
Quote by foxylady2209
Will you lot not get it???????
It doesn't matter a pile of shit of a union destroyed a government or a government destroyed a union - between them they destroyed a whole fucking industry!!!!!!!!!!!!!
//storms off to watch the BAFTAs
Quote by starlightcouple
i think mr scargill through his own demons did the job perfectly well on his own mr staggers, with very little help from thatcher.
did the NUM with a small number of militants bring down a government that was democraticaly elected by millions?
i think you will find that instead of blaming just one person in thatcher for the unions demise, look closer to home with the leedership of that union.
after just looking on google he is as deluded today as he was all those yeers ago.
yaay for democracy and the downfall of a union that thought it could control everything with threats. :thumbup: thatcher had the biggest balls and the stomach for a reel fight mr staggers, and that my friend is what history tells us of a once great and powerful union, destroyed by a few.:notes:
the bit about the socialist labour party is frightening that a man with such views was once in charge of possibly the most powerful union in british history. no wonder he decimated it.
Quote by Bluefish2009
I agree to a point. I however apportion most blame to the unions who were out of control and had to be rained in by some one. They were attacking Government under the guise of protecting workers and that was a lie.
Quote by starlightcouple
the fact still remains.
the NUM brought down a tory government, that is how powerful they had next tory governemnt under thatcher made sure the unions would pay dearly for it. they did. she finsihed the NUM once and for all.
they fell under her spell just as the printers did at wapping with murdoch.
lured into a huge sucker punch. class a politics. she won and they lost, sad but very true, and to this day they have never recovered.
the NUM has how many members today? and scargill? from what i reed. a broken man still clinging on.
that is the only fact that anyone in 2012 needs to know reely.:notes:
Quote by foxylady2209
And yet the fact remains that Scargill didn't start the strike
the fact remains that we are dependant on other countries for our fuel supplies
the fact remains that it was the Thatcher government who reneged on existing agreements
the fact remains we have a fraction of the manufacturing industry we had in '79
the fact remains that we are a one legged economy
the fact remains that the unbalanced nature of our economy leaves us vulnerable to even the smallest of obstacles
the fact remains that Thatchers myopic contempt for the working classes has left us the one legged man in that arse kicking competition I mentioned earlier
Negotiation is not a climb down, it isn't now and wasn't then,had the old bitch not been so busy trying to prove she had bigger bollocks than any man in government we might still have a healthy manufacturing base to our economy
Quote by starlightcouple
The pits were not economically viable. Coal was available from other sources, cheaper than we could get it out of the ground. Simple as that!
Quote by Bluefish2009
The pits were not economically viable. Coal was available from other sources, cheaper than we could get it out of the ground. Simple as that!
The best place for coal is in the ground with its carbon still intact. Now we must work on more planet friendly ways to make our electric
Quote by starlightcouple
as the highlighted bit shows dean, millions? i think the banks have made us billions. the financial industry we now have in the uk will in time get back all of the money and a heck of a lot more. dont confuse me though dean with someone who has any sympathy for the banks or their workers. i dont.
not going to get into a long drawn out debate about the mining history, as i know this has been done to death on here with not an outright winner.
what i will say though is it was not just thatchers fault but the miners leeder as well who it would seem put his own feelings of hate of thatcher way above the feelings of his members, who in the end were left with nothing.
peeple still blame thatcher for everything it seems with nobody else taking any of the blame. the miners leeder refused to accept any change in the industry and then when thatcher saw her chance, she took it.
in 2012 dean is there a call for coal? would the indusrty survive in todays market? at the same rate it was producing coal in the 70's or 80's? somehow i think not as there are cleener fuels. so thatcher was right after all that the industry would not survive in its current form so it needs change.:notes:
it was not only cannock that lost pits my friend. there were a few in the south that suffered as well.
a brilliant piece of journalism dean this link which if you read all of it , you will see that scargill and the " scabs " were certainly not on the same side, yet belonged to the same union. who was right?
" By far the biggest liability for the strikers was their leader, the NUM president Arthur Scargill ".
Quote by Too Hot
Star I think you just argue the toss about football and footballers. Over the months it has become more and more difficult to follow and understand your points as logic seems to be really lacking.
(edit)
As far as football and footballers go I have written to Ed Milliband and asked him why he is having a go a Captains of the Industrial and Commercial for earning a good living out of creating wealth and industrial success when dick head footballers who are nothing but spoiled brats earn several million pounds a year for nothing and get the most creative tax advice available. There is a slight erring in the aim of Mr Muilliband with his daily attacks on the highly paid in a sector that is responsible for production, growth and wealth. He should target the dick head footballers who don't create, produce or encourage anything other than their own bank balances - I wonder if the myopic loony labour supporters will support that kind of ranting?
Quote by Max777
I would star have liked the press to report what was happening
Yes three pages and only one report in the British press 24 hours after the events,one does wonder at the significance
Quote by starlightcouple
Ah so you're insinuating that someone else is a liar ... I see
Quote by starlightcouple
though some would still say that they do not :twisted:
Quote by starlightcouple
corruption in our police force has been there since the days of Robert Peel.
it is not right of course but sometimes to catch a criminal you have to match there criminal acts and there thoughts.
Quote by starlightcouple
:sigh: .... The thing is you see .... and this time I'll type it in English .... I have applied and I'm not eligible ... I am not the only one...is that clear enough for you star ??? shall I underline and embolden it ??? do you want it to come round and sing on your doorstepfor fucks sake
Quote by starlightcouple
though some would still say that they do not :twisted:
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Really and who might they be ???
Quote by Bluefish2009
So yes Blue I am suggesting that this and other stories are being conveniently hidden behind this one
Quote by GnV
He is a symptom not the disease...He is smoke and mirrors ... prestidigitation is an old art ... watch their hands not the distractions
Quote by Bluefish2009
Are you suggesting the press used this; http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/404421.html In an attempt to cover their bad news?
Like burying unfavorable news, doing a Jo Moore?
Quote by starlightcouple
what would you like them to do mr staggers? hang them high just for being reporters of the sun?
shoot them at dawn for daring to even work for the paper?
or maybe the evidence is flimsy?
or maybe the majority of peeple reely dont give a damn?
three pages and nearly nothing. read from that what you will!
Quote by starlightcouple
though some would still say that they do not :twisted:
Quote by starlightcouple
there you go mr staggers. you may be able to top up your pittance of a salary :thumbup:
Quote by Ben_Minx
Current affairs is such a dull name for the vibrant heart of a swinging community.
I propose, in all seriousness, that this element of the renamed Grumpy Old Men to lighten the tone and give all site visitors a chuckle.
What do you think??