Must seem strange, to some folks reading this thread, that the idea of a BBW party is so popular.
But having spent most of my adult life in the deliriously delicious wonderful company of bigger girls, I can well understand it why it seems such a good idea to some people.
The fact is that most men, after the age of impressionable pubescence, love bigger girls. Why? Well, men like tits and arses and thighs..... and bigger girls have more of those assets than thin ones. They generally also - I say from experience - have much bigger appetites for life and love, and men sooner or later discover this.
Simple as that......
Thirty years ago, when the art directors of national papers and magazines were heterosexual and 30+, everybody knew bigger girls are more fun, and the pin-ups were girls like Diana Dors and Sophia Loren. Now the ADs are all 22 year-old metrosexual shirtlifters, so they favour pin-ups who look like lads.
But on a day-to-day basis, the problem isn't with the men, but with other women: they spend half their lives starving themselves to death to look "fit", and then when they go to a club or party and see all the men ogling someone who's a bigtitted wobbly size 20, they get VERY nasty.
So all BBWs get used to spending ages making themselves look nice, and then winding up in the lav in tears because some woman - and it is always a woman - says, in a stage whisper: "Look at the state of that", or "How can she have the nerve".
One of the things I enjoy about the lifestyle is that generally it's so non-judgmental: no-one generally worries too much about age or race. It's about time the courtesy was more generally extended to normal women
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Kniphofia
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 76
Forum
Well said, Bucksfun.
This has bugger-all to do with protecting vulnerable people, and everything to do with dried-up right-on political wimmin who find all pornography demeaning. Backed up of course by the usual press sensationalists: "Does YOUR child have a perve in her puter?"
And all the time, of course, doing bugger-all to actually "protect" anyone.
But this is the sort of government we've got. More like the Soviet Union every day.
This has bugger-all to do with protecting vulnerable people, and everything to do with dried-up right-on political wimmin who find all pornography demeaning. Backed up of course by the usual press sensationalists: "Does YOUR child have a perve in her puter?"
And all the time, of course, doing bugger-all to actually "protect" anyone.
But this is the sort of government we've got. More like the Soviet Union every day.
This'll be like all the other laws. They won't be able to catch the really nasty people, so they'll nick the naughty ones.
I don't mean the cops will be raiding private dungeons.
But I bet you ISPs will stop hosting even the mildest bondage images; and a few nice harmless people will be very publicly nicked for being in possession of obscene material.
Prepare to saw up those hard drives. It's a sad, mad world. I'm not into BDSM, but I shiver for those who are.
I don't mean the cops will be raiding private dungeons.
But I bet you ISPs will stop hosting even the mildest bondage images; and a few nice harmless people will be very publicly nicked for being in possession of obscene material.
Prepare to saw up those hard drives. It's a sad, mad world. I'm not into BDSM, but I shiver for those who are.
If this chap IS a journalist, he's not a very good one, to arouse so much suspicion.
But taking up the point, I do feel that SH members are much too wary of the Press. They treat us like monsters and perverts only because they don't understand us, and we make tittilating copy for readers who don't understand us. Shouldn't we be changing that, rather than running away from it?
We're rather in the position that gays were 50 years ago..... and gays became acceptable because they educated the public to stop thinking of them as "queer"; to regard an alternative lifestyle as a respectable option.
Seriously: the Press aren't going to be at all interested in individual swingers, unless they are celebs, politicians, vicars, teachers, or senior policemen.
There is a real argument for answering their questions frankly, and being less afraid.
But taking up the point, I do feel that SH members are much too wary of the Press. They treat us like monsters and perverts only because they don't understand us, and we make tittilating copy for readers who don't understand us. Shouldn't we be changing that, rather than running away from it?
We're rather in the position that gays were 50 years ago..... and gays became acceptable because they educated the public to stop thinking of them as "queer"; to regard an alternative lifestyle as a respectable option.
Seriously: the Press aren't going to be at all interested in individual swingers, unless they are celebs, politicians, vicars, teachers, or senior policemen.
There is a real argument for answering their questions frankly, and being less afraid.
From trying a variety of methods, the best result is with a good NEW blade in a proper triple blade razor and - important - NO LUBRICANT AT ALL. Do it very gently and the result is beautifully smooth and long-lasting, with absolutely no pain or rash or itching (though it IS a bit expensive on razor blades). Do ask yourself, though, if it will look nice..... just a personal opinion, but I don't think shaved pussies look very cute, except when they're really fresh and new-looking.
If someone sends an identical e-mail to several addresses, most filters will guess them to be spam, and put them in the Junk file.
Actually, a good thing in some ways: it's one way of telling whether you've had a thought-out reply to your ad, or whether it's just some bloke sending a round-robin to loads of people. But does mean you need to glance in the Junk.
Actually, a good thing in some ways: it's one way of telling whether you've had a thought-out reply to your ad, or whether it's just some bloke sending a round-robin to loads of people. But does mean you need to glance in the Junk.
It really ISN'T just supply and demand....
I speak from experience, as someone who helps and looks after the interests of girls seeking males...... but who - at the same time - is a man looking for couples in his own right.
As a single man, I get on average two genuine new contacts a week, either via SH or through people I've already met. Great. And lovely to be in that situation. But it ain't cos I'm pretty (I'm not). Nor lucky. I just TRY.
If you're a couple (or a gal) willing to meet single guys, you get flooded with dozens, even hundreds, of replies: and 99.9 per cent of them are completely and utterly fucking useless and hopeless, because the blokes are very very obviously lazy, thick, ignorant, rude, illiterate and pigshit twatting stupid. It really is very hard indeed to find a reply from a geezer who seems from his mail to be be even half-way like a decent civilised human being you'd want to even say hello to, let alone go to bed with.
If single guys would genuinely put some thought into their ads and replies (even to the shocking extent of using spellcheckers and punctuation), a whole new life would open up and their beds would break under the weight of grateful women. Unfortunately very few of them can be arsed to do anything about it, and almost none of them will be bothered to read this thread. Good. All the more for the rest of us.
I speak from experience, as someone who helps and looks after the interests of girls seeking males...... but who - at the same time - is a man looking for couples in his own right.
As a single man, I get on average two genuine new contacts a week, either via SH or through people I've already met. Great. And lovely to be in that situation. But it ain't cos I'm pretty (I'm not). Nor lucky. I just TRY.
If you're a couple (or a gal) willing to meet single guys, you get flooded with dozens, even hundreds, of replies: and 99.9 per cent of them are completely and utterly fucking useless and hopeless, because the blokes are very very obviously lazy, thick, ignorant, rude, illiterate and pigshit twatting stupid. It really is very hard indeed to find a reply from a geezer who seems from his mail to be be even half-way like a decent civilised human being you'd want to even say hello to, let alone go to bed with.
If single guys would genuinely put some thought into their ads and replies (even to the shocking extent of using spellcheckers and punctuation), a whole new life would open up and their beds would break under the weight of grateful women. Unfortunately very few of them can be arsed to do anything about it, and almost none of them will be bothered to read this thread. Good. All the more for the rest of us.
So many people are curious about a "Tamworth".... word of explanation.
In the past year I've been invited to three very large (8+) gangbangs, all of them held by girls who don't know each other, and all in Tamworth, Staffs. Must be something in the water there.
On another geographical note, if you should (by accident, naturally) happen to stumble onto a porn site, have you noticed how they now often have little boxes which - having read your ISP - offer delights close to home, if you'll just click here?
Trouble is that they're not that accurate, so my box always says: "Women are longing to fuck you in Aston." Which is not very appealing, really. Aston's like, well, Moss Side, or Chapeltown or the back of Kings Cross. So yes I'm sure there are women longing to be fucked. At about a tenner a go.
In the past year I've been invited to three very large (8+) gangbangs, all of them held by girls who don't know each other, and all in Tamworth, Staffs. Must be something in the water there.
On another geographical note, if you should (by accident, naturally) happen to stumble onto a porn site, have you noticed how they now often have little boxes which - having read your ISP - offer delights close to home, if you'll just click here?
Trouble is that they're not that accurate, so my box always says: "Women are longing to fuck you in Aston." Which is not very appealing, really. Aston's like, well, Moss Side, or Chapeltown or the back of Kings Cross. So yes I'm sure there are women longing to be fucked. At about a tenner a go.
These days depends what nationality you are, it seems to me.
On American pornsites, a "gangbang" is what I'd call an orgy.
So far as I've ever understood it, 2 blokes + 1 girl is a 3some or MMF and anything more than 2 blokes+1 girl is a GB.
Anything over about 8 blokes is a "Tamworth".
On American pornsites, a "gangbang" is what I'd call an orgy.
So far as I've ever understood it, 2 blokes + 1 girl is a 3some or MMF and anything more than 2 blokes+1 girl is a GB.
Anything over about 8 blokes is a "Tamworth".
There's a lot said here about time wasters, and I've suffered a fair bit of the outcome myself, over the years. But I really don't think anyone sets out to be a TW.
Seems to me that the people who don't come up to the mark usually have a reason which is good enough for them, at the time: the lad has a fright-attack, the couple maybe have a row of some sort.
He thinks he won't be able to get it up on the night, or he is suddenly horribly aware that the dick-pic he sent wasn't actually his; she thinks suddenly that she really is far too fat, and the new underwear doesn't fit properly, or she's got a spot on her tit, or the husband tells her on the way to the meet that he'll feel jealous if she comes; or she takes a last look at the other couple's picture, and thinks the other girl is far prettier.
It's humanity, and all sorts of things can go wrong with it. Not everyone is good at explaining themselves, or apologising. People are rarely malicious.
Seems to me that the people who don't come up to the mark usually have a reason which is good enough for them, at the time: the lad has a fright-attack, the couple maybe have a row of some sort.
He thinks he won't be able to get it up on the night, or he is suddenly horribly aware that the dick-pic he sent wasn't actually his; she thinks suddenly that she really is far too fat, and the new underwear doesn't fit properly, or she's got a spot on her tit, or the husband tells her on the way to the meet that he'll feel jealous if she comes; or she takes a last look at the other couple's picture, and thinks the other girl is far prettier.
It's humanity, and all sorts of things can go wrong with it. Not everyone is good at explaining themselves, or apologising. People are rarely malicious.
Going back to the lift story. I get in a hotel lift and there is a small rather scruffy man already in there. I am sure I know him
ME: Oh! Hello!
MAN: Oh, hiya! (shakes hands)
ME: How's it going, Matey? (trying desperately to remember who he is)
MAN: Oh, y'know, still strumming the guitar (points to case on floor)
ME: Got any good gigs lined up? Making any dosh?
MAN: Oh not doing too badly
ME: Are you playing in the bar?
MAN: Er, no, I don't think so.....
ME: Oh fuck, you're Cliff Richard (bangs face against lift doors)
ME: Oh! Hello!
MAN: Oh, hiya! (shakes hands)
ME: How's it going, Matey? (trying desperately to remember who he is)
MAN: Oh, y'know, still strumming the guitar (points to case on floor)
ME: Got any good gigs lined up? Making any dosh?
MAN: Oh not doing too badly
ME: Are you playing in the bar?
MAN: Er, no, I don't think so.....
ME: Oh fuck, you're Cliff Richard (bangs face against lift doors)
