This seems to suggest that "normal" hardcore would be okay although there's still the grey area of BDSM.
What's everyones opinion on this ( )?
Personally I have a few of issues with it.
1) My internet is provided by work (as I work from home) so I guess I'm going to have to invest in my own connection.
2) What constitutes "Depicting ?". You could argue that bondage and other BDSM content depicts as it can appear forced.
3) "New laws so videos streamed online in the UK will be subject to the same restrictions as those sold in shops". Does this affectively ban all hardcore content, including video's uploaded here?
All seems very draconian to me.
umm I kind of like that Disclaimer. I may have to add that as my signature.
I don't really like the whole gay, bi, straight labels. People get too hung up on them. Outside of the swinging world, it's all a case of who you fall for. I've know people who have thought of themselves as completely straight, then met that special person who happens to be of the same sex. Does that mean they've always been bi or gay, or is it just love.
In the case of swinging, it's all just pleasure, does it really matter if the person giving you that pleasure is the same sex?
I've been around people in so called "Alternative" relationships since I was a young teenager so maybe I'm just more open to the idea.
Disclaimer:
Please note this is only my opinion, I understand other people have different points of views and I'm not say they are wrong and I am right.
I've not had any problems with Avast, but then I'm not the best person to judge anti-virus capabilities seeing as I've only ever suffered from 2 viruses in my entire computing history! One of those was intentional (knew it would give me a virus).
I've tried AVG in the past but found it was lacking a feature that Avast has. Don't ask me what it was cause I can't remember.
I don't tend to download stuff from places that are likely to contain viruses, and my network is locked down quite tight.
I believe that anyone who is sexually active should get themselves checked out at least 1 a year. Even if you're in a monogamous relationship.
I know it sounds bad but you can never be 100% sure that your partner has been faithful. It's not as if it costs anything, plus its a good time to get some flavoured condoms for free!!!
In the world of swinging it just makes sense to get yourselves checked.
Has anyones else GUM Clinic stopped making you sign the insurance waiver before the blood test? My clinic used to make you sign a doccy stating that you understand if the AIDS test comes back positive you won't be able to get insurance. The last couple of times I haven't had to sign it. Maybe that because I always use my real name and they can see that I've already signed it though.
Do you ever find yourself browsing the forums and purposely not reading a thread because it has to many pages?
Or am I just lazy...
I used a large chocolate champagne bottle we got for our wedding on Mrs Maidstone. Was fun but melted very quick and the chocolate sort of seperated so wasn't even that nice when cleaning her up.
Just wanted to thank those who post on this forum. I don't often post but I often read and some of the posts make me laugh so hard.
Congratulations you two!!!
Personally I prefer some hair. As has been mentioned the whole bald thing is a little pre-pubescent. Having said that Mrs Maidstone prefers hers bald, so I don't get any choice in the matter.
I've got quite a few Gay friends. Although that's probably because my Brother was Gay and my Niece is a Lesbian. So I've always been open to "alternative" life styles. Having said that one of my close friends that never knew my brother is Gay.
Hi, I was just wondering why the 5 minute wait has reappeared on the chartroom. There are obviously still lots of problems with the chatroom and I get kicked out regularly. Annoying but not really a problem if I can re-enter it immediately. But to ge forced to wait 5 minutes, only to get kicked out again 2 minutes later, is not annoying it makes it unusable.
Well thanks for eveyones opinions. I would still like to see more representative pictures of both members of the couples. I'm much more likely to send a message to a couple if there is a picture of both of them on it. Come on people we all must have holiday pictures. I understand why people don't like showing their faces, but they can be obscured.
Why is it that the majority of couples only ever have pictures of the women?
Does anyone know why the gallery pictures are coming up with a "coming soon" image?