Also when they do go on a break they never tell us what to do whilst they are away, or in the event that they never come back.
It seems a bit one sided nay slightly irresponsible to leave us to our own devices when they swan off doing exactly what pleases them. Which in this case is nothing more for the time being.
I mean we are left to assume something which may not necessarily be what they want us to assume. having made an exit of sorts, it seems contradictory to come back almost immediately to put us right in our imaginings.
Although many do return having had a break and soon take up their old roles and status as if they had never gome away.
So I wonder if having a break or simply not joining in are any different?
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
duncanlondon
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 47
UK
Forum
The idea that the forums were at some point better than now can only come down to indivdual appreciation. It just seems like that. Those who are currently whoopdedooing it now may well take that viewpoint in a year or so.
Fairly soon we'll be saying 'the forums just aren't what they were 15 minutes ago'.
Fairly soon we'll be saying 'the forums just aren't what they were 15 minutes ago'.
not so much of a clique, but more a flavour of the moment, selective notion. which attracts whatever participants that are available and willing to 'work' the idea.
usually it runs out of steam pretty quickly as it falters on basic logic, lack of constructive debate and the fundamentally poor origination of the topic.
good topics create interesting debate, poorly designed ones encourage arguments.
usually it runs out of steam pretty quickly as it falters on basic logic, lack of constructive debate and the fundamentally poor origination of the topic.
good topics create interesting debate, poorly designed ones encourage arguments.
you find women and men hookering in all aspects of life. the specialists aren't found on a site like this though.
there were several women operating in the sites early days. i got a few pms from some. they are probably still operating now under new logins.
but as for the surprise on discovering them, it doesn't cause me concern.
there were several women operating in the sites early days. i got a few pms from some. they are probably still operating now under new logins.
but as for the surprise on discovering them, it doesn't cause me concern.
I think many originate in observations of repeated things, and a simplistic 'law' has developed around them. Some seem to tie in closely with prime numbers and whole number mathematics. So that people's restless thinking, has created this predictive process. Some are happy some are sad, some full of doom. there was a superstition for just about anything at one time.
but it hasn't left us completely. you only need to see a group of it engineers hanging about a new installation and you will hear them stating superstitions all over again, as they worry about the outcome of their work.
but it hasn't left us completely. you only need to see a group of it engineers hanging about a new installation and you will hear them stating superstitions all over again, as they worry about the outcome of their work.
if the general feeling is that such things are not logical or rational etc. then its also not easy to rationalise them.
i think many are 'gut feelings' and 'instinctive' responses. why do you make some decisions in a different way to others. and would you do so in an emergency etc.
so 'folk lore' simply provides some kind of history and legacy to these things. keeping them as a store of behaviourial monitors or such like.
even the most rational people will exercise some sense of caution why?
i think many are 'gut feelings' and 'instinctive' responses. why do you make some decisions in a different way to others. and would you do so in an emergency etc.
so 'folk lore' simply provides some kind of history and legacy to these things. keeping them as a store of behaviourial monitors or such like.
even the most rational people will exercise some sense of caution why?
being invited into to someone else's secrecy is not always as simple as it is presented. Somewhere down the line there may be an awkward compromise at the least.
Also the idea that you may eventually get to know them and they you is not necesarily true. you are only sharing a secret. so you may never find out who they really are, and why they are doing what they do in such a manner.
So whilst it may seem an open and honest gesture to make, it can't be in reality, because of the nature of what it is. a practised deceit. a professional lie.
A lot of people don't care either way and learn to live with this as they discover it in people.
At times it seems to me, to be more of a warning than an attraction.
Also the idea that you may eventually get to know them and they you is not necesarily true. you are only sharing a secret. so you may never find out who they really are, and why they are doing what they do in such a manner.
So whilst it may seem an open and honest gesture to make, it can't be in reality, because of the nature of what it is. a practised deceit. a professional lie.
A lot of people don't care either way and learn to live with this as they discover it in people.
At times it seems to me, to be more of a warning than an attraction.
you and the people you are meeting decide who will book the room. then you agree on who pays what to whom. there is no cheating anyone.
there is no sneaking about, you just go about using the rooms as a sensible guest. any kind of silly behaviour or talk will simply make you feel and look extremely foolish.
otherwise the enjoyment is yours.
there is no sneaking about, you just go about using the rooms as a sensible guest. any kind of silly behaviour or talk will simply make you feel and look extremely foolish.
otherwise the enjoyment is yours.
Quote by tweeky
Its not really practicable to consider bi as a main feature of a typical swinging profile. To be a practising bi would involve a group of at least 2 males and 2 females in any combination at any time, meeting enough to say that its truly the mainstay of your sex life.
so a typical hetero couple will be dabbling on occasion, but is it enough to say 'yeah i'm bi'
i have played with guys in a couple but its never been enough in my life to say i'm a practising bi.
So as you dont do it often enough you dont put it on your profile? So what about a single guy who is not getting any from any sex? Is he unclassified
I guess we all have ways of looking at it but mine is simple. Guys dont turn me on and I could not physically play with guys. A little contact when playing jointly with a female is unavoidable but its not expected to be sexual. If you have or can play with guys or might like to play with guys in my way of thinking that makes you bi. I am unable to do any of the things in the previous sentence, that makes me straight.I guess now we will get the "no labeling" squad in. Not that I care its cut and dried to me and makes no difference how people want to perceive themselves as all I care about is how I perceive them. Does make life a little awkward though if you think some men who have played with men consider themselves not bi and dont put it on the profile. I would certainly say they were and that could lead to crossed wires at some future point.
Anyone not doing some sex is simply celibate.
But if there are going to be a variety of interpretations, then its down to people sorting those out with each other, making sure they understand each other etc.
Its not really practicable to consider bi as a main feature of a typical swinging profile. To be a practising bi would involve a group of at least 2 males and 2 females in any combination at any time, meeting enough to say that its truly the mainstay of your sex life.
so a typical hetero couple will be dabbling on occasion, but is it enough to say 'yeah i'm bi'
i have played with guys in a couple but its never been enough in my life to say i'm a practising bi.
so a typical hetero couple will be dabbling on occasion, but is it enough to say 'yeah i'm bi'
i have played with guys in a couple but its never been enough in my life to say i'm a practising bi.
So would it be fair to say that couples who advertise for big black men are primarily misguided as size seems to be more in favour of white men. yet its a comforting belief, so let's not spoil it.
That black guys are staying quiet on this one as the benefits outweigh the truth. that big white guys don't need to worry as they are already in demand?
That average sized buys are no better or worse off than before.
That the dildo business is expecting long running profits?
That black guys are staying quiet on this one as the benefits outweigh the truth. that big white guys don't need to worry as they are already in demand?
That average sized buys are no better or worse off than before.
That the dildo business is expecting long running profits?
