Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login

Patrica's rent

last reply
36 replies
1.8k views
0 watchers
0 likes
Just been watching Channel 4, news and was supprised by what I heard.
A lady (Patricia) was worried she would have to move out of her house in Islington because of the budget.
Housing Benefit now capped at £400 per week
Patrica's rent £690 per week
Patricia's benefit up until now £583 per week
Short fall of £183 per week
I did notice the manicured fingernails and 42" plasma tv
I am quite shocked that people were able to claim £35, a year in housing benefit
I am gobsmacked
Do people fell this is realy right?
just go down the local council with the right hand shake and away you go wink
Quote by Lizaleanrob
just go down the local council with the right hand shake and away you go wink

I am just not sure that paying over £35 K for some ones rent is justifiable
Quote by Bluefish2009
just go down the local council with the right hand shake and away you go wink

I am just not sure that paying over £35 K for some ones rent is justifiable
socialist and left wing you get what you want
doo try to keep up blue :giggle::giggle:
Quote by Lizaleanrob
just go down the local council with the right hand shake and away you go wink

or should that be the left hand shake lol
That is exactly why the housing benefit has increased from 14 billion to 21 billion pounds in ten years.
The idea that someone can live in a seven bedroomed house and claim the 1500 quid a month rent off the taxpayers alliance is a fucking joke, or is that the newspapers making it up again?



This is never ending bollocks.
If she has to make up the shortfall then tough shit....get out and get a cheaper property.
I am sick and tired of seeing these scroungers take us all for mugs, and the councils let them get away with it.
and people wonder why the man who has been honest and hard working all his life suddenly picks up the shotgun and blasts the people who have made his life a misery.
more than half of the council boards are thieves and corrupt.
if i had my way id throw them out of the top window of the least a cleaner would have a job!
Quote by tyracer
and people wonder why the man who has been honest and hard working all his life suddenly picks up the shotgun and blasts the people who have made his life a misery.
more than half of the council boards are thieves and corrupt.
if i had my way id throw them out of the top window of the least a cleaner would have a job!

Never........
Quote by kentswingers777
and people wonder why the man who has been honest and hard working all his life suddenly picks up the shotgun and blasts the people who have made his life a misery.
more than half of the council boards are thieves and corrupt.
if i had my way id throw them out of the top window of the least a cleaner would have a job!

Never........
I think the word for this is now fallible wink
and yes blue this is just the tip of the iceberg i think this £400 limit is overdue and justified if these people found a job would they still rent these places dunno
Quote by Bluefish2009
Just been watching Channel 4, news and was supprised by what I heard.
A lady (Patricia) was worried she would have to move out of her house in Islington because of the budget.
Housing Benefit now capped at £400 per week
Patrica's rent £690 per week
Patricia's benefit up until now £583 per week
Short fall of £183 per week
I did notice the manicured fingernails and 42" plasma tv
I am quite shocked that people were able to claim £35, a year in housing benefit
I am gobsmacked
Do people fell this is realy right?

My bother-in-law receives over £2,000 / month + in benefits including housing. Neither his wife nor him works and they have many luxury items. However I struggle with how they can afford all of these items and proplerly care for their 5 children? Personally I believe he should be working but he claims that he could not make as much working.
Part of the problem here is that rents in some ares of central London have no relationship to "normal" living costs - the question is "if someone in these areas has to resort to benefits (clearly they must have had high earnings to get there in the first place) should they be allowed to stay put or move to a cheaper area?"
I would say, "OK let them have the benefit of the higher rent allowance for say six months maximum (they have probably paid into the system at one time on that sort of level), then if they cannot get back to high paid work, they should be made to move".
Plim
Quote by Plimboy
Part of the problem here is that rents in some ares of central London have no relationship to "normal" living costs - the question is "if someone in these areas has to resort to benefits (clearly they must have had high earnings to get there in the first place) should they be allowed to stay put or move to a cheaper area?"
I would say, "OK let them have the benefit of the higher rent allowance for say six months maximum (they have probably paid into the system at one time on that sort of level), then if they cannot get back to high paid work, they should be made to move".
Plim

I like that :thumbup:
These scrounging benefit scum are of course only getting shelter tis the landlords who are making the profits.
Quote by Ben_welshminx
These scrounging benefit scum are of course only getting shelter tis the landlords who are making the profits.

Yes, can't argue with that Ben, and to be fare the lady in the example above does work part time.
My feeling were, is it right for the government to give this amount of our tax money away? Is a cap of £400 still too high?
BTW, good to see you in the forum again Ben lol
£400 per month wouldn't get you very much even round here..
A semi decent habitable flat is in the region of £500 per month..
But if your lucky enough to own your own property at the time of your unemployment then the benefit you receive is paltry....
After waiting 13 weeks and building up arrears that come to over £1000 you will get the interest paid (which in my case would be equal to around £60 per month)
Then when you go back to work you start paying the mortgage again and also extra on top to clear the arrears...
Quote by Steve
£400 per month wouldn't get you very much even round here..
A semi decent habitable flat is in the region of £500 per month..
But if your lucky enough to own your own property at the time of your unemployment then the benefit you receive is paltry....
After waiting 13 weeks and building up arrears that come to over £1000 you will get the interest paid (which in my case would be equal to around £60 per month)
Then when you go back to work you start paying the mortgage again and also extra on top to clear the arrears...

Nope but £400 a week could.
Quote by Mr-Powers
£400 per month wouldn't get you very much even round here..
A semi decent habitable flat is in the region of £500 per month..
But if your lucky enough to own your own property at the time of your unemployment then the benefit you receive is paltry....
After waiting 13 weeks and building up arrears that come to over £1000 you will get the interest paid (which in my case would be equal to around £60 per month)
Then when you go back to work you start paying the mortgage again and also extra on top to clear the arrears...

Nope but £400 a week could.
redface
Must stop speed reading..
Quote by Steve
£400 per month wouldn't get you very much even round here..
A semi decent habitable flat is in the region of £500 per month..
But if your lucky enough to own your own property at the time of your unemployment then the benefit you receive is paltry....
After waiting 13 weeks and building up arrears that come to over £1000 you will get the interest paid (which in my case would be equal to around £60 per month)
Then when you go back to work you start paying the mortgage again and also extra on top to clear the arrears...

Why is that? Why is some one who is renting, entitled to more than some one who is in the same trouble, but owns their home? That seems mad to me dunno
Quote by Bluefish2009
Why is that? Why is some one who is renting, entitled to more than some one who is in the same trouble, but owns their home? That seems mad to me dunno

Probably because in the long run the home owner the tax payer bails out could potentially profit from the sale of the property they own, whereas the tennant is merely paying rent to put a roof over their head.
Quote by Jewlnmart

Why is that? Why is some one who is renting, entitled to more than some one who is in the same trouble, but owns their home? That seems mad to me dunno

Probably because in the long run the home owner the tax payer bails out could potentially profit from the sale of the property they own, whereas the tennant is merely paying rent to put a roof over their head.
And lining a greedy landlords pocket rolleyes
Quote by Steve

Why is that? Why is some one who is renting, entitled to more than some one who is in the same trouble, but owns their home? That seems mad to me dunno

Probably because in the long run the home owner the tax payer bails out could potentially profit from the sale of the property they own, whereas the tennant is merely paying rent to put a roof over their head.
And lining a greedy landlords pocket rolleyes
So if you loose your job, rent your own house out and move into rented housing, :giggle: oh no, then you would have an income :twisted:
Still not clear to me!
Quote by Bluefish2009
So if you loose your job, rent your own house out and move into rented housing, :giggle:
Still not clear to me!

That's if the mortgage lenders agree to you renting it out...
Then you would be gaining an income from it and maybe not entitled to any benefit for a rented property...
I went through all this recently when I was unemployed...
Got nowhere...
Quote by Steve

Why is that? Why is some one who is renting, entitled to more than some one who is in the same trouble, but owns their home? That seems mad to me dunno

Probably because in the long run the home owner the tax payer bails out could potentially profit from the sale of the property they own, whereas the tennant is merely paying rent to put a roof over their head.
And lining a greedy landlords pocket rolleyes
Because all landlords are greedy :roll:
I suppose the question to you should be whether you would be prepared to sacrifice a stake in the property you own which you could either a) buy back from the government when you aren't suffering such hard times or b) pay back any benefit given in relation to the property + a proportion of any profit realised should you sell the property.
Quote by Jewlnmart
Because all landlords are greedy rolleyes
I suppose the question to you should be whether you would be prepared to sacrifice a stake in the property you own which you could either a) buy back from the government when you aren't suffering such hard times or b) pay back any benefit given in relation to the property + a proportion of any profit realised should you sell the property.

And why should I have to pay back any benefit I receive when those who rent dont ?
Quote by Steve

Because all landlords are greedy rolleyes
I suppose the question to you should be whether you would be prepared to sacrifice a stake in the property you own which you could either a) buy back from the government when you aren't suffering such hard times or b) pay back any benefit given in relation to the property + a proportion of any profit realised should you sell the property.

And why should I have to pay back any benefit I receive when those who rent dont ?
Because you gain financially by receiving the benefit to pay your mortgage.
Quote by Jewlnmart

And why should I have to pay back any benefit I receive when those who rent dont ?

Because you gain financially by receiving the benefit to pay your mortgage.
Ahhh I see now....
Your in favour of 2 sets of standards....
Pay rent to those who dont/cant/wont buy and give nothing to those who try to better themselves and but their own property....
Thanks.....I see now :thumbup:
Quote by Steve

And why should I have to pay back any benefit I receive when those who rent dont ?

Because you gain financially by receiving the benefit to pay your mortgage.
Ahhh I see now....
Your in favour of 2 sets of standards....
Pay rent to those who dont/cant/wont buy and give nothing to those who try to better themselves and but their own property....
Thanks.....I see now :thumbup:
Not at all. I'm saying no individual should profit from any benefit they recieve. I fail to see how choosing to be a tennant makes someone inferior to someone who owns property.
Quote by Jewlnmart

And why should I have to pay back any benefit I receive when those who rent dont ?

Because you gain financially by receiving the benefit to pay your mortgage.
Ahhh I see now....
Your in favour of 2 sets of standards....
Pay rent to those who dont/cant/wont buy and give nothing to those who try to better themselves and but their own property....
Thanks.....I see now :thumbup:
Not at all. I'm saying no individual should profit from any benefit they recieve. I fail to see how choosing to be a tennant makes someone inferior to someone who owns property.
It does not make them inferior, but it does give them an advantage over the home owner which is unfair, however I can now see the problem, A home owner could if they were a little dishonest, put them selves in a position where they might benefit financially as a deliberate act. but then so can a person who is renting, they no longer need to find the money for rent
Quote by tyracer
and people wonder why the man who has been honest and hard working all his life suddenly picks up the shotgun and blasts the people who have made his life a misery.
more than half of the council boards are thieves and corrupt.
if i had my way id throw them out of the top window of the least a cleaner would have a job!

Council boards?
Extensive knowledge of local government have we?