:gagged:
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Darkfire
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 49
0 miles · Greater London
Forum
Darkfire was not pink and fluffy last night let me tell you 
the psychotic irate super-bitch on community care leave came out to play, especially when her lighter decided to give up the ghost as well in the rain while stood on the hard shoulder :taz:
come to think of it, that's probably why no one stopped to help ...two red glowing eyes and steam billowing out her nostrils in the dark
the psychotic irate super-bitch on community care leave came out to play, especially when her lighter decided to give up the ghost as well in the rain while stood on the hard shoulder :taz: come to think of it, that's probably why no one stopped to help ...two red glowing eyes and steam billowing out her nostrils in the dark
Thanks FB 
despite limping down the M1 in a poorly car, then getting stranded with no rear lights on the very scary hard shoulder in the rain after being flashed at and recieving hand gesutres from other motorists (none of whom offered to help I might add :kick
, being guided into the services by a very nice truck driver who took pity on me standing there piss wet fooking through looking like a drowned rat (
) and then being stuck there for 2 hours in the rain until someone from the SH network came out to help me at 2am (:worship:) and tailed me all the way home, where i promptly made a large dent in the drivers door by kicking it just a little bit too hard .....and not making it to work today so the whole staying sober/leaving early shite was all in vain anyway 
....I had a fab night :thumbup: :lol:
despite limping down the M1 in a poorly car, then getting stranded with no rear lights on the very scary hard shoulder in the rain after being flashed at and recieving hand gesutres from other motorists (none of whom offered to help I might add :kick
, being guided into the services by a very nice truck driver who took pity on me standing there piss wet fooking through looking like a drowned rat () and then being stuck there for 2 hours in the rain until someone from the SH network came out to help me at 2am (:worship:) and tailed me all the way home, where i promptly made a large dent in the drivers door by kicking it just a little bit too hard .....and not making it to work today so the whole staying sober/leaving early shite was all in vain anyway ....I had a fab night :thumbup: :lol:
Quote by Xxxsexy24uxxx
Yes, im a member of a swinging website. Yes I have posted adult pics of myself online. Yes I am bisexual....
But No, this would never affect my judgement in the workplace and as for putting my morality in question I find that truly insulting.
What a messed up world we live in
:thumbup: - not only did they question it, they sacked her for it and struck her off the professional healthcare worker register!! :shock:
- which will I assume, come up on any future CRB check, so not only does she lose the 'professional' status, but any chance of working in nursing or with children, again.Incidentally, several quotes in the local paper, including the headteacher, other teaching staff & parents indicate that the majority support Ms xxxxx. The 'issues' come from the school Governors who then passed it to the NMC.
Quote by keeno
The case of the nurse is the same but possibly has a different emphasis. The nurse works with vunerable children and given most of the publics inability to seperate various sexual practices they presumably thought she would photographing the children or interfering with them in some manner. I have a gay friend who is a teacher who lives in fear of being accussed of 'fiddling with his pupils'
The pervertion feared is, I fear, in the mind of the accussers
I'm afraid I dont agree keeno, she was sacked and struck off because of the morality clause...and the fact that someone lifted her pics off the site and sent them to her employers out of spite (or whatever possible reason they had to interfere in her personal life & bring it to the attention of the NMC)
I dont think it was (as far as the NMC are concerned) anything to do with the children she worked with or any percieved risk to them etc. There has never been any suggestion that because she works in a school, the kids are in any way involved... its that she engaged in 'deviant' (
) sexual practices (by posting her pics on a website) and this doesnt sit well with those who are concerned with the public image of her profession. 
In the local paper, this is big news
so I thought I'd bring it here for discussion. (I've edited out personal details...not that it really matters as this woman's face, name and personal info is all over the local rags anyway :roll
Perhaps as a timely reminder that the vanilla world really are still not open-minded, nor respectful of people's (our) personal discretion and right to a private life.
I have in the past been bound, and know of several colleagues who are subject to a 'morality claus' in their employment contracts, which means effectively that any activity which is deemed to be detremental to the reputation of the profession (and they find out you're engaging in it) is summount to misconduct, and is a sackable & strike-offable offence :shock:
There has been alot of local support for the lady in the article, on the basis that what she does in her private life being exactly that - private - and as it doesnt affect her ability or approach to the 'day job and professional career, who the fuck are the NMC to decide that having her pics on a website is 'fundamentally incompatible' with the image of the profession?
I know there are alot of professional people on this site - so, what do you make of this?
It just underlines to me why discretion generally is (and should be)absolutely core to the swinging community, and why some to some people it is absolutely imperative - hence they are not able to post pics or 'go public' :cry:
What concerns me more though is that there are still people out there who, given the opportunity, can and will take pics/ vids/ stills from webcams and post them to your employer :roll: And given the scope of potential rejection, spite and people who just dont 'get it' in this scene, alongside the general chipping away of the importance of knowing who you're talking to and who's viewing/accessing your profile, gallery and advert pics here, its a risk many of us take every day :cry:
but...what do you make of it?
so I thought I'd bring it here for discussion. (I've edited out personal details...not that it really matters as this woman's face, name and personal info is all over the local rags anyway :roll
Perhaps as a timely reminder that the vanilla world really are still not open-minded, nor respectful of people's (our) personal discretion and right to a private life.
A school nurse who cared for children with special needs in Derby has been struck off from the profession for running her own pornographic website.
xxxxx, 41, broke down in tears after the Nursing and Midwifery Council's disciplinary committee yesterday decided her misconduct meant her fitness to practice as a nurse had been impaired.
The committee later decided that xxxx should be struck off rather than cautioned or suspended.
At the hearing in central London yesterday, xxxx, of Derby, admitted setting up a pornographic internet site and posting pictures of herself engaging in sexual activities.
But she denied her fitness to practice had been impaired as a result.
xxxx was sacked from xxxx School in November 2004 after an anonymous letter containing photos of her having sex was sent to the head teacher and chairman of governors.
She had worked at the xxxx school, which caters for more than 60 pupils, since 2001.
The Nursing and Midwifery Council heard xxxxx ended up with 500 members on her personal porn site after she set up the explicit web page on the age-restricted section of in July 2004.
Committee chairman xxxxx said they accepted that Ms xxxxx appeared to have a good working record but a caution or suspension would be an "insufficient sanction."
She said: "We have concluded that Miss xxxxx behaviour was fundamentally incompatible with being registered with the NMC.
"She was expected to uphold the good reputation of the profession. She manifestly failed in that duty and public confidence in the council would be undermined if she were not struck off."
I have in the past been bound, and know of several colleagues who are subject to a 'morality claus' in their employment contracts, which means effectively that any activity which is deemed to be detremental to the reputation of the profession (and they find out you're engaging in it) is summount to misconduct, and is a sackable & strike-offable offence :shock:
There has been alot of local support for the lady in the article, on the basis that what she does in her private life being exactly that - private - and as it doesnt affect her ability or approach to the 'day job and professional career, who the fuck are the NMC to decide that having her pics on a website is 'fundamentally incompatible' with the image of the profession?
I know there are alot of professional people on this site - so, what do you make of this?
It just underlines to me why discretion generally is (and should be)absolutely core to the swinging community, and why some to some people it is absolutely imperative - hence they are not able to post pics or 'go public' :cry:
What concerns me more though is that there are still people out there who, given the opportunity, can and will take pics/ vids/ stills from webcams and post them to your employer :roll: And given the scope of potential rejection, spite and people who just dont 'get it' in this scene, alongside the general chipping away of the importance of knowing who you're talking to and who's viewing/accessing your profile, gallery and advert pics here, its a risk many of us take every day :cry:
but...what do you make of it?
Quote by Suze43
Just look so attractive on tho!! (not, but sick of getting wet jeans all the time!)
Suze xx
dont be so sure Suze
I have a major thing for tight jeans/ jodhpur type things tucked into wellies
and whatever happened to those green waxed jackets that everyone used to have :sad: those had the amazing ability to make anyone wearing them look the 'horsey' country girl type who's just ripe for pinning against a tree with her knickers to one side and jeans round her knees :twisted:
tight jeans on a curvy ass, and wellies :inlove:
what time you taking the dog out later? :rascal:
Quote by Missy
To pay more to have the exclusive use of a swinging club for a few hours - nope, I wouldn't go. I would rather pay the normal price and just arrange to meet people there. Not because of a price issue, more a principle one. It feels to me that for the exclusive use thing you're being taken advantage of
Missy I agree on your points about buffets and charity to be honest, but then I guess we make the choice whether to attend such functions anyway :thumbup: ...but I'm not sure I understand what you mean in the bit about 'being taken advantage of' above?...and its particularly poeple's thoughts like yours that I'm interested in ..so, can you expand on that?
Quote by Geordiecpl2001
If it was something "out of the ordinary" such as hiring a yacht (wow), then would have no problem with splitting the cost.
I remember quite a while ago, someone was going to hire a yacht/ small cruise ship type boaty thing, and although I cant remember the actual costs, it was something like £3000?? (i'll go find the thread in a minute a look
) ok, been to check and i think we can safely omit this example from this discussion -
. This is not the type of event/ costs I'm talking about at all...total cost was £33 grand for a holiday party of 11 people, before flights etc etc etc :shock:but, a yatch is a good example of what I'm talking about :thumbup:
I just wanted to say that of course 'for profit' parties etc go on....but, you wouldnt find them advertised on the site in LMU etc - and in that itself I see a risk.
There are no site 'sanctions' etc to help if it goes tits up, no public explanation or investigation over costings etc...on on your own head be it kinda thing.
Me personally I dont like the 'for profit' thing. I dont think anyone should make a profit from their activities or friendships here as a result of inviting them to stuff. (little debate in my head says 'but dont we do that each time we pay to get in a club anyway ???) Contributing to actual costs though, I think is different.
There are no site 'sanctions' etc to help if it goes tits up, no public explanation or investigation over costings etc...on on your own head be it kinda thing.
Me personally I dont like the 'for profit' thing. I dont think anyone should make a profit from their activities or friendships here as a result of inviting them to stuff. (little debate in my head says 'but dont we do that each time we pay to get in a club anyway ???) Contributing to actual costs though, I think is different.
God, why do i make things so complicated
Ok, let's say.....someone hires a swingers club for a few hours of our exclusive use, the cost per person is more than what it would cost to go on a 'normal' open night....but you're effectively paying to be there for this particular event and the exclusivity of the venue....
would you?
Ok, let's say.....someone hires a swingers club for a few hours of our exclusive use, the cost per person is more than what it would cost to go on a 'normal' open night....but you're effectively paying to be there for this particular event and the exclusivity of the venue....
would you?
would you pay money to attend an event? :idea:
I'm interested to see people's oppinions on this...so...i'll explain what I mean (now's your chance to go get a cuppa)
I'm not saying this is accross the board, but there does appear to be a shift toward privately organised 'doos' (be that social events or parties - I'm not talking about Munches really, although they're still relevant to this discussion) where we're moving away from the pub-function-room-and-voluntary-contribution/ couple-of-quid door-charge to dividing the hire charge of a new venue between guests in order to attend something 'different'
possible examples of what I mean:
an organiser hiring an entire swingers club for the evening for private use of their guests
an organiser booking 20 places at an event, for which guests pay for the tickets
a private house party event
hiring a limo to ferry guests to and from the event and each guest contributes toward the cost
hiring a venue generally, be that club, pub, campsite, hotel, resaurant, party bus, boat, coach to go somewhere on, the list is endless....where the organiser pays out for the booking and those attending pay an equal share of this.
etc etc
I guess what I mean is, additional costings over and above the usual travel/ hotel and entrance costs.
What would you pay for...and how much? - and in all cases I mean where the amount you pay is not for profit, but to share the costs of the event itself between those attending.
would you trust an organiser of such an event with your cash upfront? would you accept the risk of losing your money if you couldnt attend?
and, if you have any oppinion on 'for profit' events such as exclusive swingers parties (Fever, Belle Baise etc) where you know in advance that the organiser is making a profit on your ticket price...feel free to post
would you?
I'm interested to see people's oppinions on this...so...i'll explain what I mean (now's your chance to go get a cuppa)
I'm not saying this is accross the board, but there does appear to be a shift toward privately organised 'doos' (be that social events or parties - I'm not talking about Munches really, although they're still relevant to this discussion) where we're moving away from the pub-function-room-and-voluntary-contribution/ couple-of-quid door-charge to dividing the hire charge of a new venue between guests in order to attend something 'different'
possible examples of what I mean:
an organiser hiring an entire swingers club for the evening for private use of their guests
an organiser booking 20 places at an event, for which guests pay for the tickets
a private house party event
hiring a limo to ferry guests to and from the event and each guest contributes toward the cost
hiring a venue generally, be that club, pub, campsite, hotel, resaurant, party bus, boat, coach to go somewhere on, the list is endless....where the organiser pays out for the booking and those attending pay an equal share of this.
etc etc
I guess what I mean is, additional costings over and above the usual travel/ hotel and entrance costs.
What would you pay for...and how much? - and in all cases I mean where the amount you pay is not for profit, but to share the costs of the event itself between those attending.
would you trust an organiser of such an event with your cash upfront? would you accept the risk of losing your money if you couldnt attend?
and, if you have any oppinion on 'for profit' events such as exclusive swingers parties (Fever, Belle Baise etc) where you know in advance that the organiser is making a profit on your ticket price...feel free to post
would you?
