We are a very happy household.
You could see, even in the interview Charlie still seemed just plain nasty.
I've heard some rumours that they are putting in more housemates tonight.
This isn't much help in this case, but if you buy a French wine, look on the label for 'appelation controlee'. This is the highest of the quality marks they give their wine. The lower quality wine will have 'vin de pays' or 'vin de table'.
That is my only bit of wine knowledge really.
I always want to get the same seat on the bus in the morning on the way to work. I know it is rubbish, but I seem to fall into these rituals.
he haw he haw.... French. I love a French woman's accent.
The show seems to have been rigged a bit to keep her in. One week she had enough votes to be up for eviction, but as a punishment for discussing eviction she actually ended up not being up (it is a bit more complicated than that) and I felt the fake eviction you mentioned was a good excuse to let the crowd boo her and then put her back in.
I am not sure whether she has psychological problems or if she is simply a nasty person.
It's not quite the same but I love 'Second Life'.
A couple around our age, probably middle class background. Both very chatty, friendly people. Not pushy, but very excited at the idea of a foursome.
So, who is looking forward to Charlie getting evicted on Friday?
I just can't wait (my life is that sad and empty).
We have a bottle of wine ready and we are looking forward to booing at the TV.
Am I the only Big Brother fan here?
I think some people are using the chatrooms to pull. Their main reason to go there is to find someone to meet, not really to chat.
I have no idea of the percentages, but some couples are not looking for single guys, so those couples may well ignore guys under those circumstances.
My experience of the chatroom has often been that if I chat with a single guy, often they will start pushing for a meet. Usually quite early on. Peronsally this can get a bit tiring.
From my own experience I have had one single guy go a bit postal on us when we didn't accept his advances. He even complained about us to the ops which resulted in us being banned from the site. It took us a couple of days to have our account reinstated by admin and the ban revoked. (it was the weekend) After that I decided I would stay well clear of single guys in the chatrooms.
I also gave away my star wars collection, I had lots of the big ships and vehicles as well.
I have actually rebuilt the collection now thanks to ebay. I keep the figures in little plastic bags. Hmmm, maybe I should stop now, this is all starting to sound a bit sad.
Lene has an Ewok village... there, we are both sad. I feel better.
Is Gordon brown?
Sir Alan, sugar?
Hmmm, well is it so bad if they want wank fodder? I'm sure there could be room for both on the forum.
Looking at the context of the rest of the site, it doesn't seem that innapropriate.
I am curious, would such a post be locked be locked, and if so why?
(I only gave the fantasy or photo thing as examples, things that I could quickly think of)
It would be helpfull if you could easily see from their profile whether they were a freebie or a premium member.
Well, we need to sort this our Harry Hill style... "FIGHT"
Hmm that would make an excellent computer game, lots of Gods fighting it out, although it would offend rather a lot of people. Perhaps Salmon Rushdie could do the advert.
I'm wondering if the cams are a way for some couples to take their first step into swinging?
Personally though I much prefer the real thing.
I've just looked at the stats and at the moment there are apparently 1703 people in the chatroom and 90 on the forums.
90 is still a good number, but you can see what is pulling in the crowds.
I would like to see a lot more of the site opened up to freebie members. Maybe that is not good business, I don't know. If only the Forums were opened up I am concerned you would get a lot of people trying to advertise and trolling here, simply because they can't interact elsewhere.
With regards to flamming etc, I think you get that on Forums everywhere, simply because everyone has plenty of time to analyze a message to death. I post on a cats forum with lots of nice American cat women (not literally, they are not in PVC sadly) and even these ladies can get into massive rows on their forum.
To be honest, I am not sure if this will work, but if someone is being a bit harsh, just let them know maybe via PM. Possibly that will just cause more arguments, who knows.
There is no need to apologise Wench. hmmm maybe I have spent too much time with swinging couples. I have obviously had my view distorted (see I didn't use the C word)
I think more than subtle hints are needed.
He is a guy, so if she just comes out with it I imagine he will be quite keen. She just needs to wave the carrot of MFF in front of him. No man can resist!!!
Mmmmmm, winking never felt so naughty!!
We really have a mix, but quite often, maybe 40% of the time we will make each other cum through masturbation. For Lene it is easier to cum that way and I reallyenjoy being wanked off.
That is why with our swinging we went for Soft Swing.
They have one at the club OurPlace4Fun (North London), but it wasn't used at all when we were there.
It wasn't totally anonymous, if I remember correctly.
We went a long time ago (years ago), so things may have changed
It's the way I talk. The way I use the English language.
I wondered, has anyone here ever corrupted a non swinging couple? For example did you manage to convince non swinging friends to join you?
I can see couples getting a single male friend to join them quite easily, but I think it would be harder to get friends who were a couple to swing.
If this did happen, did it ruin the friendship afterwards?
Thanks for your replies everyone. It seems that a lot of people are using other methods, apart from the ads for meets. Maybe we need to move with the times and be less ad-dependent!
Thanks everyone, for those that posted here and messaged us.