WOOOOHHOOOO......and a lime under the sofa...what luck
Yes thought I saw Sarge...or was I just hoping...still need revenge for his cheekiness this morning lol
Come in Alex,
I have found the secret stash of tequila, and plan on getting s**t faced ......fancy joining me ???
Well if im stuck in here I might as well make the most of it !!!
Fran
xxxxx
Fran puts her head around the GFZ door for the first time ..........
Sneaks in whilst no-one is looking and puts up a big banner saying " GET WELL SOON FRED XXXXX"..........Then runs off before anyone sees
PS Fred stay away from the pizza from now on xxxxxxxx
Love Fran
xxxxxx
I hope Duckpathian is not too worse for wear today. I did see him propping up up the bar at one point and as I left looking very horny :twisted: nuzzling between Kit's beautiful breasts!!!
Lucky Duck!!!
Fran & Stu
xxxxx
Jags,
a, e, i, o, u, (y sometimes) , . ; : ' ? ! "
Add to swingingpete's posts and Hey presto....its still B*****ks!
Luv
Stu
xxx
Hi Alex xxxxx (for you)
We know your post was not meant to insult, we do not believe that anyone who has posted a name and shame on here has meant it in that way. We know it has a comic value and it has a function in that someone may think twice before posting a stupid insult like the one you outline.
However, we feel that this is dangerous territory, it won't take these plonkers long to start posting to the thread with imaginary posts and our name, your name or even Mals attached.
It begins the rot, spreads distrust and soon the site is full of suspicion and loses its genuine role. Take for example the idiots in the chatroom who pm you without asking, you ask them not to and within seconds of being warned they are then accusing you or someone else of pm'ing them! If it happens there, we can be sure it will happen here.
Many of the one liners are actually traditional swinging fair. Before the advent of internet swingers sites we had to use contact mags, the ads were 10 or 12 WORDS long if you were lucky and correspondence would then have to develop. No meet for tonight..lol...not with the postal service anyway!!!
Ok, we agree we want to keep the plonkers away, but naming and shaming is dangerous in many ways, we feel. It is so open to abuse. Why all the effort to write the advice sections, for all the work the Mods do etc. etc, lets just have a name and shame section, ..those who didn't attend meets, those who lied to you etc...if it was wrong in the Mods eyes previously, how does that make this right?
This feels too much like the playground, if we aren't adult enough to spot and deal with the idiots on the threads and through the moderation team then what are we saying to those types? We are showing ourselves to be functioning on the same level.
Now, if this thread had been what silly, obnoxious or downright stupid ads have you seen...without naming..then it would have been quite a funny thread.
Can't we just go back to ignoring these plonkers, let the Mods and Admin deal with the real tossers and focus our threads on the positives rather than critcising people whom we have never met, who may, unbeknownst to us, float someones boat?
What is the value of this? We all know that the fools come and the fools go, they at least provide a giggle, but I cannot understand any mileage in a name and shame policy...it's a joke!
For one, I believe any thread like this, and a sticky at that, is bound to do us as a swinging community more harm than good. Already tarred as sad individuals, abused in our past, need help and counselling etc etc according to the gutter press, now we are to come over as a closed, antagonisitic group that most people better stay away from.
A lot of genuine people will be put off by such a thread and just what the hell will naming and shaming do to the ones named. Nothing, if they are of that ilk, they will continue to post here or elsewhere in the same manner. It probably won't change them!
A while back we raised the subject of some sort of verification system...we were shot down in flames being told it was unworkable and unfair on newbies. That it might develop a name and shame style system and that should not happen. To which we agree..and now this.
This is unfair and I have to say a little childish, we know there are tossers, idiots, whatever you want to call them, but we thought they were dealt with through the Mods system. We have had our fair share and although it can be annoying or even upsetting sometimes we feel we all have to accept that this is a free site and therefore anyone can access it and that swinging is not the preserve of a particular class or group..so even the
idiots are gonna try their hand.
Anyone is capable of making a prat out of themselves while getting used to the site, particularly in the forum and we are not so naive as to believe that theren't people who frequent this site that won't take up the single line offers posted in the "Lets meet" section, there are many varied swingers and not all want to acquaint themselves with someone's life story before they have a swing!
This site has a doggers section, how different is that activity compared to the one line merchants expecting a shag just cos its a swingers site? You don't necessarily exchange emails, pics, phone calls when you go dogging, sometimes I guess it just happens and sex with strangers occurs...maybe thats enough info for some people.
Surely there is room for all, if people turn out to be real idiots who abuse the site or its members then the Mods and admin have the necessary powers, this just smacks of superiority complex and is more than off-putting to those who might just be dipping their toes in the swinging pool.
We do not wish to put our names to this as swingers or members of this site. Is this a new site policy? It seems to go against the grain that Mark has established.
Fran and Stu
We have done this already...and not too long ago....
see
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/6142.html
but thats just my opinion ....!!!!!!!!
Fran
I went to bed last night as the match sticks could no-longer hold my heavy eye-lids open, I had waited in vain for my sparring partner to return and demonstrate his verbal agility upon his keyboard, and could hold out no-more.
Still I awoke this morning in eager anticipation that the said member would have left his witty riposte through the wee small hours! Yet again, I was disappointed to find tallnhairy (awright mate!) was still the last postee...
Now I look again, still awaiting, but to no avail!
Then I recalled, I bet copy has to be in by this time in the afternoon, maybe the promised story was too difficult to obtain? Still, the one being made up now about Gareth Gates is bound to be as big as any swingers one!!!
LOL...yes, I am joking Ukdogger....if you still visit us, just wondering why you hurl an insult and then run?
Stu...of the "I am off to get ready for munching" variety!
How about the absolute classic bit:
Tim is sat having his lunch with Keith...Keith says "watched that Heartbeat last night, was a repeat though"
"yeah, shit isn't it" says Tim
"didn't bother me though" says keith " I hadn't seen it, what did you do?"
Tim replies....
"I just stayed in and had a big old wank!"
Bloody classic!!
Fran
xxx
Men Behaving Badly had some classic moments....
Fran
xxxx
Love Finchy!!!! Brilliant bit where Dawn is kneeling down to pick up some papers (I think )and he says "while you're down there love".
Every Office has a Finchy....bugga...I think its me in ours!!!!
Stu of the "Fran and...."variety.
Almost forgot....Jacques Roulancy, guest Chef of the "Windows" Restaurant at the Park Lane Hilton, London.
His Foie Gras and Asapargus Pie is to die for!!!
Fran
xxxxx
PS UKdogger....go read this:
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/7923.html
I am not alone....(bit X-Filesy that...whoo..hooo!!!)
Stu...you know the rest by now!!!
C'mon ukdogger...inspire us....
or shall we read it all in the News of the Scum on Sun ( well actually we won't....lol...please post to the Observer too!!!)
Stu