Quote by deancannock
and hey...it gave us ...Girls Aloud
For that alone...I vote its good !!!!
Noooo it wasn't the X-Factor... that was Pop Idol the Rivals
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
vampanya
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Female, 51
Straight Male, 57
0 miles · E Riding of Yorkshire
Forum
Orgasminator
I think that if a post is edited (inc removing text) before anyone else posts on the thread there is no edit notice at the bottom. I've done that many times when i've changed a spelling mistake - but if someone else has posted before you edit THEN you see the 'edited post' thingy.
So is the text was removed before anyone else posted there would be no edited post notice at the end of the post.
So is the text was removed before anyone else posted there would be no edited post notice at the end of the post.
Orgasminator
I agree with minx. People use all sorts of words to describe themselves, the words they think fit best at the time. I dont think anyone who uses the word professional is being elitist.
And back to the OP if someone wants to stay annonymous until further down the road towards meeting for ANY reason that's up to them. People have every right and reason to be cautious, especially if they feel their reputation away from this website is at stake.
And back to the OP if someone wants to stay annonymous until further down the road towards meeting for ANY reason that's up to them. People have every right and reason to be cautious, especially if they feel their reputation away from this website is at stake.
Orgasminator
Quote by cockslut
i'd like them to issue video cameras to be fitted to our cars and then we can send them footage of bad car drivers breaking the highway code. bad parking, bad overtaking,going through traffic lights on red etc etc, oh and if we fined everyone who's number plates are illegal,i'm sure we'ed be half way out of the huge debt the countries in.
So who would all these endless hours of peoples own footage of what they considered to be bad driving be sent to? Who would process it and filter out the nonesense or the stuff that could never be used? Who would pay for all this to be implimented? Im sure it would cost far more than it could ever hope to generate.
The problem with this is that it relies on the public policing driving which we're just not qualified to do. Even cameras dont tell the whole story.
Orgasminator
Quote by awayman
So what's 'The Big Twist' going to be?
My money's on some kind of sudden death arrangement with one or more of the ousted acts being given the chance to come back at the expense of one of the fame whores...
Of course it's a fix. Some of these acts knew they were through before they even auditioned. It has always been like this.
A trap door opening up under them, dropping them into a vat of molten steel.....
or a guillotene...
Both pretty sudden and that would make really interesting veiwing! Can we have that for Big Brother too (when it magically reappears as I'm convinced it will)?
Orgasminator
Quote by flower411
Have you ever checked out the first section of the Compensation Act 2006? The Uren case is relevant too..
Robert Uren claims to have been encouraged to take part in a dangerous activity ....I tell everybody that I see on a horse that they`re mad and shouldn`t be sitting on the stupid animal in the first place cos it`s dangerous.
Id be even more of a H&S nightmare then. I ride my horse without wearing a hard hat most of the time. I give it plenty of thought, assess the risk and take it anyway. Its my risk. H&S can go slide a hedgehog up its arse.
I ride hatless because its fun and i love to feel the wind in my hair. Not much beats that. I know what'll happen if I fell off. Am I irresponisble? yes perhaps. But enjoying life every time i go out for a ride? Absolutely!
no hedgehogs were harmed in the making of this post
Orgasminator
Quote by flower411
Have you ever checked out the first section of the Compensation Act 2006? The Uren case is relevant too..
Robert Uren claims to have been encouraged to take part in a dangerous activity ....I tell everybody that I see on a horse that they`re mad and shouldn`t be sitting on the stupid animal in the first place cos it`s dangerous.
Id be even more of a H&S nightmare then. I ride my horse without wearing a hard hat most of the time. I give it plenty of thought, assess the risk and take it anyway. Its my risk. H&S can go slide a hedgehog up its arse.
I ride hatless because its fun and i love to feel the wind in my hair. Not much beats that. I know what'll happen if I fell off. Am I irresponisble? yes perhaps. But enjoying life every time i go out for a ride? Absolutely!
no hedgehogs were harmed in the making of this post
Orgasminator
So what friendly fun club do you go to where someone can risk being violently assaulted for something so trivial as their choice in clothing?
If that were ever to happen I would hope that the offenders were to feel the full consequences of their actions. Hideous people that they would be.
I'll stick to clubs where no-one minds what anyone else is or isnt wearing, whatever their gender or anything else. It would seem a safer option.
If that were ever to happen I would hope that the offenders were to feel the full consequences of their actions. Hideous people that they would be.
I'll stick to clubs where no-one minds what anyone else is or isnt wearing, whatever their gender or anything else. It would seem a safer option.
Orgasminator
Quote by brucie
fb, whilst i understand your sentiment i think its a little naive.
pointing out that somebody looks like a freak is not necessarily judgemental (albeit maybe not the best choice of words due to its connotations). feeling sad when seeing someone who is so clearly unhappy in their skin is not unreasonable..
How do you know they're unhappy in their skin? They may just be finding their feet and a little frightened of recieving riducule from people who dont understand what they're doing. Many cross dressers do it simply because they like the clothes and feeling they get wearing them. Only a small few have a desire to actually live as a woman.
Quote by brucie
so im not sure what it says about me except thst i feel sorry for someone who finds it necessary to veer so far out of what most people would consider "normal" behaviour.
as for their money. i disagree. soem clubs dont allow jeans as it is seen as lowering the tone. a general sex club shouldnt allow behaviour which may be reasonably offensive to the majority. just as gay men arent welcome to flount their sexuality openly in rios neither should other people. there are speciality clubs for that sort of thing. in those do as you please.
a sex club that doesn't allow anyone to flaunt their sexuality? How would that work then? What you really mean is you would like a sex club that caters only for your tastes and should seek to ban every other form of expression.
Sex clubs are a place where people can do things outside their norms. Women included can wear in public what they would never dream of wearing anywhere else and feel damn good about it, safe in the idea that they are in a non judgmental place with non judgemental people also doing what might be a little out of their ordinary.
Why not just ask them Brucie? They'll give you much better reasons than we can only speculate upon. And you probably wont vomit (little britain ref) while talking to them, even if you do feel a bit sad. :thumbup:
Orgasminator
I hate to be a bore but you're wrong there. Pole dancing for entertainment does not automatically mean that it falls into the sex establishment criteria. Far from it. Only the fact that its in a swingers club (for the purpose of this debate) would make it anything to do with adult entertainment and thats because of the venue not the activity. Pole dancing in a pub needs no licence specific to adult entertainment. But that's going off the point even further.
Dancing is dancing and as bizarre as it may seem, establishments have to have a licence for it whether its performance or girls having dance round handbags. All establishments. Pubs included.
Dancing is dancing and as bizarre as it may seem, establishments have to have a licence for it whether its performance or girls having dance round handbags. All establishments. Pubs included.
Orgasminator
Thats not the point. You need a licence for people to dance whether its as a show or to a disco. Its not just about performance, its about dancing in general. And it would be stretching the point massively to say that a pole dance in a swingers club was just for excersise.
Orgasminator
Quote by anais
How about this ?
TV = £25
3 nuns with £1 ea. = £3
Assistant = £2
Total = £30
If you split the cost of the TV 3 ways:
25/3 =
The nuns paid each.
9 minus = x 3 ( nuns )= ~ £2 ( Assistant got this )
Hope that makes sense.
That's exactly how my son and I worked it out early!
Yet - if you do it the other way it works out wrong
:?Its meant to, its a deliberately misleading question. I love this one.
Its a great riddle/joke to use at a party. When it was told to me a few years ago the aim of the other person was to see how many times we would do the same sum and come up with the same question, 'wheres the other pound?' But the question is wrong, they never paid £9 each. Its a clever twist and unless its spotted (and it almost never is until its explained) you will go round and round in circles! Great fun haha 