Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Trevaunance
Over 90 days ago
Bi-curious Male, 51
Straight Female, 52
0 miles · Exeter

Forum

I will never use one of those charity bags for donating household goods. I would much rather donate the items in person to a shop or recognised recycling facility. I simply don't trust the bag collectors to do as they claim to do.
If I do not recycle the bag as a waste bag for my own purpose I quite happily leave it outside the front door as part of an ever increasing pile. Maybe one day people will take the hint wink
Quote by starlightcouple
That is why for me the FA cup is the greatest tournament in club football anywhere in the world...It is certainly the oldest and is a shame that when it suits them, the FA have belittled this once great trophy.
It always used to be the finale of the footballing season, Wembley 3pm kick off, etc

I see that the FA have revealed that the FA Cup final will once again be the of the football season.
You have been offered some excellent advice from previous posters, I hope you act on it and therefore have more success in the future.
From our perspective I'd like to point out that you appear to have selected all the options in the looking for section that include women, but without thinking about it. Amongst others you are currently looking for a gay female couple. Under what circumstances do you think that a gay female couple are likely to be looking for a single straight male?
And when I say they're off I don't mean Mrs T's knickers! This time. But you've probably guessed it's one of those 'goodbye' threads.
In around eighteen hours we will drop off our wonderful children with their grandparents and then travel together to our embarkation airport.
Mrs T is going to sub Saharan Africa to provide medical care, whilst Mr T is heading into Asia to enhance the emergency provision in remote areas. We will return in August, hopefully full of health and to a vibrating south west swing scene.
Some people may call us irresponsible parents for leaving our children for so long, but to that we say simply that they have three sets of grandparents, 6 blood uncles, 4 blood aunties and more cousins than you can shake a shitty stick at. We would rather leave them in the bosom of their family for four months, than work away separately and therefore leave them as a single parent lead for eight months with no stabilisation between one parent coming home and the next leaving.
In over nine years as members of SH we have met in person and online with some great people. We wont talk about our meets, but when it comes to online I, Mr T, have to say that the regular forumites are the people that help me come back day to day. Star, Gnv, Flower, Toots (when your not giving me grief in the chatroom about my arm!), easy, nola, rogue, HnS, Too hot and all the others, you make this site worthwhile during the day.
One person I should perhaps give some recognition too is Mr Mids himself. I sometimes wonder whether the rest of you look at our tussles in the same way as Star and Gnv? An online soap maybe. Jed, I can honestly say that though you feel, and have said, that I have destroyed the forums, and other stuff, that I have honestly enjoyed chatting and debating with you online. I would like for us to meet you sometime for a drink or two, because you and I have many similar views, it just seems unfortunate at times that one of us knows them better than the other! Keep posting, maybe you'll get good enough to win one day ;)
Right guys. Time for bed. We have a long weekend in front of us. We will, God willing, be back in August. We may very well be looking for chances to blow off steam, so feel free to let us know what's going on nearer the time. Our internet connection will be sketchy at best during the next few months because of our locations, and we will use it for our family. So take care all, have a great time doing what you are doing and above all...
Happy swinging :swingingchair:
One thing often forgotten about Churchill is that he was dropped like a hot stone by the Country when they no longer saw a need for him. This came merely two months after the Armistice with Germany and a month before the end of the second World War.
On a much smaller scale Mrs Thatcher, as was, was dropped like a hot stone by her party when they no longer saw a need for her.
Isn't it amazing that these two stalwart leaders are often pushed towards the same pedestal, but both had similar fates.
Quote by Toots
Proportionally the amount of speeding instances occuring each day (in the millions most likely) to the amount of accidents caused by speeding would probably be almost insignificant? Attitudes or awareness don't need to change, I doubt many are unaware of the consequences of speeding and if they perhaps should not be behind a wheel.

Inappropriate speed (exceeding the speed limit and driving too fast for the conditions) contributes to 14% of all injuries, 15% of serious injuries and 24% of deaths on the road. Almost 500 people are killed each year on Britain’s roads, and 3,000 are seriously injured, because drivers and riders travel too fast.
On its own, exceeding the speed limit, contributes to 7% of all seriously injured road casualties and 14% of all road fatalities, resulting in the deaths of 241 people, and serious injuries to almost 1,500 more people, in 2010.
Unfortunately, most drivers exceed the speed limit at some time. Around half (46%) of car drivers exceed the 30 mph limit in urban areas during free flowing traffic and on 40mph roads, 23% speed.
The speed limit is set as the maximum legal speed you can travel along that road. If you exceed the legal speed limit you are driving illegally and therefore having broken the law you are a criminal. It's black and white.
I speed, most of us do at some point or another. We all seem to accept that there will be consequences if we are caught by the Police, but very few people will think of the other consequences, such as killing someone.
Speed cameras might slow people down for a small stretch of road, but they don't stop speeding altogether or prevent dangerous driving.
I have to be honest and say that I fail to see how Baroness Thatcher can be blamed for the closure of a mine three years after she left office.
Quote by MidsCouple24
How safe would you feel if one of those fanatics was sat in a Nuclear Submarine somewhere with an equally fanatical crew ?

Safer than I feel when Mrs T is driving :scared:
Quote by Too Hot
Sorry no more posts from me, fluffy or otherwise, for a week - off on my travels again.

I shall shortly fall silent myself as I am doing the same. only difference is that I may be longer than a week cool
Quote by whiplash
And how strange that out of the whole of my post which mentioned council tax benefit being cut, bedroom tax, the over 65's working and residing in valuable housing stock but being exempt.. you chose to pick up and highlight one particular sentence regarding welfare payments.... I rest my case!

Get over yourself.
I made a point based on something you posted. Something, that I basically agree with. Yet you have chosen to label me as what? I don't even know! Igorant? An ignorer of you?
Am I really that wrong for deciding to pick part of your post up and agree with it in a friendly way, whilst not debating the aspects I already agree with?
Wow.
Thanks whiplash, so often people take replies as a swipe. sad
I am glad to see the maths. Because if nothing else it helps me and others to understand. I have never been in your situation, and I hope I never will.
Yet, I see it all the time. People struggling to survive.
You have to accept that there are a number of unemployed people though that tar everyone with the same brush?
But as you asked, I can see why you get irked, and for what it's worth I really do sympathise.
Quote by whiplash
the majority of jobs are for so few hours that It would cost me money to actually be in work....I want a job not a bloody hobby!!!

Whiplash please don't take this wrong as it is not an intended swipe at you.
Is this not a symptom of life today? a larger number of part time jobs, or job shares, just so the state can make it's target of the number of employed, or returned to work mums? Whether you hear it here, on Jeremy Kyle or anecdotally how many of us have heard 'It would cost me money to actually be in work'?
It really grips me, but I also know how bad it can be and see it on a regular basis.
I really do think that welfare is wrong and that it should either pay to be in work or out. The middle ground is unacceptable.
Quote by starlightcouple
Take it with a large pinch of salt Steve. None of us ( for I would fall into the camp you mention ) would truly wish anyone dead, but it's a measure of the absolute hatred her name still brings out in those who got the shittier end of her particular stick.
It's difficult to mourn when you think of just how many lives this woman destroyed, callously, to such little purpose, cos as others on there have rightly pointed out this golden age of Thatcherism we're gonna be hearing about endlessly in coming weeks is about as golden as a spray painted turd. If only her legacy could be buried with her but no, it lives on, to be lived out in the daily lives of those still suffering the consequences thanks to her and her latest incarnation at the head of the Tory party. I piss on the lot of 'em. She was truly a callous, loathsome woman who cared not one bit for those she cut adrift in a sea of misery. Why should those people pretend to care now she's dead? I'm not into revisionism or hypocrisy. I make no apologies for it.

Can you answer the question that after she stepped down and the Tory party lost the election to Tony Blair, why did Labour not reverse any of her polices on Trade Union reforms and Privatised industries?
Tony Blair gave a glowing reference to her today, and I actually take my hat off to him that he of all people realised her greatness.
She was deposed by her own party and John Major won the following election .... FFS!!!
I worded that completely wrong lol
The policies that Thatcher reformed such as Union Reforms and the privatisation of companies, why when Labour came into power under Blair did they not reverse her policies?
Think i worded that correctly this time. wink Chhers for correcting me Staggers. :bounce:
Tony Blair admitted to what we all know. He consciously decided to continue many of the policies that were introduced under the Baroness. Moreover the Labour party decided when they were in power not to reverse the decisions already made.
Although out of context: Didn't TB look ill and old in that interview?
Quote by Steve
A number of my "friends" on a well known social networking site are celebrating her death...
How very sad that someone should feel that the right thing to do...

Steve, I think you are absolutely correct. No person should celebrate the death of another. It is barbaric.
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
If you just happen to accidentally creep over the speed limit ,you are not in control of your vehicle and therefore a hazard to other road users ... if you do it deliberately you are an irresponsible idiot

I find myself totally hand in glove with you on this point.
On a separate note I am always surprised by the number of people to claim they are safe drivers just because they passed a test once in the past, that may well have been their umpteenth try.
I have to resit my driving test, my LGV test and my blue light qualifications on a regular basis. I hasten to add that although I failed my first LGV (HGV as it was at the time) test, I have never failed any of my almost 60 tests!
It doesn't mean I am a safe driver, just that I am more aware of the safe driving techniques appropriate at the time.
And lets face it the 30% discount I get on my car insurance through the Institute of Advanced Motorists is not to be sniffed at lol.
Quote by starlightcouple
This countries greatest ever PM without a shadow of a doubt.
She will be only the second PM in British history to be given a full State funeral I believe, the other being Winston Churchill. Too much to take in at this time as I am personally shocked and gutted on the hearing of her death.
RIP Maggie..........politics was never the same after you stepped down anyway.

She asked not to be given a state funeral and will not be given one. She will receive a ceremonial funeral. The essential difference is that she will not lay in state being peered at by passing tourists.
Quote by MidsCouple24
Then it was a worthless thing to say in the conversation because to deter is not to stop, you can put in measures to deter people from doing things but that doesn't mean you will always stop them especially when talking about fanatics and religious motivation. The deterrent has worked to an extent but has not stopped war just perhaps curbed the etremes leaders might take it.
According to Saddams military advisors when asked why Saddam had refrained from using Chemical Weapons against the coalition forces replied that he was scared to use them because he knew the coalition had much more powerfull weapons at their disposal to retaliate with. (The Kurds however did not)

The assurance of mutual annihilation is the deterrent that stops Nuclear war. When both sides faced each other in the cold war, neither side had the balls to launch first, because they knew what would happen to them. However the knowledge of certain death ensured that once the bluffing, posturing and expelling of diplomats was over then no one pressed the launch buttons. So deter was to stop surely? Or did I sleep through a nuclear war?
When Saddam was deterred from using chemical weapons against the coalition, it was the threat of even greater military action against him that stopped him. If the Kurds had a deterrent, then I have no doubt it would have stopped him also.
The unfortunate truth is that speed on it's own doesn't kill. It contributes to the effects of an incident, but dangerous manoeuvring, handling and driving are the root cause of most RTI's.
Speed camera's are in principal a good idea IMHO, however their number increased dramatically a few years ago and most don't appear to be related to so called 'accident blackspots'. I remember hearing people say in the past that they didn't mind paying the fine but that it should go to the Police, not the government. Funny thing was that when the rules were changed to allow the Police to directly benefit from each and every fine the number of cameras expanded rapidly.
If a camera is situated in the right place it can have an effect on road safety, but in the wrong place it is a cash cow and a blot of the reputation of the Police.
So as I see it the young girl at the centre of this story has made a series of public broadcasts insinuating that she takes drugs, that she drinks, she is racist, sexist and a bigot. Yet the shock of this story isn't that she has said these things, but that she said them between the ages of 14 and 16!
Lets get the cops round to talk to her parents and her about under age drinking, drug taking, and antisocial behaviour and kick her out of the £15k taxpayer funded job she has been given.
Or we could accept that she has made a massive mistake at a young age and genuinely regrets being so full of attitude in her formative years.
dunno
Quote by Lizaleanrob
hopefully someone will set them on fire.

and of course try to douse the flames with acid :censored:
I think that in all probability they will be segregated and under additional protection to prevent this kind of thing happening. I'm sure that it's only a matter of time before someone tries though.
Quote by MidsCouple24
In this instance I agree with the law and you, I was pleased when they stopped sending 17 year old children into warzones,

That would be June 2003. However it is an inconvenient truth that at the time we had 17 year olds deployed to fight in Iraq.
Mark my words. Following the next general election the result will be a Tory government, with labour as the Opposition and the LidDems/Others (including UKIP picking up the pieces).
I firmly believe that it will be a close run thing, perhaps close to a new coalition, but ultimately it will not be a hung parliament. The elections of May this year will be a wake up and in the next years to 18 months the Tories will bring in some form of vote winner. I don't know what it will be, but I'm sure there will be one.
I find it comical that so many left wing people feel now is the time to vote for this far right leader, especially given that the party has never held a parliamentary seat!
Oh don't get me wrong, I think that if it all kicks off we will get involved militarily. However I think that this country knows that Nuclear weaponry is a deterent and a last resort. Not first strike.
Incidentally, You mentioned the thread being about nuclear war? I presume you are aware that the OP was over one year ago and not related to North Korea at the time?
Quote by Trevaunance
Our subs may already be there, who knows.

Quote by Trevaunance
We only have 1 sub at sea with nuclear strike capability and she has better things to do than sit on the Korean peninsula. The USA on the other hand...they may have an Ohio class sitting somewhere close by. And it only needs one of those babies to lay waste a nation.

Not quite correct. We have a minimum of one submarine at sea at any one time, however their movements are generally kept secret and therefore there is potential for there to be more than one out there somewhere. for example was reported in the Indian ocean last month, well within strike range of Korea.
Quote by Rogue_Trader
Trenchant is a t-class...
You need a vanguard class boat for ballistic missile work. We have 4, I know where 3 are. The other, that is on patrol, well not even the Admiralty knows exactly...which is just how it should be.

Rogue, you appear to have misunderstood me and attempted to put words in my mouth. I haven't mentioned anywhere that we have sent an SSBN to the area, or that the sub we may or may not have nearby has a nuclear strike capability. You have.
I have said that we may possibly have a sub in the area. If so then I imagine they are doing what subs do best, listening, gathering intelligence and threatening surface and subsurface operations. The additional strike capability of cruise missiles against land based targets is also a formidable weapon.
Quote by Rogue_Trader
We only have 1 sub at sea with nuclear strike capability and she has better things to do than sit on the Korean peninsula. The USA on the other hand...they may have an Ohio class sitting somewhere close by. And it only needs one of those babies to lay waste a nation.

Not quite correct. We have a minimum of one submarine at sea at any one time, however their movements are generally kept secret and therefore there is potential for there to be more than one out there somewhere. for example was reported in the Indian ocean last month, well within strike range of Korea.