Bluefish2009's Profile

11 Oct 2011

Quote by Lizaleanrob
reading this article
made me think something i`ve wondered for a long time have prices finally reached a celling limit
home fuels ,food prices and petrol prices are all now suffering poor sales
the likes of tesco are selling sites and posting the worst sales figures in two decades can only mean one thing The Celling price has been reached for these items

I think prices will continue to rise, the poor will get poorer and possibly be priced out of travel and other such things :sad:

View Post

11 Oct 2011

Quote by starlightcouple

I feel Star that it only fare to warn you that it was just after this time I had this urge to follow Fox Hunting!!!! :-x:-x

OMG bluefish.
i think i shall take up knitting lol

:laughabove::laughabove::laughabove::laughabove:

View Post

11 Oct 2011

Quote by couplefunuk
We tried it. The reality for us wasn't as good as the fantasy.
Don't get me wrong, it wasn't bad - just not for us. We still enjoy elements tho.
There are websites that will help you out. Swinging sites aren't really the place to be looking. All you find are so called self proclaimed 'bull's' who really don't have a clue what it's all about, just want to fuck your wife with no regard for what's in it for you.
Choose carefully tho and you'll have a ball.
*Her*

I wonder if you know of some good sites, on this subject, if such info could be placed in our inbox? lol

View Post

11 Oct 2011

Quote by gulsonroad30664
The only route to a sustainable future is population control, it doesnt matter how 'green' we go, the worlds population is increasing at an unsustainable rate.
I have no answers regarding how this can be done, but if we dont control growth nature might do it for us - with potentially catastrophic results.

control growth ? what growth ? industrial activity worldwide has dropped 30% in the last 2 and a half years. climate change (the new catch phrase) was known as global warming until the university of east anglia was caught corrupting the data which proved global cooling.
the earth has always undergone climate change and always will do. "the sun" not murdochs comic is the overwhelming influence not mans activity.
the earth's population is soley dependent upon man's ability to harness and control energy. "energy flux density per square kilometre". if you want to go the route of population control as do the ruling elite, someone has to choose who is to live and who is to die.
the global warming bollox was designed to achieve exactly that. if you reduce the carbon footprint of a continent where the majority of people live at subsistance level, you will kill them by the million. billions will die as a consequence of the global economic collapse as well and that will put paid to all the crap about the worlds population increasing at an unsustainable level. nonsense anyway
I agree!
:thumbup::thumbup:
Ultimately, truth is its own defense. There never was a shred of truth in the claim that humans were causing the Earth’s climate to heat up by using so-called “fossil fuels” and engaging in manufacturing and other activities. There was no dramatic “global warming” in the 1980s until the present.
The Earth’s climate has warmed very slightly since the end of the Little Ice Age, dated to around 1850. Five hundred years of extremely cold weather had gripped the northern hemisphere starting around 1300. The much heralded “climate change” is, unlike the weather, measured in terms of centuries, not days, weeks or years. It is used by politicians that do not know what they are talking about. It is also used by charlatans, but I repeat myself.
Under the direction of the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) a massive fraud was engineered. The object was to turn carbon dioxide (CO2), a common though minor atmospheric gas, into a commodity that could be traded in exchanges around the world that would issue “carbon credits” to utilities, industrial facilities, and others who would be required to pay for permission to produce energy and products. It was an audacious scheme.
From here;

View Post

11 Oct 2011

Quote by deancannock
"When he became Prime Minister, David Cameron carried on the theme, promptly declaring that he wanted the Coalition to be 'the greenest Government ever'.
His new Energy and Climate Change Secretary Chris Huhne added that he wanted to go 'further and faster than ever before'. Then it was announced that Britain, uniquely, should set a minimum price for carbon credits, instead of allowing the market to decide."
Taken from the article linked in blue's post. So what is mr Cameron going to say to those that voted for him, on the promise they were to be the greenest government ever !!
So pretends to be green when wants a few votes, but ditches it as it might cost more. I do believe all the chemicals we are pumping into the atmosphere and our sea's are haveing an effect. As humans we always say we are are what we eat !! Our diet shapes our health and well being to a great degree. Is our planet, any different? Keep pumping it with chemicals and it will get sick !!! Treat it with respect, and it will last a lifetime !!

You are quite correct Dean, it is a cheap and dirty trick..... Did we expect anything less from a politician?
I agree, we mast have some respect for our world, for future generations.

View Post

11 Oct 2011

Quote by starlightcouple
since getting into this scene with mrs starlight i have been fasinated by the whole cuckold thing.
we are looking at all avenues to this.
what has happened to me over the last few months?
are there any other peeple here who have gone into that bit of the scene? am i going mad by wanting to see mrs star shagged by another guy whilst i only watch?
i am confused.

Join the club of the confused club Star!! wink

This is of coarse the main reason we are here at all, (See our profile) For many years I had this very strange fantasy of watching the wife with another man.....
We spoke about it, play acted it out for a long, long time. We then joined here and hung around watching, reading, and listening to others. Then talking to others and researching the subject. It is far more popular than you might think. There were some worries, like how would I feel when it really came to the real thing, what if he seamed to satisfy the wife better than me, and many more such thoughts. But when we Finlay did try it out, all such problems disappeared and we both enjoyed it very much.
Some times I just watch, video, photograph, some times I join in with a threesome.
I am NOT, how ever a cuckold, as I have no wish to be humiliated in any way what so ever
I feel Star that it only fare to warn you that it was just after this time I had this urge to follow Fox Hunting!!!! :-x:-x

View Post

10 Oct 2011

Quote by tweeky
I guess we should just do the China way and fuck it lets make money!!!!!

Well, too a point yes, As I do not fully subscribe to the "man made global warming" con. I do how ever agree, we must be careful what poison's we pump into the air and sea, but not to the point of bankrupting our selves

View Post

9 Oct 2011

George Osborne talks common sense on climate change! lol

Very refreshing indeed, after years of over zealous laws from our last Government. :thumbup:
How climate change zealots are wrecking every last industry this country possesses.
Rather overshadowed by events at the Conservative Party conference in Manchester last week was a line in George Osborne's speech which could mark the start of a long overdue political transformation in Britain.
The Chancellor acknowledged that a decade of environmental laws had been piling unnecessary costs on households and companies, adding that Britain was not going to save the planet by putting ourselves out of business.
Read more:

View Post

7 Oct 2011

Quote by twos_company
foxes r cute...
go out n hunt the riff raff

OK

on my way :thumbup:
This huntsman has already started lol

Tally Ho

View Post

6 Oct 2011

Quote by neilinleeds
Well I guess they help drive up the price of homes, but to be honest the only emotion they evoke is a little bit of envy, so as long as no rules are broken good luck to them

So offering subsidies to those wealthy enough to afford two houses in a way that helps drive up the price of local housing is a good thing? Or at least, nothing to be overly concerned about? Oddly, I thought you'd previously gone out of your way to remind us that homelessness is also a countryside issue, having summat to do with a lack of affordable housing and a hike in prices over and above the national average in areas where wages are typically lower than the national average?
confused

N x x x ;)
p.s. I never did welcome you back properly did I Blue? Sorry about that. An oversight on my part, cos I do like playing out with you yer know. ;)
Yes you are quite right I did, I just don't seam to feel quite so passionate about it these days. To be a hundred % honest here, I don't know if the hike in housing cost,s really effects the homelessness. It moves many from where they might like to live to where they can afford, but does not make them homeless. We have a few homeless wandering around town here, but there fate was not due to house prices.
And, thank you for the welcome, its good to be back amongst friends lol

View Post

6 Oct 2011

I think a more agresive approch may be required to prevent further problems

View Post

6 Oct 2011

The Government are supporting pro-hunting training lol

This put a smile on my face
However the anti-hunting lobby headed by the League Against Cruel Sports has slammed the Government for supporting what they see as pro-hunting training when hunting foxes or deer with more than two hounds was made illegal in 2005.

View Post

6 Oct 2011

Quote by neilinleeds
What's your thoughts on second-home owners? Those who buy a weekend bolt-hole in Dorset or Devon at London prices, and then leave it empty for much of the year, drawing on council tax breaks of up to 50% paid for by people like me living in the inner cities? How much more of an impact, if any, d'you think those owners might have on property prices near you, given their subsidised local contributions, and the consequent affordability of the 'rural dream' for locals?
Seems as city dwellers they may also have an impact on your local politics, as subsidised council tax payers, even though they don't really live there. I know you don't live in Cornwall, but by way of example . . .

N x x x ;)

Well I guess they help drive up the price of homes, but to be honest the only emotion they evoke is a little bit of envy, so as long as no rules are broken good luck to them

View Post

5 Oct 2011

Hi guys, we are interested in hearing more about the dogging spots close to Blandford Forum. Times, places, how busy are they, what type of action, have you been to any, any new places, etc. Please feel free to message us.

View Post

5 Oct 2011

The wife loves Glory holes. We set our own up in our shed for fun for a while. Would love to know for any in the Dorset area if any one out there knows of any thing.

View Post

5 Oct 2011

Quote by Ben_Minx
I firmly believe that prolonged monogamy is an unnatural state.

:thumbup:

View Post

5 Oct 2011

Quote by HnS
Blue,
As a semi-urban rersident (2 miles out of town and 1 mile from National Park), we are some of those who joined the Forestry sell off, or at least if it went ahead one with some access/continued usage attached.
As part of a group that actually pay over £600 per mile of forest we use (in excess of £820,000 for the Forestry Commission last year alone) and recognised by the Forestry Commission as one of only a couple of groups that pay them rather than them having to spend to provide access to others, the proposals actually meant that not only the FC income would be impacted, but also rural economies with the associated spend over over £3m annually.
Sadly it seems the politico's seem to have jumped on ours and several other groups protests on the FC sell off for their own 'glory', votes, PR, etc.

All three suspect

View Post

5 Oct 2011

Quote by tweeky
Slight hijack but you would be surprised the effect TV can have on an industry.
Thanks to Mr Dickenson his bargin hunt his real deal and all the spin off like cash in the attic and sell you tits here Interest in auctions is rife. Inexperienced bidding equals higher prices. I dont buy antiques or at least not very often I stick around the commercial and lost proerty items. Though you can still see the increase in numbers and people paying silly prices for items they have not even tested. The best example of this was only a few months back. I went to look at some expensive audio equipment at a local auction. The items had been withdrawn from sale and had been removed from the building. Each item was worth somewhere from 400 to a 1000 pounds. At the auction the auctioneer started selling the itmes :shock: I thought they had been re entered and I hadnt been able to view them Bids went up to 600 on the first few items. Then there was a pause and a conversation and the auctioneer annoucnes sorry! these items were withdrawn. Everything is sold as seen at these auctions :scared: Have been caught out in the past my self on minor amounts but people here were bidding 600 quid on items they had not even viewed :scared: Could have been wrecks. Lots of people now think there is a quick buck to be made, there can be but not often on bidding 600 for items that may not even work, lunacy!

Fools rush in!!
I have now found a more sensible article on rural house prices

I do not think it is anything new though, none of the children I grew up with, older ones and younger ones could afford to buy in the village where we grew up :sad:

View Post

4 Oct 2011

I think a further important thing to remember is, this is just a speed limit increase we are talking of. We do not have to drive at 80 at all times. It is not a target. There will be time when conditions are not suitable to do so, and people will take conditions into account and drive accordingly. Those that do not do so, were probably the ones who would not stick within the speed limits any how.

View Post

4 Oct 2011

I actually think these numbers prove nothing for either side of the argument. The debate is regarding a rise in speed on motorways, so unless you have numbers of people killed on motorways due to driving faster than 70, they prove nothing.
I found this enlightening;
How many people are killed or injured on Britain’s roads?
Great Britain has one of the best road safety records in Europe and the world. Despite massive increases in traffic over the last few decades, the number of people killed on our roads has fallen from around 5,500 per year in the mid 1980s to under 2,000 in 2010. However, this still means that around five people die on Britain’s roads every day.
Reported Road Casualties in Great Britain, 2010
Killed - 1,857
Seriously Injured - 22,660
Slightly Injured - 184,138
All - 208,655
These figures are for road accidents in which someone was injured on a public road and which were reported to the police. Although virtually all fatal road accidents are reported to the police, it is known that many involving injury are not reported, even when some of those involved required medical or hospital treatment. It is estimated that the total number of road casualties in Great Britain is between 680,000 and 920,000 per year, with a best estimate of around 800,000. This includes an estimated 80,000 people who are seriously injured.
Common causes of these unnecessary tragedies include:
Speeding
Around 600 people a year are killed in crashes in which someone exceeds the speed limit or drives too fast for the conditions.
Drink Driving
Around 400 people die a year in crashes in which someone was over the legal drink drive limit.
Seat Belt Wearing
Around 300 lives each year could be saved if everyone always wore their seat belt.
Careless Driving
More than 400 deaths a year involve someone being "careless, reckless or in a hurry", and a further 200 involve "aggressive driving".
At-work
Around one third of fatal and serious road crashes involve someone who was at work.
Inexperience
More than 300 newly-qualified drivers and their passengers are killed in car crashes a year.
From here;

We could say that actually only around 600 could even be atrubuted loosley with speed at all?

View Post

4 Oct 2011

Quote by HnS
Who is the Party of the Countryside?
Any party or individual who thinks that they can 'score' a few votes from the rural electorate
always has been, always will be

I think your probably correct, i feel its interesting to see them squabble over the voters though. Don't think I can recall them doing that in the recent past. Trouble is they could squabble between them selves and not listen to those who really matter.
But I have yet to be convinced the rhetoric on this opening can be met with concrete policy, and thus electoral success.
Take forests, for example. It was a big victory for Labour and an unfortunate early u-turn for her counterpart Caroline Spelman, the Environment Minister. But it was hard to tell if opposition to the Government plans was motivated by a concern for rural voters. It was the metropolitan activists that jumped on the 38 degrees e-petition, that started the chorus of dissent, that eventually forced the government's hand. Many living in the countryside were far more comfortable with the idea of the land being privately owned - as so much is already - and a good proportion of them would have jumped at the chance to be given the opportunity to manage these areas better than the Forestry Commission currently does. But they weren't listened to. And so this became a fight of to privatise or not to privatise, with the countryside's voice getting lost in the philosphical melee.
From here;

View Post

4 Oct 2011

Quote by tweeky
Our recycling which is paper cardboard shoes tines all types of stuff goes weekly along with food waste collected seperately. Our wheelie bin goes every 2 weeks on the same day. You have to pay to have a green garden wheeli bin (no thanks) and they did offer composters but on a first come first serve basis with so many free ones then the rest had to pay. Sorry but I dont pay council tax to be entered into a lottery. Plastic recycling is coming in soon, works well for me so far.

Our recycling, every two weeks is tins, can, plastic bottles, paper. Shoes etc have to be taken in our selves just like garden waist. We made our own composter just as my parents and grandparents did before me.
I would hate for our house hold rubbish to be collected fortnightly though

View Post

4 Oct 2011

Quote by Ben_Minx
I have a problem with the concept that increasing speed limits makes journey times shorter. I do not believe that it does.

I think your correct Ben. If it does it is so little

View Post

4 Oct 2011

Rather than me clutter up the whole of the C/A with my countryside issue's, I thought I would bring this thread back near the top and pop any new issues I think could be of interest to debate in here lol

View Post

4 Oct 2011

Is 'River Cottage effect' putting the rural dream out of reach for millions? How TV shows have made countryside houses £27,000 more expensive than in urban areas
I bring this one up as it is local to us!
I think this is probably a load of old rubbish, I can't see this tv show, and others like it, really had this kind of effect on house prices.
Plenty of city dwellers long to escape to a life of growing vegetables, raising pigs and making cider
We don't need to many fox loving city dwellers invading our countryside any how wink