Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Staggerlee_BB
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 62
Bisexual Female, 64
0 miles · Widdrington Station

Forum

O.K. have it your nicely and remember the first step in problem solving is identifying the problem
Quote by Bluefish2009
I think the world has gone made!

Not actually fined then ...headline should read ...Council investigates littering ticket after realising they've employed an idiot


On the surface looks like idiots at the wheel ... headline should read ... Council applies rules:are rules stupid

And finally Esther...
Don't you just love the accurate unbiased reporting in the super soaraway Sun ....the word you're looking for is Cunts
The thing is Blue I don't disagree with the idea that many aspects of the modern world have far too many of the sharp corners wrapped in cotton wool.... the problem is that you and your army of people fighting the threat are pointing your guns at the wrong people,and that solves nothing
Quote by Bluefish2009
Sounds like smoke and mirrors to me

So if it's smoke and mirrors Blue,who do you think is trying to hide what behind them ??
Whether it be the unreal/imagined, threats of H & S or the fear of litigation, the effect is the same, which Bear has highlighted, good for him, we need to fight such madness.
Quote by common sense
Dealing with threats in the modern world
Rule 1:
Identify the threat
Quote by Bluefish2009
Sounds like smoke and mirrors to me

So if it's smoke and mirrors Blue,who do you think is trying to hide what behind them ??
Quote by starlightcouple
for me ' when and if a time ever comes where every single person abides by the views and actions of amnesty international, with regards to human rights issues then i may well change my mind on those issues. but for me peeple are killed on a daily basis all because they want others to bow to their own values and beliefs, with no regard at all for others beliefs and values.
human rights are also equal rights, can you have one without the other dunno
two wrongs obviusly do not make a right, no more than sometimes two rights can make a wrong. :notes:

So if I'm reading this right ..... You'll support Amnesty when it's no longer needed .... or a campaign for human rights is only worth joining when there is no longer any need for a campaign for human rights ..... wow that's a nasty little loop you've got yourself into there .... you want to be careful you don't disappear somewhere unpleasant
P.S. Strange isn't it that most of the critiques of Amnesty quoted in your link come from governments being critiqued ... i.e. The U.S.A. complains about Amnesties criticism of Guantanamo....I mean who'd of thought such a thing .... ban them now I say ..bunch of bloody commies .... take 'em out and shoot 'em..... hanging's too good ....etc etc
Confidence tricks rely on greed and stupidity to work..... if you're not too greedy or too stupid to see the truth you get conned .... soooooo is this a con ?? are you too greedy or stupid to do the maths ??
And Bear like so many before him is talking out of his arse .....he means that insurance companies and their fear of litigation stop kids from doing things ....health and safety laws are on the whole just applied common sense
Quote by neilinleeds
supporting the right of everyone everywhere to hold whatever beliefs they wish and not be imprisoned and persecuted for them does seem quite a good idea don't you think

no i do not on some occasions, and of course mr staggers it would be dictated by who is doing the persecution and the imprisonment, but more importantly than that, the reesons as to why those peeple have been persecuted and imprisoned. dont you think dunno
i certainly do not think that some peeples beliefs are correct. so you are possibly saying as an example that the taliban should not be persecuted or imprisoned for there beliefs? because those beliefs kill peeple on a regular basis. many peeple would say they are not persecuted enough.
that is why sometimes it can be dangerous for us all to join amnesty. would the taliban be in the queue to join up? rolleyes
Rubbish. Beliefs are incapable of harming anyone. They exist only as chemical / electrical patterns in the brain. Persecuting someone for those beliefs is persecution plain and simple. It's actions that harm, and though those actions are often informed by belief generally speaking individuals should be free to believe what they like, whether we like it or not. Even so far as allowing a Taliban member to believe that adulterers should be stoned or apostates beheaded, so long as they don't try to impose that belief on others. It's when they actually start chopping people's heads off that the time has come to get properly involved. Up until then the only appropriate course of action is rational debate as regards whether the belief is a valid one, or a complete load of self-deluded shite.
Saved me a couple of minutes there Neil ty
Quote by starlightcouple

Of course the situation in Syria and many other parts of the world are important, I said Sasha would support petitions on other subjects, there are many, from the destruction of the rain forests to the killing of people under government supervision, I think she has good knowledge of this from her Russian history under Stalin, but the question was asked as to wether or not the subject of gay rights were important enough to bother about in a world where people are dying, and I said yes, to some they are, perhaps not as important as stopping people being murdered but certainly not to be dismissed as "unworthy of support", we should be supporting all that we can that is against injustice everywhere and in every form, if these things are not brought to attention of the masses then nothing can be done about anything. Nobody should decide what is worthy of discussion or support or what isn't, just inform people and let them make thier own choice to support or ignore a situation. Signing one petition to stop the killing in Syria but letting the murder go on in other countries, as it does, it as imoral as ignoring the all the other acts of agression, subversion, etc that are happening, I just believe in giving what time you can to stand up for what you as an indivdual believe is right or wrong, I would respect someone for saying it is right to ban gays more than I would respect someone who says "what the hell" because I respect peoples right to have an opinion regardless of what it is, no opinion is grounds for no comment to me.
Just my opinion of course lol

let me make a suggestion if you want to heal the world. rolleyes

i am all for equal rights my friend it is just sometimes it feels like some issues are rammed down peeples throats, purely to force someone elses opinions and beliefs onto others. that is also wrong, and to be honest putting petitions up for anything should not be allowed as who knows where it will end. dunno
i am sure you will do more good there than putting a petition on a swingers web site, by having a look on the link i posted. i am sure there is enough on that website to keep you going for a while. :notes:
just my opinion of course. innocent
good luck in your search. :thumbup:
Good idea perhaps we should all join Amnesty,I did many years ago ..... supporting the right of everyone everywhere to hold whatever beliefs they wish and not be imprisoned and persecuted for them does seem quite a good idea don't you think
Davy Jones ?? Locker ?? No?????? ...........wanders off muttering under his breath......pearls.....swine......etc....etc.
Quote by MartnJewl
I didn't think Jewl would be upset by Davy Jones death, but then I saw her face. Now I'm a bereaver.

Shame .... comments like this should be put in a dark quiet place to think about how wrong they are......
A locker perhaps
Quote by Lizaleanrob
That Mr Mann chooses to table this motion now,does not make the point invalid,it does suggest a degree of opportunism, but that's the game ... shall we now make a list of Tory M.P.'s who were careerist opportunists ?? I'll start with Winston Churchill
obfuscation ...there's a word
disingenuous ... that's another
It would appear that one does not have to be in parliament to understand either.
HnS yes it's a fucking disgrace,it was when Mandelson and Blunkett and any number of former ministers of any persuasion took it and it is now ....Mr Mann (loving that name) is to be thanked for bringing it to our attention

I'm in agreement with you that's it's a disgrace that they are able to claim severance pay. The point I was making was the double standards of John Mann ( you call it opportunism) . I would have been a lot more impressed had he raised the matter when it was his own ministers claiming their pay offs.
a balance view is always a problem when presented to an unbalanced audience max :thumbup::thumbup:
Rare though it is for me to use these but.....:laughabove::laughabove::laughabove::laughabove::laughabove::laughabove:
Will this be Camerons' poll tax ?? yes and no ..
Yes: it is ill conceived, unpopular,and potentially disastrous....The N.H.S. does need reform, the first thing that should be done is the removal of the ridiculous concept of a 'market' in second thing is to do away with the notion that 'competition' is the way to get the best most efficient service for customers;the privatised gas,electricity,water,rail and telephony industries should stand as more than enough proof of the fallacy of that idea.
No: there will be no riots,it will not bring down his government or end his tenure as Tory leader..people are no longer surprised enough by the greed and idiocy of our politicians to do anything about it
Quote by starlightcouple

You really must stop believing what you read in the papers,or at least start reading a more honest one

dont reely buy papers but if i did the last one i would buy or read is the one that supplied your link to.
i cannot think of reading anything more boring to be honest. ah honest not something you associate with newspapers including that one.
"There are no facts, only interpretations."
- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) :grin:
So which inquiry was that again ???
The bookmark I use takes me straight to the forum .... I read it,decide if anyone has been enough of an idiot to be told so, then I log in
Quote by starlightcouple
is david cameron accountable for everything one of his tory mp's do essex? i meen if one of them did something dishonest would david cameron be accused of knowing and thrown to the lions?

Do you mean in the same way that a Government minister is held responsible for the cock ups of his department ?? you know those whose resignations or sackings The Sun so readily calls for ?? then YES he is responsible
Quote by starlightcouple
murdoch may well have known more than we do, but the enquiry found him to have done nothing wrong. he appologised resoundingly and shut the offending paper down. if an enquiry found no wrong doing on his part, how can you then judge him otherwise dunno i see that the guradians report into the notw hacking was a lie, do you condone that at all?

Which inquiry is this ?? this one ??? not much talk of 'innocence' there
Or do you mean the as yet unfinished Leveson inquiry ...no conclusions there as yet.
You really must stop believing what you read in the papers,or at least start reading a more honest one
That Mr Mann chooses to table this motion now,does not make the point invalid,it does suggest a degree of opportunism, but that's the game ... shall we now make a list of Tory M.P.'s who were careerist opportunists ?? I'll start with Winston Churchill
obfuscation ...there's a word
disingenuous ... that's another
It would appear that one does not have to be in parliament to understand either.
HnS yes it's a fucking disgrace,it was when Mandelson and Blunkett and any number of former ministers of any persuasion took it and it is now ....Mr Mann (loving that name) is to be thanked for bringing it to our attention
Oh well,it was a joke....but our local Sainsburys and Tesco have a train line separating them and a station (closed) next to them both ... There is no reason why goods have to be transported long distances by road and few reasons why they need to travel short distances in large road destroying polluting resource hungry H.G.V's
Quote by deancannock
well...bankers are in private sector !!
What I am actually trying to point out...is how one set of workers make a loss, double what they did last year, and yet pay out £78 million as a bonus !!!
Whilst other workers, who are in no way to blame for the current financial situation,...(the example shown was as it was in the news), have not had a pay rise for 3 years !!
I for one, do not think, this is right !!!

Of course it's not right .... I was going to write a post explaining why I thought this,but it's fucking obvious so I wont bother
Quote by Steve
Poor old Public sector workers eh rolleyes
It's no different down here in the private sector either...

The difference is that we ALL rely on public services to some degree.
And the public services I "use" I pay for every month via my taxes....
And people rely on private sector services just as much...
Just take my particular job as an example....
If no-one maintains the HGV's that deliver the goods to the stores/warehouses etc how they be able to sell them and us be able to buy them dunno
That's just one example.....There are ,doubtless, many others.....
Trains? ........innocent
Option 1 .... don't sign and have no chance of reducing your fuel bills and 'sticking it to the man'
Option 2 .... sign and possibly reduce your bills and take part in a victory for the common man over the intransigent blank stare idiocy of the corporate monster
It seems like a no-brainer to me
....quite literally

Looks like it may well be time for the energy companies to discover the true nature of a 'free' market
Star ... I do wonder at your motive for defending news international and 'honest Rupe' ,if it is out of an idea of fair play and justice I would suggest that you've hitched your cart to the wrong horse entirely
Blue ...that a small proportion of the population, of any species, is killed by dogs,is not a prerequisite of conservation or preservation of that species...if your argument is for the welfare and preservation of hare populations then perhaps that should be what is done, not farming them only to cull them to 'control' the population
Quote by Ben_Minx
Nar book yerself in for a tit lift and a G spot retread you will be fine. I am having my scrotum ironed next week to ensure I pass for 39.

I had my scrotum ironed once .......
it's the last time I go near a golf course
Quote by GnV
As she seems to be responsible for that bloody awful multi note wailing used by every other 2nd rate singer currently polluting the airwaves, i guess she's left some sort of legacy :undecided:..........not even in the same league as the recently departed Etta James though worship

Grumpy ol barsteward :lol2:
bolt
But he is right
Quote by MidsCouple24
The UKs manufacturing industry was destroyed by Countries that were in a position to offer cheaper alternatives, the simple truth is that we could buy the products cheaper abroad, cheaper steel products, cheaper warships, cheaper aircraft, cheaper coal, cheaper everything, the consumer wants the cheapest price, occasionally we make a fuss about how something is made and if the workers producing the garments or the coffee are paid a fair wage but for the most part we don't think about were it came from or to what cost to the indigineous population of the Country we bought it from.
Unions wanted us to buy the dearer products from the UK and quite rightly so, that was thier job, the government (all of them) wanted to balance the books and get products at the best possible price.
When you offer a bag of coal to someone that cost £20 to produce but can only sell for £10 something has to be looked at, add to that someone abroad offering the same bag for £5 and there is a situation to be looked at.
Unions were making demands that NO government could hope to agree to if they were to give the best service to the Country as a whole. Demands that even many of thier members didn't believe they wanted or needed, Governments did not look at alternatives to simply buying everything from abroad, there was a balance to be looked at, a £5 bag of coal, is on the surface cheaper and a wise move, but not if the bag of coal has hidden costs of another £5 for unemployment benefits etc, profitable mines could have stayed open, non-profitable mines could either be improved or closed, certain ships could have been built in Britain whilst importing a part of our fleet.
I don't know all the answers but it seems that everyone governments and unions alike just drew a line in the sand and would not compromise or negotiate.

When you have a nationalised coal steel and power industry,when you have nationalised railways ...surely it is common sense for them to buy each others products ... you effectively have a nil sum whatever the market price may be .... decentralised purchasing and the import of raw materials is under these circumstances a nonsense .... who's fault ?? not the unions as you say
What British industry required was investment in plant to bring our product up to standard,what it required was for government to reel in the increasingly autonomous and corporate management and directors of nationalised industry and point out a few home truths to them.
Coal .. much of the imported coal was heavily subsidised by the governments of the countries in which it was mined ... it wasn't in the long run cheaper it merely had a lower price, any money spent on it was lost to the British economy,that spent on higher priced British coal or steel or cars or ships or or or stayed in the British economy and enriched the people of this country ...more expensive certainly but also a much lower cost
Quote by Bluefish2009
I can only assume the industry's you mention were no longer viable. Unions looking after workers is one thing, but when they push wages up and up, the eventual effect has to be we can no longer compete with country's who have lower welfare standards and cheaper employment.
Mrs T went a long time ago, we have also had 18 years of a Labour government since that time. dunno

And yet we still need coal,steel,energy,
The ensuing years of 'labour'* government are a red herring,it is many many years since a corpse was brought back to life,and even then it was just a story in a book
Blue (serious question) did you support the countryside alliance when they opposed the ban on foxhunting ?? Why ??
*the inverted commas are to signify my belief that the last labour government was that it name only .... it's policies certainly bore no relation to the Labour party I grew up with ... That Labour party would have been ashamed to have it's name associated with the Blair/Brown version)