Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
marmalaid
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 52
0 miles · Staffordshire

Forum

Quote by LilMissGullable
But what would you really like for christmas....... dunno

And what would you realy like, LMG?
Im getting my chrissy prezzie 3 weeks early biggrin
Well, 1 of them.... rotflmao

I saw what you did there... very good biggrin
You might be getting it early, but you're not gonna open it until Christmas Day, are you?
Quote by westerross
We still quite good at making money.

Yeah, my first thought was financial, insurance is another thing we are good at.
Quote by The Muttleys
What a fine example of a rally driver he was, a great loss indeed, he will be missed.

I don't know who Richard Burns is, other than he's a rally driver as stated above, but any death is a said thing. Sympathies to his loved ones.
Quote by yeahitsme1
hello eveyone...im new here and just wanted to say "hi"... im 25 male 6"2 blonde hair,blue eyes ..and looking to meet new people hopefully for some adult fun..never done this before but i fought i would give it a try......anyone in the southwest area..somerset - wiltshire..... smile

Hi and :welcome: take a seat, and enjoy yourself.
Chris
Quote by Lissa
anyone else, famous or not, past or present, who would it be?
And why?
I'd like to be Neil Armstrong, taking that 'one small step for man'

I'd love to go into space, probably be better on one of the more plush starships though biggrin nice bit of replicated food, great cool
Quote by TallFunLondon
Casanova - for obvious reasons!

What you wanna be that lightweight for?
bolt
Quote by Mister_Discreet
I'm seeing 5 SH cookies here, but they look harmless enough to me, and don't seem to have changed since the takeover.
I'm more concerned about the javascript that's trying to report every page load to - view the source for this page in your browser and you'll see what I mean.

So it does, I was looking at the source last week and it wasn't there, so thats a very new thing.
From what I can see it's the sort of stats that loads of website collect as a matter of course, screen width, colour depth and resolution. Looking at how we see the screen so that the page can be designed as appropriate. Seems all anonymous to me.
Quote by Clare and Steve
So after a most shite day yesterday :cry: ,todays gonna be a good one biggrin
Off to have a day of shopping with me mum :thrilled: And she's treating me to have me hair done :mrgreen:
No snow here either :smug: ,even though is fecking freezing :huh: :uhoh:
Then to spend the evening with my most wonderful worship sexy hubby :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :evil2:
And then i recon sleep for about a week to recover :sleeping:
So Happy Friday Everyone :thrilled: and have a good weekend kiss
:happy: :happy: :happy: :happy: :happy: :happy:

Thanks Clare, so did it all go to plan? I didn't get to Glasgow :cry: but I had a good time otherwise biggrin
Quote by Calista
did you know the use of lipstick originates from wanting to have the oral labia resemble the blood-flushed look of the aroused aroused genital labia; this indicates that the female is sexually ready. :shock:

Dunno about that but Darkkfire had some gorgeous tasting lippo at Derby wink
LOL Postie was wearing my cherry* at one point at Marcuso's party redface redface redface redface
Flavoured Lipstick*
Cx
Have you got any cherry left that I may partake in?
(See you at Wigan biggrin)
I don't really understand what the rules are now, can a landlord just decide what time he wants to shut, and that's it?
I went to a pub on Friday night and, on exiting, asked the bouncywoman what time they were closing, I didn't fully understand her answer, but I think it was;
"It depends how busy we are, but two o'clock if there's not enough people in."
Evening, (listens for the echo from the empty GFZ takes advantage of the lack of populace and ejaculates into the advocaat, no-one will notice!)
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Quote by davej
I have been in intensive training for an death defying ......no safety net attempt at a swinging heaven new world record. :happy:
me posting fingers have been hardened by soaking them in vinegar and then baking them under a gently heated grill for weeks on end......
I have conditioned my brain to cope with multi tasked thinking, by filling in both 'The Sun' and the 'Daily Star' crosswords, as well as watching Emmerdale all at the same time and then answering three randon questions about the programme...... :crazy:
I have trained myself to ignore 40 years of conditioning and to simply 'let go' when my bladders full, rather than leave my post to go to the toilet......
(mrs davej wasn't best happy about this one, the furnitures fucked mad )
all in all.........I'm ready!!!!!! :thumbup:
It is my intention at a date in the near future and subject to the permission of the mods, to attempt to have my name showing as the last post made, on every thread (excluding stickies and locked threads) on page 1 of the cafe.
Every post will be relevant to the threads title.
The attempt will be made between the hours of 1930hrs and 2300hrs so as not to be advantaged by the slow traffic offered by the twi light hours.
....however there is a catch flipa
my biggest vice is.....betting, I love a bet ......a bet on anything, therefore I wanna make this into a challenge to give me that bit of extra.... oompfff...I need 5 of the guys to step forward and agree that they will join me, in submitting to an independant and trustworthy member, a clear and correct picture of themselves as a..........
McDick happy meal !!!!!!
Yes gentlemen .......I want you to slap your chap into a buttered, sesame seeded bun, stick it on a plate, surround it with chips and get it photographed...If I succeed then your McDicks get a public airing and if I fail, my McDick goes public and yours get chucked in the bin for selling as pig food..
whadya say guys.........

Time to give Dave an incentive I think...
I'm not making a record attempt here, because I'm using the twilight hours, but it'll remind him and prod his mushy brain, with any luck...
GO DAVE!
Quote by andy4sarah
Just a queston......
anyone know how many people have to be involved for a group of people to be classed as an orgy .....???? Just one of those silly questions that google can't answer !!!!
answers on a postcard to.......
PMSL
Thanks
Sarah

Just needs one to look at your avatar and say "Aww gee, that's a really nice top you have on there, do you need a hand getting out of it?" biggrin
Quote by Calista
Be interesting to know how many of the parents who object actually attend church and truely practice their faith, as opposed to being those who turn up, repent and carry on the same next week!
C x

What's church got to do with it, church is where people meet in His name, prayer can be done at any time in any place, it'd be interesting to see how many people have called for Him when in bed, I know I've heard one or two of you :twisted:
rotflmao ahh but never me ............................ yet ;)
C x
Oooh, you tease. kiss
Got to go in a min though...
Quote by Him'nHer
Marmalaid If you read what I posted in response to Calista, you will see that I DO NOT believe that MY personal beliefs are any more or less important than anyone elses. I have stated that I do not believe in religion. I DO NOT see anywhere that I have written that I believe in Darwins theories. All I have stated is that I am not religious.

Sorry, that's not the way I meant it to sound. I wasn't being personal, but what you did say was that Darwinism should be given 'sciences' statues, whereas creationism should be left to religious studies.
Quote by Him'nHer
Putting it simply what I believe in is personal to me......... I respect that others have different beliefs, and that is personal to them. I DO STRONGLY BELIEVE IN MODERATION. It's ok to me that children (mine included) get taught fundamental Darwin theory as well as fundamental grounding in all the worlds major religions............ or do you think that this is wrong?

Mal will be pleased smile
Again, I agree, but Darwinism should be given the factual appearance that being part of the science curriculum gives to it.
Quote by Fallen Angel
Just popped into this thread to see if it was less dangerous than my X factor thread - I reckon I will stick to religion and politics!
sorry for the hijack - as you were xxx

I thought X-Factor was both religious and political these days biggrin
Quote by Calista
Be interesting to know how many of the parents who object actually attend church and truely practice their faith, as opposed to being those who turn up, repent and carry on the same next week!
C x

What's church got to do with it, church is where people meet in His name, prayer can be done at any time in any place, it'd be interesting to see how many people have called for Him when in bed, I know I've heard one or two of you :twisted:
Quote by Him'nHer
OK so what is this thread all about? It is obviously getting itself into dangerous territory (mod/member disagreements aside) It ultimately is trying to talk about religion (and what did my dear old long departed da' say....... never argue politics or religion son)

But we are a community that respects one another and embraces our differences, we are adult enough to discuss this. It's not dangerous, just helps us see new ways of looking at the world, and that is surely good.
Quote by Him'nHer
I personally believe that our children at an early age should be taught the fundamentals of scientific belief (including Darwin theory) as well as the fundamentals of all the "common" religions (which would include christianity, Islam, Hindu, Budism to name but a few) This happened when I was at school and I finished school in 1970 FFS..........

I agree, almost...
Why should your belief, Darwinism, be give more credance than my belief, Creationism?
Quote by Tra-n-Lee
Now, quite clearly, its not a legitimate "theory" - even the most religious of people must know that. It isn't based on any factual evidence, and thats what a mortal being must have to create a theory or an evaluation. If their is no factual evidence, then obviously they're can be no legitimate reason for spreading an "idea" so wide across a generation such as the American youth. The FSM actually makes more sense than ID because it at least makes some attempt at generating evidence, whilst ID is based on blind faith.
If blind faith is your thing, then that fine - but you should be taught that blind faith is correct and the only way. Studying Darwinism is the study of one mans ideas that are backed up by evidence and collaborative agreement by many others. ID lacks evidence.

I don't want to be seen as a zealot here, but anyway, I'll answer your equally zealous assertions...
Where's the proof of Darwinism? There's at least as much 'proof' of Devine design as there is of evolution. What's the phrase, I can't remember it, something like corelation does not equal causation.
Evolution: Man came from the apes because??? we look fairly similar, we share 98% of our DNA.
Creationism: We share 40% of our DNA with bananas, if we came from apes then why are pigs more genetically similar? Why are pigs used to grow organs and not primates?
You talk of evidence and agreement, evidence only means something has happened, it does not say what caused it. What you say was caused by natural selection or evolution, I could say was caused by God's great plan. Agreement? What does that mean? People agreed that the Earth was flat, didn't make it right, it was just right in their eyes until it was disproven. I believe that Darwinism is the same, it fits your evidence and so it must be true. In time it may be disproven, but I don't believe that Darwinism will ever be proved.
Quote by Mister_Discreet
In America, teaching of religion in schools is forbidden.

Surely this violates Religious Freedom Rights?
No, it protects Religious Freedom Rights. If a school was to teaching that one religion is correct, then that violates the 'rights' of all the other religions to say they are correct.
I don't know about the American system, I don't even know about the British educational system, I only know about when I was at school. RE was taught where the rudiments of the major religions were taught. Darwinism wasn't part of that, maybe it should have been.
Quote by Mister_Discreet
How can it be fair to dismiss what so many people believe as fact in preferance for what many other people see as fact. Darwinsim, atheism and agnosticism are as much a belief as creationism, what's your belief and label from the above? Why should your belief be taught and not mine? If that's not fundamentalism what is?

We are NOT talking about beliefs here. You can't teach beliefs in American schools, it's (rightly or wrongly) against their law. We are talking about scientific theories, which are being taught in science lessons.
FSM and Evolution are theories which fit the facts, and Intelligent design is not. Applying scientific rigour to theories and disregarding theories that do not fit the facts is fundamental to understanding science, otherwise schools would be teaching phologiston, the 4 greek elements and witchcraft in science lessons.
Ok, what is a scientist? Am I one because I've done a few experiments in my time?
What's a theory? Isn't it a belief? Darwin stated his theory of evolution, that developed into a conviction where those beliefs became fact, it's not been proven, he just thought it was right he was persuasive enough to have people believe him.
Christ did the same, he had the certainty of his convictions and was persuasive enough to have people believe him and follow him. Where's the difference on an interlectual level?
You said that Evolution is a thoery that fits the fact, my belief is that God creating the Earth, the seas, the skys, day and night, animals and man fits the facts just as well. The beliefs that I have have been about for far longer, how can that fact alone be enough to have them removed from the curriculum?
Oh, and we are talking about beliefs here, that was the original topic. Besides, what is Darwinism if not a belief? It's certainly not a fact.
Chris
Quote by The Muttleys
Intelligent design, has no scientific basis in fact, and therefore should be treated with the disdain that it deserves.
Load of bollocks !!!, and thats being polite ! :shock:

You may believe that you have a lovely wife, incidentally I agree, but, does it have any basis in demonstrable and purely scientific fact, or is it a "Load of bollocks" just because it's a belief?
Hugs to the lovely Mrs M.
kiss
Quote by Tra-n-Lee
Already apologised in PM about half an hour ago for the "over-zealous" remark, and stated i was not criticising moderation on the boards, and that wires simply got crossed... rolleyes#
From: Tra-n-Lee
To: Mal
Posted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 6:11 pm
Subject: Oh well!
lol - crossed wires there! Apologies anyway; the original post made sense in my head and people PM'ed me asking why it had been locked while they were trying to reply so i got very confused!
Anyway, no agitation meant - just confusion.
Cheers,
Lee

Well done, Lee. Shall we drop it now then?
Quote by Mister_Discreet
about all that carbon dating stuff, and being able to breed new types of dog and there's no such thing as dinosaurs, nope, we can't hear you la la la la la la ...". They have been convincing schools to teach this crap alongside evolution, or in the worst cases instead

And here was me thinking that you were a well reasoned and tolerant individual, MD!
How can it be fair to dismiss what so many people believe as fact in preferance for what many other people see as fact. Darwinsim, atheism and agnosticism are as much a belief as creationism, what's your belief and label from the above? Why should your belief be taught and not mine? If that's not fundamentalism what is?
Chris
Quote by Calista
Personally I am too young to remember it biggrin
Cx

:laughabove: rotflmao :sleeping:
Quote by Calista
There are SO many! biggrin
Mr. Benn
Noggin the Nog
The Clangers
Mary, Mungo & Midge
I can't remember the name of my favourite though! There was Octavia the ostrich, Topof the monkey and a Brummie pig called Pig - anyone remember what it was called? confused:

Inigo Pipkins
Would be you, wouldn't it? :rude:
Quote by Mal
Well, how about we have it on a level playing field and we Mod at the level of the posters post - is that fair? That way I can see a post, play dumb, ban them and tell them it was for anything I care to make up. Sounds about right? And no, that isn't how we do it now, but I might change my mind very shortly.

What's the odds on seeing an apology now, Mal?
I'll give 10-1 against rolleyes
Quote by Tra-n-Lee
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/60359.html
Started by a well-known member, absolute gibberish to nearly everyone, only locked because it was about a topic not relevant to SH overall discussion (e.g. radio). And even that was locked with an explanation of WHY it was locked, which is all i asked for in the first place!
Thats the only reason it was locked - not because it was gibberish.

Mod baiting isn't a great idea around here, whoever you are. It'll just get up peoples noses and you won't get on too well. Why not drop the modding whinge and carry on with the topic?
Chris