Our joy is that my sister is safe and Kat was in London last week not this week.
Hope you all have a fun time
:karaoke: :beer: 
and hugs to all who care to claim them. Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Kit
Over 90 days ago
Straight Female, 66
UK
Forum
Quote by EagerSlut
Oh yes, ES it is a VIP Layby - it has hot and cold running water, showers, WC's, bed and breakfast with soft egyptian cotton bedlinen and fresh bacon for brekkie and hugs and Sarah and Helen.
Never heard of Kit's Layby before?
Wanna try it?
Ooooooooooooh! Can I bring my Kitty with me?
Only if Kitty likes Hugs too :twisted: and you leave her behind on Monday :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Ummm, you do realise you are aiding and abetting me in Hi Jacking your own thread don't ya?
Quote by DreamerHelen
Oh I'm a complete tart and totally perverted....LoL....
Where are we going for that group hug Kit?
Well, Sarah is on her way round to mine, so I reckon I'd best stay put
Get your gorgeous spanked arse over here quick Helen :twisted:
Any more for any more? Group hugs at Kit's :rascal: :rascal:
Quote by 3someinpreston
Is that the shiny black key with spikes on next to the sign that says "Enter at your peril"?
No, No - don't touch that one whatever you do :scared: :scared: :scared:
If it is shiny and black with spikes, It's the key to the GFZ :shock: :shock:
The key to the dungeon issparkly pink and fluffy, mind you, Mrs 3someinPreston, I would suggest you pick up the black spiky one and use it at the weekend
:rascal: :rascal:
Ooohhh, the decision is yours
:twisted:
Quote by EagerSlut
Well don't be of us are trying our best to turn it into a seedy sex den! :censored: :twisted:
(Behind the scenes at any rate) :rascal: :rascal:
Welcome, BTW :thumbup:
and some of us are succeeding :shock:
Welcome both of you, you seem clear about what you are looking for so I wish you all the best.
Just one word of advice - we have dungeons too, just ask Dildo
Stuart_Tanina,
all is not lost - we were in very much the same situation last year
It started off as 'part time' is now very much 'full time' though. There are plenty of benefits (if you look very carefully).
I am not Taxi service any more -she does that
I get my errands run for me when I havn't got the time to do it myself (or I'm just too lazy!)
She's not a bad cook
She's hardly ever here
She has learn't not to ask too many nosey questions
but above all - I know she is happy and safe
There is also, that she is so used to being independent that she is now talking about leaving again
all is not lost - we were in very much the same situation last year
It started off as 'part time' is now very much 'full time' though. There are plenty of benefits (if you look very carefully).
I am not Taxi service any more -she does that
I get my errands run for me when I havn't got the time to do it myself (or I'm just too lazy!)
She's not a bad cook
She's hardly ever here
She has learn't not to ask too many nosey questions
but above all - I know she is happy and safe
There is also, that she is so used to being independent that she is now talking about leaving again
Quote by Jags
One of my favourite poems (along with the Jenny Joseph one about growing old)
Philip Larkin - This Be The Verse
They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.
But they were fucked up in their turn
By fools in old-style hats and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another's throats.
Man hands on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don't have any kids yourself.
This from the guy who said that sex was invented in 1966!!
:P
That's brilliant Jags. I've not heard it before.
Thanks for brightening my day
Alex - just pride yourself that you do not measure things the same as your mum does.
Quote by freckledbird
Well, I have to say I'm one of those guilty of posting a message to say I reached the 4000 mark. Also not ashamed of doing it whatsoever - it's harmless after all. It's also within AUP I think and if it's not interesting (which it isn't really) it slips off the page quick enough because people who don't want to read/respond, don't.
I did say that it was not against the AUP. I also asked for an explanation in the reasoning behind making such a post, but as yet have still to hear one apart from your's; that it is not interesting really.
I am not in any way trying to shame people, I am merely stating my opinion and saying how this behaviour makes me feel.
Well speaking personally, there was no reasoning, I had a look how many posts I'd made and posted about it. Attention-seeking I suppose, but I daresay we can all think of types of post which annoy us and we deem to be a waste of time and/or effort. Ah, that makes some sense now. Thank you for an honest answer.
Quote by freckledbird
Well, I have to say I'm one of those guilty of posting a message to say I reached the 4000 mark. Also not ashamed of doing it whatsoever - it's harmless after all. It's also within AUP I think and if it's not interesting (which it isn't really) it slips off the page quick enough because people who don't want to read/respond, don't.
I did say that it was not against the AUP. I also asked for an explanation in the reasoning behind making such a post, but as yet have still to hear one apart from your's; that it is not interesting really.
I am not in any way trying to shame people, I am merely stating my opinion and saying how this behaviour makes me feel.
I am with Jags on this one.
Lack of physical conventional beauty is not the same as not being sexually unattractive.
I have had amazing sex with a person that would not be deemed conventionally attractive facially, but he worked for me in lots of different ways.
But, there are lots of ways to be ugly - this can be inside or out. As Libra said, there are lots of people who are really ugly on the inside, although they may be conventionally attractive on the outside.
So, I guess, if the question is about the whole person and not just their looks then my answer would be - if a person is ugly inside then, No!
Lack of physical conventional beauty is not the same as not being sexually unattractive.
I have had amazing sex with a person that would not be deemed conventionally attractive facially, but he worked for me in lots of different ways.
But, there are lots of ways to be ugly - this can be inside or out. As Libra said, there are lots of people who are really ugly on the inside, although they may be conventionally attractive on the outside.
So, I guess, if the question is about the whole person and not just their looks then my answer would be - if a person is ugly inside then, No!
Lou,
at 20 years old you should be grabbing life with both hands and seeing where it takes you. You may take a very winding path, but if you keep focussed on what is important to you in your life, and aim for that, you will invariably get it. Most of my more pleasant experiences in life have arrived by chance rather than by judgement - keep an open mind and you will find the right path for you eventually.
Guess what i'm saying is - do whatever feels right for you at this time. It may not be right in 2 or 3 years time, but you will have that experience under your belt.
at 20 years old you should be grabbing life with both hands and seeing where it takes you. You may take a very winding path, but if you keep focussed on what is important to you in your life, and aim for that, you will invariably get it. Most of my more pleasant experiences in life have arrived by chance rather than by judgement - keep an open mind and you will find the right path for you eventually.
Guess what i'm saying is - do whatever feels right for you at this time. It may not be right in 2 or 3 years time, but you will have that experience under your belt.
Whew, sorry all you needy people - I have been away myself and having some fun :twisted: but rest assured, I am refreshed, recharged and ready to be the bestest, most responsive and softest, attentive, angelic angel ever (well, if that's really necessary I s'pose I could if I wanted to )
Right, who needs some attention? :angel: :angel: :evil2:
)Right, who needs some attention? :angel: :angel: :evil2:
Quote by fabio grooverider
okay then... can i make a suggestion.... rather than a "look i have gotten to xxxxx" how about we are allowed one a year on the aniversary of membership... that way the gobby and not so gobby are treated alike.........and it only happens once a year!!!
feel free to rip to pieces????
sean xxxxxxx
Fabio - I did not say 'you cannot do this' it is not against the site AUP and I am not a mod who has a duty to enforce it. I have simply expressed my opinion and frustration at these types of posts. I do not say they are wrong - just that I cannot relate to the relevance of them in any way whatsoever. If you wish to post 'hey, I have reached xxxxxx posts' please feel free to do so, but do not expect either myself, or a number of others on this site to respond in a positive manner; if at all.
I do not feel that your reference to 'gobby' and 'not so gobby' is relevant. A person can make few posts or many posts - the number of posts a person makes is subject to so many other factors aside from their individual 'gobbiness', that this would be an unacceptable measurement for many in whether they were to be deemed 'gobby' or 'not'.
Saying all that - can you explain the importance of the volume of posts a person makes for me, so that I may try to understand where you are coming from?
Quote by RedHot
Does it really matter just how many posts people have made on the forums??????
For the life of me I just cannot understand the reason why peo ple post -' ***********so many posts for me', and then others go on to congratulate them!!!!!!
Am I missing something fundamental here?
Is the number of posts linked to something more worthwhile?
Is the number of posts a person has made a measure of some sort?
Does any one really care how often another person has posted?
Having said that - I can understand those who make a 'milestone' post and use it to 'really' say something, but those who just say - yippee, xxxxx number of posts for me
Am I really alone in feeling this way?
Hooray, someone feels the same as me - I sometimes think I'm alone in thinking this. When will some people learn that it's quality not quantity that we want to see in here?
Mike.
Yup! Me too! I just hate the whole point of these threads - that's if there is one
Besides, I seem to remember about a year or so ago this was discussed - the for's and against of post counts.
Didn't it lead to a mass *flounce* of members who thought it actually *mattered* or was that all a dream?
Tracy-JayneNope, you were not dreaming TJ, it really did happen, but it seems the site continues to suffer from a residual element that appear to believe that it really does matter
hence the usually calm, sweet,nice Kit venting in this room :shock: Quote by northwest-cpl
Does it really matter just how many posts people have made on the forums??????
For the life of me I just cannot understand the reason why peo ple post -' ***********so many posts for me', and then others go on to congratulate them!!!!!!
Am I missing something fundamental here?
Is the number of posts linked to something more worthwhile?
Is the number of posts a person has made a measure of some sort?
Does any one really care how often another person has posted?
Having said that - I can understand those who make a 'milestone' post and use it to 'really' say something, but those who just say - yippee, xxxxx number of posts for me
Am I really alone in feeling this way?
nope your not alone. I see no point in it at all and have never bothered doing it myself, nor will I. The number of posts that I make means nought to me, but I guess that for some folk it does.
I totally agree and while we're at it, the introduction/welcome threads can take up half a page and bring on the same feelings of groundhog day as How big are you? or Do you like anal?
Incidentally, I was going to agree quietly to myself but thought that a public agreement would not only show solidarity but would also boost my post count.
sorry, could not resist 
