoughts of capital punishment. To me it is worth the state expenditure to have these people pay for there crimes in time served without freedom.
I never want to be associated with the death of another whether legal or otherwise. Obviously if some atrocity was to happen to my family then my feelings would be different. Of that I have no doubt. This is why i am glad that we have a system of Law and justice that is upheld by others rather than the victims.

Totally agree.
Nola x
why am I against the death penalty...
let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven
Colin Stagg
All people who probably would have been given the death penalty, all cases where they were proved to be found innocent after years in prison......
so what do you since you wouldn't have been able to bring those people back..... say "oops sorry... my bad"
i know.... lets go after the people who went after them.......
it would all be madness.... the only thing an eye for an eye does, is leave the whole world blind.....
Quote by fabio
it would all be madness.... the only thing an eye for an eye does, is leave the whole world blind.....

Yep; Mahatma Gandhi said that.
There are those that say, 'I disagree with the death penalty, but if anyone touched my family, I'd kill them'.
There are those that say, 'I eat meat, but I could never kill'.
So I don't know any better than any of you, how to go about this. rolleyes
So just stay out of trouble and avoid nutters..... wink
Quote by fabio
let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Quote by Dave__Notts

let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Always one to have a laugh at a serious issue!1
I've always been against the death penalty but if someone hurt my children I don't know weather I would be big enough or brave enough to hold that opinion.......
Quote by kentswingers777

let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Always one to have a laugh at a serious issue!1
If I can't laugh at life then I would be depressed all the time. There are so many issues that are serious but I couldn't possible get involved with all of them or I would worry about others instead of what is dear and important to me which, is my friends & family.
To me it is irrelevant to what people think of this issue.....it is the law that we do not hang, shoot, inject a murderer or any other felon. It has been voted out and will never return. So why is it such a serious issue when nothing will change?
We might as well discuss vigilantes.....as at least they work outside the law and they will, can and do spring up and deal out "justice". Even though they get it wrong as well.
Am I for it or against it? Depends if the Renault 5 was on trial lol
Dave_Notts
Quote by markz
I've always been against the death penalty but if someone hurt my children I don't know weather I would be big enough or brave enough to hold that opinion.......

My kids are big enough and strong enough for me not to think about that but, if they were vulnerable I'd be right with you matey!
.
Quote by Dave__Notts

let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Always one to have a laugh at a serious issue!1
If I can't laugh at life then I would be depressed all the time. There are so many issues that are serious but I couldn't possible get involved with all of them or I would worry about others instead of what is dear and important to me which, is my friends & family.
To me it is irrelevant to what people think of this issue.....it is the law that we do not hang, shoot, inject a murderer or any other felon. It has been voted out and will never return. So why is it such a serious issue when nothing will change?
We might as well discuss vigilantes.....as at least they work outside the law and they will, can and do spring up and deal out "justice". Even though they get it wrong as well.
Am I for it or against it? Depends if the Renault 5 was on trial lol
Dave_Notts
Never say never. This country is getting more violent by the day. They said they could never tame New York, but they have. The three strike rule and your out has worked a treat over there. I would never rule anything out, and maybe just maybe in the future the death penalty will return.
Quote by Dave__Notts

let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Always one to have a laugh at a serious issue!1
If I can't laugh at life then I would be depressed all the time. There are so many issues that are serious but I couldn't possibly get involved with all of them or I would worry about others instead of what is dear and important to me which, is my friends & family.
To me it is irrelevant to what people think of this issue.....it is the law that we do not hang, shoot, inject a murderer or any other felon. It has been voted out and will never return. So why is it such a serious issue when nothing will change?
We might as well discuss vigilantes.....as at least they work outside the law and they will, can and do spring up and deal out "justice". Even though they get it wrong as well.
Am I for it or against it? Depends if the Renault 5 was on trial lol
Dave_Notts
Quote by kentswingers777

let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Always one to have a laugh at a serious issue!1
If I can't laugh at life then I would be depressed all the time. There are so many issues that are serious but I couldn't possible get involved with all of them or I would worry about others instead of what is dear and important to me which, is my friends & family.
To me it is irrelevant to what people think of this issue.....it is the law that we do not hang, shoot, inject a murderer or any other felon. It has been voted out and will never return. So why is it such a serious issue when nothing will change?
We might as well discuss vigilantes.....as at least they work outside the law and they will, can and do spring up and deal out "justice". Even though they get it wrong as well.
Am I for it or against it? Depends if the Renault 5 was on trial lol
Dave_Notts
Never say never. This country is getting more violent by the day. They said they could never tame New York, but they have. The three strike rule and your out has worked a treat over there. I would never rule anything out, and maybe just maybe in the future the death penalty will return.
Poppycock to all of it. New York is not any 'safer' it is just more scared.
The death penalty won't ever come back. Thank goodness.
Quote by splendid_

let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Always one to have a laugh at a serious issue!1
If I can't laugh at life then I would be depressed all the time. There are so many issues that are serious but I couldn't possible get involved with all of them or I would worry about others instead of what is dear and important to me which, is my friends & family.
To me it is irrelevant to what people think of this issue.....it is the law that we do not hang, shoot, inject a murderer or any other felon. It has been voted out and will never return. So why is it such a serious issue when nothing will change?
We might as well discuss vigilantes.....as at least they work outside the law and they will, can and do spring up and deal out "justice". Even though they get it wrong as well.
Am I for it or against it? Depends if the Renault 5 was on trial lol
Dave_Notts
Never say never. This country is getting more violent by the day. They said they could never tame New York, but they have. The three strike rule and your out has worked a treat over there. I would never rule anything out, and maybe just maybe in the future the death penalty will return.
Poppycock to all of it. New York is not any 'safer' it is just more scared.
The death penalty won't ever come back. Thank goodness.
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:
Quote by kentswingers777

let me give you some really high profile examples..
The Birmingham Six
The Guildford Four
The Maguire Seven

The Renault Five dunno
bolt
Dave_Notts
Always one to have a laugh at a serious issue!1
If I can't laugh at life then I would be depressed all the time. There are so many issues that are serious but I couldn't possible get involved with all of them or I would worry about others instead of what is dear and important to me which, is my friends & family.
To me it is irrelevant to what people think of this issue.....it is the law that we do not hang, shoot, inject a murderer or any other felon. It has been voted out and will never return. So why is it such a serious issue when nothing will change?
We might as well discuss vigilantes.....as at least they work outside the law and they will, can and do spring up and deal out "justice". Even though they get it wrong as well.
Am I for it or against it? Depends if the Renault 5 was on trial lol
Dave_Notts
Never say never. This country is getting more violent by the day. They said they could never tame New York, but they have. The three strike rule and your out has worked a treat over there. I would never rule anything out, and maybe just maybe in the future the death penalty will return.
Come the revolution eh! :lol:
The homicide rates in this country are falling,not rising so how has it got more violent? Or do you want hanging for more than one crime? Maybe burgalery?
If we look at history and see when hanging was introduced for 212 offences in this country, did it make it a safer place? Nope.
Dave_Notts
PS Splendid_ Whats a Poppycock? Searched my karmasutra and never found any reference!!!!
Dearest Members,
Within a ‘perfect world’, the penalty of death would be absolutely ‘pure’.
Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world.
We all know the influence that our Tabloid Press has within the United Kingdom & other sections of the Mass Media. This results in pressure being placed upon the Justice System:
Police & Crown Prosecution Service.
Also, if the Death Penalty was to make a return this could also become Political.
With Members of Parliament / Political Parties using this to gain popularity with the electorate.
In this country we have seen massive miscarriages of justice when this pressure has been applied which has meant that innocent people have been ‘locked up’ for over 20years..!!
What really needs to be investigated is the background for such violent crimes. For example do we as a society need to ban certain things from the Television such as:
Reality Television, perhaps?
The above example shows how any member of the public can make vast amounts of money just via ‘mouthing off’ & allowing the world to view their life. Has this created a mind-set within our society that –
‘I have the RIGHT to say anything I want because I can & you can’t do anything about it..!!’.
We have to realize that our actions have consequences. Therefore is the Media supporting this viewpoint or not?
In last year’s ‘Big Brother’ (Channel 4).
Emily said the ‘N’ word. Emily then is told that this is unacceptable & is kicked off the show.
Ziggy said the ‘N’ word. Ziggy stay’s on the show.
My point a lack of standards in our society. This then shows people that are influenced by Television, that if they are good looking & popular then they can get away with things that other less popular people can’t.
My point is that in America they have the Death Penalty (in certain states) & the
Murder Rates are increasing. Instead of investigating the cause they deal with the effect.
A society along with the criminal is also guilty of the crime.
That’s all I’ve got to say on the matter.
From,
Wunderhorse.
Quote by Wunderhorse
Dearest Members,
Within a ‘perfect world’, the penalty of death would be absolutely ‘pure’.
Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world.
We all know the influence that our Tabloid Press has within the United Kingdom & other sections of the Mass Media. This results in pressure being placed upon the Justice System:
Police & Crown Prosecution Service.
Also, if the Death Penalty was to make a return this could also become Political.
With Members of Parliament / Political Parties using this to gain popularity with the electorate.
In this country we have seen massive miscarriages of justice when this pressure has been applied which has meant that innocent people have been ‘locked up’ for over 20years..!!
What really needs to be investigated is the background for such violent crimes. For example do we as a society need to ban certain things from the Television such as:
Reality Television, perhaps?

The above example shows how any member of the public can make vast amounts of money just via ‘mouthing off’ & allowing the world to view their life. Has this created a mind-set within our society that –
‘I have the RIGHT to say anything I want because I can & you can’t do anything about it..!!’.
We have to realize that our actions have consequences. Therefore is the Media supporting this viewpoint or not?
In last year’s ‘Big Brother’ (Channel 4).
Emily said the ‘N’ word. Emily then is told that this is unacceptable & is kicked off the show.
Ziggy said the ‘N’ word. Ziggy stay’s on the show.
My point a lack of standards in our society. This then shows people that are influenced by Television, that if they are good looking & popular then they can get away with things that other less popular people can’t.
My point is that in America they have the Death Penalty (in certain states) & the
Murder Rates are increasing. Instead of investigating the cause they deal with the effect.
A society along with the criminal is also guilty of the crime.
That’s all I’ve got to say on the matter.
From,
Wunderhorse.

Yes.
Thats it really. Just yes!
Dearest Members,
I was thinking more about the influence of the Mass Media especially the Tabloid Press.
A couple of weeks ago a ‘certain newspaper’ wrote an article about a ‘certain celebrity’ engaging in an Orgy during their Birthday Celebrations. Other people involved where according to this newspaper ‘fellow celebrities’.
The manner of this article was making this celebrity come across as let’s say ‘lacking morals’ & being ‘sleazy’. Yet the same Newspaper is obsessed by Sex & promotes these values within it’s pages also somehow the same paper claims to be a ‘Family Paper’?
So what is this paper an ‘18’ or ‘U’ certificate? Can’t be both….
Also, the mentioned Newspaper got it’s ‘eye wiped’ when a vast amount of people sent
E – Mail’s & Phoned in (leaving contact details) saying:
If Adults want to engage in Group Sex, then what’s the problem?
According to reports a number of people mentioned that they would not buy the paper again.
So my point is the nature of the Tabloid Press in the U.K is hypocritical in the extreme & is very dangerous due to the power of influence they have within our society. (please read my previous post on this thread).
From,
Wunderhorse.
Quote by Wunderhorse
Dearest Members,
Within a ‘perfect world’, the penalty of death would be absolutely ‘pure’.
Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world.
We all know the influence that our Tabloid Press has within the United Kingdom & other sections of the Mass Media. This results in pressure being placed upon the Justice System:
Police & Crown Prosecution Service.
Also, if the Death Penalty was to make a return this could also become Political.
With Members of Parliament / Political Parties using this to gain popularity with the electorate.
In this country we have seen massive miscarriages of justice when this pressure has been applied which has meant that innocent people have been ‘locked up’ for over 20years..!!
What really needs to be investigated is the background for such violent crimes.
My point is that in America they have the Death Penalty (in certain states) & the
Murder Rates are increasing. Instead of investigating the cause they deal with the effect.

:thumbup: some good points well made!
Nola xx
if you are going to hold my my home town and state (New York) as a shining example... a few things you might want to know first...
.....there hasn't been a person executed in the State of New York since june 1963......the last person hanged in the UK was August 1964
the "Three stikes" rule isn't one really brought up at all in New York... that has more to do with California, and there it has been controversial because some of the "heinous" crimes that brought "strike 3" and 25 to life in prison include the following.....
shoplifting golf clubs....
stealing 9 video cassettes...
Stealing a slice of pepperoni pizza from a group of children...
and my personal fave
Stealing 4 chocolate chip cookies........
in you want a better comparison between california and the UK then california have approximately 175,000 prisoners in a system designed for 85,000
there radical solution to relieve some of the overcrowding..... releasing some of the lower category prisoners up to two weeks earlier than they would have done....
does that sound really familar???? it should do, the government got panned for suggesting the same thing last year

FYI
wtf?
Our post in here had a massive section deleted and it wasn't rude or anything, just a comment about a case in the USA, where the parents were inf avour of the death penalty for the people who murdered their son, but choose to give them life instead, so they would remember what they had done every day for the rest of their lives.
Quote by markz
I've always been against the death penalty but if someone hurt my children I don't know weather I would be big enough or brave enough to hold that opinion.......

with you 100%.....but it would not be justice i would be after...it would be revenge....two very differant things !!!
Quote by deancannock
I've always been against the death penalty but if someone hurt my children I don't know weather I would be big enough or brave enough to hold that opinion.......

with you 100%.....but it would not be justice i would be after...it would be revenge....two very differant things !!!
its totally diffarent if its your own child, a parents natural instinct is to protect your own, killing someone whos done nothing to me personally is something i could never do and if im not willing to do something myself i cant agree to expecting someone else to do it.
I've always said the same, if i knew i had to spend life in prison and had the option of having a injection to kill me i'd take the injection, death is no punishment once your dead you know nothing, living life in prison is far worse in my opinion, by i will say one thing for certain crimes life should mean life
Quote by DeeCee

FYI

Well I learned a few things from that - thanks.
Quote by SlurpySarah
There is a massive shortage of organ donors in this country, yet we have paedophiles, child-murderers and the like eating, drinking, enjoying tv etc all of which is paid for by our taxes which could be going in to healthcare, and much more for genuine, decent human beings. I say, put these animals down immediately after conviction and harvest their body parts for transplant. Use what crap is left for land-fill.
SlurpySarah xx

so would you accept an organ from a serial killer if you needed it?
Abso-bloody-lutely! IMO It's their mind/personality that caused them to commit the horrendous crime, and those parts can't be transplanted. The rest of them is just offal, but could be of use to somebody if not just for research.
Problem: Many of the above criminals did "it" while also using drugs and alcohol. Many will have been iv drug users, a high-risk category.
Still, you can always screen for communicable disease.
Since many organs are of no use for transplant if more than a few minutes has elapsed since death, that also raises another problem.
You remember the saying:
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
Now, while I have no intention of associating the emotion in the above statement with child murderers, I can mention this:
Today you would execute people for those crimes, and use their organs to prolong the life of others. That will immediately call a halt to those crimes. There is a sci-fi novel along those lines (and some novellas sporned from it) where murderers body parts were used for transplant. Murder stopped. So, failing to pay tax became a capital offence. Tax fiddling stopped. So it ended-up with people being executed for crossing the road in the wrong place.
In the end people started being kidnapped for organs for transplant (which has already happened in this time/world)
Where is the line drawn ?
Bearing in mind, we already HAVE a government that is already using the fear of crime to remove peoples rights ?
Quote by JTS
There is a massive shortage of organ donors in this country, yet we have paedophiles, child-murderers and the like eating, drinking, enjoying tv etc all of which is paid for by our taxes which could be going in to healthcare, and much more for genuine, decent human beings. I say, put these animals down immediately after conviction and harvest their body parts for transplant. Use what crap is left for land-fill.
SlurpySarah xx

so would you accept an organ from a serial killer if you needed it?
Abso-bloody-lutely! IMO It's their mind/personality that caused them to commit the horrendous crime, and those parts can't be transplanted. The rest of them is just offal, but could be of use to somebody if not just for research.
Problem: Many of the above criminals did "it" while also using drugs and alcohol. Many will have been iv drug users, a high-risk category.
Still, you can always screen for communicable disease.
Since many organs are of no use for transplant if more than a few minutes has elapsed since death, that also raises another problem.
You remember the saying:
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
Now, while I have no intention of associating the emotion in the above statement with child murderers, I can mention this:
Today you would execute people for those crimes, and use their organs to prolong the life of others. That will immediately call a halt to those crimes. There is a sci-fi novel along those lines (and some novellas sporned from it) where murderers body parts were used for transplant. Murder stopped. So, failing to pay tax became a capital offence. Tax fiddling stopped. So it ended-up with people being executed for crossing the road in the wrong place.
In the end people started being kidnapped for organs for transplant (which has already happened in this time/world)
Where is the line drawn ?
Bearing in mind, we already HAVE a government that is already using the fear of crime to remove peoples rights ?
exactly...we run out of murderers or they are in short supply,what next lower the offence to include lesser crimes to fit the high demand for organs.
Quote by deancannock
two wrongs have never made a right. By agreeing to death penalty you lowering yourself to there level. We have seen so many convictions recently overturned...so chance of killing wrong person is high.
so as far as I am concerned the death penalty has no place in a civilised society.

"and the meek shall inherit the earth". NOT!!
It is precisely because there is no effective deterrent to make wrongdoers think twice that they have no repect for societys laws and rules and commit crimes at all levels with out fear of any meaningful reprisal.
So called do gooders and defenders of ferral anti social types profess to hold liberal attitudes would change i feel if it were they who were on the receiving end of a ,Mugging or Intimidation or had someone close to them have it happen or worse to them.
We have all seen the 'green light,go for it, be our guest' message sent out time and time again to the criminals with sentences meted out to victims such as Farmer Tony Martin.
This breeds apathy in the general public and no confidence in the law to protect us. This has to makers and Politicians take note.
By God i feel better after that.
Rob
Quote by Seven_up
two wrongs have never made a right. By agreeing to death penalty you lowering yourself to there level. We have seen so many convictions recently overturned...so chance of killing wrong person is high.
so as far as I am concerned the death penalty has no place in a civilised society.

"and the meek shall inherit the earth". NOT!!
It is precisely because there is no effective deterrent to make wrongdoers think twice that they have no repect for societys laws and rules and commit crimes at all levels with out fear of any meaningful reprisal.
So called do gooders and defenders of ferral anti social types profess to hold liberal attitudes would change i feel if it were they who were on the receiving end of a ,Mugging or Intimidation or had someone close to them have it happen or worse to them.We have all seen the 'green light,go for it, be our guest' message sent out time and time again to the criminals with sentences meted out to victims such as Farmer Tony Martin.
This breeds apathy in the general public and no confidence in the law to protect us. This has to makers and Politicians take note.
By God i feel better after that.
Rob
with all due respect... rubbish. As I have said recently in another thread. I am probably a 'do-gooder' in your opinion. I would class myself as being open-minded as well. (I also class myself as a damn good shag but that is for another time and place)
Anyway, Youhave no idea of my history/life experience or anyone elses here. So passing judgement on how or why I formed my opinion just shows how narrow minded you actually are.
as for Tony Martin. well, I wasn't there and am not privvy to all of the information. But I believe with the little information I have that he received a just and fair sentence.
happy valentines day !
If, in the future you become a victim then i would like to hear what you have to say about the words you have written.
Rob