Liverpool player Luis Suarez has been convicted by the FA of racial abuse, Fined £4000 and given an 8 match ban, that to me should have been and end of it, with hopefully some regret and a lesson learned on his part.
So I was dissmayed to see the whole Liverpool squad, obviously with the approval of the Club owners, manager and shareholders approval, enter the field for thier pre-match warm up wearing one and all Suarez shirts with his name and number on them as a gesture of support.
Supporting racism is disgusting, the whole club should now be facing fines and point deduction in my opinion. Please don't tell me they were of the same opinion as me and felt that the support would show they thought the matter at an end, not a club with image advisors, legal advisors, PR consultants, supposedly intelligent businesmen and the like on thier payroll.
To me it said "so what he is racist we don't care why shouldn't he be"
Hang your heads in shame Liverpool FC and I hope the FA will take action for your display of united racism. :sad:
This whole fucking thing has got out of hand.
Bang their bleeding heads together, tell them to grow up and act like adults.
Just goes to prove that footballers are a load of fairies - over paid, over rated and over sexed ones at that.
This is not one word against another. Saurez used a racially discriminating word by his own admission but this word is not offensive in his own country.
It is simply not possible in Britain to use any word - offensive or otherwise - to infer any kind of racial differences.
Kenny Dalgleish will ultimately be held responsible for the big error in judgement in letting the players wear those t-shirts. Very much like Richard keys and Andy Gray, he is of an age that is not up to speed with modern day attitudes to discrimination and displayed his ignorance by allowing the players to wear those shirts.
Liverpool's attitude overall has been questionable for no other reason than the sensitivity of the issue, they really ought to have maintained a dignified silence until they had the report in their hands and any appeal had been heard and ruled on. I wonder if Liverpool will now face charges of bringing the game into disrepute by facing up to the Football Association in this way.
Are we permitted to say/write what words he used or called some one so we can judge or make up our minds as to how serious this was....
I ask as I do not know what happened, do not follow football at all
would the other player have been charged had he racially abused Luis Suarez ?
would anton ferdinand be charged had he racially abused john terry?
no no and no again i beleeve.
sorry but that is how i see things.
A bit of perspective.
I draw your attention to the line "Sticks and stones may break your bones, but words can break hearts".
The offensive word used by Suarez is 'negrito' and is said to not have the nasty racist tone in Uruguay, where he is from, that it does here. The word is offensive, but rather than rightly consign it to history, it is kept alive by the likes of MTV, and is seen to be used extensively by black people amongst themselves, yet if a white person were to use it, all hell would break loose. Until such time that everyone reads from the same page, this problem will never go away.
There are none so blind as those that cannot see.
You carry on with the heartfelt unsubstantiated rants and I will occasionally challenge them.
You may wish to note that a huge proportion of victims of racially motivated crimes consider themselves to be white. I can find no evidence that such complaints are treated less seriously by the police.
It is not about wether the law is equal, it is not about what wether a person is racist to a white person, it is about one person ebing racist towards another and by his own admission he was, end of.
If you want to campaign about the law, change the world that is a good thing but until then the law is the law, I have to admit that I cannot remember the last time I heard a black man call someone whitey or honky, they seem to have got the idea regarding racism.
However you ask for a case where a black person was charged with racist comments to a white person, fair enough but I ask you to give me a case where a black person was found to be being racist, I haven't heard any footballer or anyone else accuse someone of calling them a honky or whitey but would be interested to hear about such an accusation.
The problem for me with racism, is that it can be used as a weapon, as has been mentioned above, re the word . Even the word racism is often used against some one to stop them expressing what might be legitimate views.
I am often called names, county bumpkin, and country yokel and many more, I am not offended. often it is meant jokingly and said warmly. But how can one be sure? I have Irish Friends nicknamed Paddy, welsh ones called Taffy, none are offended. I new Taffy 2 years before I learnt his real name.
Some times the line in the sand is very blurry
What I am doing is using FACTS to dispute the nonsense you post.
I shall continue to do so.
I had one of these as a toy/teddybear as a child, bet they dont sell many now
""In a statement reported by the BBC, Virginia (Ginny) C. Knox, previously brand director for Robertson's and later Chief Operating Officer of the Culinary Brands Division of RHM, told The Herald Newspaper in Scotland in 2001 that the decision to remove the Golliwogg symbol from Robertson's jam and marmalade jars was taken after research found that children were not familiar with the character, although it still appealed to the older generations."
And you can still buy the dolls. I gave my daughter one a couple of years ago as a Xmas present. As I anticipated it sparked her outrage but prompted a welcome debate.