why is it when someone advertises a meet in the forum the majority of people who seem to reply are the ones who "CAN'T " make it,or not into that particular "event" probably putting other peeps off replying. i don't think you make the person advertising feel any better by saying oh we can't come got something else planned or you wouldn't catch me doing that, do they find the time to reply to ads they have no intention of going to, wouldn't it be time well spent just replying to the events you want to attend?
sometimes - and I often do this - responding to a thread just to say you cant make it serves as (1) a bump up the page..... (2) a :thumbup: for the person who wants to meet cos I know them and know they're genuine etc so might encourage someone who's interested to reply - a bit like 'vouching for' .... or (3) because its a well written post - not a one liner with no info - and responding to it is a way of wishing them luck and saying 'I cant make this particular meet, but I might be interested in future'.
Maybe it's a little like real life ?
If I have a call, or text, or :shock: a letter, inviting me somewhere; I will nearly always reply whether I can make it or not.
So if I see someone I know well post for a meet, I might post such a reply, or send a PM.
I see what you mean about the LMU forum to a point.
It can seem as tho strangers are telling strangers they can't come/make it, but could that be seen as "sowing seeds" for future meets.
And let's not forget not everyone knows who knows who.
we personally would like to see people post saying that they cant come.. it gives you the satisfaction that people have taken the time to read the post and the time to reply..ok you may not have got any meets out if these replies but at least you know you are doing something right..
surely its better to have 5 posts saying thanks but no thanks than no replies at all.
its a friendlier way all round..
I'd rather see replies saying 'can't make it but maybe next time' than have no one reply. I do the same myself. If I see an ad that appeals but can't make it for whatever reason, I'd prefer to let that person know that I'm interested but can't manage anything at that time.
Isn't it better to have replys then no replys at all.......at least it keeps it on page one!
sorry.................
..... i can't reply to this thread!
yes, it may well be easier to avoid looking at, if im not able to go, or do not wish to go, but surely its another way of getting more info (ammo?) on people who we converse with, or have met/meet
Surely , if threads, whether they apply to an individual or not, are kept alive, it keeps the forums alive, and therefore gives people reason to read.
there was recently a link entitled Single Doggers tips VOL 1, now, whatever my reasons for being on this site, and community, this subject holds no interest for me, yet i chose to read it, by the same token, if i have no reason to go to a munch in for example, liverpool, id still read it, as id like to see what sort of people would go to that, if those people are people i find interesting, which i have decided via profile, forum or chatroom, then id see if they are likely to go to munches in other locations, which would then give me a reason to read those threads, so i could see if we are ever likely to cross paths
Absolutely agree with you Essex, and that's probably the exact reason that some people DO read them. However, Cockslut is making comment about people who post that they can't attend said munch. To read the munch threads (with no intent to attend the munch) then complain about the people who say they can't go, is a bit odd.
ok it seems me against the rest of the world "lol".on this issue but seriously is no one concerned about what effect it has on the sites performance etc, surely it must slow it down and clog it up with thousands of "threads" that wasnt necessary?