Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Trevaunance
Over 90 days ago
Bi-curious Male, 51
Straight Female, 52
0 miles · Exeter

Forum

Quote by MidsCouple24
I stated that an SS battalion of Irish fought for Germany on the Eastern Front, that is undisputable fact, it was you who thought the very idea that the existance of such a Battalion was comical,
Who is laughing now lol

I dispute it. Now you prove it.
If I recall correctly the number of Irish volunteers that joined the German forces during WW2 was in the region of 70-80.
That hardly sounds like enough men to form several battalions of Waffen SS. Unless they've been on the Guinness of course lol
Quote by MidsCouple24
What about Malta do we immediately give it to the nearest Country

What a ridiculous thing to say. Truly ridiculous. What right do you think the UK has to simply give away a foreign nation to a third party?
The regional rooms are without doubt a nod in the direction of all those that have asked for them. It is great to see that the SH towers are listening, and if people are unhappy then mybe they should voice their opinion during the debate, not once the decision is made.
However it's a bit disappointing to see that the entire south of England is bracketed in one room, in comparison with the north, which has a few rooms, and Wales has none!
Nice to see some replies to this question. I'm surprised how many people feel they aren't knowledgeable just because they don't have a formal qualification in something though.
It's a misleading subject line, given that your first post offers no advice whatsoever.
But it's nice to see that you've enjoyed your time here. wink
So is that what we do know?, simply post links with absolutely no comment on it whatsoever? Wow, seems strange to me.
Quote by Lost
Got any plans afoot for 2015 I wonder?

I'll be attending the commemorations at Quatre Bras and Waterloo, but certainly not in any official capacity, just as an interested party.
The topics we debate on here are as far ranging as our own social, cultural, religious and economic backgrounds. I think we all agree that we know of at least one person we have diametrically opposite views from on at least one subject, but agree with strongly on another. Some debates slip by with barely a reply, and some ramble on for many pages with replies and counters from all angles.
All in all I think we have quite a balanced mix on the forums. Most, if not all of us are prepared to admit when we know absolutely nothing about a topic, and we are certainly all experts at finding on-line evidence to back our views!
There are certain areas of debate that I feel comfortable enough to debate without referring to wiki, the newspapers or other on-line sources; And I have the feeling that many of you feel the same. So with that in mind my question is simple. What aspects of life do you feel you have sufficient knowledge to debate without referring to the Internet for facts/figures and assistance?
I'm not looking for self proclaimed experts, just the topics that you feel comfortable enough with. I have openly stated many times that I know nothing of political or social ideology, nor do i have much grasp on taxation or business.
For myself I would say I know a lot about history, particularly military history. I have studied 3 separate A levels focusing on different periods of history, but even outside these studies I have always had one foot in the past. I have organised and guided several battlefield tours in Normandy, the Western Front and Waterloo. Next year I will be guiding a tour from Oporto, through Spain to Toulouse in France following the major battles of the Napoleonic wars. I'm no expert, but I feel comfortable enough with the subject to debate.
I also feel comfortable debating the armed forces, the emergency services and Exeter City FC lol
So come on guys, where does your particular knowledge lie?
Apology accepted.
I've suffered bullying too, but only in my adult life. It's not called bullying though, it's called racism. There is fuck all you can do about the colour of your skin or your genetic make up, but you do have the opportunity as an adult of trying to prevent some misery on the next generation. It's quite clear that you feel that uniformity does nothing at all to prevent bullying. it is even more clear that you don't even think it's worthwhile as just one counter measure to bullies. We will just have to disagree.
Where did I say that uniforms/clothing was the sole cause of bullying Foxy?
By all means 'bless my innocent heart' in such a condescending manner all you like, but I still believe in 'removing opportunities' for bullying. If just one child escapes the cruelty that bullying inflicts by having a uniform policy then it has achieved something.
Of course, there are many other reasons why people are bullied, and it doesn't just stop at the school gates. It continues to feature at every stage through life. But that isn't a reason why schools should not try to reduce just one cause is it?
Rather than protect my children from everything in the world, I have allowed them to suffer any number of coughs and colds. The net result is that my daughter at 13 turns off her bedroom radiator, my son of 11 does the same and they both like the window open at night. They rarely get colds or coughs these days and they are perfectly healthy for it.
If you are happy with your financial situation why begrudge investors making money to improve their financial situation?
Out of interest, did you look further than the Because later in the article you copy and pasted from it says 'Like-for-like sales, excluding petrol and VAT, rose 0.5%, which was better than the near 1% decline reported by market leader Tesco in the year to February'. Hardly a land of milk and honey.
Quote by MidsCouple24
But I stand by what I say that it is not the consumers that have caused this situation and I offer as proof the fact that loads of middle priced and expensive products are also targetted by fraudsters, criminals simply hit any target that they can, in this instance they found that they could supply horsemeat at beef prices and make good money out if it, and to make this possible they found that supermarkets were using long chains of supply where checks were not made on exactly what was being purchased and processed. they targetted processed meat products not cheap meat products, some of those processed products are undeniably cheap but not all, Findus is not a budget brand, burger king is not a budget burger.

There are far better business minds than mine that use this forum, however I suspect the quote in bold is incorrect. You mentioned Findus, so I'll use your example. If Tesco wants to sell Findus products then they may buy them direct from Findus, although I suspect there is at least one intermediary. Essentially they are buying the finished product. Given the long and convoluted supply chain we have seen in the news recently from farmer to abattoir to factory then the final product, via many different traders and intermediaries; Is it really the fault of the supermarket? They aren't the ones with the long supply chain.
Quote by starlightcouple
you take tax off something.
a stealth tax recoups the losses.
the only thing which is free is nothing.

Air??
lol
Quote by maybecouple
Might get a bit more response if you updated your profile and included some pics. We might have been up for it dunno

:thumbup: Agreed.
Quote by Rogue_Trader
Pleasure to be of service Trev...I'm a bit of a Roverphile at heart having owned several and still have 2 now.

I prefer cat's myself lol
A jaaaaag man...eh Trev?? lol you got the sheepskin coat to go with??
No, but I do have a couple of peugout's. smile
Quote by Rogue_Trader
Pleasure to be of service Trev...I'm a bit of a Roverphile at heart having owned several and still have 2 now.

I prefer cat's myself lol
Quote by tyracer
we are to blame for all of this because we are greedy and demand cheaper food prices.

This seems like a perfectly reasonable statement. It is merely saying that as consumers we have demanded cheaper products and as a result a third party has found a cheaper ingredient. It certainly is not an admission of guilt for selling horse labelled as beef.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote by MidsCouple24
I do not think I am responsible for Rover going out of business because I didn't buy a Rover car but bought a foreign one instead

If you really must go off on a tangent then at least make it a sensible one. Rover cars went under because people didn't buy enough of their vehicles to keep the firm afloat. So by not buying one, you did contribute to the failure of the company, and strengthened the position of it's competitors.
Quote by GnV
Where did Ty admit to being responsible for selling horsemeat that he had labelled as beef?
His only admission was to eating it with full knowledge in France where horsemeat is freely available and labeled as such.
Or did I miss something?

:thumbup: You beat me to it!
Who cares? Sounds like a flash in the pan and a bit of publicity for this Mantel woman.
Really Jed?
You are prepared to sit on one side of the fence or the other, but have no idea what separates the two sides?
Quote by MidsCouple24
Yep personally I will go along with that, right now I want out of europe, tomorrow is a day too late, BUT, I would rather see it reformed and Britain given a fairer deal and all Countries allowed to run much of their own affairs, I never thought a market, common or otherwise ran the Government, our local market doesn't run our council, it was supposed to be about trading wasn't it ?

Proof that people don't see what they are offered?
Quote by starlightcouple
DC ain't a patch on Maggie, and he would never match her as a PM.

I for one am suprised Star,