Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Lissa
Over 90 days ago
Straight Female, 60
UK

Forum

Quote by chashoniton
Fingerbobs!
I can remember trying to make some out of bits of card!
x

Fingermouse, Fingermouse
I am a sort of wondermouse
A hit, a miss, A blundermouse
Fingermouse, that's me
I am a mouse called Fingermouse
A mouse with guts and nerve
I get past cats so easily
with my famous body swerve
I'll get my coat redface surprisedops: :oops:
For Matt.
I miss you, kid!
The road is long
With many a winding turns
That leads us to who knows where,
Who knows where.
But I'm strong,
Strong enough to carry him.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
So on we go.
His welfare is of my concern.
No burden is he to bear,
We'll get there.
For I know
He would not encumber me.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
If I'm laden at all,
I'm laden with sadness
That everyone's heart
Isn't filled with the gladness
Of love for one another.
It's a long, long road
From which there is no return.
While we're on the way to there,
Why not share?
And the load
Doesn't weigh me down at all.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
He's my brother.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother...
This has allegedly been put out by the London Ambulance Service.
I really hope that's true.................it's brilliant!
Would all helpful passers by please note:
If you really must ring for an ambulance for someone you see collapsed/dead/fitting/sat in a shop doorway, please ring then, and not three hours later, by which time – not surprisingly – the deceased has got up and left.
Two adult males sitting outside South Kensington tube station, sharing a bottle of Diamond White cider are NOT collapsed – they are having breakfast/dinner/lunch/a party. Singing, talking, vomiting and belching are all indications that the said males are alive.
Someone who is sitting in a shop doorway when it’s pissing with rain is SHELTERING, not collapsed.
Just because someone with crutches is sitting down, they are not necessarily in need of medical intervention. Having hospital crutches is a clue. They have already been to hospital, and have been discharged.
If you really feel you just have to interfere in the life of a person happily sitting there drinking himself into alcoholic oblivion, when you ask him if he needs an ambulance, please take it as a massive clue when he says “Faaaaaaaaarrrrrrkkkkkk Ovvvvvvvvvvv!!!!!” This is his little way of saying “Thank you for your concern, but I’m 
When someone tells you they are fine, and they do not want an ambulance, please, please, please believe them. They are NOT lying – they know what they are doing.
Someone who is staggering between point A and point B CAN walk. The helpful clue is the movement of the legs and feet. If someone tells you that they cannot walk, but their legs are moving, THEY ARE LYING. Don’t believe them.
Green stuff coming from a drunks’ nose is NOT a reason for an emergency ambulance – it is actually a reason for an emergency hankie. Green stuff emanating from the patient’s nose is very rarely Cerebro-Spinal Fluid, despite what you might have learnt from Casualty, ER and Holby City. It is SNOT.
If you see a pair of legs under a car, and the legs are surrounded by mechanic’s tools, the person under the car has NOT been run over – he is more than likely to be FIXING it. Other clues are the radio playing nearby, and the deceased singing along to the music.
Talking of cars, if you happen to see several cars colliding with each other, and you can’t get through to the ambulance service, have a look around you. Yes, the other twenty people with phones stuck to their ears are ALL calling the ambulance service. That’s why you can’t get through. And please tell us the right location – saying you are on Greenford Broadway when you are on Southall Broadway is less than helpful. And please don’t insist you are right and the other twenty callers are wrong – it is highly unlikely.
Oh – and – please do not call the ambulance service if you see 200 people fighting on Fulham Broadway on Friday night. We are not remotely interested, and will not become interested until the police arrive. The police have guns, batons and CS gas, and can deal with a large fight a lot better than two female LAS personnel who are five feet nothing and jointly weigh 12 stone, and are only armed with rubber gloves and a frothy cappuccino from the Wild Bean Cafe. Please ring the police first – we’ll pop along a bit later. Honestly. We will.
Finally – the dictionary meaning of the phrase “passer by” is “A person who happens to be walking past someone or  It does not say “A person who stops and interferes. Don't do it Mate - it's not worth it!!
Quote by firelizard
When you start having regular meets with someone, what happens if you get abit too involved with what is going on their lives?. Does your concern for them if they have problems or worries dampen down the sexual tension for either party?
I suppose what I am trying to say is do you find it easy to keep a relationship going as just a "good sex" relationship or does it invariably become something more than that and cause problems further down the line?. Is it better do you think to have someone you have regular sex with or maybe to have lots of peeps you only very occasionally play with?
I would start with us but we're not experienced enough yet to know whats best for us so it's over to you!
Love
FIRE xx

I've been down the fuck-buddy route, and yes, it can become too involved. Towards the end he wanted to spend more time bitching about his ex and his problems than having sex.
I now prefer the more anonymous, once or twice scenario. I have enough problems without worrying about someone else's. Sex with someone else is just supposed to be fun and a relief from normal life, not a session acting as Marge Proops biggrin
Quote by lipsucker
Hey I'm new to the site, and very happy with the results so far biggrin
Had some fun meets with single fems and couples and thats in about 6 weeks?
And I'm just an average looking bloke, average cock size and pretty hairy, but what I am is polite, honest and genuine, I take time to read profiles and adds and respond to what people want, if its not what I want I don't bother with a PM.
Also I socialise, get to know some people, not many so far, but I'm persistent, and chat on-line so people get to know who I am.
Yeh people who don't answer can be frustrating, especially after you have spent 20 mins on your PM, but what the hell people are busy.
I have had a pretty good average of polite No Thanks, and if you socialise as well as meet, you really don't want to bump in to people who think you are an idiot.
Lets face it, you take the rough with the smooth, how often does "fancy a F**K" work in a night club? The people on here are real people, who enjoy a varied sex life as do I, you have to treat them like people!!!!!! If you want a quick F**K, drop your wallet in a massage parlour, thats what they are there for. If you want to meet likeminded people be nice smile
Stay safe & have Fun
T
hey all we are asking is for a bit of common decenty to answer peoples replys
but then i guess its asking a bit much
Common decency doesnt come into it and yes you are asking too much. So is someone puts an advert in and recieves 100 replys per day as some of the ladies do get, are you suggesting that they have to reply to each and every one. Its nearly impossible for people to find the time to do that. ok if only a couple of replies are gained and they have read you requirements and fit the bill but you still dont want them then maybe you should reply to them, but most people recieve far too many to do be able to reply to them all.
Louise xx
if your so busy and that popular then how come your on here so much as said decentcy deserves an answer or in this case obviously not
Sorry, Lipsucker, but just who the hell are you to query how much time someone chooses to spend on here?
You're obviously just feeling hard done by because you haven't had your quick shag yet.
Well, I've got news for you. With an attitude like yours you're unlikely to get one either.
You single guys can be a fucking nightmare. You seem to assume that all you've got to do is PM someone and they will be so desperate for your wonderful cock that they'll throw themselves at your feet. Wake up....................you are one of thousands...............accept that, change your attitude, change your approach and you might just luck out.
Quote by lipsucker
Hey I'm new to the site, and very happy with the results so far biggrin
Had some fun meets with single fems and couples and thats in about 6 weeks?
And I'm just an average looking bloke, average cock size and pretty hairy, but what I am is polite, honest and genuine, I take time to read profiles and adds and respond to what people want, if its not what I want I don't bother with a PM.
Also I socialise, get to know some people, not many so far, but I'm persistent, and chat on-line so people get to know who I am.
Yeh people who don't answer can be frustrating, especially after you have spent 20 mins on your PM, but what the hell people are busy.
I have had a pretty good average of polite No Thanks, and if you socialise as well as meet, you really don't want to bump in to people who think you are an idiot.
Lets face it, you take the rough with the smooth, how often does "fancy a F**K" work in a night club? The people on here are real people, who enjoy a varied sex life as do I, you have to treat them like people!!!!!! If you want a quick F**K, drop your wallet in a massage parlour, thats what they are there for. If you want to meet likeminded people be nice smile
Stay safe & have Fun
T
hey all we are asking is for a bit of common decenty to answer peoples replys
but then i guess its asking a bit much
And all I as a female is asking for is for people to READ MY PROFILE PROPERLY.
As has already been stated by several people, if a guy can't be bothered to do any more than look at the pics, and can't be bothered to read the text to find out what I am actually interested in, why the Hell should I bother to reply?
Just done a bit of research and it sounds as if Meat and Sassy have nailed down the cause.................it sounds like a detox reaction.
Good eh, you try to do something that benefits your body and end up feeling worse biggrin
Quote by tonmar01
Lissa,
My sympathies are with you today, as I'm suffering with a migraine.
(((((HUGS))))
M xx

No, mine are with you. Compared to a full-blown migraine, this is just a minor inconvenience :cry:
I have got the mother and father of a headache today. It isn't just refusing to shift, it's unpacked its bags and is sitting on the sofa with its feet up.
I do get headaches occasionally but nothing like this.
The only thing I can possibly think may have caused it is that over the last couple of days I have started drinking loads of water. T'other half is always moaning at me about the amount of coffee and coke I drink so I've been trying an alternative.
Am I barking up the wrong tree, or could the change in drinking habits be to blame?
Oooh, ooh, oooh................no, I know what I'd de-invent.
RELIGION!
Over the centuries mainstream religions have probably been responsible for more misery, torture and death than any other single factor.
I don't include Buddhism here, Kiss, before you get cross with me biggrin
If you could de-invent anything what would it be, and why?
Mine are a toss-up between the Atom bomb and personal bloody stereo's.
The atom bomb, because there would have been no Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and probably no development of today's nuclear weapons, and all the potential for mass destruction that go with them.
The personal stereo because they are just so flipping irritating when you get someone else's crap choice of music second hand.
Quote by laterunner
Congratulations! I'm still trying for my first 3-sum on this site, you would not believe how many time-wasting couples i've had this past two years! single guys up for a laugh i can understand, but i had expected something better from couples.....even if it was just a 'thanks but no thanks'! Can begin to see why the ranks of bi/gay partners are beginning to swell....please, if you really are'nt up for it, then keep off the site.......

It really makes me laugh when single guys accuse couples of being time-wasters and not genuine. In my experience it's the single guys................those using the ads specifically..............who are the time wasters.
I've given up using the ads for just that reason.
Quote by
We already have a routinly armed Police Service, The Mod Police.
Do you really think a Police officer would shoot anybody unless his or an innocent life was at stake.

sad
But it has happened too many times already as I said earlier Stephen Waldorf (Unarmed), James Ashley (Unarmed), Harry Stanley (Unarmed - but believed to be carrying a gun. It was a chair leg), Jean Charles De Menezes (Unarmed).
One innocent killed by police fire is one killing too many. Those policemen who are trained to carry guns know how to incapacitate or kill with one shot, yet in so many of the police error shootings there is always an element of over-kill. One shot to the head is enough if carried out by a trained marksman. Not 5. Or 6. Or 7.
:(
Sorry de sade but with that comment you show your glaring lack of knowledge.
I read your earlier list, published above, again with interest.
Harry Stanley was shot and killed because he had an item, reported to the Police by a witness to be a shotgun, declared by Stanley to be a shotgun, wrapped in a plastic bag and therefore undistinguishable and an unknown quantity to all but Stanley. Despite repeated warnings from armed officers, over a not inconsiderable amount of time it has to be said, Stanley refused to comply with the officers and eventually brought the item to bear at the officers who responded by opening fire.
Was Stanley the one responsible for getting shot?? I reckon so.
Similar incident in Glasgow recently involving a man with an umbrella wrapped in a towel who eventually knelt down and took aim at armed officers despite repeated attempts to comply.
He was shot and survived.
Was he the one responsible for getting shot?? I reckon so.
Accidents will happen, mistakes will be made. We are not talking about robots, we are talking about human beings, albeit highly trained ones, and as the previous thread on "Could you Kill" has highlighted, no one really knows until it comes to the crunch.
Where mistakes are made in that arena, unfortunately the chance of someone dying is extremely high and rightly those involved should be thoroughly investigated and where action neccessary it should be taken swiftly.
I will however leave you with this thought
In the case of unlawful killing of Jean Charles De Menezes the officer who did the shooting was given information from the Security Service and surveillance team that De Menezes was a suspected suicide bomber who had been followed from a target address and as he entered the station, just after a failed attempt previously, the belief was that this male was about to detonate a bomb on board the train and possibly kill and maim hundreds of innocent passengers.
Knowing this information (not the armed officers fault it was wrong, someone elsewhere should be brought to task over that one and hopefully will) that officer boarded the train and took the action neccessary to disable a suicide bomber (In the "uneducateds" eyes it was overkill, experts would argue convincingly that it is neccessary overkill for a particular reason)
So knowing that he was walking up to a believed walking bomb, and may be killed as a result, the officer did so and carried out his duty.
Brave man or fool?
Hero or villan??
I'm still very much in the NO camp for routine arming but I do take my hat off to them for the role they undertake.
Have you ever heard the term 'Suicide by police'. It is used in America.
Yes. Isn't that where people who want to die but can't bring themselves to end their own life deliberately put themselves into a position where they get shot?
Following on from the famous quotes thread, this is for famous last words people didn't say, but should have biggrin
Example
Captain of the Titanic 'Full speed ahead, and fuck the icebergs'
Pharaoh at the Red Sea 'Sod the bridge, let's take the short cut'
So what famous last words should other people have said? :D
We visited London recently, and I have to admit, seeing police officers armed with what I assume are some kind of sub-machine gun (apologies to the experts, I don't know much about guns) did make me feel both uneasy and sad. I really don't know if I would like to see every police officer walking around with a gun.
Having said that, when we have visited European countries where the police ARE armed, we certainly haven't witnessed the binge-drinking, mob culture behaviour from the local teenagers that you can see in any town or city here in the UK. Is that because they have respect for/fear of the police?
If I could be sure that arming the police would make our streets a safer place I would be all for it.
If you asked Raz, the Kurdish guy I work with, if Saddam should die.................I think most of you could guess what his answer would be.
Some really interesting responses to my initial question.
I suppose in a way it was a bit of a simplistic question..................I'm sure it's very true that acting in the heat of the moment is totally different to a cold-blooded decision to kill.
So here is a different scenario to consider.
Your child/partner is threatened with death, and the only way to save them is to push a button that will kill a dozen random strangers somewhere in the world. Would you push that button?
If yes, how many would you be prepared to kill?
Would you kill 20? 50? 100? 1,000?
Would there come a point where you wouldn't consider the life of your loved one worth the sacrifice of so many?
Quote by Babe-n-a-biker
biggrin Should have stuck to the cocks in the first place lol

Plenty of cocks outside of the chatroom too :D :D :D :D
Quote by Calista

Here we go again rolleyes
It was a joke...............J-O-K-E.
Oh, I really can't be arsed!

You posted expecting everyone to agree with you?
No, unlike some people on here I realise that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I can also appreciate when something is SUPPOSED to be satirical, and not start having a fit about it, or treating it as a serious piece of work.
Then ... let me voice my opinion without having a fit about it or treating it like a serious piece of work ... I never called anyone and would suggest that you've taken other peoples opinions personally.
Cx
Sorry, I don't believe I have had a fit, I'm just bored with the whole thing. If you don't think it's funny, fine. If you do, fine.
I'm off to look at cocks in the Chat room.
Quote by Calista

Here we go again rolleyes
It was a joke...............J-O-K-E.
Oh, I really can't be arsed!

You posted expecting everyone to agree with you?
No, unlike some people on here I realise that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but I can also appreciate when something is SUPPOSED to be satirical, and not start having a fit about it, or treating it as a serious piece of work.
Quote by Calista
THE NATURAL LIFECYCLE:
The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building and improving his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the squirrel is warm and well fed. The shivering grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.
THE END
THE BIGOTS VIEW OF BRITAIN:
The squirrel works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the squirrel is warm and well fed.
A social worker finds the shivering grasshopper, calls a press conference and demands to know why the squirrel should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others less fortunate, like the grasshopper, are cold and starving.
The BBC shows up to provide live coverage of the shivering grasshopper; with cuts to a video of the squirrel in his comfortable warm home with a table laden with food.
The British press inform people that they should be ashamed that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so while others have plenty.
The Labour Party, Greenpeace, Animal Rights and The Grasshopper Council of GB demonstrate in front of the squirrel's house.
The BBC, interrupting a cultural festival special from Notting Hill with breaking news, broadcasts a multi cultural choir singing "We Shall Overcome".
Ken Livingstone rants in an interview with Trevor McDonald that the squirrel has gotten rich off the backs of grasshoppers, and calls for an immediate tax hike on the squirrel to make him pay his "fair share" and increases the charge for squirrels to enter inner London .
In response to pressure from the media, the Government drafts the Economic Equity and Grasshopper Anti Discrimination Act, retroactive to the beginning of the summer. The squirrel's taxes are reassessed. He is taken to court and fined for failing to hire grasshoppers as builders for the work he was doing on his home and an additional fine for contempt when he told the court the grasshopper did not want to work.
The grasshopper is provided with a council house, financial aid to furnish it and an account with a local taxi firm to ensure he can be socially mobile.
The squirrels food is seized and re distributed to the more needy members of society, in this case the grasshopper.
Without enough money to buy more food, to pay the fine and his newly imposed retroactive taxes, the squirrel has to downsize and start building a new home. The local authority takes over his old home and utilises it as a temporary home for asylum seeking cats who had hijacked a plane to get toBritain as they had to share their country of origin with mice.
On arrival the tried to blow up the airport because of Britain's apparent love of dogs. The cats had been arrested for the international offence of hijacking and attempt bombing but were immediately released because the police fed them pilchards instead of salmon whilst in custody. Initial moves to then return them to their own country were abandoned because it was feared they would face death by the mice. The cats devise and start a scam to obtain money from peoples credit cards.
A Panorama special shows the grasshopper finishing up the last of the squirrel's food, though Spring is still months away, while the council house he is in, crumbles around him because he hasn't bothered to maintain the house.
He is shown to be taking drugs. Inadequate government funding is blamed for the grasshoppers drug illness.
The cats seek recompense in the British courts for their treatment since arrival in UK .
The grasshopper gets arrested for stabbing an old dog during a burglary to get money for his drugs habit. He is imprisoned but released immediately because he has been in custody for a few weeks.
He is placed in the care of the probation service to monitor and supervise him. Within a few weeks he has killed a guinea pig in a botched robbery. A commission of enquiry, that will eventually cost GBP10,000,000 and state the obvious, is set up. Additional money is put into funding a drug rehabilitation scheme for grasshoppers and legal aid for lawyers representing asylum seekers is increased.
The asylum seeking cats are praised by the government for enriching Britain's multicultural diversity and dogs are criticised by the government for failing to befriend the cats.
The grasshopper dies of a drug overdose. The usual sections of the press blame it on the obvious failure of government to address the root causes of despair arising from social inequity and his traumatic experience of prison. They call for the resignation of a minister.
The cats are paid a million pounds each because their rights were infringed when the government failed to inform them there were mice in the United Kingdom
The squirrel, the dogs and the victims of the hijacking, the bombing, the burglaries and robberies have to pay an additional percentage on their credit cards to cover losses, their taxes are increased to pay for law and order and they are told that they will have to work beyond 65 because of a
shortfall in government funds.
THE END

You posted, I'm entitled to voice my view on things .... I've changed the title to represent my view ... and if I manage to come up wth an analogy in which the destruction of war and how the moral consequences can easily be distorted I'll post it.
Tolerance ... a small word that small minded people forget.
Understanding ... something the human race demands but never gives.
Charity ... see both the above.
Cx
Here we go again rolleyes
It was a joke...............J-O-K-E.
Oh, I really can't be arsed!
My favourites
Close Encounters Of The Third Kind
The Castle
Reservoir Dogs
Pulp Fiction
The Lion King redface
But NOT the execrable The Da Vinci Code.
Quote by PoloLady

This is actual data from the Home Office, I will quite happily send you the link.
Persons in detention currently seeking asylum.
Female..................180, 10 of them minors
Male......................1,645, 5 of them minors.
Lots of family's running from persecution there then!

Don't get me wrong - I have no intention of supporting an open door policy - far from it.

Crikey, hold the front page.....................we actually agree on something biggrin :D :D
Quote by PoloLady

Well excuse me if I happen to feel that people who have lived and worked here all their lives, paying tax and National Insurance and contributing to the economy, are more deserving of our compassion that some free-loader who hasn't been here five minutes and is only here for what they can screw out of the system.

So it is all so black and white... is it?
Isn't it?
Do you really think this country can continue to be the sponge of Europe, soaking up anyone who wants to come here?
You're right...
let's send back all of the professionals, the skilled and non-skilled workers (which companies and the health service have been actively recruiting) back and to hell with the effect that would have on the economy and society. Why the hell should these fuckers bring their families here with them.
Ooops - you didn't mean those though did you?
Fuck it! Let's clump all the asylum seekers into the same stereotype and bash them instead. If they can't get a job they should be sent back to watch their other children be and tortured. Just because they have suffered more than we could ever imagine, why the fuck should we get involved... they only suffered so they could have a sob story to move here and sponge.
Actually, now I come to think of it… it’s not so black and white after all.
This is actual data from the Home Office, I will quite happily send you the link.
Persons in detention currently seeking asylum.
Female..................180, 10 of them minors
Male......................1,645, 5 of them minors.
Lots of family's running from persecution there then!
Quote by PoloLady

Well excuse me if I happen to feel that people who have lived and worked here all their lives, paying tax and National Insurance and contributing to the economy, are more deserving of our compassion that some free-loader who hasn't been here five minutes and is only here for what they can screw out of the system.

So it is all so black and white... is it?
Isn't it?
Do you really think this country can continue to be the sponge of Europe, soaking up anyone who wants to come here?
Quote by PoloLady

I have compassion for the elderly born and bred in this country who will have to decide between warmth and food this winter.
I have no compassion for a bunch of free-loaders who come here looking for an easy life with their hands held out.
I have no compassion for those who come here because we are a tolerant society, who then have no tolerance themselves for our way of life.

Do you have compassion for those who come to work here as Doctors and Pharmacists who care for the health and wellbeing of the elderly born and bred here... without which our health service would be in greater shite than it is already.
Do you have compassion for those who came here and work as cleaners, porters, catering staff... because many of our own born and bred will not get off their own arses and work for a living?
I don't believe I said anything against people prepared to work for a living.............only those looking for a free ride!
No, you just collectively referred to squirrels and grasshoppers - leaving people do make their own assumptions. It was the 'born and bred' comment which will impact the most on how the story is now perceived.
Well excuse me if I happen to feel that people who have lived and worked here all their lives, paying tax and National Insurance and contributing to the economy, are more deserving of our compassion that some free-loader who hasn't been here five minutes and is only here for what they can screw out of the system.
Quote by PoloLady

I have compassion for the elderly born and bred in this country who will have to decide between warmth and food this winter.
I have no compassion for a bunch of free-loaders who come here looking for an easy life with their hands held out.
I have no compassion for those who come here because we are a tolerant society, who then have no tolerance themselves for our way of life.

Do you have compassion for those who come to work here as Doctors and Pharmacists who care for the health and wellbeing of the elderly born and bred here... without which our health service would be in greater shite than it is already.
Do you have compassion for those who came here and work as cleaners, porters, catering staff... because many of our own born and bred will not get off their own arses and work for a living?
I don't believe I said anything against people prepared to work for a living.............only those looking for a free ride!
Quote by PoloLady
I personally find this really offensive.

So did you stop reading it at the very first thing that offended you, or did you carry on to the end so you could be really offended? biggrin
How then could anyone express a defferent opinion if they are ignorant of the full detail? confused
Well, that doesn't seem to stop a lot of the opinions on here! :twisted:
Quote by splendid33
I personally find this really offensive.

So did you stop reading it at the very first thing that offended you, or did you carry on to the end so you could be really offended? biggrin