Quote by twos_company
everyone agrees for once....
!!!
Did that really just happen ????? :shock:
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Darkfire
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 50
0 miles · Greater London
Forum
Quote by tweeky
Before our public pics were just of Mrs Tweeky and the first reason was quite simply that she is by far the more attractive. Put your best foot foreward as they say. At the time the account was made Mr tweeky was how shall we say "fat with a large beer belly" stick that on a profile and you dont get many replies.
but isnt this what we mean about using the fem as 'bait' because you think that having pics or a description of you that show you as being "fat with a large beer belly" puts people off? and you get a far better response by using her in the pics, than telling any interested parties the truth BEFORE they spend time responding to you?
me, I'd rather have a straight up honest description and make my choices based on that, than be 'reeled in' based on only half the facts.
And as it happens, personally, I'd be highly likley to respond to an ad or pics that are honest and 'here it is like it or lump it' because that to me speaks volumes about the actual people themselves
Quote by vdub
Much more fun in the same room - and how the heck is Sarah meant to explore her bi side if I've gone off with the other girl. I vote the big bed option with lots of people
Also, I like to be able to be there for Sarah if she ever gets in to trouble - moreso on the club scene, but I'd never forgive myself if somebody hurt her.
you two, it''s about time! May I suggest that what you've just put in your post , goes in your ad? along with an expansion of 'very bi curious and looking to explore that side of me'
for example - are you (Linzi) wanting to play with just another bifem? or with the guy of a couple too? Will Kev play with the other fem? or just watch?
(and you dont have to post it in here
, but would be useful info for your advert/ profile) 
Quote by flidais-media
I think we've probably scared them off hun, sat here discussing 'them' , must feel like walking into the lions den.
and it does feel like that, because we've all been new at some point and remember it well.
Well, possibly, but, if they are secure in what they are doing they should be back. If they are 'scared off' then, perhaps, they aren't ready for the scene after all?
When something is posted in an open forum people will always comment on it, it's something we have to accept
my point precisely - Are they secure in what they're doing? after re-reading their ads, and back tracking through posts (not many of them I hasten to add) , I'd say No, they're not secure (oooo i'm a judgemental cow today arnt i!) and THAT bothers me - especially when they're so open to being 'led' (aka 'helped) into a scene they may not be ready for.
I'm being patronising again, but where's the god damn Mentoring scheme when ya need it?
Quote by mike48
corruption.....please explain ?
To clarify - and bearing in mind Linzi & Kev havent been back to the thread yet to post their views but we continue to speculate on their relationship, how long married, age etc.......
i said this:
I also think (IMO) that some swinging couples/ singles may be 'uncomfortable' meeting you in the sense that many dont want to 'teach' or show the ropes to inexperienced (and young) couples in a sexual sense. No one would want to push you into anything or talk you into anything , and its oh so very easily done, especially with people who are so keen to jump in and be 'taught' - it could all be a very different ball game the following morning . I dont mean to sound patronising, but am aware that I do sound that way ...
...and while I'm doing the patronising thing, I may as well say that I do find the thought of your pics being 'cute' and 'sweet' quite worrying. Mike this isnt a dig at you, but my gut instinct (based on pics/ ad and thread) says these two are 'ripe for corruption', and that concerns me too. I might be way off the mark here I know, and I'll apologise in advance in case I am.
By 'ripe for corruption' I mean that from their ads ('someone to show us the ropes',etc) this couple come across as being pretty naive. Yes they're new but thats not the issue, its the fact they (and like I've already said, it may well just be me jumping to assumptions when actually they may well be totally clued up & know exactly what they're doing) are looking for an experienced couple/ single to 'help' them .
From the ad/ profile and posts, I cant work out what it is they're actually looking for - Linzi is a bi curious fem, so maybe they're looking to experiment and expand this????
The flip side of course, and what I meant by 'ripe for corruption' is that to me Linzi & Kev appear naive, young, eager to be 'led', and looking for someone to show them the ropes - and IMHO this also makes them both prime targets for, let's say, the more manipulative people who are around in this lifestyle. I'm not saying Linzi & Kev cant think for themselves etc, but there are people here (in the minority of course, but nevertheless, they're here) who use 'helping someone' as a platform purely to their own gain.
And that applies to any of us, whether we're 20, 30 or 99, married single and anything else in between.
Quote by mike48
If you were looking for an older single guy and didnt live so far away i,d give you a chance ...so come on all you older more seasoned cpls and bi fems lifes about taking chances why not take a chance on these two ..they could do with a hand up
hand up or protective wing?
Quote by m1970
I think 2 hours is enough
there's no feckin wonder your Mrs doesnt want it
somewhere in my head there's a little phrase thats just popped up to say hello - it says ' if he cant do the job properly, do the fucker yourself'
she's probably got shares in Ann Summers hun and you wouldnt have the first clue :doh:
I've been back and read through your ad and profile a few times now ( 
)
and I'm curious as to why (in your ad) you're looking for a couple but in your profile your activities are dogging/ threesomes/oral and parties.
My initial advice to you both (and please feel free to pm, I'm only a part time bitch) is to concentrate on perhaps looking for intimate meets - drinks/ meal/ talk/ and extend to playing is you feel comfy with it - with couples (or singles) and leave the parties alone until you're much more sure of yourselves. That's only my gut response though of course.
I also think (IMO) that some swinging couples/ singles may be 'uncomfortable' meeting you in the sense that many dont want to 'teach' or show the ropes to inexperienced (and young) couples in a sexual sense. No one would want to push you into anything or talk you into anything , and its oh so very easily done, especially with people who are so keen to jump in and be 'taught' - it could all be a very different ball game the following morning . I dont mean to sound patronising, but am aware that I do sound that way ...
...and while I'm doing the patronising thing, I may as well say that I do find the thought of your pics being 'cute' and 'sweet' quite worrying. Mike this isnt a dig at you, but my gut instinct (based on pics/ ad and thread) says these two are 'ripe for corruption', and that concerns me too. I might be way off the mark here I know, and I'll apologise in advance in case I am.
I'd be more than happy to meet you both SOCIALLY to just chat and find out more, but you're way out my area so the pm box will have to suffice, if you'd like?
)and I'm curious as to why (in your ad) you're looking for a couple but in your profile your activities are dogging/ threesomes/oral and parties.
My initial advice to you both (and please feel free to pm, I'm only a part time bitch) is to concentrate on perhaps looking for intimate meets - drinks/ meal/ talk/ and extend to playing is you feel comfy with it - with couples (or singles) and leave the parties alone until you're much more sure of yourselves. That's only my gut response though of course.
I also think (IMO) that some swinging couples/ singles may be 'uncomfortable' meeting you in the sense that many dont want to 'teach' or show the ropes to inexperienced (and young) couples in a sexual sense. No one would want to push you into anything or talk you into anything , and its oh so very easily done, especially with people who are so keen to jump in and be 'taught' - it could all be a very different ball game the following morning . I dont mean to sound patronising, but am aware that I do sound that way ...
...and while I'm doing the patronising thing, I may as well say that I do find the thought of your pics being 'cute' and 'sweet' quite worrying. Mike this isnt a dig at you, but my gut instinct (based on pics/ ad and thread) says these two are 'ripe for corruption', and that concerns me too. I might be way off the mark here I know, and I'll apologise in advance in case I am.
I'd be more than happy to meet you both SOCIALLY to just chat and find out more, but you're way out my area so the pm box will have to suffice, if you'd like?
Other than being able to send personalised winks, is there any way we can tell who's an 'extra package member' and who's not? ie, does it say so in their profile? do they show up in the chatroom in a different colour or something?
might give us some idea as to whether they're able to do this stealth mode thing.....
just a thought
might give us some idea as to whether they're able to do this stealth mode thing.....
just a thought 
