Quote by ToshUK
Roku ju ku ga
Dai suki desu yo.
Oishi desu
In translation:
Sixty nine that is
Something I really adore.
Its delicious.
Sixty nine that is
Something I really adore.
Lets cum together
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Theladyisaminx
Over 90 days ago
Straight Female, 62
United Kingdom
Forum
Hope this comes across alright as I am straight and would like to ask how others found out they have bi tendencies.
I can talk how I feel about woman as I am one.
I myself have wondered if I could have another woman, and for me the want has never been there, I am not discussed about the fact that women do, I can see the attraction, as I have found some woman to be very sexy, but then to have sex with them just isn’t my thing.
I have felt in some cases that it is either something that they do to please men, and in other cases perhaps could be that they haven’t come across men that can totally satisfy them. But I believe in a lot of cases it is personal choice.
I can’t say much about BI men as I haven’t had experience in that area.
I am just intrigued and would like to understand others views.
What are you thoughts on this subject?
I can talk how I feel about woman as I am one.
I myself have wondered if I could have another woman, and for me the want has never been there, I am not discussed about the fact that women do, I can see the attraction, as I have found some woman to be very sexy, but then to have sex with them just isn’t my thing.
I have felt in some cases that it is either something that they do to please men, and in other cases perhaps could be that they haven’t come across men that can totally satisfy them. But I believe in a lot of cases it is personal choice.
I can’t say much about BI men as I haven’t had experience in that area.
I am just intrigued and would like to understand others views.
What are you thoughts on this subject?
I wouldn’t have a group of ten guys cum all over me.
But I have a fantasy of 5, I would let them cum over me I belief this is a very sub side of me talking. I have had 3 guys do it and I loved it, as respect and trust had been built up (we have played with them a few times separately first) they knew it was something I wanted to happen so it never felt like I was being used.
I loved to see them shoot and the pleasure on my face they said was incredible.
So yes I could do more with the right guys.
It is strange as I feel all
writing that. 
But I have a fantasy of 5, I would let them cum over me I belief this is a very sub side of me talking. I have had 3 guys do it and I loved it, as respect and trust had been built up (we have played with them a few times separately first) they knew it was something I wanted to happen so it never felt like I was being used.
I loved to see them shoot and the pleasure on my face they said was incredible.
So yes I could do more with the right guys.
It is strange as I feel all
writing that. That was actually a repeat Minxy petal, the main one is on a Wednesday, No.2 is on tonight!.. 
I really enjoyed it actually, it made my life seem a bit quiet that's for sure! And no, not a chance would I let my child rule the roost OR speak to me like that!
Although I will hopefully see the other episodes, it has left me feeling frustrated somewhat, I feel I need to shake those parents to get a grip!
By saying no it the easier option in the long run.
I really enjoyed it actually, it made my life seem a bit quiet that's for sure! And no, not a chance would I let my child rule the roost OR speak to me like that!
Although I will hopefully see the other episodes, it has left me feeling frustrated somewhat, I feel I need to shake those parents to get a grip!
By saying no it the easier option in the long run.
Quote by wonderweb
Having a boy clothing is relatively easy, I buy his jeans, which have to be a certain style (courtesy of my baby sisters input) and he started buying for himself when he hit around 13. He likes cheeky ones from hmv, although he has got a few trendy ones as well.
Actually for a lad I think he's a lot more stylish than I was at his age and considering he doesnt get regular pocket money I think it's quite impressive that he does spend his money on clothes when he gets it.
Something I have noticed is that its a lot harder for kids to get a job young these days. My sister worked at the local take away when she was 14 and I had a better ware job at 13, yet no one will employ a child of 15 any more and because of this it is almost impossible to get a paper round.
I think this is such a shame I had a saturday job at 13 I loved the independance this bought me and I learnt the value of money very quickly. I feel children are missing out big time here.
I watched a fly on the wall documentary last night. It was about a family with 4 children. One of the daughters was 19 still at home, and seemed to rule the parents.
She was able to do what she liked come in and go out anytime she wished. She was going out around 10-11pm clubbing every night and some of the time wasn’t getting home until morning, phoning work sick and laying in bed all day. Then she lost her job, and never contributed a penny to the house.
The parents were pulling their hair out and it caused stress between them and unset the family balance. Neither of the parents were strong enough to put their foot down and say she was not going out.
I could not believe they let her do this within the home, I know at 19 they should be treated at adults but there is no way I would let one of my children treat this house and us that way, it just wouldn’t have got that far.
My attitude is when they leave home that have total control in their own lives then they can do what they wish, while living here our rules apply.
Am I wrong in saying this?
Are there really parents out there that let their teenagers rule?
She was able to do what she liked come in and go out anytime she wished. She was going out around 10-11pm clubbing every night and some of the time wasn’t getting home until morning, phoning work sick and laying in bed all day. Then she lost her job, and never contributed a penny to the house.
The parents were pulling their hair out and it caused stress between them and unset the family balance. Neither of the parents were strong enough to put their foot down and say she was not going out.
I could not believe they let her do this within the home, I know at 19 they should be treated at adults but there is no way I would let one of my children treat this house and us that way, it just wouldn’t have got that far.
My attitude is when they leave home that have total control in their own lives then they can do what they wish, while living here our rules apply.
Am I wrong in saying this?
Are there really parents out there that let their teenagers rule?
My daughter is coming up 12 and while I let her choose her own clothes I would still have the last say. AS I have seen some fashions some 11 yesr olds are wearing and I shudder and think I wouldnt let my daughter go around the streets looking like that.
Luckily she herself is a little tomboyish so I dont have the problems of her flauting herself. But some of her friends go out with makeup on and look about 14.
I find it so scary, what is there left for them to explore at the ages of 15-16?
Luckily she herself is a little tomboyish so I dont have the problems of her flauting herself. But some of her friends go out with makeup on and look about 14.
I find it so scary, what is there left for them to explore at the ages of 15-16?
Quote by Peanut
I believe that if my son 'couldn't sit down for a week' that violence had happened to him. There is no way on this earth that I would perpetrate that level of violence against another adult let alone someone I had nurtured. I do not believe every law of this land. (and believe much less about those that are fed to people in other lands) but this is where my son is raised and he will live within these laws. That includes violence.
Your attitude has obviously worked with your son, but I'm sorry to say that the similar attitude countrywide is, in my view, the root cause of ever-escalating youth crime.
God I hate it when I use this expression, but I can't think of an alternative, "in my day" parents came down hard on their kids and indulged in corporal punishment. Kids didn't see it as violence against their person, neither did parents. The kids saw it as a reason not to transgress whatever rule it was that they broke. It was an effective method of reigning them in. Now I know you detest it, but it worked.
Now 'we' are softer on our kids, the rules are in favour of the kids not being punished they have learnt that they can pretty much do as they like and all they are going to get is some limp-wristed punishment or a telling off. Yes a real deterrent that is
Kids like your son were always likely to be well behaved so would never have needed physical punishment anyway. It's the ones who don't have a sense of right and wrong, who don't give a crap about how others feel or what consequences are. They are the ones who need to feel the stimulus of not being able to sit down for a week.
Your son is not representative of the kids who do need a thwack.
in my experience that approach certainly doesnt work !
my parents used corporal punishment and both my siblings went on to do things both morally and criminally wrong, one of them did something that affected other peoples lives and livelihood too !
Strangely enough, my father used (quite extreme at times) corporal punishment both on me and my brother and we turned out level-headed with a pretty good sense of right and wrong. Neither of us turned turned to crime and neither of us are violent.
All in all a pretty good example of how specific, personal examples are not good ways of making a point.
The fact remains that as liberal thinking towards children's punishment has increased there's also been a similar increase in youth related crime, especially violent crime. e.g
I don't think it's unfair to assume that one has had some form of affect on the other, do you?
Edit: Link to Daily Telegraph article
Sod what the polls say and any paper states, we can see and hear with our own eyes and ears.
We see children out of control we hear on the streets incidences that have happened. Things just were not like that years ago. You never had children killing children, something somewhere is going so totally wrong.
I think part of the problem was given children helplines and saying if a parent hits child to call, yes we need to protect children from violence within the home, but surely there is violence and a smack for doing wrong.
Have these changes really cracked down in violence in the home?
I doubt not.
What I feel it has given if for everychild to be able to abuse the system.
Like most sytems they seen to be abused more,than for the purpose intended.
This is my opinion!
Quote by bouncy332
its just a recession y the fook they can't say it is beyond me calling it a credit crunch don't make it any better
We could say that, but we have never seen banks falling to their knees as we are now.
Merryl Lynch one of the top investment banks in serious trouble, and others that have Collapsed. Is it really just another recession?
we have been through um b4 n will again just learn from it n don't do credit like us if we can't have it cash we don't have it
I agree and still remember the hard times of the early 90's when interest rates were 15%. We learnt our lesson then and dont have what we cant afford. We haven't used credit sinse.
But so many people want now pay later, the majoroty of children think they can have it now.
Nobody today seems to understand the value of money
ok we gotta tighten our belts for a while but we ain't gotta worry bout havin stuff reposessed cause everythin is ours already
Same here, but there are so many not in this possition.
as for who is gonna sort it out well not this goverment thats for sure thier original slogan was things can only get better well we r still waiting
I totally agree with you!
change of goverment is in order me thinks
We can change but I thing there is no party at present suitable to change to.
With the state of the banks what is going to happen with our country?
We have got rid of all our manufacturing industry, our only strength left in the world is the square mile.
If our Banking and stock markets collapse, what future in the world will we have left?
I think things look very bleak for the future for our children.
There hasn’t been job security for a while now, as there once was was.
How can we get out of the dire situation we now see ourselves in?
This credit nation is now falling to its knees.
We cant I believe just blame this government surely we could see the mistakes of past governments to.
Is there really a way out?
There doesn’t seem to be anyone strong enough that I can see around to get us out of the shit we are now in.
We have got rid of all our manufacturing industry, our only strength left in the world is the square mile.
If our Banking and stock markets collapse, what future in the world will we have left?
I think things look very bleak for the future for our children.
There hasn’t been job security for a while now, as there once was was.
How can we get out of the dire situation we now see ourselves in?
This credit nation is now falling to its knees.
We cant I believe just blame this government surely we could see the mistakes of past governments to.
Is there really a way out?
There doesn’t seem to be anyone strong enough that I can see around to get us out of the shit we are now in.
I have seen a couple of profile pictures lately that leave a lot to your imagination; I find these pictures very mmmmm sexy.
I often sit wondered what the rest of them looks like, and then my mind drifts off to a distant planet, and I get myself a little worked up, I have a great imagination.
Do you conjure up naughty thoughts on some of the profiles you see?
Are you like me, and enjoy looked at the ones that leaves a lot to your imagination?
I often sit wondered what the rest of them looks like, and then my mind drifts off to a distant planet, and I get myself a little worked up, I have a great imagination.
Do you conjure up naughty thoughts on some of the profiles you see?
Are you like me, and enjoy looked at the ones that leaves a lot to your imagination?
Quote by noladreams30
I'd be happy to meet most, but there are one or two I'd sooner avoid.
Honestly, do you have to have a dig in every post?
:doh:
We all have people we don't agree with/like/get on with in here and in real life.
At the risk of sounding petty, get over yourself!
Now... back to spreading the love.... :inlove:
:thumbup: agree with you totally!
Quote by kentswingers777
Talk about going off into a tangent m8.
It may well stink, but it is the rules. You seem the type of person that does not like sticking to rules....
You have your opinion and I have mine, and I know which one is right. Yes maybe will change me signature, as mr perfect just about sums me up really.
Ya cant even get a copper to come out if you have been burgled, how the heck is a copper going to come out to kick a nasty little brat off of a bus?
Rules are there, and if ya don't stick to them then don't moan, when people break them. I might as well talk to me telly.
So do you stick by every rule?
Some I feel can be bend a little if it isnt breaking the law.
I didnt think you held rule is such a high esteem!
Quote by kentswingers777
I shall say again for the hard of HEARING.... The kids KNOW that no Oyster card NO travel!!!
That sounds more like a statement of fact rather than an opinion so I'll counter with something else...
Kids know a lot of things, but sometimes they forget those things, primarily because they don't think like adults, which is what you are doing now.
It must be great being a perfect adult who never forgets anything or gets anything wrong. I wish I was like you.
Meanwhile back in the real world, kids forget things and lose things. They do it all the time and I really don't think that will change any time soon. Do you?
So this leaves several quandaries. What happens to the poor kid who's lost his pass? What happens to the kid who's forgotten his?
Now you suggest that they should be punished by not being allowed access to the bus.
I suggest that they should be allowed access to the bus.
You suggest that it should be this way because there are rules.
I suggest that it should be my way because it's safer for the kid to be allowed on.
So the crux of the matter seems to be that you suggest that rules take priority over safety.
Do I have this right?
I bet you wish you was too, but hey ho such is life..
Does priority take preference over safety? hmmmm. Let me give YOU a scenario then. A child gets on a bus and causes trouble. He or she rips a seat and is abusive to the driver. You with me ? Right that driver then chucks that child off of the bus and he or she then has to walk home. On the way home that child is either knocked down or God forbid something more serious happens.
Are you then telling me that the driver was wrong to kick that child off, and the driver is to blame as he followed the rules of his employer and ejected that child?
I think you are coming up with reasons to justify your answer to the original post!
If a driver kicks a child off for ANY reason that is wrong then? In YOUR world a child should never be kicked off for any reason? Is that right?
I have read through the posts and that isn't what anyone is saying incluing me!
I think you are trying to put words in our mouths.
If it is then that child has no reason to behave and has no fear of punishment. If it is not then a child kicked off could have something happen to it on the walk home... no ?
I know perfectly well that having no Oyster card is not the same reason as a child being abusive, and both could carry the punishment of not getting or staying on that bus but...there is a line that the bus companies follow, along the same lines you and me have to follow everyday of the week, and that word is " RULES ".
If a child has forgotten his card or lost it, the schools always will sub the child it,s fair, there are many other alternatives. Why should the bus company or the driver bare the brunt of this?
I know I am perfect but even I thought people less perfect would understand that point.
Maybe I should change my signature...what ya think?
Mr perfect.... has a sort of ring about it me thinks. My question was and still is would you throw a child off because they didn't have a bus pass that day?
Yes !! Won't do it again then maybe?
Well I think if you have bought your kids up right a stiff word in their ear from the driver, to say you would not let them off next time would be enough to make them release that next time they would not be so lucky!
Quote by kentswingers777
I shall say again for the hard of HEARING.... The kids KNOW that no Oyster card NO travel!!!
That sounds more like a statement of fact rather than an opinion so I'll counter with something else...
Kids know a lot of things, but sometimes they forget those things, primarily because they don't think like adults, which is what you are doing now.
It must be great being a perfect adult who never forgets anything or gets anything wrong. I wish I was like you.
Meanwhile back in the real world, kids forget things and lose things. They do it all the time and I really don't think that will change any time soon. Do you?
So this leaves several quandaries. What happens to the poor kid who's lost his pass? What happens to the kid who's forgotten his?
Now you suggest that they should be punished by not being allowed access to the bus.
I suggest that they should be allowed access to the bus.
You suggest that it should be this way because there are rules.
I suggest that it should be my way because it's safer for the kid to be allowed on.
So the crux of the matter seems to be that you suggest that rules take priority over safety.
Do I have this right?
I bet you wish you was too, but hey ho such is life..
Does priority take preference over safety? hmmmm. Let me give YOU a scenario then. A child gets on a bus and causes trouble. He or she rips a seat and is abusive to the driver. You with me ? Right that driver then chucks that child off of the bus and he or she then has to walk home. On the way home that child is either knocked down or God forbid something more serious happens.
Are you then telling me that the driver was wrong to kick that child off, and the driver is to blame as he followed the rules of his employer and ejected that child?
I think you are coming up with reasons to justify your answer to the original post!
If a driver kicks a child off for ANY reason that is wrong then? In YOUR world a child should never be kicked off for any reason? Is that right?
I have read through the posts and that isn't what anyone is saying incluing me!
I think you are trying to put words in our mouths.
If it is then that child has no reason to behave and has no fear of punishment. If it is not then a child kicked off could have something happen to it on the walk home... no ?
I know perfectly well that having no Oyster card is not the same reason as a child being abusive, and both could carry the punishment of not getting or staying on that bus but...there is a line that the bus companies follow, along the same lines you and me have to follow everyday of the week, and that word is " RULES ".
If a child has forgotten his card or lost it, the schools always will sub the child it,s fair, there are many other alternatives. Why should the bus company or the driver bare the brunt of this?
I know I am perfect but even I thought people less perfect would understand that point.
Maybe I should change my signature...what ya think?
Mr perfect.... has a sort of ring about it me thinks. My question was and still is would you throw a child off because they didn't have a bus pass that day?
Quote by Peanut
I tend to disagree with both of the above viewpoints.
Much as I tend to dislike gobby 11 year olds, I dislike slavish and robotic obedience to the powers that be more.
I'm sorry but it just seems to me to be a way of shirking one's own moral responsibilities and common-sense.
And no I wouldn't kick the kid off the bus and the boss can go fuck himself for all I care. If that kid got hurt because I kicked him/her off the bus I couldn't live with myself, and to me that is worth losing my job.
You fellers are obviously different.
Peanut I totally agree,
I have thought about this topic and to me the safety of all children would always come first.
If I was in that position I too would allow them on, if then they caused trouble I would ask them to leave, but I still have to give children the benefit of the doubt.
If then I got into trouble with the company and they sacked me because of it. I wonder if a court of law would see that a fair dismissal. I am not one to take any action to court, but I would that as a act of principal.
Quote by Nohandscouple
Thanks to all so far for your replies.
Lil, you are right more a bad use of words and not the situation!!
Peanut, I think you hit the nail on the head, I am sure that for both of us it is just that what we fantasise about is not the "Norm" in society and because we are both (as I am sure most swingers are) very much normal, we sometimes question our "normal" thoughts for our right to have fun!!
I relate to what you have said, I often and still wonder how we have gone against the norm, But my answer to myself is this is the norm for us.
I would say if you decide to try it never on a first meet have expectations, what you fantasise about isn't the reality.
But we have had great fun and no regrets.
Talking is key and you will hit some issues you cant count for, talk them through and listen to each other.
Only the two of you can decide what is best for you and trust is paramount.
Some make it a lot don't be careful, and good luck in what you decide.
