..I were to state that I have a "non member" bi female friend who wants to play with me and another girl?
that's what I am currently looking for (the "other" girl, that is)...but I have a feeling that if I were to post this on my ad (it somehow already is), most people would dismiss it as the umphteenth single bloke who tells no matter what story to try and score a date..
am I being too cynical?
I just get the impression that most of us are prejudiced against the "hordes" of single males and therefore tend to dismiss their "claims" as just that...when actually there can be truth in them. I myself am a cynic by default..so I wonder if I should bother making the effort or just forget about it...
Knowing how difficult it is to get a reply, let alone arrange a meet, id say have a go, what do you have to lose?
I'll have a look but if I remember correctly, currently it's just my ad, on which I've just added a line saying that I can involve another bi friend..
anyway if it's a problem I can work on the wording to make it compliant to the rules
but I guess it still is a waste of time..
anyway, for the sake of debate...would anyone actually believe my words, or just dismiss it as fake bait? what is the general view?
So, just arrange to meet ladies as a single male, as you have been doing. When you meet them, bring up the possibility of a female friend joining you at a later date.
You have a single male account. You can advertise for yourself to meet other members of the site.
You cannot advertise for a third party.
If you want to advertise for you and your fuck buddy (whatever term you want to use) then the two of you would need to get a joint/couple account.
If you have a problem with the site's AUP, then by all means contact Admin. I'm sure they'll be happy to discuss it with you.
Nola x
I thought a public debate would help other people in similar ambiguous situations
(and I'm also still intrigued by the "public perception" of single males profiles and what in them is perceived as honest and or misleading or "baiting")
however, I guess I'll take it off then, no problem with that..but I would really love to receive a public answer on this matter, from anyone of the admins..
Essex, I appreciate what you are saying - but let's be clear: Melting Pot is advertising on a single male account for a third party who is NOT a member of SH. That is not allowed.
Nola and Dg are correct....end of basically.
If you want to take this further MP - please contact Admin :smile:
MP
Just get your female friend to join the site.
End of problem.
I just might..lol
as for the debate, I doubt it would go anywhere with the admins either..which is why profile and ad have been restored
my interest is and was more in "how things are perceived"..
thanks ste..I thought my ad to be pretty accurate in what I look for and repeated it mainly to be visible in the various searches (by categories)..I would never repeat the same ad in the same area and I am indeed not ready to shag just about everyone..lol ( I just repeated it because I AM however interested in the diverse "configurations" couples, single ladies, groups..etc..and repeating the ad is just the way to be visible to all these different configurations, nothing more..it's still me)
I'll think about it though and see if I should modify some of the ads or take them of altogether (but I'm sure that as an ex single you'll agree that less visibility reduces any chances even further :P.. then again...I'm not really desperate either, lol)
I realise we have 2 mods and an op on this case.
I dont see how the rule "Thou shalt not allow a third party to operate thine account " could possibly be interpreted as meaning you cant advertise for somebody to have sex with you and uncle tom cobbly and all.
For instance, how the hell do you ensure punters at dogging sites are SH members? Employ a bouncer?
Just a thought, perhaps the AUP could be better worded or perhaps the interpretation is wrong.
I realise we have 2 mods and an op on this case.
I dont see how the rule "Thou shalt not allow a third party to operate thine account " could possibly be interpreted as meaning you cant advertise for somebody to have sex with you and uncle tom cobbly and all.
For instance, how the hell do you ensure punters at dogging sites are SH members? Employ a bouncer?
Just a thought, perhaps the AUP could be better worded or perhaps the interpretation is wrong.
humm,
i see the issue is that she( the ther person) isnt a member, but what if you are a single member and theres another single member and you do play together but also want to meet others as a couple? you can then say on your single profile that you have another male/female that you play with and would like to meet others with?
but only if your both members, but hw would you know? unless those two single memebrs have to state on each of the profiles that they are paired up for sex with ***** o, infacto breaching discretion?
also if two singles are a couple but liek to remain as singles as they also play alone they cant actually advertise to meet as a couple as they dont have a couples account. or should thay have 3 accounts?
just pondering really.
back the the op.
i wouldnt come across you looking for a bi fem to join you casue if i was looking for a couple you wouldnt come up in the search.
xx fem xx
Fem, I've seen stuff in LMU where a post has been made saying "threesome with myself and female member XXX" and then their name has been stated.
I guess it is up to you how you arrange it. I have had a meet with two guys off here and we arranged it to our mutual convenience in chat.
Point being that we are all members, so none of us were breaking a rule.