Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Melting_pot
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 47
0 miles · Lombardy
Forum
one of mine..
I'm a bit of a "fisherman's friend" addict..yes, the strong ones in the white package..
I eat them like some people smoke..except I've never seen anyone smoke two at a time and sometimes I do that too.
now..I don't know if you're familiar with the taste of them and with what they do to your mouth..but if any of you are..
have you ever tried to drink a cold glass of water straight after having downed one of the sweets?
if that doesn't blow the top of your head off..nothing will
I'm a bit of a "fisherman's friend" addict..yes, the strong ones in the white package..
I eat them like some people smoke..except I've never seen anyone smoke two at a time and sometimes I do that too.
now..I don't know if you're familiar with the taste of them and with what they do to your mouth..but if any of you are..
have you ever tried to drink a cold glass of water straight after having downed one of the sweets?
if that doesn't blow the top of your head off..nothing will
:?duncan, you are right of course..but I can't help but notice that it's mostly men who get this sort of criticism..when a woman is playing away without her husband's consent, most people (the men anyway) seem prepared to close an eye... or at least cut her some slack, which does not seem to happen with men.
as a jew I'm not new to "child mutilation"..after all that is wat circumcision is..
I do condone that though, while I do not understand the piercing thing at all:
circumcision: it happens on or around the 8th day of life of every jewish boy, and judging by what I saw when my brother had it done, it's quite a bloody mess.
it is also performed by a surgeon, however, so it's as safe as can be..and it has, in the long run, beneficial health effects. there are religious/social/health reasons that somewhat justify or at least make sense of the whole endeavour. it is part of a millennia old tradition. this accounts for something.
piercing of the earlobes: in western society there is no reason at all to having it done to babies. in asian and african countries where this is part of the tradition, has a social and religious significance, I put it on a par with the circumcision of jewish babies..
in western europe, where it is purelly done for aestetical reasons, mostly misguided and for the visual pleasure of parents, it only saddens and enrage me.
so far I have seen none here in england, but in italy I've seen it a number of times...and every single time, the parents are precisely the kind of people I would want to have nothing to do with and nothing in common.
intellectually, socially and morally, the kind of people in italy who would do such a thing are just simply lightyears away from myself, in lifestyle, education, profession and social behaviour.
this may sound deeply disparaging, and it is not meant as such. I am sure that these people are decent human beings on their own accord..I just feel like I have nothing to say to the likes of them, nor they to me... no common ground whatsoever.
I find piercing a baby's ears distasteful, cheap, vulgar and mean.
the 3 of my sisters had theirs done between the ages of 12 and 18... and always after long debate and making sure that it's what they really wanted and that they were ready to take care of themselves as long as the safety of their earlobes was concerned. (as in "stopped tomboying around")
if I ever have a daughter, she will need to convince me she has good reasons to want it..and unless she's articulate enough to do so, the answer will be no for as long as she'll need my, or someone else's, money to do it.
I do condone that though, while I do not understand the piercing thing at all:
circumcision: it happens on or around the 8th day of life of every jewish boy, and judging by what I saw when my brother had it done, it's quite a bloody mess.
it is also performed by a surgeon, however, so it's as safe as can be..and it has, in the long run, beneficial health effects. there are religious/social/health reasons that somewhat justify or at least make sense of the whole endeavour. it is part of a millennia old tradition. this accounts for something.
piercing of the earlobes: in western society there is no reason at all to having it done to babies. in asian and african countries where this is part of the tradition, has a social and religious significance, I put it on a par with the circumcision of jewish babies..
in western europe, where it is purelly done for aestetical reasons, mostly misguided and for the visual pleasure of parents, it only saddens and enrage me.
so far I have seen none here in england, but in italy I've seen it a number of times...and every single time, the parents are precisely the kind of people I would want to have nothing to do with and nothing in common.
intellectually, socially and morally, the kind of people in italy who would do such a thing are just simply lightyears away from myself, in lifestyle, education, profession and social behaviour.
this may sound deeply disparaging, and it is not meant as such. I am sure that these people are decent human beings on their own accord..I just feel like I have nothing to say to the likes of them, nor they to me... no common ground whatsoever.
I find piercing a baby's ears distasteful, cheap, vulgar and mean.
the 3 of my sisters had theirs done between the ages of 12 and 18... and always after long debate and making sure that it's what they really wanted and that they were ready to take care of themselves as long as the safety of their earlobes was concerned. (as in "stopped tomboying around")
if I ever have a daughter, she will need to convince me she has good reasons to want it..and unless she's articulate enough to do so, the answer will be no for as long as she'll need my, or someone else's, money to do it.
I don't watch these kind of shows, and really don't understand how anybody could want to appear on them and be made a fool off on national television.
I heard about her through the internet and indeed she has a brilliant voice.
as far as these shows go..I believe they're staged from start to finish and that the public that goes to see them "live" should be ashamed for partaking in them... and humiliating the aspiring performers time and again.
only big brother sort of reality shows are worse, because in them there is not even the pretend search for a sparkle of talent or human quality.
that's my 2cent on it.. and I don't care if I come over judgemental and arrogant...these shows just irk me.
I heard about her through the internet and indeed she has a brilliant voice.
as far as these shows go..I believe they're staged from start to finish and that the public that goes to see them "live" should be ashamed for partaking in them... and humiliating the aspiring performers time and again.
only big brother sort of reality shows are worse, because in them there is not even the pretend search for a sparkle of talent or human quality.
that's my 2cent on it.. and I don't care if I come over judgemental and arrogant...these shows just irk me.
simply a remnant of "social handicap", connected with identifying oneself with anything other than straight..and hence declaring oneself "less of a man" and by extention a lesser human being, with the idea that even here someone might get judgemental about it, starting with our mirrors...quite silly, really.
but then, I don't really know how the mind works, when faced with such a "identity crysis"..as so far I haven't been bitten by the "letstryacock" bug.
A.
but then, I don't really know how the mind works, when faced with such a "identity crysis"..as so far I haven't been bitten by the "letstryacock" bug.
A.
I don't really care.
mostly in my experience I've been the first "try" of a girl that was approaching swinging for the first time (unless they've all been magnificently leading me on..which I seriously doubt) so there have been very few sloppy seconds for me.
when there were, I was never bothered about it. I never, so far, had the chance/misfortune/accident of bumping into the actual "first cock" of the situation. would I mind? not really..I've never been able to "rate" men for their looks and I would only know about them what I learned from my prospective date..and exchanging experiences is more a turnon than a downer..
I just don't bother with getting to know men, because we're never going to go anywhere past a drink and a pat on the back at a social (and I still have to go to my first)
and if I don't know them, how can I judge them?
also, I always talk to some extent with the girl I plan to meet..and I would not be into them if I did not value their intelligence and ultimately their taste.
after all, if they're into me, they can't have that bad a taste for men, can they? :giggle:
truth is, I meet for nsa sex, which means I'm into that particular person..not in her life, choices, lifestyle or previous relationships, casual or otherwise.
the chance of a good time together with her is not subjected to what she does with her time when I'm not with her.
mostly in my experience I've been the first "try" of a girl that was approaching swinging for the first time (unless they've all been magnificently leading me on..which I seriously doubt) so there have been very few sloppy seconds for me.
when there were, I was never bothered about it. I never, so far, had the chance/misfortune/accident of bumping into the actual "first cock" of the situation. would I mind? not really..I've never been able to "rate" men for their looks and I would only know about them what I learned from my prospective date..and exchanging experiences is more a turnon than a downer..
I just don't bother with getting to know men, because we're never going to go anywhere past a drink and a pat on the back at a social (and I still have to go to my first)
and if I don't know them, how can I judge them?
also, I always talk to some extent with the girl I plan to meet..and I would not be into them if I did not value their intelligence and ultimately their taste.
after all, if they're into me, they can't have that bad a taste for men, can they? :giggle:
truth is, I meet for nsa sex, which means I'm into that particular person..not in her life, choices, lifestyle or previous relationships, casual or otherwise.
the chance of a good time together with her is not subjected to what she does with her time when I'm not with her.
I think I'll try my luck with the (apparently)minority of girls that appreciate things to be "au naturel". I'm just not confortable with a razor anywhere near my precious bits (not since I was circumsized as a baby..lol)
on the flipside, I like a girl to be trimmed, and don't mind if she is shaven or even waxed..but if she prefers to be natural too (haven't met one in years though) I, off course, know I have no right to complain, given my own choice on the matter.
on the flipside, I like a girl to be trimmed, and don't mind if she is shaven or even waxed..but if she prefers to be natural too (haven't met one in years though) I, off course, know I have no right to complain, given my own choice on the matter.
as a footnote, on another website I've been specifically asked by a girl NOT to tell her anything I might have been upto with any other girl of said website, as that would put her off..(I reckon she would somehow feel like nr x of a list, or something like that..understandable..wrong to some extent, but understandable)...
since I haven't met her yet, I'm more than willing to shut my trap
anyhoo..
is this "don't tell me" something common to the ladies? and what are the reasons for it? is my assumption for her reasons anywhere near the mark, in your opinion?
since I haven't met her yet, I'm more than willing to shut my trap
anyhoo..
is this "don't tell me" something common to the ladies? and what are the reasons for it? is my assumption for her reasons anywhere near the mark, in your opinion?
I have no problems in naming the sin, but I would never name the sinners.
what I've been upto is totally my business as it is my choice to divulge any part of it, insofar as I don't name the people I've been doing it with, which is something I would only do with their consent.
it has nothing to do with bragging either and I would only talk about it in a spirit of exchanging experience and giving each other new ideas or stimulating thoughts..preferably in private conversations with my date of the moment. I've written pubblicly about things I've done in the past, that are not traceable to the person I've done them with..again in the spirit of public debate about sexuality and experience, not just for a joke.
I feel this is my right, and nobody should diss me for it.
what I've been upto is totally my business as it is my choice to divulge any part of it, insofar as I don't name the people I've been doing it with, which is something I would only do with their consent.
it has nothing to do with bragging either and I would only talk about it in a spirit of exchanging experience and giving each other new ideas or stimulating thoughts..preferably in private conversations with my date of the moment. I've written pubblicly about things I've done in the past, that are not traceable to the person I've done them with..again in the spirit of public debate about sexuality and experience, not just for a joke.
I feel this is my right, and nobody should diss me for it.
yup...they do.
have to say it's mostly a married couple sort of destination...I was there with a female friend that was just a friend, and we did not have anything going between us (even though after the first night the lady who did our room felt compelled to move our beds together..rofl..
..and that was kinda frowned upon by some of the locals..but all was very polite and not pushy..they were surprised and perplexed, but not judgemental.
a great holiday anyway, but because of nature, sea, monuments and population...sex just wasn't on the menù for us..lol
I have no doubt though that there are quite a number of dutch people over there who wouldn't mind a bit of play :P
have to say it's mostly a married couple sort of destination...I was there with a female friend that was just a friend, and we did not have anything going between us (even though after the first night the lady who did our room felt compelled to move our beds together..rofl..
..and that was kinda frowned upon by some of the locals..but all was very polite and not pushy..they were surprised and perplexed, but not judgemental.
a great holiday anyway, but because of nature, sea, monuments and population...sex just wasn't on the menù for us..lol
I have no doubt though that there are quite a number of dutch people over there who wouldn't mind a bit of play :P
I've been there before the tzunami, in a hotel I doubt to exist anymore (tzunami hit that area pretty hard).. went up with a friend, and we traveled with a dutch travel agency, so found mostly dutch, german and a few english people.
sadly I have to report that when we went, just about everything closed at 10 pm. little or no life at all after that.
if the locals play, they do so behind closed doors (the local ladies won't even take a swim in the sea without at least covered shoulders..and it's unheard off, so a local guy told us, for a young man to take a girl out for the night if she's not his fiancée)
this is of course based on what we were told, so might be inaccurate.
still...the holiday was worth every penny...but not for "sex related reasons"
sadly I have to report that when we went, just about everything closed at 10 pm. little or no life at all after that.
if the locals play, they do so behind closed doors (the local ladies won't even take a swim in the sea without at least covered shoulders..and it's unheard off, so a local guy told us, for a young man to take a girl out for the night if she's not his fiancée)
this is of course based on what we were told, so might be inaccurate.
still...the holiday was worth every penny...but not for "sex related reasons"
I have been on "rushed" dates a couple of times..but generally I find that talking a lot before meeting, works better...it leaves no room for incomprehentions or misunderstandings.. it leaves as little "grey areas" as possible and it gives a chance to find those things both parties are really into and will then introduce in the bedroom.
also it can build up quite some sexual tension, if you have enough fantasy for it.
also it can build up quite some sexual tension, if you have enough fantasy for it.
am I the only idiot here who has no accurate idea of how hung he is? (by measure of hand, so to speak I'd say about average/medium...have not had complaints..then again I don't think I've ever shagged the kind of girl that would point and laugh..nor have I had complaints on my performance..so it may well be that I'm small and don't know)...girth I know to have enough to have a few girls consider and then dismiss anal.
that's all I know, besides the fact that maximum erection is hard to achieve in "laboratory conditions" and that an accurate measurement is hard to do...
AND of course that I would look and feel like an idiot, in the bathroom, wanking with a ruler in my hand... which is why I never bothered in the first place.
I am a bit amazed and also a bit put off by the constant pursuit that seems to happen here..I get the feeling that 70% (purely figurative number..don't start nitpicking) of the ladies declares that they're after a big cock..possibly black.
each to their own taste, of course... and there are enough ladies out there who swing the other way..so that's not it..but I HAVE noticed it... (on other websites I've been on it wasn't as evident nor "important"..)
also, I've noticed that when it comes to it, most girls will admit that in fact it isn't necessary and can actually be a bit of a problem.
I've also noticed that most male profiles (or couples) on which I've stumbled seem to have all huge cocks..which I find a bit suspicious, given that I might not know my size, but I HAVE read upon the subject and the average size is quite below what is most commonly reported on said profiles...
my conclusions?
girls are greedy!
:giggle: :giggle: :giggle: :giggle:
that's all I know, besides the fact that maximum erection is hard to achieve in "laboratory conditions" and that an accurate measurement is hard to do...
AND of course that I would look and feel like an idiot, in the bathroom, wanking with a ruler in my hand... which is why I never bothered in the first place.
I am a bit amazed and also a bit put off by the constant pursuit that seems to happen here..I get the feeling that 70% (purely figurative number..don't start nitpicking) of the ladies declares that they're after a big cock..possibly black.
each to their own taste, of course... and there are enough ladies out there who swing the other way..so that's not it..but I HAVE noticed it... (on other websites I've been on it wasn't as evident nor "important"..)
also, I've noticed that when it comes to it, most girls will admit that in fact it isn't necessary and can actually be a bit of a problem.
I've also noticed that most male profiles (or couples) on which I've stumbled seem to have all huge cocks..which I find a bit suspicious, given that I might not know my size, but I HAVE read upon the subject and the average size is quite below what is most commonly reported on said profiles...
my conclusions?
girls are greedy!
:giggle: :giggle: :giggle: :giggle:
Quote by swcpl2005
So aside from the moderator love-inwould Admin care to comment on mexy's observation, i.e. that once pics have been self-tagged, they can still be modified by other viewers?
PS Mex, I tagged yours, whisper sweet nothings in the chat room and I mayv even let you know what I chose
my guess is you CAN tag them, but it won't have any bearing on the pics, as the "self tag" still will trump whatever you've tagged them as.
it still doesn't solve the problem, as it still means "more work" for whoever feels like tagging pics other than one's own.
"I think we've made it" (never EVER say that)
"who is there?" (turn the light on, you twat!)
"it's all over now" *hug and stroke on the back of the head*(why do all thriller and action movies end with that?)
oh..and something non verbal... L-shaped duvets and blankets...it's either cold for both, or I want to see some tits!
"who is there?" (turn the light on, you twat!)
"it's all over now" *hug and stroke on the back of the head*(why do all thriller and action movies end with that?)
oh..and something non verbal... L-shaped duvets and blankets...it's either cold for both, or I want to see some tits!
Quote by Gnb
things I disagree with
all that is asked is for the race to be made just a little bit safer.
horses are smart animals and running and jumping is in their nature. they would not fall and injure themselves terminally if the jumps were "at a reasonable difficulty level".
right now, this particular race is a bit like polevaulting, but with the bar to jump over made of glass shards and put on fire. only a lunatic jumper would take that sort of risk..
horses don't get to decide what sort of obstacles they have to jump over. it's for responsible men to make it so that the chance for injuries is at an acceptable level of risk. the frequency of deaths suggests right now, this level is well surpassed.
all it takes is for the organizers to make the jumps less conspicuous, giving the horses a better visibility.
in the end, these horses are worth a lot of money, as racehorses and for their bloodlines..if nothing else, it makes economic sense, to try to make it so that they survive the race.
