Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
mr__powers1
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 54
Straight Female, 54
0 miles · Greater London

Forum

Quote by doublepenspec
Hi, I'm looking for an ex army girl origionaly from Woking; last name is 'XXXXX'. You were in the army trainnig regiment pirbright around 95/96 and did not complete your training and opted to leave as it was not for you. You will be around 40-42 now.
Get in touch if you remember me and are interested in some sexy fun.
xxx

And she'd be on a swingers site because..dunno
Quote by Trevaunance
What a strange comment to make.

Nope that Flower down to a tee.
LOL. The film looks brilliantly bad....just checked and Donald Pleasence claimed this to be the worse film he ever made.
Quote by Cubes
and why not look for a partner on a swinging site? where else will you find a likeminded person who really understands the sharing of partners with love?
Vanilla world condemns this!
Pam xx

:thumbup: SH has sparked a shed load of weddings over the years.
Yeah....and divorces. lol
We don't lower our standards, but some people wether in clubs or through swinging sites who have contacted us, are punching well above their weight...these people seem to think that because we are swingers we will play with just about anyone, if it isn't going to happen in the vanilla world it sure isn't going to happen in the swinging world.
Quote by notquiteacougar
Just found out last night that my sister has been sleeping with my ex husband on and off over the last 12 years (including when we were together)! :sad: :sad: :sad: Oh and they owned up that they have spent time together "slagging" me off to each other!

nah........ thats nothing on 50shades lol
Well if you want more proof:
I was adopted aged 5 because I was abused and neglected too, I have the burn scars to prove the abuse too! Grew up with controlling adoptive parents and they forced me to have a termination at the age of 19... and before you ask: yes they did force me and I was 24 weeks in... then ontop of that failed marriage to a man who had a tendancy to attempt suicide on a regular basis and then after splitting with him... my youngest daughters dad used to control my life (literally) wasn't allowed out or to have a phone or to have health visitor there without him being there... I wasn't even allowed to go to the doctors on my own! And he used to beat me up!
Noo.... course.. I have nothing on Christian Grey do I?!?!! lol Oh and there's a lot more I could add... but I thought stick with just a few for now!
No, please do tell! rolleyes
Quote by flower411
I'm a gobby bint :giggle:

No change there then!! :bounce::bounce::bounce:kiss
He never went to Australia at all ....Minx has had him stashed under her bed for some time !
Shudders at the thought ! :scared:
Quote by wendyandtim

Oh well, each to their own.

Yes, makes a change from the boring bi-fem stuff. :twisted:
Your right, absolutely have no interest in watching bi fem stuff, but neither have I in the humiliation of a cockold husband.
Quote by wendyandtim
1. The satisfaction of the wife will be the prime concern of the lover and cuckold husband.
2. At the request of the lover the cuckold husband will not be allowed penetrative sex with his wife and her pussy will be reserved for the exclusive use of the lover once he has proved his ability and commitment to satisfying her on a regular basis.
3. The cuckold husband will make his wife freely available for use by the lover, and vacate the marital bed, whenever required.
5. The cuckold husband will perform services required by the lover and wife including, if required, oral stimulation of the lover.
4. The cuckold husband may, with the approval of the lover and wife, be allowed to watch and masturbate himself.

Oh well, each to their own.
Quote by starlightcouple

Star your a fucking wind up merchant who could make an argument out of nothing, and clearly working to rub anyone and everyone the wrong way on here.

thankyou for editing your post to put the bottom part in :thumbup:
maybe in hindsight you thought maybe you had been a bit harsh, by way of me only asking for the link. :notes:
Quote by Mr-Powers
But as you want your link, here it is rolleyes

now click on the HTML in the third correspondant.
It might only be for 2009 and 2010 but it will give you an idea of what it costs now...most definately not 5 million but guess what! much closer to the cost of an episode of Holby City!

well it was not that hard then mr powers to supply a simple link, which is all i asked for.
but to get back on topic, even at that cost do peeple think that over a quarter of a million pounds is good value for something that places us second from bottom, and is an obvious bias show? i know i do but maybe other peeple may think it is good value.
what suprises me though is that the only way the BBC let license payers know the cost of things, is through the Freedom of Information Act 2000, as i could no way find those figures easily, almost as if they have something to hide.
No it wasn't that hard but as I was using my iPad, I had to go and turn my bloody PC on just so I could post you the link.:roll:
Quote by starlightcouple

Fuck me Star, chill will yah!! I was only checking out a couple of other forums and just got a rough idea of how much It may cost the BBC to broadcast, i mean you guessed a figure of between 3 and 5 million, I mean why that figure, what have you based that on? Why not 10 to 15 million, why not 20 to 25 million and why not £370,000, about what it costs to produce an episode of Holby City

my figures were pure guesswork you indicated that you had checked somewhere, and i asked for the link so i could check.
Quote by YOU
I just did a little check, it would appear we don't pay as much as you think, apparently we don't pay no more than what it cost to film an episode of holby city

by that comment i presumed you had got it from a decent source and not some other forum. i could not find any reliable source as to how much it cost so i asked you a simple polite question.
my you are a bit quick tempered and a bit rude to be honest, must be hot in your end of the woods.rolleyes best to keep out of the sun my friend. innocent
i think we should bring back this person.

Star your a fucking wind up merchant who could make an argument out of nothing, and clearly working to rub anyone and everyone the wrong way on here.
But as you want your link, here it is :roll:

now click on the HTML in the third correspondant.
It might only be for 2009 and 2010 but it will give you an idea of what it costs now...most definately not 5 million but guess what! much closer to the cost of an episode of Holby City!
Quote by starlightcouple

I just did a little check, it would appear we don't pay as much as you think, apparently we don't pay no more than what it cost to film an episode of holby city and. I don't think that cost 5 million an episode.

apparently? have you any figures at all mr powers?
me or you do not know how much a single episode of holby costs, but with all the staff on huge wages, the production crew on huge wages and the whole filming, it dont come cheap. also remember that it is a huge hit with viewers as well. unlike the eurovision that in reality is a waste of 5 pounds of license payers money.
if you are not producing actual costs i would presume there are none in black and white. fancy sharing that link you found with regards to not costing more than an episode of holby please.
Fuck me Star, chill will yah!! I was only checking out a couple of other forums and just got a rough idea of how much It may cost the BBC to broadcast, i mean you guessed a figure of between 3 and 5 million, I mean why that figure, what have you based that on? Why not 10 to 15 million, why not 20 to 25 million and why not £370,000, about what it costs to produce an episode of Holby City
Quote by starlightcouple
Does anyone actually know how much It costs the UK each year?

well we all know that where the BBC are concerned, money holds no bounds. but to be honest mr powers i am very suspicious as those figures you wondered about are nowhere to be seen. are they hidden somewhere in the bowels of the BBC expendeture pages?
as a pure guess i would say between 3 and 5 million license payers pound notes. i as an aside, did read that the BBC were taking more peeple to the olympics, than there are british athletes. no suprises there then working for an organisation funded by others, and nothing to stop you spending what you like.
I just did a little check, it would appear we don't pay as much as you think, apparently we don't pay no more than what it cost to film an episode of holby city and. I don't think that cost 5 million an episode.
Quote by BigAsh41
I am a bit confused. I joined swinging heaven at the same time as elsewhere. Four weeks ago.
Score so far:
elsewhere: 3 couples, 3 singles already met and talking to another 3 couples and 2 singles to arrange to meet. I have 5 verifications to prove I am real, not a timewaster and will turn up.
Swinging Heaven: 0 meets, most messages ignored totally, 2 couples responded but still waiting for a call to arrange meet.
I have the same profile, pictures etc
Just a bit gutted a paid for a year on SH.
Anyone else found the same? Must just be different type of people on here?

Maybe the people elsewhere, aren't as fussy? dunno
Quote by Inanna
Out of interest did you notice whether he had logged into this site during the month at all?
Personally I think he didn't want anymore contact but now he's thinking 'Oh well might as well see if their game for another one!'
If he wasn't logged on then maybe, just maybe it might be worth being polite but firm. If he has logged in however, kick him into touch, he's playing you for fools.

Yes - we checked that, and he did. After a few days, we sent him a message from the site (thinking maybe he had lost his phone, and giving him the benefit of the doubt about not replying to our texts) - we asked him if everything was ok. He logged on and read it (which we know because it showed as read in our sent items), but he didn't reply. Again, we gave him the benefit of the doubt, figuring he may have been just popping in and was too busy to reply. So, we waited a while. After he had logged onto the site several more times without replying, we left it. We didn't check after that whether or not he logged on.
I understand the need to seek advice on the matter, but this says it all, fuck him he had his chance, time now to move on.
Quote by Lilmiss
That's right, he hasn't been named... but 'hypothetically'.. he could read this thread. How would you feel if the shoe was on the other foot and somebody discussed your private message? Its already been said in the OP that he's been met from this site.
I once received a nasty mail from somebody I said 'No' to meeting and opened a thread about it. It got removed on the terms if 'Invasion of privacy'... because I stated the nasty message I was sent. It's exactly the same thing.

But what has actually been said about the private message either than he had some shitty news. If it was a more detailed message with all the details about why he ignored/snubbed them for over a month, and they then went on to tell us all the details, then I think that would come into question.
Quote by Inanna
We're still pretty new to the scene and only joined SH at the start of April, so we're still finding our way a bit with various questions of etiquette, behaviour and what we find acceptable or not. We're struggling with a particular question, so thought we'd seek your views...
We met up with a guy about 3 weeks after we joined the site. We'd messaged back as forth a lot, we'd spoken all together on cam in a private chatroom, and we'd exchanged a lot of texts and even had a phone conversation. All of this was intended to make sure that we were on the same wavelength, wanted the same things and (as far as we could tell without meeting) had that spark of sexual chemistry. So, after all of that, we met for a drink and things went well, so we ended up having a great night with him (you can use your imaginations for that part of the story!!)
But, afterwards, he just dropped off the radar. Despite having bombarded us with texts before the meet, he didn't reply to texts, he didn't reply to messages on the site, and after a week, we concluded that he must have been the kind of guy who gets a kick out of the chase and then loses interest - despite having told us that he preferred meeting the same couple regularly than having a string of one-offs. We put it down to experience and moved on. (But have been more cautious ever since - if he lied about that, what else may he have lied about?)
Today, out of the blue and over a month since we met, he texted to say: "sorry for dropping off the radar, had some really shit news and didnt know how to handle it, apologies for my behaviour, hope you're both ok x"
We're now in a dilemma. We liked him a lot, we thought we got along really well (both on a social and physical level) and we had hoped to see him again. But just dropping off the radar with no explanation and totally ignoring us kind of put us off - isn't it a bit rude to spend the night with a couple, then ignore them for weeks, then pop up hoping to just pick things up again...? On the other hand, he has now explained why he behaved so rudely (well... sort of). So, would it now be hypocritical and mean of us to just ignore him?

So he used the excuse about having some very shitty news blah blah blah...very clever, see that now puts you on the spot. Shitty news or not it's still no excuse for ignoring you, I'm sure he wasn't ignoring all people in his life, I think you were right first time, he likes the chase and once he's made the kill moves on to the next one, however a month down the line and he's not got anyone to chase so it's back to his previous conquest and by using the " shitty news " excuse , he might gain a bit of sympathy, trust me he will do it again. And I make no excuse for being such a cynic! lol
Quote by Trevaunance
Could you imagine how busy the forum would be if every user of this site had to leave a goodbye thread.
I never see the need for sympathy threads like this anyway.

My pet hate on these forums is your need to tell the world your leaving, slamming the door then reappearing some time later like it never happened, if you goner go, just go, if you want to tell anyone, take it to PM.
Quote by Freckledbird
Think your being abit of a Drama Queen, I mean FFS your flouncing because you think your reputation has been damaged and you will only return if your name can be salvaged...Oh Please, rolleyes

He already had plans to be away anyway, according to one post in LMU about Broad Street in September (posted much earlier than his flounce or the thread he thinks his character was questioned).
So he was using his so called assassination of his character as an excuse for some attention, for something he was going to do anyway...
Think your being abit of a Drama Queen, I mean FFS your flouncing because you think your reputation has been damaged and you will only return if your name can be salvaged...Oh Please, rolleyes
Quote by Bluefish2009
The church bell in our town church rings every 30 mins. So far no one has felt the need to complain about it, I suspect though, some miserable new comer will spoil it eventually.

Perhaps some want to complain but feel intimidated.
Be afraid, be very afraid

So you never watched Midsummer Murders?
Quote by foxylady2209
The church bell in our town church rings every 30 mins. So far no one has felt the need to complain about it, I suspect though, some miserable new comer will spoil it eventually.

Perhaps some want to complain but feel intimidated.
Intimidated. By the Church? An outdated, tainted organisation that can't even decide whether to allow women to be Bishops and yet employ a gay Arch-Bish?
But like all other religions, there is always the extremists!
Quote by Bluefish2009
The church bell in our town church rings every 30 mins. So far no one has felt the need to complain about it, I suspect though, some miserable new comer will spoil it eventually.

Perhaps some want to complain but feel intimidated.
Quote by starlightcouple

It doesn't quite work like that Star. A person moving to a place can have a noise complaint, even if the noise emittors have been doing it for years.
Dave_Notts

but in this case mr notts the new peeple issued a complaint and then tried to stop that complaint. it seems once in motion that complaint cannot be stopped.
so they move there, get annoyed by the bells, issues a complaint, and then when it naturally pisses all there new neighbours off they then try to rescind the original complaint.
i hope the peeple who have been there for years, send these snivelling brits to coventry. :rascal:
They only tried to stop their complaint because some of the good Christian locals, were making their lives a misery, maybe the church won't appeal because even they believe church bells ringing during the night was a bit OTT.
Quote by starlightcouple
try putting a huge speaker on your roof and blast out ding dongs every 15 mins all how long you get away with it.
why should churches get away with it?apart from which,what's the point of it?
what would jeebus do lol

if a church suddenly in the middle of the night starting ringing its bells i would agree with you a million per cent. BUT these bells and the churches were here long long long before these residents were in many cases. these peeple must have known about the church bells, and in a court of law i would say they would probably lose there case. as has already been pointed out on here about a race circuit. if you dont want to hear racing cars/bikes racing around on a sunday afternoon, then dont buy a house close to a racing circuit that has been there for years.
you dont want to have your head bitten off, then dont put it into a lions cage.
But the bells are computerised, that's cheating in my books.
It's the posh term for when middle and upper managers get suspended, they usually get side promoted upon their return, for the incompetence that got them suspended in the first place.