As the thread title says, Google never lies .......... see what you get if you type in "failure"
:twisted:
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Burtman
3 weeks ago
Bisexual Male, 66
0 miles · Derbyshire
Forum
Quote by splendid33
How do you view polyamory. ?
Normally in the living room with my youngest. We sing along to the theme tune "What's the story Polyamory" then settle down to see which brightly coloured house is going to be featured in the programme. Am a real fan of Miss Hoolie the teacher.
Quote by da69ve
Bareback or not bareback......isn't that the person or persons choice!....lets not turn it into a witch hunt...!
That certainly wasn't my intention. I agree we all have choices to make and have every right to be different, even if they provoke strong feelings in others..... I do think though that it's better to make an informed choice and, although responsibility ultimately has to lie with the individual, a responsible swinging site like SH might like to think about helping people make their safe sex preferences clear ...
Sorry if I'm going over old ground here but.....
....the AUP says that third parties cannot be included in pics without their consent. When uploading pics it says no third parties in pics fullstop. The inconsistency doesn't exactly help those who are trying to do the right thing but happen to look in the wrong place.
In the 3 or so years I've been a member I can't remember problems with third party pics being mentioned until recently.....has the site management started to introduce a new approach? If so, it might have helped if was this communicated widely to members so they could understand and help the mods out by removing offending pics themselves
....the AUP says that third parties cannot be included in pics without their consent. When uploading pics it says no third parties in pics fullstop. The inconsistency doesn't exactly help those who are trying to do the right thing but happen to look in the wrong place.
In the 3 or so years I've been a member I can't remember problems with third party pics being mentioned until recently.....has the site management started to introduce a new approach? If so, it might have helped if was this communicated widely to members so they could understand and help the mods out by removing offending pics themselves
Dawnie, I'm not sure "naming and shaming", even privately, is my style.... but if you want to search the adverts for "bareback" you will be spoilt for choice. Like it or not, this community has many who are prepared to take the risk ......or convince themselves there is no risk
Edit added ....I know other sites, particularly amongst the gay community, allow members to state their safe sex preferences (eg, always, sometimes, never, needs discussion) - it's not foolpfroof of course but it might give you a better idea of quite what risks your swinging partner is and has been taking.
Edit added ....I know other sites, particularly amongst the gay community, allow members to state their safe sex preferences (eg, always, sometimes, never, needs discussion) - it's not foolpfroof of course but it might give you a better idea of quite what risks your swinging partner is and has been taking.
Extact from an ad this morning....
Says it all really!
hi we are a mid 30,s cple we are looking for married guys for occasional meets, married because she likes to be fucked bareback and feel the cum pumped into her pussy, and we think married guys would be cleaner than single players, we are both very clean and you must be too, we are looking for 3somes at first asnd poss 1 on 1 with you and the wife, when we know each other a bit better
Says it all really!
I really wonder quite how representative those of us who insist on condoms are, particularly when I read the swingers stories on this site and others....there is hardly ever a mention of a condom, in fact many make a big play of the fact that they are having sex bareback....of course it could all be made up but I suspect not.
Sometimes when I have sex I have a secondary ejaculation. Usually it happens within five minutes of the first and seems to require that the woman is on top and very close to or actually coming. Its more of a whole body sensation than the first and the 'load' is thinner and there's much more of it. /quote]
Let me think....5 minutes after cumming,.....woman on top, pressing on bladder......different sensation.....thinner and more volume........are you quite sure you're not doing something else?
Let me think....5 minutes after cumming,.....woman on top, pressing on bladder......different sensation.....thinner and more volume........are you quite sure you're not doing something else?
Quote by Shireen_Mids
Just a thought, but what was your room called?
It was more than likely the room name that was unsuitable so Kiss is right...
Oh and Mods are forum Moderators, OP's are chatroom OPerators... If you have a question in future it would be prudent to PM one of us to ask the question...
Is there any way we can make contacting chatroom ops easier if they're not in the room you're in? The "home of the chatroom ops" is usually empty and you'd have to leave the room you're in to go there......and there's no way (that I've worked out at least) of seeing which ones are around or even online. The Sarge has put a list up in this forum but not linked, so you have to do a name search to find them ..... by which time, with my memory, I've forgotten what on earth I wanted them for in the first place
Quote by sheddy
I'm a nosy fooker at the best of times but I've noticed a lot of people are posting in this new forum that have never posted much before, more so topics are being raised in here that could have been raised in the cafe before we had the chat room forum. So my question is what suddenly made you all decide to post or raise topics now
and don't give me that clique shite
'cos most times I've seen someone start a thread or raise a question about the chatroom in the Cafe they get told the Cafe isn't the place to raise that subject - sometmes politely, sometimes less so - in the end it has the predictable effect of making some of us who spend our time in the chatroom feel uncomfortable raising our heads in the forums ...... but we enjoy this site and given another chance in here to be made to feel welcome and to contribute we're having another go.
As with all human activity you seek out and settle down in those places and with those people where you feel most comfortable....and it doesn't mean you can't get on with others when your paths cross of course - at the end of the day we've all got a lot in common here on SH whichever areas we frequent .
Quote by Burtman
As a Chatroom Op I found your comments offensive!!:x :x :x
As a Moderator I feel you are in breech of the site AUP !! :shock: :shock: :shock:
You cannot be serious! Is this a wind up or have you really censored my post. If so, i can't believe it....what on earth were you taking offense at???? Do you not see a tongue in cheek when it's staring at you in the face?
I was not tying to be rude, just trying to lighten the mood in what was becoming a fairly intense thread.Could you (the anonymous op editors) either tell me what the problem was or perhaps re-instate it so that everyone else can judge for themselves whether I was being offensive or breaching the rules
...... could you go on the internet and find a sex-based chatroom full of wonderful fun people in various states of dress and undress, every one of them in a silly hat? Thank you everyone in the South Wales room for making me smile at the end of a difficult week and everyone in this site who makes it what it is. No matter how many moans we manage to have about this site and all its communities and quirks, I wouldn't swap it for anything. 
........ or something more sinister? A few weeks ago I was browsing the chatrooms and saw the usual "BBW room - no directing" , but quick double-take confirmed it actually said "BBW room - no dieting". What a wonderfully appropriate freudian slip.....well it made me chuckle
Afterwards though, I wondered...... perhaps this was a new way of ensuring that chatrooms were only filled with the right type of members. If so, what else could be out there......"8+ inch room - please place cock on ruler before entering" , "Scots fun - passports please"? We should be told!
Afterwards though, I wondered...... perhaps this was a new way of ensuring that chatrooms were only filled with the right type of members. If so, what else could be out there......"8+ inch room - please place cock on ruler before entering" , "Scots fun - passports please"? We should be told!
Quote by da69ve
SH rules (the unwritten ones) state clearly that a person using these forums may not be:
illiterate
disabled
old
too young
need I go on?
da69ve... i can see parts of her point being valid here.....
for example... how many times on here have we seen a post with not the best spelling being ripped to pieces.....
same with an "am i too young/ too old to swing"post.....
and i do see and i am sure that i am not the only one that certain people take glee and seem the revel in trying to rip people to shreads because they take a dislike to them... i think i could show you an good example of that in this very thread......
where i do disagree with her was the "disability" issue.... because i don't think it has come up very often and i think it is a good conversation topic........
The first one yes i have been guilty in the past at that one....but the others she is just assuming.....on what proof has she put forward on these.....absolutely none.....once again she starts something then dissappears.....there is absolutely nothing to back up what she has said!...i have highlighted this part has i believe that nothing but support is given to these people when they post.....the only time they get ripped into his when they act like idiots!
"Act like idiots" is your own assumption da69ve .... many people who have difficulty spelling or constructing an articulate comment get ridiculed in this forum...... are they being idiots worthy of abuse or are they someone with a learning disability innocently trying their best to fit in with this community? You make an assumption that it's the former every time you piss-take ....and as it is often their first post you clearly haven't bothered to get to know them or give them the benefit of the doubt.
The reason I most like this community it its spirit and inclusiveness ..... we all do things that the vanilla folks tend to judge and condemn and I'd like to think this community could stand above that and not seek out folks that we can condemn just because they are not articulate or express a desire to play with someone with a disability.
