having strong abs isnt going to help, unless your going to sit up her senseless!
im off to the gym now to work on glutes and quads, just incase you injure yourself in the line of duty drew.
den
AKA, reserve number 1 for f**king Louise against a wall.
You have the obligatory cock shot on your profile! :giggle:
I'll need to make sure its in good working order mind....
m xx
I hope there is room for me, I can always perch on pks lap if not......
m xxx
Ok, this might actually answer your question dave!
There are many claims made about the need to control foxes, but there are no quantified data on the cost/benefits of fox control, nor the impact of different methods of fox control on fox numbers.
Away on my little research trip there, i came across an article that studied fox population during and post foot and mouth disease. During the outbreak, no fox hunting could be carried out.
The study found no significant difference in fox population during foot and mouth when no culling was carried out, and after foot and mouth, when the hunts could resume.
Why would culling be allowed when it is not carrying out its supposed function?
At the time of foot and mouth, areas which were employing different methods of culling were also studied.
One area of research was into a type of 'sterilisation' vaccine.
Again, results were conclusive with regards to any form of culling making no significant difference to ox population.
If there is no difference in the number of foxes whether culling happens or not, then why do we bother?
In answer to your question dave, and based purely on the evidence available,
1. We do not need to cull animals to maintain land
2. Farm animals will always be killed by foxes if culling makes no difference to the fox population
3. No method of culling is appropriate
IMO it is the management of the actual farm animals that need to be changed
IMO there is no humane method of culling a species, given that it is proven that culling is ineffective in species (ie fox) control.
m x
One other thing, I do think that this is a relatively minor debate and i do agree with whoever it was that said it was a vote building method for polititians,
The hunting ban debate took up far too much time in parliment, there were far greater issues at the time that needed addressed- it should have been a straight forward examine the evidence, realise culling has no benefit, ban any cull and be done with it!
Ok, even spookier, it seems you were also in one of Dens dreams last night, which was very similar to mine!
:eeek:
I'm very scared now!
m xx
It does! but den is getting nowhere near, i want you and the bottle of sancerre all to myself!!!!
maz xx
only once we've vetted their pics for approval, and I want them posted in this thread too!!!
Oh, and mine will be a large gin and tonic with a slice of lime....
m xx
Maz- i choose L'ami and Celtic son, Den will be along to choose his soon!
m xx
Oh, another point!
The point about foxes being barbaric and killing all the chickens in a coup but only eating a few- that's the farmers fault and comes back to survival of the fittest!!!!
If you place the chickens in an artificial environment, then you give them no means of escape/hiding etc.
The foxes natural instinct as well as to kill for food, is to develop his hunting skills, and what better opportunity than a whole roomful of chicks to practice on? This is just like the cats 'playing' with their prey, they don't callousley do it, they are genetically programmed to practice and refine their hunting skills, if they didn't, then they wouldn't survive.
The farmer has placed the chickens at a disadvantage!
Imagine a kid in an empty toy shop, he can do what he likes and take whatever he likes but only once otherwise he'll get caught...
Well, he's only going to be able to carry a few toys away with him, so he'll spend the time playing with what he can first, and then take away what he can carry- just the same as the foxes!
m xx
We'll also def be coming!
m&d xx
we dont have any, but its alright, i'll take her from behind, she looks better that way anyway! :twisted:
Though if she reads this first might need to be applying a rear naked choke to stop her getting to the knife drawer in the kitchen! :shock:
oh no, maz grabbed the stick with her teeth!
Not be kissing her for a while!!!
den
hmm, well i dont know if football is better than sex, but there is definitely a greater emotional attachment with the football.
Being a supporter of the mighty Glasgow Celtic,if we met a couple sometime, and he was a rangers fan, then i would have no trouble swapping partners with him. However, swapping football jerseys would be abhorrent.
The hoops are just too important to me to share!
Den
P.s Maz i love you very much!
)
okay it's only a lickle white lie :grin:
is due first!
