Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Theladyisaminx
Over 90 days ago
Straight Female, 62
United Kingdom

Forum

Quote by st3v3
while we're at it.. St3v3's all fluff really....

Does that count as a strike?

lol That little fella has way too much hair
I thought more like these
Quote by kentswingers777
Is it not the media that should be held accountable for naming and shaming her?

Why exactly?
People in PUBLIC positons ARE accountable to the public.
The highest of that is the Government and their MP's, so why should she be any different?
Or would you rather go back to the days where everything was hidden by the powers that be?
I am sure there are things that are of interest to you from a public persona, that you are glad you know about?
Most people I would guess are glad she was named and humiliated by her and her inadequate department, who failed a young child which led to his horrific death.
I don't believe only one person was accountable for what happened. There are far more than that, a multitude of errors, but some seem to accept that if someone is accountable then the problem will not go away.
I believe she should of been sacked but I don't believe she should have named.
Of course there was more than one person responsible...two social workers were sacked. The Doctor who could not spot a broken back was disciplined, and yes he also should have been sacked.
This case was made even worse by the fact this council's social services had already been involved with a inquiry through the death of another child. So as this was now the second serious case leading to a childs death, I would have thought lessons had been learned....obviously not.
Can I ask what purpose would it have been to only have sacked her? Why in your opinion should she have had her anonymity protected?
Would as an example you have liked the MP's and their expenses hidden from the public also? So we would never know which of those MP's were greedy gits,or as another example would have preferred Ian Huntley to have never been named?
Or what about the Moors murderers? Should they also have not been named?
I can not believe you can compare her to the Moors murderers or Iam Huntley, I don't believe she planned for children to die.
Ian huntley and the Moors murderers were a threat to society and we needed to be warned of the dangers
This I believe this is the problem with naming and shaming her, she might have made mistakes, but I dont believe she is a threat to society.
Quote by kentswingers777
Is it not the media that should be held accountable for naming and shaming her?

Why exactly?
People in PUBLIC positons ARE accountable to the public.
The highest of that is the Government and their MP's, so why should she be any different?
Or would you rather go back to the days where everything was hidden by the powers that be?
I am sure there are things that are of interest to you from a public persona, that you are glad you know about?
Most people I would guess are glad she was named and humiliated by her and her inadequate department, who failed a young child which led to his horrific death.
I don't believe only one person was accountable for what happened. There are far more than that, a multitude of errors, but some seem to accept that if someone is accountable then the problem will not go away.
I believe she should of been sacked but I don't believe she should have named.
The baby pigeon complained to his mother before flying a long distance, 'I can't make it, I'll get too tired.' Pigeon Spy story
His mother replied, 'Don't worry, I'll tie a piece of string to one of your legs and the other end to mine.'
The baby started to cry.
'What's wrong?' asked the mother sympathetically.
'I don't want to end up being pigeon towed.'
bolt
Quote by kentswingers777
What I would like to see in this country is more Cooperatives, then there will be no place for unions wink

What a bit like this ya mean?

Tea and biscuits.....lovely.
Like minds have to understand the concept, as I don't see you as a like mind, I am not even going to explain. :-P
What I would like to see in this country is more Cooperatives, then there will be no place for unions wink
I think thats even funnier and laughing here, you cant change it back now as people will think I have gone mad. lol
Quote by Theladyisaminx
just testing St3v3_Rocks :shock:

oi someones playing silly buggers pmsl that isn't what I said rotflmao
Just noticed some weird happenings on sh
When I put a post on a thread on the fun forums the word Alex ander got changed to Blacksparrow, you try it and see what happens when you have sent it.
Also someone here has been a member of the forums sinse 1971, I would of thought before sh was a twinkle in the creators eye.
Have you noticed strange happening here that are unexplained?
Quote by Derek_kelp
I'd be well up for this. See if we Londoners can do it better lol

I thought you lived in Kent :giggle:
Quote by Kaznkev
I know of a child that has been labelled with ADHD on the back of which his mother is claiming Carers allowance. His mother was telling me that her husband was abusive towards her and fights would often break out where he would hit her.
They have moved away from the violence but I am worried about this lad in that he I feel has been labelled to having ADHD and put on drugs to help calm him as to not be destructive or disturb others.
But what concerns me is that if I felt unsafe at home as a child, would I be able to focus on schooling or would my mind be in a turmoil as to worried about what is happening at home.
This lad I am sure has other issues going as to why he is reacting in such ways, frustrations that he has no way of controlling and I believe as a society we are turning a blind eye and everyone is letting him down.
I could see him getting older and all these feeling and emotions are being suppressed and unless society are willing to have a deeper understanding, these patterns will continue.
I believe some labels are there for a reason, and once there to deny all responsibility.

ADHD is a minefield,some children are unable to function without medication,others given drugs as an easy fact is though that drugs are cheaper than therapy,so doling out the pills is all too often the only solution offered.
If you are talking about costs, maybe in the shorter term, but we have to see the longer term picture, unless some of these cases are adressed now, the longer term picture can and will be much more expensive.
I know of a child that has been labelled with ADHD on the back of which his mother is claiming Carers allowance. His mother was telling me that her husband was abusive towards her and fights would often break out where he would hit her.
They have moved away from the violence but I am worried about this lad in that he I feel has been labelled to having ADHD and put on drugs to help calm him as to not be destructive or disturb others.
But what concerns me is that if I felt unsafe at home as a child, would I be able to focus on schooling or would my mind be in a turmoil as to worried about what is happening at home.
This lad I am sure has other issues going as to why he is reacting in such ways, frustrations that he has no way of controlling and I believe as a society we are turning a blind eye and everyone is letting him down.
I could see him getting older and all these feeling and emotions are being suppressed and unless society are willing to have a deeper understanding, these patterns will continue.
I believe some labels are there for a reason, and once there to deny all responsibility.
Could it be a case where by schools can claim extra funding to help teach special needs children?
I am not sure who accesses and labels all these children.
Quote by vampanya
Whats a hair set? lol It was brush
Blood orange, orange squash
Car, key

It's it a blue rinse? :giggle:
Alarm
Car alarm, alarm key
Board, Place
Quote by GnV
sex

That isnt a word association with "about" smackbottom
yes it is!! the two posts before were "think" and "about" - men think about sex every 30 seconds... so it was valid rotflmao
Quote by minx
turn

coat :twisted:
:laughabove:
Over