Sex God
This has little or nothing to do with 'austerity' measures and is just the natural result and continuation of the persecution and branding of all benefits claimants as scrounging scum ... another nail in the coffin of the welfare state
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Staggerlee_BB
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 62
Bisexual Female, 63
0 miles · Widdrington Station
Forum
Sex God
Do the sensible thing ... get rid of the bloody thing altogether ( I will one day follow my own advice)
Sex God
I'm in a similar mood myself of late .... can't be arsed to get myself drawn into another childish playground squabble most of the time .... N.B. that's MOST 
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
have the best of intentions,I also have no doubt that they are often hamstrung by a morally bankrupt organisation
many organisations can be described as that. now what was the morally bankrupt union again? no hold on give me a moment to gather my thoughts,,,,
:confused:
oh yes i remember. :idea:
Is that it ?? is that really your best attempt ??
I'm sorry .... no I really am ... if that's your best attempt to bait me then I have nothing to offer but my pity
:laughabove:
i only said a little thingy as really you are not worth the finger time on my keyboard to reply*. i reely dont know at times why i waste my time**. so on this occasion and your lack of any evidence to back up your jackanory stories, i shall bid you farewell and have a pint of best bitter on me.
*But you still keep trying to respond
**No me neither ... perhaps it's time you were honest with yourself about your true feelings
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
have the best of intentions,I also have no doubt that they are often hamstrung by a morally bankrupt organisation
many organisations can be described as that. now what was the morally bankrupt union again? no hold on give me a moment to gather my thoughts,,,,
:confused:
oh yes i remember. :idea:
Is that it ?? is that really your best attempt ??
I'm sorry .... no I really am ... if that's your best attempt to bait me then I have nothing to offer but my pity
Sex God
Quote by Staggerlee_BB
Go and look up 'anecdotal' in a dictionary
note I started my previous post with a disclaimer
note that I really don't give a shit whether or not you believe me star ... as I said I was involved in the 2 cases,take me at my word or don't .. your choice
you cannot come on here with stories of this or that, detailing nagatives about something you have openly admitted to despise and expect anyone to beleeve it without evidence.
Really !!! bugger those mods had better bet the settings changed and quick .... cos look up the page chum I just fucking did
Hi bb Here Having had a totally shit experiance of the rspca
I est my case a bunch of money grabbing bastards
The family of an animal lover who left land in his will for a nature reserve said his dying wish was ignored – after bulldozers were sent in to clear the site. David Brown spent his spare time watching foxes, badgers, hedgehogs and squirrels on the plot of land next to his house in Alderley Edge. Mr Brown, described by neighbours as a 'gentle giant', wanted it to be preserved after his death in 2007, and left it, along with his home, to the RSPCA. But the RSPCA says Mr Brown did not make it a binding condition in his will that it should not be developed– and sold the site. Now contractors have moved in to clear trees and shrubs, including a number of mature oaks. Mr Brown’s brother Geoffrey Brown, 71, of Heywood Road, said: “It’s a disaster. They were beautiful trees. “It’s very sad that this land has been left bare when my brother wanted it protected.” One neighbour said: “David loved animals and left the land for the birds and other wildlife. “Some of the trees were taller than the house and the oaks must have been 500 years old. “The sound of birds can be deafening and you see hedgehogs and badgers. I’m so angry and upset – David thought the land was safe, it was his dying wish.” Mr Brown, who lived at Belmont Cottages in Heyes Lane, was an auxiliary nurse at the Mary Dendy Unit, a former psychiatric hospital at Nether Alderley. He retired early to look after his mother and was said to have become anxious when she died in 2002 after a long illness. He was found dead at the house in 2007 at the age of 60 after apparently taking his own life. Harold Smith, chairman of the Alderley Edge History Society, was born at the cottages and the land was his garden as a boy. He said: “I think it’s disgusting. David wanted it kept as a nature reserve. He was a nice lad and would help anyone.” A council spokesman said an enforcement notice was served on the site but an investigation found there were no protected trees. No planning application had been submitted. A Land Registry document from last September shows that Deanbank Investments Ltd owns the land and Jones Residential Leasing Ltd owns the cottage. Both are based at Emerson House in Alderley Edge. The building is home of the Emerson Group, run by property tycoon Peter Jones. Recent company records show Mr Jones as a director of Deanbank Investments Ltd. A spokesman for Jones Homes said: “Neither the Emerson Group, Jones Homes or Peter Jones have acquired the land and have no ownership rights. I understand the site has been cleared of unsightly builders’ rubble, tyres, undergrowth and weeds. Two oak trees, which were diseased and unsafe, have also been removed from the site.”
Read more at:
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
Go and look up 'anecdotal' in a dictionary
note I started my previous post with a disclaimer
note that I really don't give a shit whether or not you believe me star ... as I said I was involved in the 2 cases,take me at my word or don't .. your choice
you cannot come on here with stories of this or that, detailing nagatives about something you have openly admitted to despise and expect anyone to beleeve it without evidence.
Really !!! bugger those mods had better bet the settings changed and quick .... cos look up the page chum I just fucking did
Sex God
Quote by Rogue_trader
Point taken. Saturdays stinky poos will be quite effervescent as I ask her to defend those examples and videos.
I would like to add that I have no doubt that most R.S.P.C.A. inspectors,volunteers etc. have the best of intentions,I also have no doubt that they are often hamstrung by a morally bankrupt organisation
Sex God
Go and look up 'anecdotal' in a dictionary
note I started my previous post with a disclaimer
note that I really don't give a shit whether or not you believe me star ... as I said I was involved in the 2 cases,take me at my word or don't .. your choice
note I started my previous post with a disclaimer
note that I really don't give a shit whether or not you believe me star ... as I said I was involved in the 2 cases,take me at my word or don't .. your choice
Sex God
Gave the new tent a test run in Northumberland .... stayed dry (us and the tent)
Sex God
Get some decent tea and coffee not that nasty piss weak shit they usually try to pass off as digestible
Sex God
Quote by Rogue_trader
The R.S.P.C.A. are driven by their greed, they don't do anything unless they think they'll get paid
A sweeping statement and not supported by any factual evidence.
It is indeed ... but any organisation that proports to be an animal welfare charity and refuses repeatedly to attend animals in distress is a liar.I can only offer anecdotal evidence so I wont bother.
Fucking R.S.P.C.A. I shit 'em all they want is your Grannies legacy and the chance to play at being police
On this, of the most rarest of moments, I, 100% agree with stags.
Gnv, your granny was also right, at that time they were an upstanding charity. In my view now they are not. Again, only my view, but they care very little about animal welfare.
They have become a money grabbing, (which would be ok if it was to do good) organisation. Which as stags eluded to, has become pissed on there own power.
As some one who used to donate, I have come to dislike everything they now stand for.
Again anecdotal, if you were to cite me references where they have grabbed grannys legacy and refused to help animals in distress then I shall change my opinion. But I can only go on my own anecdotal evidence of what I see from one of my close friends who has been an officer for 20 years with them.
The terrible stories that she deals with day in and day out. Humans can be so cruel and calculating. It makes me despair that I share the same genetic make up with these thugs.
The case if the young man who clubbed his terrier pup was one she attended this week. The court should have looked at psychiatric evaluation on that man because he was "wired up" wrong. But no, a fine and banned from owning an animal.
Not surprisingly given their press machine negative stories tend not to make the edit ...
However here are two examples I was (to a limited degree) involved in..
1:The case of a Rottweiler who was abandoned on the balcony of a block of flats locally when his owners were evicted... Though the dog was in distress and slowly starving to death,repeated calls to the rspca were met with indifference,apparently he wasn't their responsibility because he wasn't a stray .. the dog was finally rescued when a local rottweiler rescue climbed up to the balcony.
2: The young collie found with acid burns to it's face ... the woman who found it acted quickly and neutralized the acid with water but the dog was still in severe pain, she phoned the rspca hoping they would take the dog for treatment,their response was that it wasn't an emergency and they would not attend .. she phoned Dog lost and got through to BB who was at the time north east co-ordinator,she phoned the rspca and was met with the same response,the woman took the dog to her own vet and paid for it's emergency treatment, in the meantime BB posted on the Dog lost forum and started their volunteers phoning the rspca en-masse still they refused to attend,finally several hours later BB phoned the rspca and informed them that she would be contacting the press ... they went and collected the dog,this did warrant a small piece in the media about the rspca rescuing a dog that had been the victim of an acid attack
Finally our local rspca shelter is effectively a franchise ... they will not take strays,they pick which dogs they take in and charge the owners for doing so, they then charge again when the dog is adopted.
Any reader of Private Eye will be familiar with stories about the rspca's claims to have a right to search premises (they don't) .... power hungry,greedy and heartless .... fucking rspca I shit 'em
Sex God
Quote by Rogue_trader
The R.S.P.C.A. are driven by their greed, they don't do anything unless they think they'll get paid
A sweeping statement and not supported by any factual evidence.
It is indeed ... but any organisation that proports to be an animal welfare charity and refuses repeatedly to attend animals in distress is a liar.I can only offer anecdotal evidence so I wont bother.
Fucking R.S.P.C.A. I shit 'em all they want is your Grannies legacy and the chance to play at being police
Sex God
The R.S.P.C.A. are driven by their greed, they don't do anything unless they think they'll get paid
Sex God
Quote by GnV
So then, the Media Committee of the House of Commons has ruled that Murdoch is not fit to run a major international company.
Just who the fuck do they think they are?
John Whittingdale, the Chairman of the committee is weak. To have allowed Tom Watson free reign to include such a statement n their findings demeans the whole credibility and standing of the committee. To watch that Pratt grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst their 'verdict' was being delivered just shows what an idiot he is.
Will Mr Murdoch senior care a flying fuck? I doubt it. News Media International shares up today which is all that matters, not the comment of a half brained self serving also-ran no mark like Watson.
Grrrrrrrr
Quote by GnV
!
It's already done. The whole House is filled with supercilious idiots like Tom Watson and its still a den of thieves!
So there you are watching this fight between Dennis Neilson and Peter Sutcliffe and you're saying 'oooh that poor Ripper, he doesn't deserve that'
Sex God
Quote by Dave__Notts
Aye Stags, a small number may get a reduction but the majority see their bills go up. In my mind water should be re-nationalised
Dave_Notts
Just water ??
Sex God
Quote by Lizaleanrob
i hear some parts of opp north are experiencing floods given that you wanted to keep your water at the beginning of this thread would you now like to buy a massively overpriced dingy and some sand bags that us down south purchased for song when the drought was announced
if not then may i wish that all your dreams be wet ones this may not be the last laff but it is a very long one and i cant tell you how smug it makes us feel to look out at our wonderfull green lawns:rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao::rotflmao:
Not to worry Rob we all live at the top of hills, so a flood just means more days off work ... don't overtire yourself on Monday :twisted:
Sex God
real or not ?? how is a mere man to know ??
Oh btw .. I invariably cough
Oh btw .. I invariably cough
Sex God
Quote by Dave__Notts
there was a big hue and cry about the amount of water wasted through leaks and that was addressed
Has it really been addressed?
This is what happens with privatisation. Shareholders get paid out before the investment is put in.
Dave_Notts
isn't that why they fitted water meters
I have always advised not to get them unless you are a single person. Otherwise your bill is sky high
Dave_Notts
Not necessarily true Dave ... it depends on your house, a friend of mine with two small children substantially reduced his water bill by having a meter fitted
Sex God
Let us know how the quest for a sympathy shag goes ... I have been wondering if it was worth telling everyone about the dogs limp
Sex God
I haven't taken videos for years, but I always found the best thing was quick hands and large pockets
Sex God
Quote by Max777
Very droll Staggers! Try looking at page 4 of the Nuclear War next week thread. I have a post timed at am dated 18 April. The offensive bit is highlighted in red.
If only Gulson was so accommodating!
I did see that Max ... is that it ??? not really that offensive is it,especially when you consider the weight you give his other opinions
That's just one instance, there are many more as you well know.
To be totally honest Max I don't. I very rarely read Gulsons posts,because I haven't found those that I have to be useful.
And in all honesty (again) it's not really you I was moaning about,more the atmosphere sometimes present in these pages of hyenas on carrion.
Sex God
Quote by Max777
Very droll Staggers! Try looking at page 4 of the Nuclear War next week thread. I have a post timed at am dated 18 April. The offensive bit is highlighted in red.
If only Gulson was so accommodating!
I did see that Max ... is that it ??? not really that offensive is it,especially when you consider the weight you give his other opinions
Sex God
Quote by Max777
Of course it's just opinion ffs!! ... even those who offer evidence are only usually offering evidence to support their opinion and not the counter argument
There are those on here more than ready to cast accusations of bullying ... seems those very same people are also more than ready to join in when it actually happens
You may not agree with others opinions,you may not like others opinions,you may even be offended by others opinions... nevertheless they have every right to hold and express those opinions in whatever way they chose (AUP permitting). Constant accusations of trolling are less than helpful in eliciting a response
Opinions are one thing, stating supposed FACTS and berating other forum users for not believing those so called facts is quite another!
The trolling accusation has arisen precisely because of a lack of response to requests to provide evidence to back up the claims being made. Ensure you put the horse before the cart.
I do understand that it is often frustrating to find requests for evidence hit a brick wall,I have to be honest and say that the only 'berating' I've seen hasn't come from Gulson (or indeed Ben another treated in a similar manner) I may have missed it or I may take his comments less seriously than others, I don't I can say is that as far as he is concerned there does seem to be something of a bandwagon rolling through these here pages
I suggest you reread some of Gulson's posts, it won't take you long to see where he berates and attempts to belittle other forum posters that do not share his views. I'd also recommend removing your blinkers first.
Presumably Gulson is following your advice and retaining a dignified silence..........
Here's an idea Max ... show me the evidence
:twisted: Sex God
btw just look how readily you all jump on the wagon .... shocking if it weren't so funny
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
Seems you may be having a problem with comprehension when there is too much superfluous text Staggs so I'll chop it down a bit for you...
Well it would seem you and Star have one thing in common .... you start talking shit when you realise you're wrong,I'd suggest a dignified silence in future it looks better don't you know
Quote by Then in this thread Staggerlee_BB
You may not agree with others opinions,you may not like others opinions,you may even be offended by others opinions... nevertheless they have every right to hold and express those opinions in whatever way they chose (AUP permitting).
The two pieces of text from your fair hand seem at variance with each other.
The first quote suggests I remain silent, the second one suggests I can after all express my opinion, which of course I have done.
i think you should shut up GNV. hold on no i dont.
yes please shut up, ok then you can have your say. getting giddy going around in circles.
i dont know what you should do GNV.
No I'm sure you don't
fight fight fight
Sex God
Quote by GnV
Seems you may be having a problem with comprehension when there is too much superfluous text Staggs so I'll chop it down a bit for you...
Well it would seem you and Star have one thing in common .... you start talking shit when you realise you're wrong,I'd suggest a dignified silence in future it looks better don't you know
Quote by Then in this thread Staggerlee_BB
You may not agree with others opinions,you may not like others opinions,you may even be offended by others opinions... nevertheless they have every right to hold and express those opinions in whatever way they chose (AUP permitting).
The two pieces of text from your fair hand seem at variance with each other.
The first quote suggests I remain silent, the second one suggests I can after all express my opinion, which of course I have done.
See and there was me thinking I'd said that there were times when a dignified silence gave a better impression
Sex God
Quote by starlightcouple
I do understand that it is often frustrating to find requests for evidence hit a brick wall,I have to be honest and say that the only 'berating' I've seen hasn't come from Gulson (or indeed Ben another treated in a similar manner) I may have missed it or I may take his comments less seriously than others, I don't I can say is that as far as he is concerned there does seem to be something of a bandwagon rolling through these here pages
the trouble with internet sites is that when peeple say foolish things with not a shred of evidence, or will not supply any evidence, then they can only expect others to act in one way. sorry but max has been asking gulson for proof of his theories and opinions for the best past of two yeers and still he ignores the repeated requests. not only that but he then continues to say the same things without proof, over and over and over etc.
do you get the,
Sooooooo because I chose to reply to Max I was ??????
