Silk I like posts that are thought provoking, that is a great post. :thumbup:
We joined and pay our money for this site, after deciding together to try a new lifestyle choice together.
Before joining this site we done research about swinging we looked at many sites most of which were free.
We decided to join this site because
1) It had chat rooms where you could or didn’t have to go on cam.
2) It had a set up so you could use a private room with someone as to then not have to give private contact details where you could see the person first to see if there was some attraction and you could talk in private.
3) Nobody need know if you met, have you met etc unless this was information
that you chose to share with someone.
4) Where discretion was paramount.
5) There are profiles whereby people can say a lot or as little as they like about
Themselves
6) There is the ability to download photos or videos (option)
After taking all those factors into account we felt this had the best to offer us.
We all, when first chatting to someone wonder if they are genuine, or a fantasist, we knew not everyone we would talk to would turn out genuine, as we knew fantasists would be here too, as we read an article on swinging online.
But we took our chances that we would find what we were looking for here. We have spent time looking for we felt would be right for us, but we knew it would take time and effort. Time and effort well spent to make the right choices for us.
If there had been a system in place where people were verified when we joined I doubt very much we would of joined this site as I feel it would have taken away the privacy and protected we feel this site has given us.
I don't think thesse have been mentioned
Underground, Overground, Wombling Free,
The Wombles of Wimbledon Common are we
If we have it on not.
I think it is great there have been 469 replies and nobody had thrown any personal insults, it goes to shows we can debate, that is what I love about these forums. :thumbup:
I have voted no, but would like to explain why after much thought and consideration.
I am not bothered either way really as we are not at this time meeting.
But I likened it to say the children’s act, yes it is there to safe guard our children, but if you relied on it to do so, we all know it does not protect our children we have responsibly to do it ourselves.
Would having a verification system be totally reliable?
I believe not, it could make people trust in it to be right, then in some cases those people might let down their normal guard and so get stung.
If they get stung who or what will be held accountable?
I believe we should rely on ourselves to make judgement not a system that can never be full proof.
So for the reasons above I have said no.
My guess is the day the 999,999 member joins. :giggle:
Ahabs,
I have read all the meet link you put up, I do believe people’s preference should be adhered to.
This is just a suggestion as it stated that only people that are known or can be verified by another member will be able to come, would it not have been better to set up an invite only group, or a group people can apply too to be accepted?
Then you could have put it up in the forums there.
I think some people will always question other’s preference, and some would do it just to cause a stir.
I thought it was a couple of CV's and applications for vacancies! :doh:
Why are the implications important? I really don't understand this... and it's not the first time I've come across it. To me it's just a bit weird to care who's fucking who. 