sounds like it will be easier to find the actual guy. nice trip to paris plus possible swinging thrown in.
The thing is what is wrong with the part of sex work, which needs to be fixed?
human trafficking would continue whether the state brothels existed or not.
rehabilitating street crack grannies is all very well, but they would probably not be good for the business of a state brothel.
health checks are equally a great idea, but a decent sex worker already does this better than the average careless casual sex adventurer.
These seem to be the main points that are on discussion.
providing a place which operated in a different way to others just simply opens up another way of doing the same business. which would be just as transitory as all the other venues.
the only saleable factors could be cost and location. is it cheaper/more satisfying to get a state shag or go to the same old places?
which are at the heart of sex trading anyway. so i am not sure if there would be a noble endeavour or achievement. it woudln't really change the basic nature of sex working.
i think scaffolders probably score the most. mainly because they are macho animals and are just so obviously up for it. also they are on the job temporary, so if there's any embarassment it won't be for long.
I expect there's a case now for people being subject to Swingingheavenism..............
But how would they operate?
each sex worker would be employed and it would be on their tax returns, cv's etc.
what could the punters expect? a guaranteed result? refunds if not?
people tend to forget there is some sensitivity involved. will there be procedures to follow?
its pretty much about men arriving there when they are ready to shoot their load and workers being able to respond as best they can. it can be high turnover. would regulations hinder this?
like all public things they would differ from council to council.
but knowing there was a public brothel in an area near you, and the likelihood that someone in your family was a user. might just be upsetting for some people. supposedly it shouldn't be,but somehow i think it would a long time before they became something nobody bothered to discuss.
that would be main problem, establishing them as a common place thing.
you know 'righty ho dad, just popping out for a quick blowjob with Heather, then I'm off down the pub with the lads'.
'Mind how you go son'.
what about a good oold fashioned headache?
i didn't think he had it in him to top himself!
well he did the decent thing in the end. good old fashioned honour and such like.
or would it be more accurate to ask 'whats happened to the potential in my sex life? because a few years it looked possible now its unlikely?'
i get the feeling that when this debate comes round it is gets started with little or no thought, or at least no more than 'let's start that old chestnut again'.
i think it would take a long period of familiarisation with public brothels for it to become part of the landscape, and even then i think the brits would still find it uncomfortable. ie not in my back yard etc.
after all many sex workers operate on their own in a flat in residential areas. people eventually twig and its live and let live by and large. And that seems to be what people are happy with.
but i suppose lap dancing clubs are paving the way for the possibility of brothels. so its not impossible to imagine something similar. but it means a trek into town and extra cost.
And the likes of Raoul Moat leering at you, as you come and go through the doors.
No the run across the raod micro brothel has its advantages. a failing erection won't last long after a tube journey on a cold winter's night.
again this debate seems to commence from the viewpoint that the sex workers are going to get regular checkups. but what about the customers? do they avoid the indignity and intrusion? or are they assumed to be free of disease?
also what are the implications, when the general population have sex? would they then be considered the unclean? would the state also need to intervene?
i think in one recent survey sex workers had the lowest rate of infections compared to the general population.
i think everyone experiences those gut reactions to different people's. and you can go around and think what you like.
in theory and given time you learn not to react quite so badly with each passing year and eventually acquire a good level of tolerance and understanding.
but it becomes racism the moment you seek out people similar to yourself and share in slagging off those you find are not to your liking.
i tend to think that its a bit pointless looking for blame. it seems like the moment for a connection has passed with some people and they didn't see it. thereafter they are both wasting their own time really.
it won't be long before he gives himself up. certainly by the autumn. he won't be able to survive outdoors for long. not many people could.
he's bound to get sick or give himself food poisoning. bored to death by nettle tea and burnt rabbit.
where's Colonel Troutman when you need him?
what about incompetent school kids? there must a few of them about to make the teachers look worse than they are?
i'm 54 and still do okay. i have an older buddy and a younger one, both orientals. the older one i can see several months apart, but the younger one is usually quicker to come back, and she creates a bit until i do. but really they're both okay.
what i think works is having the lust and libido to remain interested in sex. without those you don't have the will to find it fun anymore. and i think this is what goes missing when people no longer do it.
but you also need compatible partners. so with my two its down to me entirely with one, but willingness to respond with the other. if i couldn't respond that relationship would be effectively over.
i'm keen to keep having sex and the opportunities for us older ones gets better each year. the number of crinklies out there looking and getting is more than you think. and i notice some real stunners of my age. really classy ladies with fine figures, built for it! with those older girls, you can have a real splendid time. but they have wants and needs and standards etc.
so anyway you youngsters will get old one day and this site will still be in business, so maybe there will be a SH OAP section?
I think gulson has some point. all these things we feel sensitive about have become the tools for divide and rule, as they seem to be achieving the same purpose.
all these things we feel sensitive about should also make you realise they are 'human' things. feelings and ideas that connect through you. if you come to terms with them and what they mean to you, you will be confident in yourself.
listening to extreme arguments about these things pushes them away from your self realisation. you have to learn to live with the fact that you will be a bit racist, a bit sexist etc. knowing that makes it easier to monitor your own behaviour. you won't be able to eradicate it.
once the fox has been allowed to walk into people's homes and show its true nature; i expect it won't be long before people wish to see the return of fox hunting, dogs and all.
and how much time was wasted? was the planning so tight you didn't have time to fart?
whilst the shrep thing is underway and is useful in identifying those have done it with each other. there may also be some use in identifying how many people really are interested in shagging. it might help.
was that you shagging 'just out of view' on brucies naturist beach then?
last i heard brucie was getting fisted at chariots in shoreditch.
when I went their open day was the first weekend in August. it was packed throughout with families during the day and adult action in the night.
so it may be worth checking if that's still the case now.
i haven,t been in a long time ie since before the founder died. there has definitely been an upgrade in the adult side, with various party nights going on. get onto their website and join up for free emails.
probably eureka. which is in fawkham green. but its meant to be a naturist club, although has become more than that of late.
if its beginning to look like an actual event it probably just needs to be placed in the lets meet up forum.
as for throwing it open to debate well.........
I wouldn't have thought that go getter black women would need to have things arranged for them. they do okay as they are. but a considerate idea.
Besides weren't the people who were 'having sex just out of view' more at fault than the parents who were rightfully at liberty in the designated area? why has the focus of blame gone to them? and why are we being 'asked' to consider the implications, whatever they may be?
complete coffee time gossip.
