Hmmmm...bit of a prob here for me...I agree cock pics aren't either nice, acceptable, or I believe even legal (should they be erect) in the god forsaken legal world of this country. Yet we are happy to accept tits out no problem.
Ok, so it's not illegal and I ain't gonna complain if some lady wants to display her wares (lol), but it seems more than hypocritical that the guys get panned for it (legality wise or not) yet the ladies are openly encourgaed by the users of the forum.
I said it before in kit-Kats thread re: "freedom"...where's the consistency? I know for definite that complaints of cock shot won't stop cos a guy posts a flaccid member, so lets have an all or nothing policy re the avatars and stop having a go at guys who want to display their wares...
(As to the legality side re an erect cock..mods go trawl the ads and remove every one that has a pic of an erect penis....hmmm..not enough hours in the day me feels....or is that fact that no-one reports them an indication that they are really not that unwanted in the forum either..who knows...but go full on one way or the other..please!! )
Stu of the "Fran and variety"
PS from a leg, not a tit man!!!
Ahhhhhh - I know I show my boobs - but I also show my face too!
But one thing Fran....
We girls would get panned for a 'pussy shot' too
and quite rightly so!
So I do not think that we have inequality!
Boobs you can see on most beaches these days and in most tabloid newspapers.
Alex x x
Sorry Alex, hope you didn't think I was having a go at you...but can't see the face argument re ladies...if guys were to do it...they will still get panned... my argument is consistency...not a personal attack against anyone.
My view is feel free to post what you are comfortable with...its the double standards that pervade that annoy me.
Love Stu of the "Fran and..variety"
come on IYMBE... you know that if you want you can wear their knickers stockings sussies etc....
I do not disagree with Stu /Fran.... but I do think that there is generally more acceptance of the naked or semi naked female form from both male and female, than there is of the naked male member.....yes it is not equal but that is the case in society.... we cannot deny that such members exit and I am confident that many ladies here are well pleased that they do....
I would hate to see imtimate avatarts banned... I hate dot see anything banned.... but in same way that ALex's airbags may put me of my tea so might IYMBE's intimate avatar put others off theirs!!!
Just my thoughts
Gmanxxx
with serious head on...
Never mind that I want to see this fight!!
lol. ur all talk, bring it on!!!!!!!!!
Then why do we allow either? Consistency is the question...consistency is the answer... I bleat on cos not one of the mods has commented on the "freedom" thread to my posting, yet continue to show their inconsistencies.
All or nothing has to be their watch word...yet it is applied...in my humble opinion somewhat sanctamoniously (did I spell that right....please feel free to correct me) .
I abbhor Censorship in all its forms it stifles the individual, creates conformity and allows the state to control where it has no right to... (ooohhh previous thread re: conspiracy theories and are MI6 watching..I hope so!!) Countries that censor have undergone revolution, war and all the evils of man...others that apply it succesfully only do so through fear or manipulation of the media (shit...Hutton Inquiry...that woke the spooks up)
Ok, so I am being flippant, but if this site is to welcome all then lets make the rules up front and clear, not asides, abuses, personal attacks or petty pm's to guys saying lose the cock shot. It is clear the admin and Mods want to and endeavour to run a professional, open site...lets keep it that way!
Enjoy one and all...and to the spooks.....BOOO...(that scared you!!)
Stu of the "Fran and variety"
Thought I had commented in the freedom thread....
*goes off to look*
BTW - I totally agree with your comments Fran about the comments made to some postings. New people sometimes don't understand the ethos of the site and so post things which upset others. At times the responses from some regular members has been less than helpful or constructive.
If in doubt - say nowt!!
x xx
Fran
No probs!!!
I would never show anything on an avatar that would not be acceptable in the normal press (well sun or star - ok, maybe i'd draw the line at the sport).
And i think that is the same with the majority of the females on here.
So, I don't think there are double standards really. I would certainly side with equality.
But - I'm all for everyone having their own opinion - it would be a sad and boring world if we all thought the same!
So, Fran and Stu - and especially IYMBE - Big Big Big Hugs!!!
Alex x x
Stu.... isuspect it is more to do with what is aestheically pleasing.... lets face it cocks whether flaccid or not do look comic where as I have never found anything about a woman to be comic.... sometimes I may choose to look the other way ( airbags for instance), but on the whole the design characteristics of the female form are just mor pleasing on the eye.... I suppose we would all balk at an avatar of a hot and ready vagina.... but few if any ladies post such shots as avatars.... where as blokes are a lot more brazen.... I am happy for genital shots be they male or female to be proscribed as Avatars...
Gmanx
half nine and still serious.... not enough apple juice
Go Shelly Go Shelly Go Shelly
Gmanxxx