Quote by Whipsnspurs
actually peanut i for one don't remember saying that i thought that they shouldn't be treated or have a school education. and as i pointed out before i was not the one who brought smoking in to the debate as an example.
you were the one accusing me of meaning that i agreed with smokers not being treated and then trying to cover it up. i've still not actually seen an apology for that asumption which was wrong!
whips
Your words:
Quote by Whipsnspurs
i think that if you choose not to have your child vaccinated then the cost of treatment should be paid for by the parent.
So what if the parent doesn't have the funds? And I take it that if you are saying that the parent should pay that means the treatment shouldn't be available on the NHS?
Again, your words:
Quote by Whipsnspurs
if you make a life style choices that puts you outside the normal funding for treatment then why shouldn't you pay for the damage you inflict on yourself
Or are you saying that choosing to smoke isn't a lifestyle choice?
I'd be grateful if you could re-explain the above as your later explanations seem to differ greatly from the above, or are you using a version of English I don't understand?
As for the apology, well based on the above I really don't think one is due.