Quote by kentswingers777
True Fabs but........... I cannot see how they can really decide if that was the actual cause. We can all speculate, but that does not bring convictions, or certainty.
I hope that the Met do not throw this guy to the lions, to save their own skins though.
Why can't some realise that the police sometimes have to use force to stop these kind of thugs?
Quote by jaymar
Why is it that the men with the hairiest chests and (eughhh) backs are the ones who have to shave their heads cos of the lack of hair there?
Quote by Dirtygirly
Hmmmph! I've aged prematurely too!!! :shock:
I officially have another 17 hours before I'm 36!!!
Nellie... you can feel me too if you like! :rascal:
Quote by fabio
to be honest the arrogant twat aint worth a reply
this is not just a straight guy hang up as the lady here dont wanna be suckin on a cock thats been up an arsehole thats all i gotta say
Quote by markz
Only if you're sure they're raisin an interest.
And you can only do it while they're there- otherwise you're in the wrong thread.
Quote by kentswingers777
The day is coming when the police will not get involved with anything likely to render them to end up in court.
There will always be muppets who will try to sue someone just because there is an "R" in the month. If the police act in a professional manner, they should have nothing to fear. Are you suggesting that the police should not be accountable for their actions?
When violent demonstrators cause mayhem, or violent thugs at football matches go on the rampage, or yet another drunken thug on a Saturday night, wants to smash your face in, what would happen if that officer just walked on by?
Then he/she should be disciplined. They are not doing their job. What happens if an overzealous officer lays into someone? Should they be allowed to get away with it just because they're in the force?
You cannot run a society where the police have to wear " kid gloves ". That will be the end of the road for us all.
Nor a society where an innocent in the wrong place at the wrong time is assaulted by the very people who are meant to protect him/her from such an action.
The police have an impossible job at the best of times. I saw for myself what some of those demonstrators wanted at the G20 demo. There were some there hell bent on causing trouble. How can the police possibly know just by looking at somebody, whether they are there for trouble or not?
Yeah, point taken. Beat 'em all up. Saves time.
They all fall into the same bracket.....that is life.
That same bracket being? "There?"
Imagine a country where the police never raise a hand or batton, or get involved in anything violent. I can see the images on the news now. Police stand by whilst drunks rampage through London. Now that would be bad news.
I've not seen anyone suggesting the police stop doing their job. They are paid to be part of the solution. This officer was part of the problem. An innocent man is dead. That is bad news.
Yes there are a few bad cops out there, but the vast majority do a damn fine job. To do that job in Britain in 2009 must be a bloody nightmare. No wonder we have to rely on " plastic coppers ", as there are not enough real ones now. I wonder why?
So lets weed out the ones not fit to wear the uniform, eh? Or are you suggesting that we should accept violent thugs as officers because otherwise they'd be thinner on the ground? Think rationally, this guy's not done much for the recruitment numbers, has he? Not to mention respect for the service.
People are just so quick to slag off the police until.....they need one for themselves, then there lies a different story!
They are meant to enforce the law- not act like lawless thugs. I have friends in the police force. One friend has just gone into the Met in part because of my encouragement. I'm slagging off any police officer who behaves as this guy did. It was inexcusable. And frankly, Kenty I can't help wonder if there was something in the water wherever you were on holiday. There's usually at least a smattering of sense in your posts.
Quote by Calista
Surprisingly, redundancy has me bouncing and smiling
I have my own business sitting in the background and this gives me massive opportunity to plow my efforts into it, which, working full time doesn't allow me to do!
I am so excited! :bounce:
Quote by Melting_pot
as a footnote, on another website I've been specifically asked by a girl NOT to tell her anything I might have been upto with any other girl of said website, as that would put her off..(I reckon she would somehow feel like nr x of a list, or something like that..understandable..wrong to some extent, but understandable)...
since I haven't met her yet, I'm more than willing to shut my trap
anyhoo..
is this "don't tell me" something common to the ladies? and what are the reasons for it? is my assumption for her reasons anywhere near the mark, in your opinion?
Quote by __random_orbit__
... though there is a big difference between indescretion, Phwoar, I had a great time last night! and conclusions drawn from unfounded assumption...You shagged LP then? then going on to share the assumption with others. Witchy shagged LP last night. Apparantly, he's hung like a bull elephant underneath that latex. Is there not?
lp
Quote by splendid_
why thank you all for your best wishes :inlove:
Ive had the name Splendiferous Bone suggested to me also LOL
