Amazing pictures, guys.
Favourites: pic 3 (because Linda's pussy looks good enough to eat) and pic 12 (but then, I've expresssed my enthusiasm for Linda's tits in the past...).
It would be fair so say that I am ready for more. Well, maybe give me 5 minutes!
All the best
Matt
I think it's fair to say most people would be happy to judge the results!
What are the criteria, I wonder, for such things. Technique? Presentation? Artistic impression?
Look forward to giving full marks.
Mx
Is there anyone out there who would like to indulge in a bit of phone sex with an articulate and imaginative guy? I am thinking single women or couples here. Wouldn't it be nice to have a little phone flirting, foreplay and frolicking? Get in touch for love on the line!
Matt :twisted:
Well thank you Sappho. Yes, I too was disappointed by my error at the end. Must of got over-excited.
I note from your profile that you are in publishing and so you will no doubt appreciate good grammar. If I were in your industry (please note use of subjunctive) I expect I would have acheived geateness by now.
But I am still young and there is time...
Appreciate the voote.
Matt
In my bid to be accepted at this event, could I draw your attention to the impeccable grammar in my last notice. Does good use of commas and colons mean nothing these days? If that's not sexy, I don't know what is (notice corrst apostrophe use).
Sappho, maybe we could invest in some temporary tatoos...
At the risk of sounding like a predictable single male, I'd love to be involved in this: am I allowed? If I ask very nicely?
Mxx
Had a great night at Rios: had read mixed things but went along and it was really very friendly. Got very intimate with a couple in the jacuzzi before heading through to the back - along with three other guys! A really fun - and very accommodating - lady. They were coy about names so will respect that. But what a great introduction to the scene.
Can confirm what Kat was saying about Kit's pics - came across them and got in touch. Foxy lady. :shock: