ive been a doorman for 12 years and know the ins and outs of weapons if you was to use your nailfile it would be classed as a weapon, you can use as much force as you like as long you fear for your safety you have to amost a lawyer to understand what is reasonable force i.e a robber holds you up at knife point and demands your money etc.. you hit him once and he gos to the floor you would not be charged with assult if you kicked him when he was on the floor you would charged because you had the chance to leave the scene
I think at the end of the day you do whatever is necessary to avoid becoming another statistic, and worry about the legal implications later. The law tells me this- Don`t use pepper spray to get out of trouble, or we will lock you up for five years. Pepper spray, , , or five years. Not much of a choice is it? I didn`t actively seek out pepper spray in this country (the stuff I bought in the US is still out there, I wasn`t daft enough to try to get it home on the plane!), but since I have it, I`ll use it if I have to, because I don`t have enough faith in my own abilties to take on an attacker physically....and win. I could kill someone with a brick. I very much doubt if I`d kill someone with pepper spray.
Venusxxx
very true you have to do what you gotta do to get out that situation as my criminal record will tell you and wouldnt lose any sleep going to town on someone who wants to give it a bash ,act first think later
I've been reading stats about for the past few months (yes, a sad life, but someone's got to do it)
If you really want the stats, then this site has all you will ever need, and then more.
The maximum sentence for is, on conviction, life imprisonment. Which means what it says, even if released on licence the offender can be recalled to serve the remainder of the term for even minor offences.
Several new sexual offences appear in this act, as if there were not enough already.
However, before you start criticising the law for not doing the job, you have to remember that in the majority of the cases it is one persons word against anothers. Which explains the low conviction rate.
All this is in the home office report at the url above, it makes for grim reading, and is lengthy.