Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
herts_darlings1
Over 90 days ago
Straight Female, 55
Bisexual Male, 62
0 miles · Hertfordshire

Forum

Quote by Katniss

2 more sleeps :bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Polishing my dancing shoes :taz::taz::taz::taz:

Got my posh frock and tira out! Not sure what Mrs H is wearing though lol
It's 11-11-14 the skies are clear, all seems calm.
I for one can not imagine the suffering! All I know is I am so grateful to them.
We must never forget!
We're so excited,
And we just can't hide it,
We're about to loose control and we think we like it!
:bounce::bounce::bounce:
Kissing is the physical reaction too sexual chemistry.
If the chemistry isn't there it is just " a kiss"
If the chemistry is there it makes the earth move .
Quote by Toots
Santa Clausette in a burka next... innocent

Don't be ridiculous
Yes but it is rediculous enough to be quite funny.
they'll ban the burka first
Quote by Dan_Lexa
Gemini would be nice!
We could have a twin each.

Being Gemini I think its fairly spot on. I can be fairly changeable, 2 sided
Lex wink
Hi Dan and Lexa and welcome to the forums :welcome:
Okay, been out shopping to the local mall. Looking in the window of a large chain that sells posters, calenders and the like only to see an iconic photograph of a stunning beautiful lady censored!
The photograph I refer to is of Audrey Hepburn, tira, black opera glove and a cigarette in a holder. Except no cigarette and no holder!
Come on, I mean neither of us smoke and would not dream of promoting others to smoke either but this is an iconic picture which has been deemed to be suitable for at least 50 years! It does not need tinkering with to keep the politically correct society happy.
What next, the tennis girl with jeans air brushed on? James Dean's cigarette changed to a pen?
Grump over.
Cards on table, I do not believe balls of burning gas so far away we measure them in light years rather than miles can have any influence on our personality. No way, no how! Am I right in thinking that all the constellations are in the northern hemisphere? Does this mean that people who live in the southern hemisphere have different star signs?
However, I do believe that the time of year does! A baby born in July will have a totally different experience in it's first few months than one born in November. I was born in November, I like to snuggle and be very tactile in the sack. Lady H was born in January and she is very much the same. Not scientific in any way, but then again neither is astrology.
With this in mind we may have to start a scientific study testing out the sexual compatibility of peeps born in every month month of the year and every star sign from both the northern and southern hemispheres.
Interested parties can pick up an application form from the post office or contact Lady H insuring you use the code words "Sex and the stars" Your application will be studied carefully before being deleted and I get a painful slap. lol
The X factor, sorry , this is a time capsule not room 101
Throw it in anyway and let some poor sod in the future suffer it as well.
Quote by Katniss
a very good friend of mine is an astrologer - i'm a Libra - air sign - which means I'm best off with the other air signs - but sexually i tend to go for Aries, Gemini and strangely Aquarius innocent
Married to a Scorpio for 14 years has kinda put me of the sexy scorpion sign, call me shallow but I do tend to ask someones star sign quite early on if theres a sexual liaison in the offing.

quite right , just don't forget to ask them there name lol
From the Scorpio Mr H .
Id make an exception for you coz you got Mrs H to do the marriage bit :lol:
and you did say youd wash ya bits in brown ale for me, always a great chat up line that is lol
I know I did ! I am just a sucker for a girl who knows her Suzanne Collins from her Jackie Collins . Her Everdean from her evergreens .
Quote by Katniss
a very good friend of mine is an astrologer - i'm a Libra - air sign - which means I'm best off with the other air signs - but sexually i tend to go for Aries, Gemini and strangely Aquarius innocent
Married to a Scorpio for 14 years has kinda put me of the sexy scorpion sign, call me shallow but I do tend to ask someones star sign quite early on if theres a sexual liaison in the offing.

quite right , just don't forget to ask them there name lol
From the Scorpio Mr H .
Turn on= women in stockings.
Turn off= when she wears them over her face, points a shot gun at you and demands the content of the safe! Actually that's turning me on as well come to think of it
Not sure if this is what I like about this site or if it is what I dislike!
The thread so far;-
1, Ebola
2, Charity
3, Misunderstanding about charity
4, Tempers frade over Ebola and charity
5, Member leaves over Ebola and charity and references to past inconsistances
6, Members muse over member leaving
7, Another member announces a shag might be good
8, Mod thinks the inside of a ball is interesting
Will miss Jed, I did not often agreed with him (to be honest, I didn't always understand what he was saying) but always thought what came through was a very genuine person!
SIP Jed and Sasha (swing in peace)
And Kat, would wash mi bits in brown ale for you, ay sweet talker!
Theropy starts with admitting it to yourself so there is some hope.
Bet you feel dirty about at the moment but hope this helps.
Just before last Christmas I took to licking the back of Santa's head.
I have to admit that my immediate reaction when a large company hits trouble it to sneer. It doesn't last long though when I think that profits from companies like Tesco's go into pension schemes and the taxes they pay help keep the infrastructure of the nation going. So bad news all round really. Whether it is fraud or problem in the structure of the company maybe critical. In a way fraud would be better news for the share holders as the guilty can be weeded out. If the company structure is at fault it may take a lot of hard work to fix.
I only have one theory why football is so popular, not sure it will make any sense so feel free to correct me as you see fit.
Other than running and jumping (which can get a bit boring) I am struggling to think of a simpler game! To say simple is not to detract from football in any way but all you need is 2 people, something that resembles a ball and somewhere to kick it and you are playing football. A couple of kids can’t go out and play formula 1 or ice hockey. Okay 2 extreme examples but football is the simplest team sport to start playing. Cricket you need bat, ball, something to make wickets with. Rugby you can play with a round ball but not on tarmac or concrete, even touch rugby needs to have a structure or it becomes the big kid running with the ball (not much fun). Tennis, a ball that will bounce, rackets and a net. So what game did we all play when we were kids? FOOTBALL!!
So no matter how good we were, thought we were or bad we were, it is our game. Yes I am sure the first time you enter a ground (impressive in itself) and see thousands of people it confirms it for you but you are hooked from the minute you knew you could kick a ball. So you know what it’s like to play football and you know what it’s like in a ground where thousands of people go, people like you, people who know the same as you, people that although you don’t know personally, you have a kinship with. A fellow spectator will utter “REFEREE” and you may turn to him and finish his sentence, arm raised “THAT WAS NEVER A YELLOW CARD” you don’t know that person but you know what he was thinking and how dare this outsider (the poor referee) blight your team and one if it’s champions so unfairly with a yellow card. You are united as one in your defence of what is quite obviously a miss carriage of justice.
Whether your team is Chelsea or Chester, because it is your game (you used to play after all) you see the deficiencies, you see the potential, you know when a player isn’t trying or he is being played out of place. You know how to stop the oppositions star. You know who you need to strengthen the defence. Why? Because it’s your game! You read the papers the day after the game to see how each player has been rated, you probably disagree with a lot of the ratings. You check the league position “if we win our game in hand and the 2 teams above only draw at the weekend we will be 4th!”
Who’d a thought it, some women like football too! Well yes, at school a lot of the girls used to join in with our games of football, grounds are a lot more female friendly now (the bogs at Valley Parade used to be disgusting, thank god I could go standing up!) but I still laugh at comments like “well what does she know? She’s a woman! After Radio 5 have dared send a female to report on a game and not been complimentary about the team they support.
So in a nutshell, it seems to me to be something that starts at a young age, very young. You play football, you see professionals (at first on the telly) and watch and learn. You go to the ground (your team) and form a bond, not with the players as they are transient but with the club, you only want what’s best for your club and so what if they had a bad season last season, there is always the next season or maybe the next game or the next half or the next corner and everything will be okay again. Hope strings eternal for most football supporters.
I get all that! I really do. I said in an earlier post that football is not my game of choice, it’s not that I don’t like football, I can’t think of any competitive sport I don’t like, what I really detest is the cynical manipulation of the emotions true football supporters have! The cash cow approach that is endemic in the top flight. “If you are a true supporter you have to have a replica shirt, that’s £50 please!” Look, new season, new shirt and this year it’s £55 please! An away shirt? Yes of course we have they, another £55 please.
Get every top game on Sky, except for those on BT. So to paraphrase transporters,” I choose something else”, I choose to help at the local cricket club with a bit of coaching and will turn out for them when they are a man short, I watch and shout at amateur club rugby, I watch the football teams on the local pitches when I walk the dog on a Sunday morning.
I don’t believe money in sport is a bad thing, I don’t think big money in sport is a bad thing but I don’t think the top clubs with the money either inherited through rich owners or old money from good management of finances have any inkling that they might have a responsibility for the good of the game in general. Players used to come through from smaller (feeder) clubs or were signed as youths. I know this still happens but not nearly to the same degree. Why? Because this takes time, like nurturing a seedling, looking after it and then after a few years, you MIGHT get apples. So much easier to by apples someone else has already grown, most likely abroad!
Clubs I can think of who have lost out due to the modern era, Tranmere, (Merseyside’s poor relation) used to play on a Friday night. Ferries were packed from Liverpool with people who would support Liverpool or Everton on a Saturday but would enjoy watching a game on a Friday. Now Tranmere are told when they can play and who can afford 2 or 3 games in a week? Crewe had links with the big boys in Manchester, Danny O’grady was trusted to look after young “stars” of the future. Today’s young stars of the future are playing in France or Bosnia or Peru.
Think I have said enough, just
Quote by Max777
The Newcastle fans continue to watch their club because the vast majority are season ticket holders and have paid their money up front. If they didn't turn up for matches, it would have very little financial impact on the club.
Are followers on Twitter and friends on Facebook fans in the same sense that football fans are?

Don't know, don't do twitter or Facebook. So people paying up front to watch a season of football do so because they get a big discount I presume?
Don't think I would stump up hundreds of pounds when I couldn't verify the quality of what I was getting!
You're the one who made the claim about ASDA and Tesco having 'fans' on Twitter and Facebook.
As Dean has said, any discount season ticket holders receive is minimal.
No, I asked a question! Personally I have no idea what happens on Facebook and Twitter.
Quote by Max777
The Newcastle fans continue to watch their club because the vast majority are season ticket holders and have paid their money up front. If they didn't turn up for matches, it would have very little financial impact on the club.
Are followers on Twitter and friends on Facebook fans in the same sense that football fans are?

Don't know, don't do twitter or Facebook. So people paying up front to watch a season of football do so because they get a big discount I presume?
Don't think I would stump up hundreds of pounds when I couldn't verify the quality of what I was getting!
Quote by deancannock
fact is they paid the money in... they OWN the club...and so they can actually do what they want....change the name !!!...change the colour of their strip !!! Whatever they bloody well want.
I do like the idea being floated at the moment that 25% of shares must be awarded to fans...and that they must have a seat on the directors board. At 25% they will not actually be able to change anything as such, but at least their voice will be heard, and maybe they can influence. Also they can report back to supporters trust and so at least everyone knows what is actually going on at board level.
Not a solution, but would at least be a step in the right direction.

Why is a political party saying vote for us and we will bring in legislation? What does it have to do with politics? No sorry, butt out Ed!
As Jed said, change is down to the supporters. I read with interest about 10 days ago that the supporters of Newcastle United were not happy with the ownership and management of the club! A lot of good players had gone and not been replaced. A lot of the 45,000 crown showed there displeasure.
If the owner, management and team are not up to what you expect, why do 45,000 people go to watch them? Not saying go support another team, just don't go to watch Newcastle!
If Asda and Tesco don't have fans, why do people follow them on Twitter and Facebook?
Quote by MidsCouple24
I think you will find the club situation is similar in many sports, club or individual, in Tennis for example there isn't really that much of an international scene it is more about the individual, in Rugby the club/league scene is predominant.
The difference between Rugby and Football is that there are far less players at top club level that would be ineligible to play for England, ie less foreign players, as a result the players get to play against or with fellow England rugby players more often and have a much better understanding of each other when they are called forward to represent their respective Countries ie England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, I believe it is for this reason that we have a better National Team in Rugby than in Football as I have said many times.

Good points and I think that the slippery slope towards commercial domination in Rugby is alas not far away but not quite at top flight football levels yet.
Rugby League is fully commercialised now and has been for the last 15 years. It basically runs along franchise lines. The league itself is very strong and dictates to the clubs what percentage of the turnover they can spend on players and on wages. This is designed to protect the clubs but as has happened with Bradford Bulls, clubs can still over reach themselves. The season is dictated by television. Sky spent a lot of money to ensure this happened. The main change was to summer rugby. Far more televisually to watch fast running rugby on a dry pitch and less likely to get matches postponed due to fog, frost or snow. International Rugby League never take place during the domestic season and the breaks between the seasons in the UK and those in Australia and New Zealand allows international games to take place.
The Rugby Football Union has not fully sold out (yet) but they do suffer from what is best for the clubs and countries. In England the Rugby Football Union is lucky in that it is quite well off. This allows them to subsidise players to either bring them into the domestic game or keep them in the domestic game. I understand the if Steffon Armitage had left Toulon for Bath, the Rugby Football union had guaranteed to top up his wages. As they did when Andy Farrell signed for Saracens from Wigan. The French game is awash with money as well but the other teams in the 6 nations are not as lucky. Hence the English and French clubs wanting to control European club rugby.
Cricket (well and truly sold its mother for 8 pieces of silver) is not only ruled by the international game but could not possibly exist as a full time professional sport without it! The counties lose money, the England cricket team makes shed loads. The profit is then divided up amongst the clubs. If you have ever been to see a county championship game you will see that it is unsustainable as a standalone full time professional sport. Essex v Derbyshire at Chelmsford a couple of years back, I counted the crowd 259! But the counties are there to feed the national side. The vast majority of England players are not even employed by a county! They have central contracts paid by the ECB so there cannot be a conflict of interest.
I think this is where football suffers. Club football could exist and would be arguably better without an England football team The England football team could not exist without the clubs. A good club player could expect, in one season to play for his club in the league, the league cup, the FA cup, one of the euro leagues and for his country in both qualifiers and friendly’s. TOO MUCH BLOODY FOOTBALL!!!
But he has to play for his club as it puts bums on seats, it sells shirts, it means the sponsors will stump up more money in future negotiations and EA sports will pay more for the rights to put players in their games. The international manager has to pick them because if he didn’t, he would get sacked if he kept losing games. I hear what you say about this being the same all over Europe and here I show my ignorance about football but aren’t most big clubs in Europe owned and run by people and organisations within the country, if not city? (PSV used to be run by the Phillips factory) Real Madrid (like my sports team Featherstone Rovers) is still owned by its member (approximately 93000 people)
The point surely those is that in the country at least, there is no real appetite for change at the top? Why would Manchester United (American owners) Chelsea (Russian owners) Manchester City (Arab owners) or Arsenal (insular in its outlook and a French management structure) want it to change? Where is the incentive?
There was an old couple called herts,
that whilst playing both knew there parts,
he would corner a bloke,
she would give him a stroke,
My god, what a couple of tarts!
Quote by Lizaleanrob
we asked a couple who wanted a meet for some face pics
well... what they sent us was a real deal breaker the pics where taken in a bedroom? i think.
the room was awash with clothes on the floor over the bed basically it looked like someone had thrown a grenade in the wardrobe and just walked away , on the bedside cabinet was stacks of used tissues and empty toilet rolls, the real deal breaker was two glasses of something, which when we zoomed in had a layer of what looked like mould growing on top of the fluid with a layer of fag butts in the bottom
poke

ew!
We were chatting the other day and actually we quite like winter (Mr quite likes ladies in woolly tights as well! he calls them "woolly jobs")