The claim was made in two formats, as part of the statement I made, the Police asked about any damages and the cost then I got a letter from the Witness assistance people with a claim form and another on the day of the trial so that the Judge could award damages/compensation but as they were never tried for the offence no compensation/damages could be awarded.
If anyone can advise on taking out a civil suit against them I would appreciate the advice but as they have never been convicted of entering the property or doing any damage not sure where I stand on this.
You could issue a county court summons and claim for the cost of the damage but unless the defendants have assets, you could be wasting your time.
Go see a solicitor or the Citizens Advice Bureau. They were convicted of a crime during which your property was damaged. I can't see how you can't have a claim for compensation. Or go to see your Member of Parliament!
Have you tried claiming on your house insurance?
Thought we'd lost that broken record
:bs::bs:
Who's waffling and who are the Cameron/Clegg/Cable apologists? Certainly not me!
As for your accusations of people being blinkered, remember that when you are pointing at someone, 3 of your fingers are pointing right back at you.
You don't seem to want to accept that the priority investors were in the main pension funds. The Government wanted some long term holding of the shares for stability. The fact that quite a few of these priority investors have sold their shares suggests to me that they believe the share price has peaked and the sensible thing to do was maximise their investment. The beneficiaries of this will be members of the various pension funds, hopefully people like you and me.
The shares sold to the private investors were limited to £750 per person, presumably to stop wealthy individuals buying thousands of shares at the issue price.
In time it may well be deemed that the issue price was undervalued but as I said earlier, we can all be right with the benefit of hindsight.