All my friends fancy me.
Apart from Splendid, and she's just stated she doesn't care...
:needsatongueincheekemote:
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Witchy
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 56
UK
Forum
A tale about why you shouldn't telling fibs...
actually, it made me cry.
My *baby* coming home for an unexpected short break- not that she misses us...not at all...
My divine friend and neighbour being safe and well...(and looking hot as hell! Did I just say that? :shock: )
Spending a week with allllll the flabby bits on full show in front of hubby and (not seen for ages) lover...and still being rather obviously fancied by both. :twisted:
Oh, and the words "you produce wood." I know it shouldn't be funny, but it is.
actually, it made me cry.
My *baby* coming home for an unexpected short break- not that she misses us...not at all...
My divine friend and neighbour being safe and well...(and looking hot as hell! Did I just say that? :shock: )
Spending a week with allllll the flabby bits on full show in front of hubby and (not seen for ages) lover...and still being rather obviously fancied by both. :twisted:
Oh, and the words "you produce wood." I know it shouldn't be funny, but it is.
Quote by markz
Powers- I got where you were coming from, and I'm just an (ugly) girl
Nellie was just being a nelly.
well the brown paper bag was a dead give away on that one!
I would have put money on you appearing in an ugly thread.................. :mrgreen:
Wherever you are, things turn ugly.
Quote by splendid_
I don't mind ugly people. They are useful to have around. They are just SOOOO grateful for a shag. It means I get a look in.
(disclaimer - I have loads of friends who are ugly- are you reading this witchy?)
You flucking cowbag. I wasn't going to be away forever, you know that, don't you?
And I'm not your friend. I only spend time with you because next to you, I'm the better option.
Can I read the thread now?
There is a rule of thumb with mechanics.
The time the job should take is in inverse proportion to the time the job actually will take.
Also, never ever utter the words "it's a five minute job." This is the mechanical kiss of death. Stating this will ensure much blue air, personal injury, and possibly divorce.
However, stating "I've been putting this off for months, it looks like a **** of a job" ensures a smooth, almost rewarding, fettling experience.
The time the job should take is in inverse proportion to the time the job actually will take.
Also, never ever utter the words "it's a five minute job." This is the mechanical kiss of death. Stating this will ensure much blue air, personal injury, and possibly divorce.
However, stating "I've been putting this off for months, it looks like a **** of a job" ensures a smooth, almost rewarding, fettling experience.
Quote by kentswingers777
Poor DG will be having an identity crisis, confused with Nola in one thread last week, now she is called Witchy...
Your right Res.....Sorry Witchy.x
I must be losing it, it's all this ranting.
It's DG you should apologise to...
being mistaken for me has driven lesser folk to surgery.
Quote by kentswingers777
Poor DG will be having an identity crisis, confused with Nola in one thread last week, now she is called Witchy...
Your right Res.....Sorry Witchy.x
I must be losing it, it's all this ranting.
It's DG you should apologise to...
being mistaken for me has driven lesser folk to surgery.
You have a PM.
I am fully aware of the difficulties in the fact that he hadn't actually been convicted. However, when you have someone in a position of trust with children, who has had allegations levied at them from many different directions over several decades- it stinks that nothing could be/was done.
I am fully aware of the difficulties in the fact that he hadn't actually been convicted. However, when you have someone in a position of trust with children, who has had allegations levied at them from many different directions over several decades- it stinks that nothing could be/was done.
Quote by Cherrytree
However on a different note i have just completed a ccld (childcare learning & development) course, as part of that course i had to obtain a placement in a school, in my case working with children with special needs, the most vunerable of society & i was appalled that no checks were done. No students or voluntary workers had a crb check or any other sort of police check etc.
Seemed to me that if you was there & not getting paid for it then it didn't matter who you were..literally anyone could just ring up say they wanted to do voluntary work, have a 5 minute 'interveiw' n hey presto you were in
Yes - and when I worked with mentally handicapped young adults, I was allowed to work there for 6 weeks before my crb was received back to the college.
Having to be very vague here for obvious reasons, but I've recently come into contact with a situation where a young person was abused by someone contracted in by their school for private lessons. The police, and his regulatory body have an armful of past allegations against him, but because he'd never been prosecuted, he was allowed to carry on.
Hmm.
The regulations only cover situations where there is "reward."
So if my youngest was to spend vast quantities of time at her mates, but I was never to offer to reciprocate, that would be fine. The parent/parents wouldn't need to be checked.
However, if, for example her friends parents were to do the school run, and then have them at their place playing one week...and we did the same the next, checks would be required.
It all hinges on that word "reward." Rather than have the grey area where unofficial child minders can be paid in anything other than legitimate, through the books money- the word "reward" is used as a catch all to prevent people circumventing the system.
This is, sadly, the inevitable side effect.
It has nothing to do with child protection, and everything to do with revenue.
The regulations only cover situations where there is "reward."
So if my youngest was to spend vast quantities of time at her mates, but I was never to offer to reciprocate, that would be fine. The parent/parents wouldn't need to be checked.
However, if, for example her friends parents were to do the school run, and then have them at their place playing one week...and we did the same the next, checks would be required.
It all hinges on that word "reward." Rather than have the grey area where unofficial child minders can be paid in anything other than legitimate, through the books money- the word "reward" is used as a catch all to prevent people circumventing the system.
This is, sadly, the inevitable side effect.
It has nothing to do with child protection, and everything to do with revenue.
Quote by meat2pleaseu
I break men :twisted:
You must be playing with the skinny types.
have you ever considered trying a more solidly built model, the type that can pin you to the bed so you can't even move to cause them any damage? :rascal:
OOER. There was a momentary smattering of, erm, something going on when I read that then.
Blimey.You're way of the mark with the skinnyness though. I don't go near blokes who look like I could snap them. Mainly because chances are I would snap them. And then there are the bruises from the hip bones...ouch.
I've got a good one. I was just about to leave the house for the (major) party I've been looking forward to for weeks. Shoes on feet, bag on shoulder- keys in hand. At the last moment, the sibling rivalry bout from hell broke out. So, I'm sitting in my glad rags on the sofa with only the internet and some (gross) red wine for company. 
