Howdy all..!!!!
This is my 100th post!
I think I may take myself off somewhere and celebrate - alone!!!
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Forum
Good afternoon Chaps
Following the success of the last gathering we organised we are hoping to get a few couples and a few females together this Saturday 31st July.
We will all meet up in a bar for a few drinks and then go up to the house for lots of no strings and more importantly NO PRESSURE fun!!
So its kind of a munch / party.
If your interested please do get in touch asap.
Email us at
Following the success of the last gathering we organised we are hoping to get a few couples and a few females together this Saturday 31st July.
We will all meet up in a bar for a few drinks and then go up to the house for lots of no strings and more importantly NO PRESSURE fun!!
So its kind of a munch / party.
If your interested please do get in touch asap.
Email us at
Hi there
We are hoping to find a couple and some bi fems to join us for a midweek get together in Surrey.
We are good looking, mid 20's and most importantly lots of fun.
We have ads on the site with pics of us.
If your interested please get in touch - pics are vital and we will inisist on prior telephone contact.
Look forward to hearing from you.
D&Mxxx
We are hoping to find a couple and some bi fems to join us for a midweek get together in Surrey.
We are good looking, mid 20's and most importantly lots of fun.
We have ads on the site with pics of us.
If your interested please get in touch - pics are vital and we will inisist on prior telephone contact.
Look forward to hearing from you.
D&Mxxx
Quote by Jags
Munches aren't for swinging - munches are a social meet in a public place in order to meet others (from here) with whom a virtual relationship has been started. Not a sexual meet up at all... think we had done that conversation to death!!
So... munch - clothes on, drinking, singing, falling over. Swinging - some clothes off, not so much drinking, lying down!!
Jags, you absolutely right, but munch definition isnt what this thread is about.
The original posting cited:
'Those who will swing, those who wont munch'
I am looking for ppls opion on that statement - not the mechanics of munches!!
Whats your opinion?
Quote by marmalaidStrikes me that this falls foul of Re-Lapse's suggestion on Heathers "Daft Complaint" thread where he says;
'Those that will swing, those that wont munch, and those that will do both will swing and munch'
some people I think to join this site there should be a page of big and little words that peeps have to read and understand to be allowed in!!!
Hi there
If you think that comment 'falls foul' of the daft complaint thread then I can only assume that you didnt read all of the post or took it out of context.
You might want to take another look at it
Quote by bluexxx
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.... I thought that munches were open to anyone who were swingers, therefore by defintion all munchers are swingers :shock:
Swinging is an attitude not about how many people you've shagged in the last week....
TUT
The response I seem to be hearing is that munches are open to anyone - not just swingers.
And I started this thread in order to get some opinions such as this from ppl.
I feel this is a very valid thread.
Quote by TheFacilitator
I'm interested in what 'potential' sex is! I don't want to change tack again, but has anybody any ideas. i would have thought that people who have potential sex are called wankers. If that's the case I've had potential sex.
I am quite sure that there are lots of ppl on this website that just 'get off' on the idea of maybe meeting up and never actually 'do'
That is what I mean by 'potential sex' - maybe for some ppl that is all they need.
Is it the summer holidays yet??
That could be a reason why there are more teachers on here.
It could be a stress thing - teachers either use sex (or the concept of potential sex) as a stress buster.
It could be due to being constantly surrounded by highly charged hormonal adolescents (is that spelt correctly?)
ps It isnt a thread about teachers - its about munching v swinging. It just happend to migrate into the 'teacher' thing.
That could be a reason why there are more teachers on here.
It could be a stress thing - teachers either use sex (or the concept of potential sex) as a stress buster.
It could be due to being constantly surrounded by highly charged hormonal adolescents (is that spelt correctly?)
ps It isnt a thread about teachers - its about munching v swinging. It just happend to migrate into the 'teacher' thing.
Quote by Ice Pie
Engineering type stuff to adults. Vocational as opposed to academic, but I guess the principles are the same.
Cool.
So back to the Swing/Munch debate.
I think (and I am speaking with Ltd experience here) that I would be inclined to agree with WBB's earlier comment
'in my opinion... most swingers are happy to go to munches.. but you cant say MOST munchers are happy to swing.... a lot of people DO come her for the social side, and attending a munch is i guess the natural progression.
i have to say that if i decided to give up swinging.. i would most definately still munch.'
Personally I would attend a munch - as long as there were no swinging planned that Weekend!!
Dont think I'd attend munches though if I had given up swinging (not that I intend to!) as I dont really see the point in hanging out and talking about something that I'm not going to do.
Quote by easy
Just that the original phrase (those that can, do. Those that can't, teach) is derogatory
Just seemed a little judgemental that's all. As those that swing are somehow better than those that only Munch.
Yeah, I would be inclined to agree with you, it is slightly derogatory - however that doesnt mean that I intended offence.
What I intended was to be a little inflamatory, to stir up some emotions and create a debate.
Which I think it has!!
ps Ice Pie - what did you teach??
Quote by Calista
You're saying that there are only two options either a swinger or a muncher..... what about those that do both??
No I'm not saying that and Yes I am quite sure that you are absolutley right there are those that do both.
However
'Those that will swing, those that wont munch, and those that will do both will swing and munch'
Doesnt have quite the same effect when it comes to generating a discussion!
