Hi, I have been talking to a friend on here, who has been told off for putting pictures of himself with a fem on his profile, this apparently is against site rules, he is only allowed to show himself!!............do other single members agree with this?......at the end of the day..........there are lots of cpl profiles which have either 2 cock shots, or 2 fems in there pics........surely they should only show the cpl, and no one else?.........i just wanted views of other members................will look forward to reading them.
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Singles - Views Wanted
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/main/aup.html
We all agreed to abide by the above as part of the signing up process... if something breaks the above rules then it's wrong, whether you agree with those rules now or not.
We all agreed to abide by the above as part of the signing up process... if something breaks the above rules then it's wrong, whether you agree with those rules now or not.
If they are single and I am chattiung with a view to meeting them - then why do I need to see other people they have fucked?
There is the question of whether the photos are for personal use and they have decided to post them to show they actually know how to shag.
There is no need to have other people in your photos.
There is the question of whether the photos are for personal use and they have decided to post them to show they actually know how to shag.
There is no need to have other people in your photos.
Quote by PoloLady
If they are single and I am chattiung with a view to meeting them - then why do I need to see other peope they have fucked?
There is the question of whether the photos are for personal use and they have decided to post them to show they actually know how to shag.
There is no need to have other people in your photos.
Think Polo, think!!
You could have gotten at least 3 posts out of that had you chosen to spread you wise words out! :doh:
Quote by Kiss
If they are single and I am chattiung with a view to meeting them - then why do I need to see other peope they have fucked?
There is the question of whether the photos are for personal use and they have decided to post them to show they actually know how to shag.
There is no need to have other people in your photos.
Think Polo, think!!
You could have gotten at least 3 posts out of that had you chosen to spread you wise words out! :doh:
I was waiting for the arguement
Then answer point by point - quoting rules leaves no room to argue :P
Slight meander if I may?...
I do disagree with that though I think. If I look at a profile and 75% of the photos are of the profile owner and the rest are 'action' shots I quite like having a perv. :rascal:
What I don't like personally is when a male or female has one profile photo and it's a close-up of intercourse!
Then again is does save us from pages of numerous c*ck shots we all love to hate!
Quote by PoloLady
There is no need to have other people in your photos.
I do disagree with that though I think. If I look at a profile and 75% of the photos are of the profile owner and the rest are 'action' shots I quite like having a perv. :rascal:
What I don't like personally is when a male or female has one profile photo and it's a close-up of intercourse!
Then again is does save us from pages of numerous c*ck shots we all love to hate!
Quote by swindonfun
Thanx for reply guys...........i wasnt argueing that rules are rules.........it just seemed to me that..............rules dont seem to be enforced........on everyone..........i will now hush my mouth and go sit back in the corner lol
If you find a picture which breaks the rules then use the handily placed 'report this photo' link and send it to the Mods who have access to the 'delete' button! Others do!
:P
Quote by swindonfun
Thanx for reply guys...........i wasnt argueing that rules are rules.........it just seemed to me that..............rules dont seem to be enforced........on everyone..........i will now hush my mouth and go sit back in the corner lol
They are enforced, but the Mods are only human and some are bound to slip through the net. If you find a couple or anyone else breaking the photo rules and you report it to a Mod it will be dealt with.
It's a shame people can be trusted in the first place.
Quote by PoloLady
I would love to hear someone reason for wanting to post pics of other people?
Like I said - I would be looking for photos of the person I was talking to - not the kebab on the left or the extra sausage on the side
Polo! :lol:
I don't have any objection to people posting a few photos of them playing (with others :lol
as long as the other person can't be identified. That's a difficult area to police so I suppose the rule has to be in place. Quote by de_sade
Let's put it this way...
If I found pics of me being used on someone else's profile.... their cock-shot would need updating
(snip -snip)
:shock:
Ah yes, but what if they paid you for the privilege? Surely you would stay your scissor hand then?
Have I been missing something - do people owe me money?
Orgasminator
I agree 110% with the 'Rules are Rules' and we all agree to live by them when we sign up...... but.....
...no its not the BUT your expecting.... its not the 'rules are there to be broken' saying.....
.. the AUP says, and i quote...
Purely playing the Devils Advocate here but that reads to me that, if Calista and I have photographs with us and another person(s) in, which we took on our own camera (thereby owning them) and the other said person(s) consented, the posting of these would NOT be breaking AUP rules.
Am i reading this right? Its the way it looks to me. If that is not acceptable behaviour (and again i'm not commenting on whether it is or not, just the wording of the AUP), if its not acceptable then maybe a revision of the AUP might be needed??
Morbius
...no its not the BUT your expecting.... its not the 'rules are there to be broken' saying.....
.. the AUP says, and i quote...
Quote by AUP
The posting of pictures on any part of the Swinging heaven site that you do not own....that include a third party without their consent
Purely playing the Devils Advocate here but that reads to me that, if Calista and I have photographs with us and another person(s) in, which we took on our own camera (thereby owning them) and the other said person(s) consented, the posting of these would NOT be breaking AUP rules.
Am i reading this right? Its the way it looks to me. If that is not acceptable behaviour (and again i'm not commenting on whether it is or not, just the wording of the AUP), if its not acceptable then maybe a revision of the AUP might be needed??
Morbius
I suppose we'd have to have the consent in writing and have it verified that it WAS consent from the people/persons concerned and not just a bit of paper with another person's signature forged onto it.
Admin are the best ones to ask for legalities of this. But - no 2nd parties for singles and no 3rd/4th or multiple parties for couples.
Admin are the best ones to ask for legalities of this. But - no 2nd parties for singles and no 3rd/4th or multiple parties for couples.
Quote by Jags
I suppose we'd have to have the consent in writing and have it verified that it WAS consent from the people/persons concerned and not just a bit of paper with another person's signature forged onto it.
Admin are the best ones to ask for legalities of this. But - no 2nd parties for singles and no 3rd/4th or multiple parties for couples.
Does that mean no 2nd/3rd parties ever?
I only ask because I was reading the other day that it may 'allowed' if the majority of their pics were only of themselves and only a small minority were including others. (No faces etc.)
Orgasminator
Quote by Jags
I suppose we'd have to have the consent in writing and have it verified that it WAS consent from the people/persons concerned and not just a bit of paper with another person's signature forged onto it.
Admin are the best ones to ask for legalities of this. But - no 2nd parties for singles and no 3rd/4th or multiple parties for couples.
Aye i suppost the 'sticky bit' is the proving of consent.... point made as eloquently as always Jags
:roll:
Quote by PoloLady
Guess who just pasted this in their expenses form for July …
“And before anyone suggests methods to give consent for photos to be used my others in the photos – that’s all bollox too – there is no fool-proof
Thank fuck I checked it before putting it in the envelope
Quote by PoloLady
Guess who just pasted this in their expenses form for July …
“And before anyone suggests methods to give consent for photos to be used my others in the photos – that’s all bollox too – there is no fool-proof
Thank fuck I checked it before putting it in the envelope
That would have been funnier had you not noticed it!! :grin:
At a place I used to work, if the sound engineer was bored or we had no clients in, his favourite hobby was to annoy me!
His main trick would be to come into office and when I wasn't there or not looking he would insert random swear words into my documents, forcing me to check them everytime I saw his sheepish grin.
This was all very funny until one day I missed one and the documents got sent out the the client!
