ive read this thread from start to finish and feel sorry for your experience nbg, however it occured to me when i read your profile that just as complete newbie guys are considered no goes for munches etc. perhaps a more cautionary approach would have been wise from your self , no offence intended (maybe a warning to single fems that join here wouldnt go amiss, suggestion to Mods), get to know how things work on here before diving in.
you have only been a member for a few days , and unless you validate potential meetings first with other members you may be heading for trouble.
I cant recall the joining procedure with the site but if a confirmation email is sent out then perhaps the warning could be included in that?
thoughts?
staggy
xx
thanks Mal , cant ask any more than that can we really , im guessing nbg hasnt read that first or if she did didnt act on it,, but then again ive been on here forever under a different name as you know and ive never read it either lol
we paid you in kind if i recall , the naming of a certain beast in your honour.....
and we took you to the most famous dogging site in the world , what more did you want ? Jam on it???
judy you are once again a fountain of knowledge my dear.........but you have managed to confuse my ignorant norther brain (doesnt take much) on a friday afternoon.
i shall go for a drink to try and cure the situation.
Understood, Mal.. I didn't know if the burden of checking would be less than the burden of multiple deletions.
I was thinking more along the lines of a quick scan for the common problems in the 'women seeking men' - ie does this ad have
a) a penis on the pic
b) a URL wi*th*lots*of*sta*rs*in
c) a redirecting URL
c) THAT skirt pic AGAIN
d) any mention of '100 miles from Peterborough'
I think some of the scammers rely on the short time the ads are up before deletion to get their revenue, and would be more likely to give up if they didn;t get shown at all.
Maybe the mods could have a new button to put a category into pre-approval mode when there's a spamstorm?