Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Brown shits on Bliar

last reply
53 replies
2.4k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Quote by jumptoit
GNV you live in France and obviously love it, so why do you continually slag off the politicians and government and various other things you dislike about the UK, are things so rosey in France that all the politicians continually get it right, i mean there are never strikes or riots or immigration problems there are they?!?!?
Just wondered and thats why i am asking.
Cassie

Cassie, in true JTS posting fashion:
I am still entitled to vote in UK elections. Am I not therefore entitled to comment about UK Politicians and Government?
The strikes and riots in France are legendary. France is a Republic but its citizens are entitled by law to express themselves unlike the UK where such expressions are suppressed by law. If you don't like riots, keep clear of Paris and other major cities.
Things I like about both the UK and Europe I have the conviction to express - and often do.
Of course, not every politician gets it right and some get it right more than others. But the centre right policies of the UMP affiliated President are more in keeping with my own life aspirations. Maybe that is why I am here rather than continuing to suffer like some many others under a Labour controlled administration just now.
Yes well thats a whole new thread, why the hell should you get a vote when you dont live here anymore, why should you get a say as to what happens in a country you no longer live and i assume no longer pay taxes or contribute anything towards?? Why should what should now be classed as a foreigner to the UK have a say in what happens to the people who still live here??
There are plenty that do that already, and have not done a days work in their lives....and they ARE British!
Quote by Kaznkev
No way are they worse now!
Igrew up in newcastle,the poverty and lack of hope were so thick you could cut them with a like blyth are still suffering from the mines closing
still remember on my first trip to london age 14 seeing a temp agency and my uncle having to explain wat it was,i was a bright kid but couldnt understand why there were more jobs than people
And lets not even go into the falling down schools,cuts in nurse and doctor training places TO PAY FOR TAX CUTS and the refusal to allow councils to invest in their housing stock,which has led to the housing shortages of today

Kaz
you must have grown up in a different Newcastle to me as I certainly don't recognise it from your desrcription. Had you gone walkabout in Newcastle city centre with your uncle, you would have seen that even Newcastle had temp agencies back then..not everyone was a miner!
You don't things are bad at the moment? Try telling that to the poor 200 odd buggers losing their jobs at BAe (the old Vickers) or the other 200 in consultation at another local enginneering company.
At the moment none of us probably realise just how bad things are as Mr Brown will not implement any of the austere measures required to try and extracate us from the very deep shit we are in before the general election. No matter who wins the election, you are going to see massive cuts in public spending and big increases in taxation. I think we are all in for a very rude wake up call.
I grew up in South Yorkshire ....no miners here not after about '86 anyway.
You're right about the public spending
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
I grew up in South Yorkshire ....no miners here not after about '86 anyway.
You're right about the public spending

Growing up in Scunthorpe was no picnic either, all but one of the steelworks the town was built around was shut down and thousands made unemployed. I didn't have a choice as a kid, but the day I left school I came down here to Brighton. I followed the advice of Norman Tebbit and got on my bike, and Im bloody glad I did.
Quote by kentswingers777
GNV you live in France and obviously love it, so why do you continually slag off the politicians and government and various other things you dislike about the UK, are things so rosey in France that all the politicians continually get it right, i mean there are never strikes or riots or immigration problems there are they?!?!?
Just wondered and thats why i am asking.
Cassie

Cassie, in true JTS posting fashion:
I am still entitled to vote in UK elections. Am I not therefore entitled to comment about UK Politicians and Government?
The strikes and riots in France are legendary. France is a Republic but its citizens are entitled by law to express themselves unlike the UK where such expressions are suppressed by law. If you don't like riots, keep clear of Paris and other major cities.
Things I like about both the UK and Europe I have the conviction to express - and often do.
Of course, not every politician gets it right and some get it right more than others. But the centre right policies of the UMP affiliated President are more in keeping with my own life aspirations. Maybe that is why I am here rather than continuing to suffer like some many others under a Labour controlled administration just now.
Yes well thats a whole new thread, why the hell should you get a vote when you dont live here anymore, why should you get a say as to what happens in a country you no longer live and i assume no longer pay taxes or contribute anything towards?? Why should what should now be classed as a foreigner to the UK have a say in what happens to the people who still live here??
There are plenty that do that already, and have not done a days work in their lives....and they ARE British!
But Kenty it is actually physically impossible not to pay some sort of tax to the country if you live here even if you are on the dole and claiming benefits you can not avoid paying some back wether it be vat,council tax,road tax etc.
You know, I sometimes wish I'd actually been alive in the 80s, cos England, this England, this Sceptred Isle must truly have been a land flowing with milk and honey? dunno
No, wait, actually I was alive now I think on it, and I seem to remember it was shit! rolleyes
I seem to remember that the NF had a good old time of it in the 80s blaming immigrants for the lack of jobs and what have you, but where I lived, on a West Yorkshire council estate in a pit village where there was no longer a pit after 1982 / 1983, there wasn't a black face to be seen, except in the local shops, obviously. Someone was taking the jobs, but it weren't immigrants taking 'em where I lived I can tell you. People were still out of work though, schools were still a bit pants on the sink estates. Hospitals were still a bit rubbish when you really needed them at times. Social housing was no more available to the likes of me as an indigenous white heterosexual male then as it is now, so I'm not sure the reason I can't get a council house these days is cos these asylum seekers are nicking it all? Probably it's cos it was all sold off, and the money raised was divested into other areas, instead of being put into more social housing. The same seemed to have happened to the mainstays of British industry, which were sold off to the highest bidder to help pay off national debts we'd inherited from the economic crisis in the 70s under both Labour and Tory governments?
Some would say that yer Thatcherite right were quite happy to keep the 'no such thing as scoiety' underclass right where they were, no matter what the cost, cos after all, if there's no such thing as society, well, it follows that there can be no such thing as social consequences to the political decisions that pre-date the New Labour by decades? confused
Plus ca change, plus la meme chose! The bleating of the right about the so-called forgotten working man is the height of hypocrisy.
N x x x ;)
I'd answer with reasoned and considered aruguments, but I really can't put it much better than Neilinleeds.
Mrs Thatchers quote, often misquoted, was:
"I think we've been through a period where too many people have been given to understand that if they have a problem, it's the government's job to cope with it. 'I have a problem, I'll get a grant.' 'I'm homeless, the government must house me.' They're casting their problem on society. And, you know, there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families. And no government can do anything except through people, and people must look to themselves first. It's our duty to look after ourselves and then, also to look after our neighbour. People have got the entitlements too much in mind, without the obligations. There's no such thing as entitlement, unless someone has first met an obligation."

What she forgot, frequently, was that the government often caused the problems in the first place. New building was then, as now, held-up by planning regulations.
Not to mention "look after thy neighbour": Not a chance, she can look after herself !
Anyway, government over-regulates: It always has done (at least for the last 50 years)
It over-regulates to the extent that it has held this society back for decades, and now we have the EU used as an excuse for said over-regulation (not that it needs to...the EU can over-regulate quite well on its own).
Government is to defend the country....everything else should be left to the people !
Except that the people need organisation to help them...and so we go on....ad-infinitum.
I promise not to mention that climate change is now being used to enact social change.....to the extent that government/s will soon be enacting rather strict laws as to how many children you can have....I think that each woman will be allowed to have - children (too many now so we have to have negative birth figures).
So, women, you will soon have to figure - out how to manage to have births in the minus numbers.... of a child will have to go back..... !
An interesting thought perhaps?
the left right theatre of westminster is nothing more than a show. same policies, same actions, same interests, same masters. the belgian guy is a member of the bilderberg group and will serve them well. bliar did'nt get the job, because the people would'nt buy it and the powers that be that control the brown's, bliars, camarons etc knew it. ashton is also a stooge. obvious.
Quote by GnV
And of course the conservative party never packed the house of lords with its own cronies.
No prime minister is elected.
The prime minister is the leader of the party that forms the government.
Obviously, there is an election coming.

Equally:
No Government has appointed so many Peers to ministerial posts as Bliar and Brown have done to avoid scrutiny and debate in the chamber of the House of Commons. How unconstitutional is that?
No leader of the party has been so much anointed as Brown was with threats to end political careers if they opposed him (except, of course, in Banana Republics).
The other two "one liners" are true. In the cast of the last one - bring it on!dear GnV,
where is this constitution you refer to ?
Quote by BrightonGeezer
I grew up in South Yorkshire ....no miners here not after about '86 anyway.
You're right about the public spending

Growing up in Scunthorpe was no picnic either, all but one of the steelworks the town was built around was shut down and thousands made unemployed. I didn't have a choice as a kid, but the day I left school I came down here to Brighton. I followed the advice of Norman Tebbit and got on my bike, and Im bloody glad I did.
We had a bit of a steelworks closure round here (Sheffield) too, so we had it worse so there...can't find the appropriate emoticon....bugger
Senior lobbyists told PRWeek they were aware of 'advanced discussions' regarding the elevation of the 20 individuals. Some of them are tipped for ministerial roles.
One leading public affairs agency, Mandate Communications, said it had obtained the information through discussions with Tory MPs and advisers at the Conservative Party conference last week.
Mandate is now looking to strengthen its relationships with the 20 potential peers, many of whom could be set for ministerial posts in a Conservative government.
1. Sir Peter Gershon – Government efficiency expert. Being considered for a Ministerial role making some of the toughest spending-cuts decisions facing an incoming Conservative administration.
2. Stuart Rose – Marks & Spencer Chairman whom the Tories plan to recognise for both his business acumen and his profile amongst the corporate responsibility community thanks to Marks & Spencer’s “Plan A”.
3. Jonathon Porritt – friend of the Prince of Wales and environmental campaigner. Being considered for post Copenhagen summit roving “Green Envoy” role.
4. Michael Spencer – critical lynchpin of Conservative election planning, leading party “ambassador” to the City and responsible for restoring Conservative financial health in his role as Party Treasurer. Cameron wants to keep those relationships friendly in the first few tough years of a new Government.
5. DeAnne Julius – Chair of Chatham House and former member of the Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee, will add significant gravitas – and gender balance – to the Conservatives in the House of Lords.
6. Angela Knight – former Conservative MP and current head of the British Bankers’ Association. Her appointment will send a signal to the banking sector that the Conservatives plan to work with banks to encourage recovery and seek to avoid demonising them. But it also shows that the Conservatives want a banking “insider” to help sell their vision for the new regulatory regime.
7. Ann Widdecombe – a reward for years of service in the Commons and also a symbol to the right wing of the Conservative Party that David Cameron has not forgotten that they helped his rise to the leadership.
8. Sir Howard Bernstein – Chief Executive of Manchester City Council, host to this year’s Conservative Party Conference.
9. Sir Richard Dannatt – former Chief of the Defence Staff. Respected for his independence; David Cameron hopes to rebuild bridges between government and the military brass that have strained under Labour.
10. Sir John Tusa – not a natural Tory, but as the leader of the Conservative Taskforce on the Arts in 2007, Tusa is an ambassador between the Conservative Party and the naturally left-leaning arts establishment.
11. Bill Emmott – former editor of the Economist and commentator on the growth of Chinese economic and political power. Being considered to advise the Conservative frontbench foreign policy team.
12. Sir Alan Haselhurst – recognition that there is a continued role for this respected Conservative Parliamentarian who had, until just a few months ago, been considered the favourite to become Speaker of the House of Commons.
13. Sir John Major – previously refused a peerage when offered. Now being convinced to take the position to give “elder statesman” support to a young new Prime Minister.
14. Harpal Kumar – whilst the Cancer Research UK CEO will be at pains to retain his independence, the Conservatives are keen to make a strong gesture to the campaigning community by elevating this leading charity sector figure.
15. Jill Kirby – Director of the Centre for Policy Studies and responsible for advancing Conservative thinking across a range of policy areas.
16. Robin Wight – Advertising industry legend (and President of Mandate’s parent communications group, Engine). A former Conservative Parliamentary candidate. Mooted as a link to the creative industries and symbol that the new Conservative Party is not afraid to include a man whose wardrobe includes purple and pink Oswald Boateng suits.
17. Sir Simon Milton – central figure of the new Conservative local government establishment.
18. David Ross – co-founder of the Carphone Warehouse and another senior business figure who has been close to the Conservative leadership.
19. Tim Berners-Lee – the man behind the World Wide Web contributed to Labour’s Digital Britain, but the Conservatives want his credibility behind their policies to implement the next stage in the country’s digital development.
20. Kirsty Allsopp – presenter of Location, Location, Location, famed for her pashminas, Allsopp has already been advising the Conservatives on housing matters. The daughter of a Peer, the Lords should hold no fear for the famous property developer, and her elevation would add a populist touch to proceedings.

Quote by gulsonroad30664
And of course the conservative party never packed the house of lords with its own cronies.
No prime minister is elected.
The prime minister is the leader of the party that forms the government.
Obviously, there is an election coming.

Equally:
No Government has appointed so many Peers to ministerial posts as Bliar and Brown have done to avoid scrutiny and debate in the chamber of the House of Commons. How unconstitutional is that?
No leader of the party has been so much anointed as Brown was with threats to end political careers if they opposed him (except, of course, in Banana Republics).
The other two "one liners" are true. In the cast of the last one - bring it on!dear GnV,
where is this constitution you refer to ?
The "constitution" of the UK is the set of laws and principles under which the United Kingdom is Governed.
You can also find a useful document from the Ministry of Justice
On the other hand, if you prefer the sort of written constitution which has served the passage of time and is enshrined now in the European Constitution (to which the UK is bound), you need look no further than the constitution written by General de Gaulle in 1958 when forming France's 5th Republic wink
Senior lobbyists told PRWeek they were aware of 'advanced discussions' regarding the elevation of the 20 individuals. Some of them are tipped for ministerial roles.
One leading public affairs agency, Mandate Communications, said it had obtained the information through discussions with Tory MPs and advisers at the Conservative Party conference last week.

bla bla bla
When/if it happens, your quote might carry some meaning wink
It makes no difference to me, nor to those who live abroad.
Anything labour does now, or is doing now, has been done before by conservative govs.
Or will be done in the future by whatever govs there are.
Until the lords is done away with and replaced by an elected house, hopefully soon.
Nothing is new in politics.
600 crooks ruling over 60 million saps.
Quote by JTS
It makes no difference to me, nor to those who live abroad.
Anything labour does now, or is doing now, has been done before by conservative govs.
Or will be done in the future by whatever govs there are.
Until the lords is done away with and replaced by an elected house, hopefully soon.
Nothing is new in politics.
600 crooks ruling over 60 million saps.

Is there a need for an elected second chamber at all?
The Westminster parliament is already a second chamber and subservient to the European Parliament and the Commission..
Brown and Bliar saw to that.
Is Blair a Brown Shirt?
lp
It was a conservative government that signed Britain into the common market, which morphed into the european union.
The conservatives make a lot of questioning eu membership, but they will not remove this country from the eu.
Factually, if the country left the eu it would slump to third world status immediately.
Taxation barriers would immediately go up.
The billions saved in eu donations would be dwarfed by the loss of exports and tax barriers.
Almost certainly the welfare state would have to be severely pruned and many public institutions would not survive.
Even more of a worry is that Germany would almost certainly become the dominant state, with all the historical risk that entails.
Probably several other states would leave the eu at the same time: Poland and Denmark, and maybe Italy.
Quote by JTS
It was a conservative government that signed Britain into the common market, which morphed into the european union.
The conservatives make a lot of questioning eu membership, but they will not remove this country from the eu.
Factually, if the country left the eu it would slump to third world status immediately.
Taxation barriers would immediately go up.
The billions saved in eu donations would be dwarfed by the loss of exports and tax barriers.
Almost certainly the welfare state would have to be severely pruned and many public institutions would not survive.
Even more of a worry is that Germany would almost certainly become the dominant state, with all the historical risk that entails.
Probably several other states would leave the eu at the same time: Poland and Denmark, and maybe Italy.

Actually, I wouldn't disagree with any of that.
I consider myself a European and am currently enjoying the benefits that such status provides.
Quote by GnV
It was a conservative government that signed Britain into the common market, which morphed into the european union.
The conservatives make a lot of questioning eu membership, but they will not remove this country from the eu.
Factually, if the country left the eu it would slump to third world status immediately.
Taxation barriers would immediately go up.
The billions saved in eu donations would be dwarfed by the loss of exports and tax barriers.
Almost certainly the welfare state would have to be severely pruned and many public institutions would not survive.
Even more of a worry is that Germany would almost certainly become the dominant state, with all the historical risk that entails.
Probably several other states would leave the eu at the same time: Poland and Denmark, and maybe Italy.

Actually, I wouldn't disagree with any of that.
I consider myself a European and am currently enjoying the benefits that such status provides.
With respect.....you can hardly do anything else seeing as you now live in France.
Otherwise the word " hypocrit " might spring to mind?
Is it Brown shits on Blair...or indeed a brown shit on Blair?