Reminds me of the time me and Medic1 were supposed to be meeting the stupidest Chinese woman who ever lived, but she got lost on the way.
I said "I guess we'll have to let her off as she is a...
...very thick Asian, Fred."
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Mr_D_and_HotTart
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Male, 57
Bisexual Female, 62
0 miles · Hereford and Worcester
Forum
Quote by postie
It seems that over 420,000 adverts have been posted in the Photo Ads section (assuming the numbers are all used... the 'latest' advert page doesn't show the sequential numbering system you might expect).
There are 29,790 adverts at the moment, of which there are:
2,796 Couples seeking Couples
1,300 Couples seeking Men
1,609 Couples seeking Women
128 Couples seeking Groups
220 Women seeking Couples
173 Women seeking Men
573 Women seeking Women
35 Women seeking Groups
5,791 Men seeking Couples
5,005 Men seeking Men
7,991 Men seeking Women
392 Men seeking Groups
2,515 TV/TS/CD and Fetish
Five Cooooooock rings!
1,138 Dogging
92 Holidays
32 Clubs and Parties
Aaaaand a partridge in a pear tree
ok, I had some time to kill while my DVD writer was busy!
I've added the last one for you...
Well spotted!
It seems that over 420,000 adverts have been posted in the Photo Ads section (assuming the numbers are all used... the 'latest' advert page doesn't show the sequential numbering system you might expect).
There are 29,790 adverts at the moment, of which there are:
2,796 Couples seeking Couples
1,300 Couples seeking Men
1,609 Couples seeking Women
128 Couples seeking Groups
220 Women seeking Couples
173 Women seeking Men
573 Women seeking Women
35 Women seeking Groups
5,791 Men seeking Couples
5,005 Men seeking Men
7,991 Men seeking Women
392 Men seeking Groups
2,515 TV/TS/CD and Fetish
1,138 Dogging
92 Holidays
32 Clubs and Parties
ok, I had some time to kill while my DVD writer was busy!
There are 29,790 adverts at the moment, of which there are:
2,796 Couples seeking Couples
1,300 Couples seeking Men
1,609 Couples seeking Women
128 Couples seeking Groups
220 Women seeking Couples
173 Women seeking Men
573 Women seeking Women
35 Women seeking Groups
5,791 Men seeking Couples
5,005 Men seeking Men
7,991 Men seeking Women
392 Men seeking Groups
2,515 TV/TS/CD and Fetish
1,138 Dogging
92 Holidays
32 Clubs and Parties
ok, I had some time to kill while my DVD writer was busy!
My gut reaction is that you shouldn't be making any big, life-changing decisions about swinging when you are down, and being at the messy end of a relationship, you sound pretty down to me.
Maybe given time you'll want to get back into the swing of things, maybe not. I think that either diving instantly into the scene in the hope of shagging yourself happy, or swearing celibacy eternally and then repenting at leisure might not be a good move.
Swinging isn't for everyone - it does take a level of emotional detachment, and a firm understanding of the difference between loving someone and shagging someone. Maybe you'll look back on this episode as your lesson learned the hard way? or maybe it will be the reason you decide it's not for you? Either way, time is a great healer.
I wish you good luck, and hope this all works out for you somehow.
Maybe given time you'll want to get back into the swing of things, maybe not. I think that either diving instantly into the scene in the hope of shagging yourself happy, or swearing celibacy eternally and then repenting at leisure might not be a good move.
Swinging isn't for everyone - it does take a level of emotional detachment, and a firm understanding of the difference between loving someone and shagging someone. Maybe you'll look back on this episode as your lesson learned the hard way? or maybe it will be the reason you decide it's not for you? Either way, time is a great healer.
I wish you good luck, and hope this all works out for you somehow.
Quote by onlyme1981
There is no way in this world I'd cheat on someone....I meant as a single, if I met a couple (right now, as a single), knowing that I personally wouldn't/couldn't swing when I have a partner, do I have double standards?
Would a straight man have double standards by advertising for a woman who wants to have sex with a man when he doesn't want to do that, himself?
How is your situation any different?
I get the feeling they are trying to tread a fine line between annoying the naturists by being a swinging venue and annoying swingers by assuming everyone is a holier than thou naturist.
It's perfectly possible to go there and be unaware of the 'upstairs rooms for couples to relax' and the purpose to whihc they are usually put.
It's perfectly possible to go there and be unaware of the 'upstairs rooms for couples to relax' and the purpose to whihc they are usually put.
Rule number 1 round here is that nobody can force you to do anything you don't want to, with anyone you don't want to do it with.
If you don't want to jump into bed with me, then obviously I'm fine with that. If you don't want to jump into bed with anyone else in particular on this site, equally obviously I'm fine with that, and they have to be too. Extending that to not wanting to jump into bed with anyone from this site isn't much of a jump from there, to be honest.
We do have quite a few 'social-only' people round here, and they are always welcome - in fact I definitely prefer being knocked back on general principles rather than having my deficiences pointed out to me
As for wanting to be with just one person for the rest of your life and never experience group sex or the joys of a new partner ever again... sounds incredibly kinky and perverted to me, but it seems to be quite a common perversion, and while I personally find it a bit odd, I say live and let live! You might grow out of it eventually
If you don't want to jump into bed with me, then obviously I'm fine with that. If you don't want to jump into bed with anyone else in particular on this site, equally obviously I'm fine with that, and they have to be too. Extending that to not wanting to jump into bed with anyone from this site isn't much of a jump from there, to be honest.
We do have quite a few 'social-only' people round here, and they are always welcome - in fact I definitely prefer being knocked back on general principles rather than having my deficiences pointed out to me
As for wanting to be with just one person for the rest of your life and never experience group sex or the joys of a new partner ever again... sounds incredibly kinky and perverted to me, but it seems to be quite a common perversion, and while I personally find it a bit odd, I say live and let live! You might grow out of it eventually
OK, ok... I'm a geek - how many damn closets does this site want me to come out of?
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE B-- LOCK-----
Version:
GMU/CA/O d- s a C++ U*++++ P L+ E-- W+++$ N o-- !K !w---
O? M++ V-- PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP- t-- 5? X-- R tv- b++ DI++++ D---
G e h---@ r+++@ y**++++
------END GEEK CODE B-- LOCK------
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE B-- LOCK-----
Version:
GMU/CA/O d- s a C++ U*++++ P L+ E-- W+++$ N o-- !K !w---
O? M++ V-- PS+++ PE++ Y+ PGP- t-- 5? X-- R tv- b++ DI++++ D---
G e h---@ r+++@ y**++++
------END GEEK CODE B-- LOCK------
I think this falls into 2 categories... firstly films that the studio butchered because they didn't like what the director did, and secondly films that lost bits to make them 'tighter and sharper'.
The prime example of type 1 is "Blade Runner". The version shown in cinemas had an entire layer of meaning and some subplots removed (Clues that Deckard is himself a replicant were taken out, as well as aelpxnation of the mechanical animals) and a wildly improbable happy ending tacked on (they didnt; even shoot a happy ending, they just got some stock footage from an airplane window and used a voice-over!). The director's cut is darker and more complex, and quite a different beast to the first cinema version.
The first Bridget Jones film is type 2 - the extras on the DVD were mildly funny diary-style comic asides that had no real bearing on the plot at all - there are a few similar bits left in the film, but having them all in would have been a bit over the top. I get the feeling they filmed 5 or 6 and left in the 2 or 3 that worked best. I don't recall there being a version of this DVD without the bonuses
The prime example of type 1 is "Blade Runner". The version shown in cinemas had an entire layer of meaning and some subplots removed (Clues that Deckard is himself a replicant were taken out, as well as aelpxnation of the mechanical animals) and a wildly improbable happy ending tacked on (they didnt; even shoot a happy ending, they just got some stock footage from an airplane window and used a voice-over!). The director's cut is darker and more complex, and quite a different beast to the first cinema version.
The first Bridget Jones film is type 2 - the extras on the DVD were mildly funny diary-style comic asides that had no real bearing on the plot at all - there are a few similar bits left in the film, but having them all in would have been a bit over the top. I get the feeling they filmed 5 or 6 and left in the 2 or 3 that worked best. I don't recall there being a version of this DVD without the bonuses
Quote by blithe spirit
...In 'Hurt', Johnny Cash said:
'What have I become
My sweetest friend,
Everyone I know
Goes away, in the end.
You can have it all
My empire of dirt
I will let you down
I will make you hurt.'
The emotion 70 year-old Cash put into that is incredible... even more so when you know it's not even written by him, but by somebody from a completely different tradition of music, the king of gothic angst, Trent Reznor of Nine Inch Nails. Cash did change one word of the song, though - he sings "I wear this crown of thorns..." where the original has "I wear this crown of shit..."
I feel like playing a stupid game to take my mind off having the 'flu.
It's a really simple game, just a answer a simple question then write a question of your own.
Then edit your question to make the answer look stupid!
Important: Using the 'quote' button is NOT allowed in this thread.
What do devout nuns do on St. Swithins day?
It's a really simple game, just a answer a simple question then write a question of your own.
Then edit your question to make the answer look stupid!
Important: Using the 'quote' button is NOT allowed in this thread.
What do devout nuns do on St. Swithins day?
The mods do catch them very quickly, I think it's people who haven't understood that you advertise in the category that matches what you *are*, not what you are looking for.
I did see a woman advertising in 'men seeking men' once, so it's not all one-way (and I got a smiley back from the Mods for gleefully reporting it!)
I did see a woman advertising in 'men seeking men' once, so it's not all one-way (and I got a smiley back from the Mods for gleefully reporting it!)
I was thinking more along the lines of a quick scan for the common problems in the 'women seeking men' - ie does this ad have
a) a penis on the pic
b) a URL wi*th*lots*of*sta*rs*in
c) a redirecting URL
c) THAT skirt pic AGAIN
d) any mention of '100 miles from Peterborough'
I think some of the scammers rely on the short time the ads are up before deletion to get their revenue, and would be more likely to give up if they didn;t get shown at all.
Maybe the mods could have a new button to put a category into pre-approval mode when there's a spamstorm?
a) a penis on the pic
b) a URL wi*th*lots*of*sta*rs*in
c) a redirecting URL
c) THAT skirt pic AGAIN
d) any mention of '100 miles from Peterborough'
I think some of the scammers rely on the short time the ads are up before deletion to get their revenue, and would be more likely to give up if they didn;t get shown at all.
Maybe the mods could have a new button to put a category into pre-approval mode when there's a spamstorm?
