Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

WHICH IS BETTER ?

last reply
7 replies
750 views
0 watchers
0 likes
Following a less than perfect vanilla 1 nighter very recently perpertrated by a close friend of mine in a mad attempt to scratch that itch ( her name will remain nameless but those who know us can guess ...) it made us ponder the age old question - whats worse, no sex or bad sex ?
Lets hear your opinions
GF
There's sex & there's making love. You make the best of what you have. She may not have enjoyed you!!!!!
I should have said tho - the offending event wasnt with me ! our playdays tend to be rather more satisfying
GF
humm well there's that age old saying...bad sex is better than no sex at all!
personally i'm not so sure lol
For the few times I knew I was going to get into something 'bad', I had the sense to either quietly put a stop to it, or do a spectacular runner.
Then rush home and have a good little wank. :rascal:
I'd rather not have sex than have bad sex, you can always stick with oral and hand movements :rascal:
Quote by Dawn_Mids
I'd rather not have sex than have bad sex, you can always stick with oral and hand movements :rascal:

makes me think you know something about conducting an orchestra.
"No sex" for me- that's not a request to ignore me, just a statement.
I once endured the most uninspiring sex with a lady I thought would be fantastic and very much wasn't- even faked a finish! oooohhhhhh.
:cry:
Now blow jobs are another matter- there is no such thing as a bad blow job!