Couple of chilling tales in the topic now :uhoh:
Never had any major issues - a few creepies but nothing as scary as Skinny or Amber describe. I can understand how that would be very stressful.
I have the advantage of being able to act completely bonkers too, when I feel the need
I think I would enjoy a game of stalker chicken :twisted:
34 year old.....
A toyboy to my more mature meets.....dirty old man in training for younger ladies looking to find an experienced partner in filth :rascal:
Simply Fraser to anyone inbetween.
The only change age has brought is I have stopped using the word girl and replaced it with the word lady; in both my adverts and conversations (still preceded by the words filthy or dirty in most cases).
Only me trying to find their profile to ask for an invite to the next party then??? :rascal:
"ooh whack another blast of that bear spray on my nuts" :twisted:
While I appreciate well written prose I get my fill of it elsewhere.
This is a forum, a place for the exchange of opinions and ideas.
I prefer get a broad range of people posting whatever their level of education or ability to formulate a grammatically correct response, than pages of perfectly written text from a narrower section of users.
I would encourage you to be more tolerant of other peoples language skills, while reminding you there are many genuine reasons why people may not meet your standards in grammar and punctuation.
As for 'shitting up badly written posts to make people look stupid', I would suggest only one person is going to look like a cock if you do that. :huh:
If a sexy woman PMs to give me a blojob Im not going to say "sorry I only like blow jobs" :rascal:
I think admin know exactly what they are doing in regards to dormant accounts, as stated you can filter searches by an 'active within' checkbox.
Its not a major problem for most members.
Ctrl + D, brings up the bookmarks panel in most browsers.
Its the best way to keep track of content that gets updated and is really under used by most people.
Darwin himself doesnt have much to say this, his theories on sexual selection mostly relate to the differences between male and female, choosing which partner(s) to fuck, or competing to get fucked, rather than having a base need for more than one partner for species survival reasons.
If only we could measure some really old balls we might get an answer :shock:
There is a correlation between testicle size and natural mating systems - the males in naturally non monogomous species tend to have bigger stones. Chimps have really big balls and hump around for fun, gorrilas are strictly monogomous and have iddy biddy bollocks in comparison :lol2:
Unfortunately we dont have enough samples of early man bits to find out what our behaviour was like before social conventions were introduced, or see which direction we are evolving in.....
As Mrs fun says we now have contraception, another example among many as to why darwinian theory does not relate well to human behaviour, much of which is counter productive when it comes to reproduction.
Happy New Year - hope 2012 is a great year for all :-)
